Effects of Task-Specific Step Training on Reactive Balance

Effects of Task-Specific Step Training on Reactive Balance After Laboratory-Induced Trips: A Pilot Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate a novel and pragmatic (i.e., not requiring specialized equipment) task-specific step training regimen that aims to improve reactive balance after tripping. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does this step training regimen improve reactive balance after tripping compared to no training?
  • How well does this step training regimen improve reactive balance compared to treadmill training, which is a more commonly studied reactive balance training regimen that uses a specialized treadmill.

Participants will:

  • complete step training or treadmill training (or no training if assigned to the control group) twice a week for three weeks
  • experience a laboratory-induced trip three weeks later to evaluate their reactive balance

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Virginia
      • Blacksburg, Virginia, United States, 24061
        • Virginia Tech

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years to 80 years (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 65-80 years old
  • willing to use wearable sensors for 2-3 weeks (for a separate study)
  • no lower limb amputation
  • not weigh over 250 pounds
  • pass a telephone interview related to cognitive status

Exclusion Criteria:

  • participants must pass a health screening involving a questionnaire that will be reviewed by a health care specialist.
  • participants must not have clinical osteoporosis as indicated by a bone mineral density of the lumbar vertebra and proximal femur of t<-2.0 as obtained from dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), or a DEXA scan completed within the last year.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
Experimental: step training
Two training sessions per week will be completed for three consecutive weeks. Each training session will last 0.5-1 hour with an active training time of 30 minutes per participant. Training will involve repeated volitional and reactive stepping movements that mimic the movements necessary to recover balance after tripping while walking.
Participants practice volitional and reactive stepping responses that mimic those needed when recovering balance after tripping.
Experimental: treadmill training
Two training sessions per week will be completed for three consecutive weeks. Each training session will last 0.5-1 hour with an active training time of 30 minutes per participant. Training will involve repeated exposure to simulated trips on a treadmill. To simulate a trip, participants first stand on the stationary treadmill belt. A sudden and unexpected increase in backward treadmill belt speed induces a forward loss of balance similar to when tripping. Participants are then required to take steps to recover balance and establish a stable gait pattern before the trial ends. Trials are repeated using pseudo-random speeds that provide variability and are individualized to each participant's capabilities.
Sudden treadmill changes in speed (from standing) induce trip-like losses of balance, after which participants take steps to recover balance and establish a stable gait pattern. This is repeated over a range of speeds to both provide training variability and to individualize training to each participant's capability.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Trunk Angle at Touchdown of the First Recovery Step
Time Frame: 1 week after the 3-week intervention
After a laboratory-induced trip: Angle from vertical of a line connecting midpoint of greater trochanter markers and midpoint of the acromion markers
1 week after the 3-week intervention
Trip Outcome
Time Frame: 1 week after the 3-week intervention

This is a binary variable that has a value of either "fall" or "recovery."

After a laboratory-induced trip, trip outcome will be assign to one of the following two values:

"fall" if a participant is fully and continuously supported by the harness as observed from video, or if the harness force applied to the participant, integrated over time from trip onset until 1 second after touchdown of the first recovery step, is greater than 40% of body weight * seconds. The harness force will be measured by a uniaxial load cell.

"recovery" if the harness force applied to the participant, integrated over time from trip onset until 1 second after touchdown of the first recovery step, is less than 40% of body weight * seconds. The harness force will be measured by a uniaxial load cell.

1 week after the 3-week intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recovery Step Length
Time Frame: 1 week after the 3-week intervention
After a laboratory-induced trip, the distance between a lateral malleolus marker of the stance limb and a lateral malleolus marker of the stepping foot at touchdown
1 week after the 3-week intervention
Sacrum Height at Touchdown of the First Recovery Step
Time Frame: 1 week after the 3-week intervention
After a laboratory-induced trip, the minimum distance between the walkway and the greater trochanter marker on the non-tripping limb during trip recovery.
1 week after the 3-week intervention
Gait Speed
Time Frame: 1 week after the 3-week intervention
The average forward speed of the participant prior to the laboratory-induced trip.
1 week after the 3-week intervention
Average Step Speed
Time Frame: 1 week after the 3-week intervention
After a laboratory-induced trip, the distance between a lateral malleolus marker of the stance limb and a lateral malleolus marker of the stepping foot at touchdown divided by the time from impact with the trip obstacle and touchdown of the initial recovery step.
1 week after the 3-week intervention
Trip Recovery Strategy
Time Frame: 1 week after the 3-week intervention

This is a binary variable that has a value of either "elevating" or "lowering."

Elevating or lowering, depending upon how the participant uses the foot that trips on the obstacle after the laboratory-induced trip. If the foot is elevated over the obstacle, then this will be elevating. If the foot is lowered to the ground and the opposite foot first steps over the obstacle, then this will be lowering. The measurement tool to determine this outcome is a video recording of the trip, and this outcome has no units.

1 week after the 3-week intervention

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Trip recovery strategy
Time Frame: during the week after the 3-weeks of intervention

This is a binary variable that has a value of either "elevating" or "lowering."

Elevating or lowering, depending upon how the participant uses the foot that trips on the obstacle after the laboratory-induced trip. If the foot is elevated over the obstacle, then this will be elevating. If the foot is lowered to the ground and the opposite foot first steps over the obstacle, then this will be lowering. The measurement tool to determine this outcome is a video recording of the trip, and this outcome has no units.

during the week after the 3-weeks of intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael L. Madigan, PhD, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 8, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

February 21, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 24, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 3, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Accidental Fall

Clinical Trials on step training

Subscribe