Clinical Efficacy of Acetaminophen in Mechanical Ventilation in Children With New Coronary Pneumonia

January 10, 2023 updated by: Hu Anmin, The Second Clinical Medical College of Jinan University

To Evaluate the Clinical Efficacy of Standardized Use of Acetaminophen in Mechanical Ventilation in Children With New Coronary Pneumonia

Patients were randomized to receive either paracetamol during mechanical ventilation. When patients were randomized to receive paracetamol (40 mg/kg per day in 4 doses), a placebo infusion of normal saline was administered continuously at the same rate as an equivalent infusion. Placebos could not be distinguished from the active study drug in color, odor, or viscosity.

In both study groups, IMV was maintained with sufentanil (0-0.2 mcg/kg/h), propofol (0-4 mg/kg/h), and dexmedetomidine (0-1 mcg/kg/h). Assessment of sedation levels by the bedside nurse using the FLACC pain scale to determine if the child is adequately comfortable or in need of more or less medication to maintain adequate ventilation. Assessment of sedation levels by the bedside nurse using the FLACC pain scale (every 6 hours as a minimum time interval).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

128

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Shenzhen, Guangdong, China, 518020
        • Recruiting
        • Windo Medical
        • Contact:
          • An-Min Hu
          • Phone Number: 18026980789
          • Email: sci@wm.icu

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 second to 16 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Inclusion criteria were body weight greater than 1500 g; and mechanically ventilated patients with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria were admitted with a tracheostomy in situ; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment; neurologic dysfunction, hepatic dysfunction, or renal insufficiency; known allergy to or intolerance for paracetamol; and administration of paracetamol in the 24 hours prior to mechanical ventilation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group A
Paracetamol injection

Patients were randomized to receive either paracetamol during mechanical ventilation. When patients were randomized to receive paracetamol (40 mg/kg per day in 4 doses), a placebo infusion of normal saline was administered continuously at the same rate as an equivalent infusion. Placebos could not be distinguished from the active study drug in color, odor, or viscosity.

In both study groups, IMV was maintained with sufentanil (0-0.2 mcg/kg/h), propofol (0-4 mg/kg/h), and dexmedetomidine (0-1 mcg/kg/h). Assessment of sedation levels by the bedside nurse using the FLACC pain scale to determine if the child is adequately comfortable or in need of more or less medication to maintain adequate ventilation. Assessment of sedation levels by the bedside nurse using the FLACC pain scale (every 6 hours as a minimum time interval).

No Intervention: Group B
Equivalent physiological saline

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Mechanical ventilation time
Time Frame: an average of 5 days
an average of 5 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Length of ICU stay time
Time Frame: an average of 1 week
an average of 1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 15, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 15, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 15, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 10, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2023

First Posted (Estimate)

January 19, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 19, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acetaminophen,Mechanical Ventilation,Critically Ill Children

Clinical Trials on Paracetamol injection

3
Subscribe