Effects of Nature-based Group Intervention on Quality-of-life in Lonely Older People Living in Assisted Living Facities (RECETAS)

May 14, 2023 updated by: Kaisu Pitkala, University of Helsinki

RECETAS (Re-Imagining Environments for Connection and Engagement: Testing Actions for Social Prescribing in Natural Spaces) in Helsinki

RECETAS (Re-imagining Environments for Connection and Engagement:

Testing Actions for Social Prescribing in Natural Spaces) is a worldwide project (H2020 No 945095) that addresses loneliness and the role of nature-based social intervention (NBSI) to alleviate it. Definitions: Loneliness is the perception of feeling alone, even if surrounded by people. Social prescription is a non-medical community referral approach to connect individuals with community resources to support wellbeing. Nature-based social intervention (NBSI) is a structured therapeutic groupbased social intervention that specifically include access to nature as a main component. Nature-based experiences may facilitate dynamic processes of social interactions and it can reduce feelings of loneliness.

Hypothesis: NBSI in vulnerable people suffering from loneliness is more effective than usual social and health care on improving their health-related quality of life and alleviating loneliness during 3-,6- and 12-months follow up.

Objectives: This trial aims to assess the effectiveness and to explore the processes and perceived impacts of NBSI in vulnerable people suffering from loneliness in the assisted living facilities in Helsinki. In Helsinki, the main objective is to assess the effectiveness of a 10-week NBSI (RCT) in vulnerable people suffering from loneliness on changes of their health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and loneliness compared to usual social and health care at end of intervention, and at 6-,and 12- months post-randomization.

Methods: The study design is a randomized controlled trial (RCT). The RCT will include also a process evaluation, a qualitative study and a Health Economics evaluation. Therefore, the RCT will use a mixed-method approach collecting quantitative information to assess the main outcomes and qualitative methods to explore lived experiences of participants and professionals.

The recruitment will be performed screening residents in Helsinki assisted living facilities by a survey. A total of 316 participants will be randomly allocated in two groups (c.158 each) after baseline assessments: intervention and control. Participants will sign the informed consent. The intervention is a group-based, multicomponent, behaviorally based complex intervention that requires a specific training to prepare professionals as facilitators. It is based on the "Circle of Friends" methodology.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

RECETAS (Re-imagining Environments for Connection and Engagement:

Testing Actions for Social Prescribing in Natural Spaces) is a worldwide project that addresses loneliness and the role of nature-based social intervention (NBSI) to alleviate it. This project has received funding from tte European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation under grant agreement No 945094. more information at: https://recetasproject.eu Background: Loneliness is the perception of feeling alone, even if surrounded by people. It is a growing public health concern due to its impact on morbidity and mortality even in old age, being as dangerous as smoking or obesity: it reduces people's lifespan, and it is associated with increased use of health and social services and it impairs people's quality-of-life. In Europe, 30 million European adults frequently felt lonely. Social prescription is a non-medical community referral approach to connect individuals with community resources to support wellbeing. Nature-based social intervention (NBSI) is a structured therapeutic group-based social intervention that specifically include access to nature as a main component. Nature-based experiences can facilitate dynamic processes of social interactions and it can reduce feelings of loneliness.

Justification: NBSI in urban areas may improve health and mental well-being and reduce loneliness. Investments in nature-based solutions and green infrastructure can be harnessed for health and wellbeing even in times of health emergencies (covid-19). NBSI offers a novel socio-environmental innovation to reduce loneliness by creating the social and technological infrastructure needed to support social and community cohesion.

Hypothesis: NBSI in vulnerable older people in assisted living facilities suffering from loneliness is more effective than usual social and health care on improving their quality of life and alleviating loneliness during 3-,6- and 12-months follow up.

Objectives: The study aims to assess the effectiveness and to explore the processes and perceived impacts of NBSI in vulnerable older people in assisted living facilities suffering from loneliness in the area of Helsinki. The main objective is to assess the effectiveness of a 10-week NBSI (RCT) in vulnerable people suffering from loneliness on the changes of loneliness and health-related quality of life compared to usual social and health care at 3-, 6-, and 12- months post-randomization.

