Technical Feasibility of the cfDNA Test for Non-invasive Cytogenetic Analysis of Early Miscarriages Versus the Gold Standard Microarray (NICAEA)

March 15, 2024 updated by: Hospices Civils de Lyon

Technical Feasibility of the Cell-free DNA Test for Non-invasive Cytogenetic Analysis of Early Miscarriages Versus the Gold Standard Microarray

Among the 15% of couples who experience a spontaneous early miscarriage (SEM) during their pregnancy, approximately 2 to 5% will suffer from recurrent SEM. It is only after the third SM that they will be offered a workup to look for a predisposition to SEM. This workup does not currently include a search for foetal chromosomal abnormalities that could be considered causal for this event. These anomalies are responsible for approximately 50% of SEM and their detection could lead to an explanation for half of the couples currently without a diagnosis after a standard workup. The diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities can be made by karyotype analysis or by Cytogenetic Microarray Analysis (CMA) on the product of conception. Unfortunately, karyotyping has a high failure rate due to poor cell culture of samples that are often degraded or of low quantity. The CMA is not always feasible due to the absence of analyzable feto-placental material linked to the use of a drug strategy for its elimination.

The study of cell-free DNA of syncytiotrophoblastic origin (cfDNA) circulating in the maternal plasma could be a solution as it is for non-invasive prenatal screening of trisomy 21. cfDNA is detectable from 6 to 8 weeks of amenorrhea and released in the maternal blood as long as placental tissue is present in the uterus, can be easily obtained by maternal venous sampling. If maternal blood sampling is performed before complete removal of the product of conception, then detection of foetal chromosomal abnormalities would be possible. Thus, if failure rates of CMA and cfDNA techniques are comparable, cfDNA could be preferred as it applies for miscarriages for whom no fetoplacental material can be obtained.

This study therefore proposes to compare the failure rates of the two technologies (CMA and cfDNA) for the detection of chromosomal abnormalities in recurrent SEM.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

96

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Rhône
      • Bron, Rhône, France, 69500
        • Recruiting
        • Hopital Femme-Mère-Enfant; service gynécologie/obstétrique
        • Contact:
      • Bron, Rhône, France, 69500
        • Recruiting
        • Hopital Femme-Mère-Enfant; service médecine de la reproduction
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

15% of couples will experience spontaneous miscarriage during their reproductive life. Women that will go to the ObGyn Emergency Department of our Hospital where spontaneous miscarriage will be confirmed and curettage decided will be eligible for inclusion. No additional criterion applies.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient who has suffered a miscarriage and requires a curettage to collect the product of conception
  • Patient consenting to constitutional cytogenetic analysis on cfDNA and product of conception
  • Patient of legal age
  • Patient affiliated to a Social Security system.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Venous sampling impossible
  • Miscarriage before 8 weeks of pregnancy (unusable cfDNA)
  • Patient does not understand French
  • Patient under legal protection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patient group
This group corresponds to patients who have just suffered a miscarriage and are undergoing curettage for the evacuation of the product of conception.
The product of conception taken during the intervention will be recovered at Day 1

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Failure rate of cfDNA compared to CMA
Time Frame: The outcome measure (failure rates of both techniques) will be assessed through study completion ; estimated 6 months after last inclusion.
Failure rate of cfDNA compared to CMA Since the difference in failure rates between the two techniques (MCA and cfDNA) corresponds to a comparison of 2 proportions in a matched situation.
The outcome measure (failure rates of both techniques) will be assessed through study completion ; estimated 6 months after last inclusion.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 18, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 18, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 18, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 2, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

June 12, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 15, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spontaneous Miscarriage

Clinical Trials on Curettage for the evacuation of the product of conception

3
Subscribe