Impact of Fast-rotation Coronary CT in Patients Undergoing Aortic Stenosis Workup (FAST-CCT)

February 28, 2024 updated by: David C. Rotzinger

Impact of Fast Gantry Rotation Cardiac CT Angiography on Coronary Motion Artifacts in the Absence of β-Blocker Premedication in Patients Undergoing Aortic Stenosis Workup: a Single-centre Randomized Controlled Trial

This study aims to evaluate the clinical value of a novel CT gantry supporting a .23 second rotation time and systematically compare it with 0.23 second rotation time, in patients with clinically indicated aortic CTA in the workup of aortic stenosis. Patients will be randomly assigned .23 or .28 sec rotation time CTA. Coronary artery interpretability rates will be determined in both groups.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Coronary artery analysis is an essential component of cardiac CT, but is often challenging without beta-blocker use. CT's technological advances are continuously evolving, paving the way for safer and more accurate diagnoses. Part of these innovations is the development of faster rotation speeds (0.23 sec/rotation), which is expected to allow for heart rate-independent CCTA.

Patients subjected to aortic stenosis workup routinely undergo invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in the catheterization laboratory, voiding the need to control the heart rate at the time of cardiac CT because aortic valve measurements can be performed even at higher heart rate. Still, cardiac CT in this context is performed with ECG-gating, and attempting to evaluate coronary arteries is possible without interfering with clinical decisions. Also, the existing literature advocates the use of gantry rotation speeds of at least 0.5 sec/rotation; consequently, the use of 0.28 versus 0.23 sec/rotation for this study will comply with current guidelines and will have no detrimental impact on patient management. This study aims to evaluate coronary artery interpretability in patients subjected to cardiac CT for the anatomical assessment of aortic valve stenosis prior to endovascular (transcatheter aortic valve implantation [TAVI]) or surgical therapy.

Patients will be enrolled after providing written, informed consent, and will be randomly assigned either to the test (0.23 sec rotation time) or control group (0.28 sec rotation).

The participants concerned are not subjected to any additional invasive or stressful procedure compared with those undergoing aortic stenosis workup in clinical routine.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

124

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Lausanne, Switzerland, 1011
        • Recruiting
        • Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV)
        • Contact:
          • David C. Rotzinger, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjected to cardiac CT due to known or suspected aortic valve stenosis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients unable to hold their breath, deaf or visually impaired
  • Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of <30 mL/min
  • Hemodynamic instability or cardiogenic shock, Acute pulmonary edema, Exacerbated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Pregnant and breast-feeding women
  • Patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)
  • Patient incapable of discernment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental
Patients subjected to aortic CTA with a gantry revolution time of 0.23 sec
Aortic CTA performed with short (0.23 sec) gantry rotation time.
Other Names:
  • GE Healthcare, Revolution Apex, cardiac and aortic CT angiography with 230 ms rotation time
Active Comparator: Control
Patients subjected to aortic CTA with a gantry revolution time of 0.28 sec
Aortic CTA performed with standard (.28 sec) gantry rotation time.
Other Names:
  • GE Healthcare, Revolution Apex, cardiac and aortic CT angiography with 280 ms rotation time

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Interpretable CTA rate per patient
Time Frame: Up to 90 days
Number of patients with diagnostic image quality for coronary artery disease
Up to 90 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Interpretable CTA rate, per segment
Time Frame: Up to 90 days
Number of segments with diagnostic image quality for coronary artery disease
Up to 90 days
CTA performance to measure diameter stenosis, using invasive coronary angiography as gold standard
Time Frame: Coronary angiography performed withing 30 days of CTA
CTA's diagnostic accuracy for coronary occlusive disease
Coronary angiography performed withing 30 days of CTA
Relationship between heart rate and non-diagnostic CTA
Time Frame: Up to 90 days
Correlation between of heart rate (in BPM) and the presence of any uninterpretable coronary segment on CTA
Up to 90 days
Quantitative image quality (contrast to noise ratio)
Time Frame: Up to 90 days
Comparison of contrast to noise ratio between both groups
Up to 90 days
Radiation dose per patient
Time Frame: Up to 90 days
Effective dose (mSv) comparison between both groups
Up to 90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David C. Rotzinger, MD, PhD, CHUV

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 27, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 3, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 3, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 11, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

February 2, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 1, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Diseases

Clinical Trials on Aortic CTA, .23s

3
Subscribe