Improving Occupational Therapy Students' Holistic Care Competencies Through a Structured Holistic Thinking Curriculum: a Mixed Design

November 14, 2023 updated by: Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital

Background: Occupational therapy emphasizes the holistic approach, but occupational therapy students are unable to use holistic thinking to design holistic solutions for cases immediately during their internship due to their lack of clinical experience, which requires extensive guidance from clinical occupational therapist.

Study Aim: To improve the holistic care competencies of occupational therapy students using a structured holistic thinking curriculum.

Methods: The study population was occupational therapy interns from a northern teaching hospital. The holistic thinking curriculum was designed as a structured program using mind maps, case-based discussions, and clinical observations to integrate physical, psychological, social, and spiritual aspects. The experimental group took a pre-test after a case report in weeks 4 and 5, a first post-test and course satisfaction after the first structured holistic thinking course, and a second structured holistic thinking course with a second post-test and course satisfaction in weeks 11 and 12; the control group had no course but had a guided version of the holistic thinking case study form for independent study, and the control and experimental groups were tested pre and post using the holistic thinking case study form and the personal learning self-efficacy scale.

Data analysis: Quantitative data for the holistic thinking case study form were determined by three occupational therapists with at least 5 years of teaching experience through consensus conferences to determine the degree of compliance of the case study form with holistic care, and differences between the holistic thinking case study form and the personal learning self-efficacy scale were determined by Kruskal-Wallis with a p-value of 0.05. Qualitative data for the holistic thinking case study form were determined by three occupational therapists with at least 5 years of teaching experience to determine the degree of compliance of the case study form with holistic care and regular meetings were held to achieve consistency in coding.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • New Taipei City, Taiwan, 235
        • Recruiting
        • Shuang Ho Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. occupational therapy students who were interns at the Shuanghe Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare
  2. students who could read, write, and communicate in Chinese
  3. students who were 20 years of age or older.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. those who could not attend the entire course
  2. those who could not complete the 12-week internship.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental group
During the 12 weeks of the internship, the experimental group took a pre-test after a case report-1 in weeks 4-5, which included completing the holistic thinking case analysis form and the personal learning self-efficacy questionnaire, followed by a 2-hour structured holistic thinking course. At the end of the session, subjects took the first post-test, revised the case analysis form completed in the pre-test based on the case report-1 observed in the pre-test, and completed the personal learning self-efficacy questionnaire and the satisfaction questionnaire again. During weeks 6-11 of the internship, participants continue to receive clinical practice training in assessment, intervention planning, and patient intervention skills. In weeks 11-12 of the internship, subjects took a second post-test after reading case report-2, which included completing the holistic thinking case analysis form and again completing the personal learning self-efficacy questionnaire.
The holistic thinking curriculum was designed as a structured program using mind maps, case-based discussions, and clinical observations to integrate physical, psychological, social, and spiritual aspects.
Active Comparator: Control group
During the 12 weeks of the internship, the control group had no structured holistic thinking course. During weeks 4-5 of the internship, after viewing case report-1, a pretest consisting of completing the holistic thinking case analysis form and the personal learning self-efficacy questionnaire was completed and a holistic thinking case analysis form - introductory version was given. Subjects will revise the holistic thinking case analysis form completed in the pretest and complete the personal learning self-efficacy questionnaire again. During weeks 6-11 of the internship, participants continue to receive clinical practice training in assessment, intervention planning, and patient intervention skills. In weeks 11-12 of the internship, subjects received the post-test, viewed the case report-2, and were given the holistic thinking case analysis form - introductory version and completed the holistic thinking case analysis form and the personal learning self-efficacy questionnaire.
there is no holistic thinking curriculum.Using the holistic thinking case study form - introductory version self-study

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The quantitative data of the Holistic Thinking Case Analysis Form
Time Frame: Change from baseline after immediate intervention/Change from baseline at week 12
The Holistic Thinking Case Analysis Form: Taken from cases (caregivers) to see if subjects can analyze holistic abilities/problems based on physical, mental, social and spiritual aspects. Higher scores indicate better analysis of the problem and are quantitative data. The holistic occupational therapy intervention plan extract looks at whether the subject can present an occupational therapy intervention plan with the concept of holistic care, which is qualitative. The higher the score, the more appropriate it is, which is quantitative data. The above information was coded and analyzed by three occupational therapists with more than five years of teaching experience, and quantitative information was determined through consensus conferences.
Change from baseline after immediate intervention/Change from baseline at week 12
MSLQ:Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire
Time Frame: Change from baseline after immediate intervention/Change from baseline at week 12
Measuring subjects' learning self-efficacy
Change from baseline after immediate intervention/Change from baseline at week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Course Satisfaction Questionnaire
Time Frame: After each training session(week 4-5/week 11-12)
The purpose of the questionnaire was to understand the subjects' satisfaction, usefulness, and suggestions regarding the course content and to increase the subjects' connection to the holistic care curriculum, clinical experience, and skills knowledge through course reflection.
After each training session(week 4-5/week 11-12)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 17, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 2, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 15, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • N202212038

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Holistic Care Competencies of Occupational Therapy Students

3
Subscribe