Efficacy of Direct Oral Anticoagulants as a Prophylactic Anticoagulation of Catheter Induced Thrombosis

January 21, 2023 updated by: Mansoura University

Direct Oral Anticoagulants

INTRODUCTION:

DOAC's looks like an attractive alternative to VKA because they offer important advantages beyond their easiness of administration, like less interactions and no need of laboratory monitoring. 1 All oral anticoagulant regimens but not aspirin were associated with a lower risk of recurrent VTE, while only VKAs were associated with a higher risk of major bleeding. 2 There have been significant differences between VKAs and DOACs in the risk of major bleeding by the current study size. Even though the risk of major bleeding with VKAs may be lower in patients already challenged to anticoagulation treatment. 3 Furthermore, when deciding on longer term secondary prevention of VTE, DOACs appeared safer than standard-intensity VKAs, taking clinically relevant bleeding or any bleeding into consideration.4-5 Until now there is no randomized controlled trial assessing the role of oral direct anticoagulant as a prophylaxis for catheter associated venous thromboembolism.

Aim of the work: To evaluate the efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants as a prophylactic anticoagulation in thromboprophylaxis of catheter induced thrombosis.

Patients and methods Study location: The study will be conducted at the department of vascular surgery in Mansoura University, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura, Egypt .

Type of study: Randomized Controlled Prospective study Study duration: 2 years: 2022-2024 Sample size: It will include all patients presented to our department fulfilling the inclusion criteria.

Study population: The study will be conducted in patients with any permanent catheter inserted intravenous either femoral or jugular either for hemodialysis or replacement therapy .

Inclusion criteria: Any permanent catheter inserted intravenous either femoral or jugular either for hemodialysis, replacement or chemotherapy.

Exclusion criteria: History of central venous occlusion, contraindication of direct oral anticoagulants.

Consent: Patients must sign informed consent about possible complications from the therapy.

Data collection: The demographics, symptoms, and preoperative clinical data will be collected.

History Data: including underlying medical conditions, any previous associated morbidity.

Examination: Venous examinations. Laboratory: Blood picture, Blood sugar level, Kidney functions, Liver functions and Coagulation profile.

Imaging: Duplex US Method of Randomization: Computer-based Therapies group A : Apixaban 2.5 mg twice group B : Rivaroxaban 10 mg plus placebo group C : Placebo without anticoagulation Follow up All patients are followed by duplex ultrasonography to assess the thrombosis at the tip of catheter or around the catheter 10 days postoperative and 1, 3, 6, months then after one year, venography is indicated if the clinical evaluation not matched with sonographic results.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

INTRODUCTION:

DOAC's looks like an attractive alternative to VKA because they offer important advantages beyond their easiness of administration, like less interactions and no need of laboratory monitoring. 1 All oral anticoagulant regimens but not aspirin were associated with a lower risk of recurrent VTE, while only VKAs were associated with a higher risk of major bleeding. 2 There have been significant differences between VKAs and DOACs in the risk of major bleeding by the current study size. Even though the risk of major bleeding with VKAs may be lower in patients already challenged to anticoagulation treatment. 3 Furthermore, when deciding on longer term secondary prevention of VTE, DOACs appeared safer than standard-intensity VKAs, taking clinically relevant bleeding or any bleeding into consideration.4-5 Until now there is no randomized controlled trial assessing the role of oral direct anticoagulant as a prophylaxis for catheter associated venous thromboembolism.

Aim of the work: To evaluate the efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants as a prophylactic anticoagulation in thromboprophylaxis of catheter induced thrombosis.

Patients and methods Study location: The study will be conducted at the department of vascular surgery in Mansoura University, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura, Egypt .

Type of study: Randomized Controlled Prospective study Study duration: 2 years: 2022-2024 Sample size: It will include all patients presented to our department fulfilling the inclusion criteria.

Study population: The study will be conducted in patients with any permanent catheter inserted intravenous either femoral or jugular either for hemodialysis or replacement therapy .

Inclusion criteria: Any permanent catheter inserted intravenous either femoral or jugular either for hemodialysis, replacement or chemotherapy.

Exclusion criteria: History of central venous occlusion, contraindication of direct oral anticoagulants.

Consent: Patients must sign informed consent about possible complications from the therapy.

Data collection: The demographics, symptoms, and preoperative clinical data will be collected.

History Data: including underlying medical conditions, any previous associated morbidity.

Examination: Venous examinations. Laboratory: Blood picture, Blood sugar level, Kidney functions, Liver functions and Coagulation profile.

Imaging: Duplex US Method of Randomization: Computer-based Therapies Group A : Apixaban 2.5 mg twice Group B : Rivaroxaban 10 mg plus placebo Group C : Placebo without anticoagulation Follow up All patients are followed by duplex ultrasonography to assess the thrombosis at the tip of catheter or around the catheter 10 days postoperative and 1, 3, 6, months then after one year, venography is indicated if the clinical evaluation not matched with sonographic results.

Statistical analysis

· The data will be analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. The numerical outcomes e.g. age is calculated as mean. Gender will be recorded as frequency and percentage. Chi Square test is applied to assess the association of various parameters. The results will be considered statistically significant if the p-value is found to be less than or equal to 0.05.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years to 95 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any permanent catheter inserted intravenous either femoral or jugular either for hemodialysis, replacement or chemotherapy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of central venous occlusion, contraindication of direct oral anticoagulants.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo without anticoagulation
Without any anticoagulation
Direct oral anticoagulation for catheter induced thromboprophylaxis
Active Comparator: Low Dose Direct Oral Anticoagulation
Apixaban 2.5 mg twice Rivaroxaban 10 mg plus placebo
Direct oral anticoagulation for catheter induced thromboprophylaxis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
thromboprophylaxis of catheter induced thrombosis
Time Frame: 6 months
Prevention of thrombosis
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duplex ultrasonography
Time Frame: 6 months
duplex ultrasonography of central venous system
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

January 24, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 25, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 25, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 21, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 21, 2023

First Posted (Estimate)

January 30, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 30, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 21, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • R.22.10.1907.R1.R2.R3

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anticoagulants; Increased

Clinical Trials on catheter induced thromboprophylaxis

3
Subscribe