Collaborative Care for Anxiety and Depression in Epilepsy

October 3, 2023 updated by: Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Collaborative Care to Improve Quality of Life for Anxiety and Depression in Epilepsy

This is a randomized effectiveness/implementation trial comparing a 24-week neurology-based collaborative care intervention to usual neurology care among 60 adults with epilepsy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The intervention is a 24-week, evidence-based collaborative care model initiated around the time of a neurology visit. The collaborative care team roles include the care manager/social worker and psychiatrist who interact with the patient participant and the patient's neurologist/neurology provider.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Recruiting
        • Wake Forest University Health Sciences
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Heidi M Munger Clary, MD, MPH

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Provision of signed and dated Informed Consent Form
  • Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures
  • Males and Females; Age >= 18 years
  • Diagnosis of epilepsy: Epilepsy diagnosis based on neurology clinician impression or EEG findings
  • Anxiety or Depression symptoms
  • Receiving clinical neurological care at Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current participation in another treatment of intervention study
  • Cognitive limitations precluding completion of Anxiety and Depression self-report instruments on paper, electronically, or by interview
  • Comorbid medical condition with life expectancy less than 6 months
  • Not a good candidate for collaborative care due to: Active ongoing treatment by a psychiatrist; Active suicidal ideation; Unstable drug or alcohol abuse; history of past suicide attempt and: currently prescribed 2 or more psychotropic medications for psychiatric indication OR receiving ongoing psychotherapy OR has seen a psychiatrist in the past year

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: collaborative care
The collaborative care team roles include the care manager/social worker and psychiatrist who interact with the patient participant and the patient's neurologist/neurology provider.
a 24-week neurology based collaborative care program consisting of: 1. a series of every 2 weeks care management calls by the care manager to evaluate anxiety, depression, seizures and side effects and deliver brief therapy interventions to the participant, and 2. collaborative care conferences including a psychiatrist to generate expert recommendations for anxiety and depression management and communication of recommendations between the care manger, psychiatrist and neurologist.
Active Comparator: usual neurology care
Ongoing usual neurology care, without the addition of the collaborative care program - current standard care and is thus an ethically appropriate control condition for effectiveness and implementation trials.
ongoing usual neurology care, without the addition of the collaborative care program

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in emotional quality of life subscale of the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-31) - between two groups
Time Frame: Month 6
adults with epilepsy and anxiety or depression symptoms - a higher score reflects a more favorable health state
Month 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants adhering to Intervention
Time Frame: Week 12
adherence of intervention participants to the majority of care management - proportion of intervention group participants meeting minimum adherence metric of 50% call participation at 12 weeks
Week 12
Change in Epilepsy-specific quality of life scoring (QOLIE-31) - neurology collaborative care compared to Usual Care
Time Frame: Month 6
adults with epilepsy and anxiety or depression symptoms - Score ranges from 0-100 with higher score indicating better epilepsy-specific quality of life
Month 6
Change in the number of depression symptoms - Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI-II) - neurology collaborative care compared to Usual Care
Time Frame: Month 6
adults with epilepsy and anxiety or depression symptoms -- Depression symptom questionnaire-score ranges from 0-61, with higher score indicating more severe depression symptoms
Month 6
Change in anxiety symptoms scoring (EASI) Epilepsy Anxiety Survey Instrument - between groups
Time Frame: Month 6
adults with epilepsy and anxiety or depression symptoms - The score was obtained by computing the sum of the scores obtained by items associated with it, from 0, "not at all", to 3, "nearly every day". The possible total score ranges from 0 to 54, with higher scores indicating worse anxiety symptoms
Month 6

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorders- 7(GAD-7) Score between groups
Time Frame: Month 6
Questionnaire measuring anxiety symptoms-score ranges from 0 to 21, with higher score indicating increased anxiety symptoms - proportion achieving 50% symptom reduction or remission by 6 months
Month 6
Change in Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory-Epilepsy (NDDI-E) between groups
Time Frame: Months 3 and 6
Depression symptom questionnaire specifically for those with epilepsy-score ranges from 6 to 24, with a score >15 indicating presence of a likely major depressive episode.
Months 3 and 6
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Score between groups
Time Frame: Month 6
Score ranges from 0 to 27, with higher score indicating increased depression symptoms - proportion achieving 50% symptom reduction or remission by 6 months
Month 6
Emergency Department (ED)/Hospitalization Visits
Time Frame: Month 6
Number of hospitalizations or visits to ED.
Month 6
Change in Liverpool Seizure Severity Scale (LSSS) between groups
Time Frame: Month 6
Seizure severity questionnaire- score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher score indicating increased seizure severity.
Month 6
Seizure Frequency
Time Frame: Month 6
Number of seizures experienced by participants - this will be change in seizure frequency and time since last seizure categories from baseline to 6 month follow-up: categorical rating scale developed by Epilepsy Learning Healthcare System & standardized in the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) seizure frequency quality measure
Month 6
Number of Seizure medication adjustments
Time Frame: Month 6
number of seizure medication adjustments to address side effects or lack of seizure control over 6 months
Month 6
Individual Participant Collaborative Care Call Attendance Percentage
Time Frame: Weeks 12 and 24
Individual Participant Collaborative Care Call Attendance Percentage
Weeks 12 and 24
change in emotional quality of life subscale of the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-31) - between two groups
Time Frame: Month 3
adults with epilepsy and anxiety or depression symptoms - a higher score reflects a more favorable health state
Month 3
change in brEASI (Brief anxiety in epilepsy survey instrument)
Time Frame: Months 3 and 6
Scores of ≥7 on the Brief anxiety in epilepsy survey instrument (brEASI) indicate probable anxiety disorder. Scores range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicting increased anxiety symptoms.
Months 3 and 6
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) change
Time Frame: Month 6
proportion achieving 50% symptom reduction or remission by 6 months
Month 6
anxiety in epilepsy survey instrument (EASI) change
Time Frame: Month 6
proportion achieving 50% symptom reduction or remission by 6 months
Month 6
Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) Subject Perspective
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 15
Questionnaire to help determine feasibility of Collaborative Care from Participants' perspectives - score ranges from 5-20, with higher score indication greater feasibility
Baseline and Month 15
Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) Neurologist Perspective
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 15
Questionnaire to help determine feasibility of Collaborative Care from Neurologists' perspectives - score ranges from 5-20, with higher score indication greater feasibility
Baseline and Month 15
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) Subject Perspective
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 15
Questionnaire to help determine feasibility of Collaborative Care from Participants' perspectives - score ranges from 5-20, with higher score indication greater acceptability
Baseline and Month 15
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) Neurologist Perspective
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 15
Questionnaire to help determine feasibility of Collaborative Care from Neurologists' perspectives - score ranges from 5-20, with higher score indication greater acceptability
Baseline and Month 15
Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) Subject Perspective
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 15
Questionnaire to help determine appropriateness of Collaborative Care from participants' perspectives. Score ranges form 5-20 with higher score indication greater appropriateness
Baseline and Month 15
Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) Neurologist Perspective
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 15
Questionnaire to help determine appropriateness of Collaborative Care from Neurologists' perspectives. Score ranges form 5-20 with higher score indication greater appropriateness
Baseline and Month 15

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Heidi M Munger Clary, MPH, Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 4, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 29, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 5, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

After the study is completed and results published by primary study team, de-identified, archived data will be stored for potential use if requested by other qualified researchers including those outside of the study.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

after results published by primary study team

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access to study data may be provided by the PI if requested by qualified investigators for individual participant data meta-analyses or potentially for other methodologically sound proposals.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on collaborative care

3
Subscribe