A Comparison of Three Surgical Approaches to Zygomaticomaxillary Fractures

May 8, 2023 updated by: Lydia Nabil, University of Alexandria

The Best Approach to Zygomaticomaxillary Fractures: A Comparison of Three Surgical Approaches

The study is a randomized controlled clinical trial, following the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines. The study is intended to compare between the subtarsal approach, conventional transconjuctival approach and the Y- modification of the transconjuctival approach in the management of zygomatico-maxillay complex fracture.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study is a randomized controlled clinical trial. Twenty-four patients with age range of 20-50 years requiring open reduction and fixation of a fractured zygomatic complex were randomly divided into three equal groups according to the approach used:

Group A: subtarsal approach group. Group B: conventional transconjuctival approach group. Group C: Y- modification of the transconjuctival approach group.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Alexandria, Egypt, 21526
        • Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with ZMC fractures requiring open reduction and internal fixation.
  • Adult patients aged between 20 and 50 years with no gender predilection.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • An existing laceration in the inferior and lateral periorbital site.
  • Infection at the fracture line.
  • Comminuted fracture with bone loss.
  • Acute and chronic conjunctival diseases.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: subtarsal approach
surgical approach
Active Comparator: conventional transconjunctival approach
surgical approach
Active Comparator: transconjunctival approach with Y- modification
surgical approach

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
accessibility to the fracture site
Time Frame: intraoperative
Adequate exposure provided by the incision and accessiblity to proper fracture reduction and fixation was assigned as Yes or No
intraoperative
esthetic appearance and scarring
Time Frame: 6 weeks postoperative
Postoperative scarring was recorded as noticeable or unnoticeable
6 weeks postoperative
radiographic verification of adequacy of fracture reduction
Time Frame: immediate postoperative
computed tomography was requested for adequacy of fracture reduction assessment and this outcome was assigned as Yes or No
immediate postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The duration for exposure of the fracture site
Time Frame: intraoperative
The duration from performing the incision till the field exposure calculated in minutes
intraoperative
postoperative pain
Time Frame: at 24 hours and 1 week
Pain was evaluated at 24 hours and at 1 week according to a 10-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), (0-1=none,2-4=mild,5-7=moderate,8-10=severe).
at 24 hours and 1 week
sensory nerve function
Time Frame: 3 months postoperative

Subjective assessment of the infraorbital nerve sensation by patient questioning about any alteration in sensation at 3 months postoperatively.

Objective assessment by dental probe pressure to assess sensory changes along the distribution of the infraorbital nerve with contralateral side comparison

3 months postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 26, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

February 5, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 11, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

January 25, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 9, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Zygomatic Fractures

Clinical Trials on subtarsal approach

3
Subscribe