Methods: The study design is a randomized controlled trial (RCT). The RCT will also include a process evaluation, a qualitative study and a health economics evaluation.

Therefore, overall, the RCT will use a mixed-method approach collecting quantitative information to assess the main outcomes and qualitative methods to explore lived experiences of participants and professionals. The recruitment will be performed by screening residents in Helsinki assisted living facilities by a survey inclusing 1500 residents. Inclusion criteria will be age 65+ years, suffering from loneliness, living permanently in assisted living facility, being voluntary to participate, having Minimental Examination at least 15 point (not being moderately-severly cognitively impaired), being able to move independently with or without assisting devices, sufficient sight and hearing and not having a seirous illnes with a prognosis than 6 months. A total of 316 participants will be randomly allocated in two groups (c.158 each) after baseline assessments: intervention and control. Participants will sign the informed consent. The intervention is a group-based, multicomponent, behaviorally based complex intervention that requires a specific training to prepare professionals as facilitators. It is based on the "Circle of Friends" methodology developed in Helsinki University. Participants in the intervention arm meet in closed groups including 5-12 participants once a week for 9 times. The group activities include nature-based activities and discussions on them and participants' loneliness. The groups facilitators will use group dynamics to facilitate participants' mutual interaction and to support their self-efficacy. Control group participants will receive usual care, and a list of nature-based resources available in their area.

Main outcome measures will be changes in loneliness by De Jong Gierveld Loneliness scale and health-related quality-of-life by 15D measure. Secondary measures will be changes in wellbeing (Psychological Wellbeing scale), EuroQual 5D-5L, cognition (Minimental State examination, Clock-drawing test, verbal fluency), walking speed and frailty (Physical frailty), self efficacy (Generalized Self-Efficacy scale), sleep quality, attachment ot neighbourhood (12 Neighborhood Assessment Scale), and relationship with nature (NR-6). THe use of health and social services will be collected from central records and health economic analyses performed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

316

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age at least 55 years
  • Suffers from loneliness at least sometimes
  • lives permanently in assisted living facility
  • is voluntary to participate
  • has Minimental Examination at least 15 points or CPS <5 (not being moderately-severly cognitively impaired)
  • is able to move independently or dependently with or without assisting devices
  • sufficient sight and hearing to participate in group activities

Exclusion Criteria:

having a serious illness with a prognosis less than 6 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Nature-based social prescribing group intervention

Groups of 5-12 persons will formed from one assisted living facility. All of them will undergo an individual interview to assess their wishes for the nature-based activities.

Participants meet in a closed group 9 times for once a week for 10 weeks. All 2-4 hour sessions will include nature-based activities and mutual discussions about the experiences of nature and loneliness.

2 professionals will facilitate and observe the group more thoroughly, give feedback to each other, and make use of group dynamics. They write diaries on each session and receive feedback from their trainers. The groups are objective oriented (aiming to alleviate loneliness, to improve participants' self-efficacy), client oriented and aim with favorable group dynamics to mature, self-directing group in which the participants have made friends with each other and want meet with each other without the facilitators after the official group intervention is over.

Groups of 5-12 persons will formed from one assisted living facility. All of them will undergo an individual interview to assess their wishes for the nature-based activities.

Participants meet in a closed group for 9 times once a week for 10 weeks. All 2-4 hour sessions will include nature-based activities and mutual discussions about the experiences of nature and loneliness.

2 professionals will facilitate and observe the group more thoroughly, give feedback to each other, and make use of group dynamics. They write diaries on each session and receive feedback from their trainers. The groups are objective oriented (aiming to alleviate loneliness, to improve participants' self-efficacy), client oriented and aim with favorable group dynamics to mature, self-directing group in which the participants have made friends with each other and want meet with each other without the facilitators after the official group intervention is over.

