Efficacy and Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Relationship of Intranasally Administered Sufentanil, Ketamine, and CT001

October 17, 2023 updated by: Cessatech A/S

Analgesic Efficacy and Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic Relationship of Intranasally Administered Sufentanil, Ketamine, and CT001 After Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Extraction - A Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled Study

A randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, study comparing the analgesic effect of intranasal CT001 to intranasal sufentanil, intranasal ketamine or placebo for treatment of acute pain in adults undergoing surgical removal of an impacted mandibular third molar, where bone removal is judged to be needed.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

220

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • NV
      • Copenhagen, NV, Denmark, 2400
        • DanTrials

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 55 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy (The American Society of Anaesthesiologists' Physical Classification System (ASA) I-II) male or female participants scheduled for surgical removal of an impacted mandibular third molar, where bone removal is judged to be needed
  • Age: ≥ 18 and < 56 years
  • Body Mass index above (>)18.5 or below (<) 30.0 kg/m2
  • Prior to randomisation: Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS anchored by 0 = "no pain", 10 = "worst pain imaginable") ≥ 5 at rest within 4 hours after the administration of the last dose of local anaesthetic

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current or history of any clinically significant disease or disorder, which, in the opinion of the investigator, may put the potential subject at risk when participating in the study, or influence the potential subject's ability to participate in the study or influence the study results.
  • Any clinically significant illness, medical/surgical procedure or trauma within 4 weeks of the administration of investigational product that is likely to introduce additional risk factors, jeopardize study integrity, or to interfere with the study assessments or procedure
  • History of increased bleeding tendency
  • Clinically significant mental illness
  • Opioid Risk Tool score of >3
  • Pain Catastrophizing Scale score, total points >30
  • Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), points ≥ 11 for anxiety or ≥ 11 points for depression
  • Daily intake of analgesics
  • History of alcohol or drug abuse or use of illicit drugs or positive screen for drugs of abuse at screening or on admission to the Clinic prior to the administration of the investigational product.
  • Abnormal nasal cavity/airway

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Intranasal
Experimental: CT001
Intranasal
Active Comparator: Sufentanil 27 mcg
Intranasal
Active Comparator: Ketamine 27 mg
Intranasal
Active Comparator: Sufentanil 13 mcg
Intranasal
Active Comparator: Ketamine 13 mg
Intranasal
Active Comparator: Sufentanil 40 mcg
Intranasal
Active Comparator: Ketamine 40 mg
Intranasal
Active Comparator: Sufentanil 13 mcg/Ketamine 13 mg
Intranasal
Intranasal
Active Comparator: Sufentanil 13 mcg/Ketamine 27 mg
Intranasal
Intranasal
Active Comparator: Sufentanil 13 mcg/Ketamine 40 mg
Intranasal
Intranasal
Active Comparator: Sufentanil 27 mcg/Ketamine 13 mg
Intranasal
Intranasal
Active Comparator: Sufentanil 27 mcg/Ketamine 40 mg
Intranasal
Intranasal
Active Comparator: Sufentanil 40 mcg/Ketamine 13 mg
Intranasal
Intranasal
Active Comparator: Sufentanil 40 mcg/Ketamine 27 mg
Intranasal
Intranasal
Active Comparator: Sufentanil 40 mcg/Ketamine 40 mg
Intranasal
Intranasal

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sum of pain intensity differences at 55 min
Time Frame: 0-55 min
Derived from pain intensity scores measured by the Numerical Rating Scale (0-10, 0= no pain, 10= worst possible pain).
0-55 min
PK-PD relationship for analgesic efficacy IN sufentanil, IN ketamine and IN CT001
Time Frame: 0-180 min
To assess the relationship between analgesic efficacy and the plasma concentrations of intranasal sufentanil, intranasal ketamine and intranasal CT001.
0-180 min

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maximum Pain intensity difference (PIDmax)
Time Frame: 0-180 min
0-180 min
Time to meaningful pain relief
Time Frame: 0-180 min
Time when participants feel that the pain relief becomes meaningful to them
0-180 min
Sum of pain intensity differences at 30 min
Time Frame: 0-30 min
Derived from pain intensity scores measured on the Numerical Rating Scale (0-10, 0= no pain, 10= worst possible
0-30 min
Rescue medication
Time Frame: 0-180 min
Number of participants receiving rescue medication
0-180 min
Number of patients who are considered a responder/non-responder, 30%
Time Frame: 0-30 min
Number of participants with at least 30% reduction in pain intensity score compared to baseline
0-30 min
Number of patients who are considered a responder/non-responder, 50%
Time Frame: 0-30 min
Participants with at least at least 50% reduction in pain intensity score compared to baseline
0-30 min
Sum of pain intensity differences at 90 min
Time Frame: 0-90 min
Derived from pain intensity scores measured on the Numerical Rating Scale (0-10, 0= no pain, 10= worst possible
0-90 min
Time to perceptible pain relief
Time Frame: 0-180 min
Time when participants feel that the pain relief becomes meaningful to them
0-180 min
Time to rescue medication
Time Frame: 0-180 min
0-180 min
Mean pain intensity difference (PID) from baseline at rest
Time Frame: 0-180 min
0-180 min
Mean pain intensity difference (PID) from baseline on jaw movement
Time Frame: 0-181 min
0-181 min
Ramsay sedation score
Time Frame: 0-179 min
Change from baseline in Ramsay sedation score (1= agitated, anxious, restless, 6= unarousable)
0-179 min
Median time to a request for rescue medication
Time Frame: 0-180 min
0-180 min

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 5, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 5, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

October 5, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 17, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

August 19, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 18, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 17, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on CT001

3
Subscribe