- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05639920
Validation of Emergency Surgery Score (ESS) in Egyptian Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy
Validation of Emergency Surgery Score (ESS) as Outcome Prediction Score in Egyptian Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Emergency laparotomy is the most common emergency surgery which considered a life saving exploratory procedure for which the clinical presentation, underlying pathology, anatomical site of surgery, and preoperative management vary considerably. There are more than 400 OPCS codes describing surgery that could come under the umbrella term of 'emergency laparotomy' which reflect the diverse nature of this surgical cohort. In spite the lack of data on the outcomes of emergency laparotomies it is generally considered very poor mortality rates following emergency laparotomy Internationally reported range from 13% to 18% at 30 days Even after innumerable advances in surgical skills, antimicrobial agents and supportive care. There is a need for early prognostic evaluation of these individuals to identify patients in high risk for more agressive treatment Using an ideal scoring system will help in ;.making appropriate decision on those patients. accurately predicting the risk of developing serious complications or die . Categorizing patients into different risk groups which would help to prognosticate the outcome, select patients for intensive care and determine operative risk, thereby helping to choose the nature of the operative procedure .
The Emergency Surgery Score (ESS) was developed as a novel preoperative risk assessment tool for patients undergoing EGS in 2016 ESS accurately predicts outcomes in all types of emergent laparotomy patients and may prove valuable as a bedside decision-making tool for patient and family counseling, as well as for adequate risk-adjustment in emergent laparotomy quality benchmarking efforts.10
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Doaa A. Mohamed
- Phone Number: +201111834281
- Email: doaaellisy25@gmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Jehan A. Sayed
- Phone Number: +20100 625 3939
- Email: Jehan.alloul@yahoo.com
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients more who are 18 years old or older.
- Patients who are in need of an emergency laparotomy within 24 hours of admission.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients less than 18 years old.
- Patients who are not accessible for follow up to the 30th postoperative day.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Group A
|
Validation of Emergency surgery score in predicting mortality and mortality in Egyptian patients undergoing Emergency laparotomy
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
validity of emergency surgery score in laparotomies surgeries. .Emergency surgery score the minimum value 3 and maximum value 29 , and the higher scores mean a worse outcome
Time Frame: "through study completion, an average of 1 year".
|
Emergency surgery score the minimum value 3 and maximum value 29 , and the higher scores mean a worse outcome. Score includes demographics (e.g., age, race, sex), comorbidities (e.g chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD], hypertension, ascites), functional status, and preoperative laboratory variables (e.g sodium, albumin, and WBC count). Laboratory values are divided into low, normal, and high (where applicable) using clinically relevant cutoffs. Demographic factors and comorbid conditions are dichotomized using ACS-NSQIP definitions of normal and abnormal. Age will dichotomiz into younger or older than 60 years ; race, into white or colored ; "partially" or "totally" dependent is deemed as functional dependence; and dyspnea with moderate exertion or rest was classified as dyspnea. Body mass index is divided into less than 20, 20 to 35, or greater than 35 kg/m2 . Laboratory values are divided into low, normal, and high using the NSQIP definitions. |
"through study completion, an average of 1 year".
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
mortality rate in emergency laparotomies surgeries.
Time Frame: 1 year
|
case fatality rate in emergency laparotomies surgeries.
|
1 year
|
morbidity rate in emergency laparotomies surgeries.
Time Frame: 1 year
|
incidence of surgical site infection
|
1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Nag DS. Assessing the risk: Scoring systems for outcome prediction in emergency laparotomies. Biomedicine (Taipei). 2015 Dec;5(4):20. doi: 10.7603/s40681-015-0020-y. Epub 2015 Nov 28.
- Saunders DI, Murray D, Pichel AC, Varley S, Peden CJ; UK Emergency Laparotomy Network. Variations in mortality after emergency laparotomy: the first report of the UK Emergency Laparotomy Network. Br J Anaesth. 2012 Sep;109(3):368-75. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes165. Epub 2012 Jun 22.
- Rix TE, Bates T. Pre-operative risk scores for the prediction of outcome in elderly people who require emergency surgery. World J Emerg Surg. 2007 Jun 5;2:16. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-2-16.
- Ahuja A, Pal R. Prognostic scoring indicator in evaluation of clinical outcome in intestinal perforations. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013 Sep;7(9):1953-5. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/6572.3375. Epub 2013 Sep 10.
- Mercer S, Guha A, Ramesh V. The P-POSSUM scoring systems for predicting the mortality of neurosurgical patients undergoing craniotomy: Further validation of usefulness and application across healthcare systems. Indian J Anaesth. 2013 Nov;57(6):587-91. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.123332.
- Neary WD, Heather BP, Earnshaw JJ. The Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM). Br J Surg. 2003 Feb;90(2):157-65. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4041.
- Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA, Zimmerman JE, Bergner M, Bastos PG, Sirio CA, Murphy DJ, Lotring T, Damiano A, et al. The APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest. 1991 Dec;100(6):1619-36. doi: 10.1378/chest.100.6.1619.
- Chang RW. Individual outcome prediction models for intensive care units. Lancet. 1989 Jul 15;2(8655):143-6. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)90193-1.
- Kongkaewpaisan N, Lee JM, Eid AI, Kongwibulwut M, Han K, King D, Saillant N, Mendoza AE, Velmahos G, Kaafarani HMA. Can the emergency surgery score (ESS) be used as a triage tool predicting the postoperative need for an ICU admission? Am J Surg. 2019 Jan;217(1):24-28. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
- Peponis T, Bohnen JD, Sangji NF, Nandan AR, Han K, Lee J, Yeh DD, de Moya MA, Velmahos GC, Chang DC, Kaafarani HMA. Does the emergency surgery score accurately predict outcomes in emergent laparotomies? Surgery. 2017 Aug;162(2):445-452. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.03.016. Epub 2017 May 26.
- Vasileiou G, Ray-Zack M, Zielinski M, Qian S, Yeh DD, Crandall M. Validation of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma emergency general surgery score for acute appendicitis-an EAST multicenter study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Jul;87(1):134-139. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002319. Erratum In: J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Mar;88(3):466.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Emergency surgery score
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Emergencies
-
Betsi Cadwaladr University Health BoardRecruitingMedical EmergenciesUnited Kingdom
-
Central Hospital, Nancy, FranceCompleted
-
Universidad de AntioquiaCompleted
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...UnknownMedical EmergenciesChina
-
Technische Universität DresdenCompletedPerformance in Simulated Emergencies | Stress During Simulator Scenario | Behaviour of Physicians in Simulated EmergenciesGermany
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyZentralinstitut für die Kassenärztliche Versorgung in DeutschlandUnknownNon-urgent EmergenciesGermany
-
Peking University People's HospitalBeijing Emergency Medical Center; Beijing Red Cross Emergency CenterCompletedEmergencies [Disease/Finding]China
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterRecruitingOncologic Complications and EmergenciesUnited States
-
Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and SimulationCompletedCardiopulmonary Resuscitation | Education | Medical Emergencies
-
Mbarara University of Science and TechnologyUniversity of CalgaryUnknownMaternal, Newborn and Child Health Emergencies