No Intervention: Control
The control arm will receive individually usual care in assisted living facility (e.g. the existing social prescription as available) Usual care is the appropriate comparison rather than a placebo for complex interventions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in health related quality of life
Time Frame: From baseline to 3months, 6months, 12 months
15D health-related quality of life instrument. Minimum 0 (worst) and maximum 1 (best). 15D will be used as an index ( 0 to 1) and the changes in various 15 dimensions will also be explored.
From baseline to 3months, 6months, 12 months
Change in loneliness
Time Frame: From baseline to 3months, 6months, 12 months
De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale (minimum 0 (best) and maximum 11 (worst))
From baseline to 3months, 6months, 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Psychological Wellbeing
Time Frame: From baseline to 3months, 6months, 12 months
Psychological Wellbeing Scale by Routasalo et al. 2009 (Minimum 0 (worst) and maximum 1 (best).
From baseline to 3months, 6months, 12 months
Change in executive function
Time Frame: From baseline to 3months, 6months, 12 months
Clock Drawing test (Minimum 0 (worst) and maximum 6 (best).
From baseline to 3months, 6months, 12 months
Change in cognition
Time Frame: From baseline to 3months, 6months, 12 months
Verbal Fluency (Minimum 0 (worst) and maximum >30 (best)).
From baseline to 3months, 6months, 12 months
Change in global cognition
Time Frame: From baseline to 3months, 6months, 12 months
Minimental State Examination (Minimum 0 (worst) and maximum 30 (best).)
From baseline to 3months, 6months, 12 months
Change in self Efficacy
Time Frame: From baseline to 3months
Generalized Self-Efficacy scale by Schwarzer & Jerusalem 1995
From baseline to 3months
Change in blood pressure
Time Frame: From baseline to 3months
Blood pressure
From baseline to 3months
Change in sleep quality
Time Frame: From baseline to 3months, 6months, 12 months
One item questions
From baseline to 3months, 6months, 12 months
Change in attachment to neighbourhood
Time Frame: From baseline to 3months
Neighborhood Assessment Scale
From baseline to 3months
Use of health and social services
Time Frame: during 12 months from baseline
Use of health and social services retrieved from registers
during 12 months from baseline
Change in social relationships
Time Frame: From baseline to 3months, 6months, 12 months
Number of new friends, continuation of group activity, satisfaction with relationships
From baseline to 3months, 6months, 12 months
Change in frailty phenotype
Time Frame: From baseline to 3months
Physical frailty
From baseline to 3months
Change in relationship with nature
Time Frame: From baseline to 3months
Questions related to nature attitudes
From baseline to 3months
Health economic analyses (costs of health services with EQ5D-5L)
Time Frame: During 12 months (3mo, 6mo, 12mo)
EuroQOL 5D-5L
During 12 months (3mo, 6mo, 12mo)
Repeated wellbeing before, during and after the intervention
Time Frame: Baseline, during the intervention and at 3 months
4 items related to psychological and physical wellbeing
Baseline, during the intervention and at 3 months
Repeated short measure of wellbeing
Time Frame: Baseline, during the intervention and at 3 months
4 items related to psychological and physical wellbeing
Baseline, during the intervention and at 3 months
Satisfaction with social relationships
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months
Items on social relationships and social activity
Baseline, 3 months
Number and time spent on outdoor activities
Time Frame: 3 months from baseline
Number of outdoor activities and time spent there during the intervention
3 months from baseline

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Group participants' opinions
Time Frame: during the group and at 3 months
Group participants' opinions about the group activities and its impact on loneliness and social relationships
during the group and at 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jill S Litt, PhD, Barcelona Institute for Global Health

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 21, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 21, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 28, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 12, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

August 19, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 945095 HEL

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Sharing Time Frame

2022 - 2026

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Study protocol has been submitted to a peer reviewed journal. Clinical study report will be available in 2026.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Loneliness

Clinical Trials on Nature-based social prescribing group intervention

3
Subscribe