- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05904418
Robot-Assisted US-Based Vertebral Segmentation for Pedicle Screw Trajectory Identification
Robot-Assisted US-Based Vertebral Segmentation for Pedicle Screw Trajectory Identification: A Comparison With Handheld US-Reconstructions and Ground Truth CT-Data
This other clinical trial compares robot-assisted US scanning with handheld US scanning and ground-truth CT data of the lumbar spine in healthy, young volunteers. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Is a 3D reconstruction of a lumbar spine from robot-assisted US scanning equivalent to or better quality than a 3D reconstruction from handheld US scanning?
- Can a machine learning algorithm automatically segment the bone anatomy from robot-assisted and handheld US scanning to generate 3D lumbar spine reconstructions?
- Can pedicle screw trajectories be identified based on posterior vertebral landmarks of 3D reconstructions of lumbar spines from both robot-assisted and handheld US scanning?
Participants will:
- fill out a medical history questionnaire
- get clinically examined
- have an ultra-low-dose (ULD) CT Scan of the vertebra L1 to S1
- have a handheld US scan of the vertebra L1 to S1
- have a robot-assisted US Scan of the vertebra L1 to S1
- fill out a post-study questionnaire
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
The following hypotheses are tested:
- A 3D reconstruction of a lumbar spine from robot-assisted US scanning is equivalent to or of better quality than a 3D reconstruction handheld US scanning.
- A machine learning algorithm can automatically segment the bone anatomy from robot-assisted and handheld US scanning to generate said 3D lumbar spine reconstructions.
- Pedicle screw trajectories can be identified based on posterior vertebral landmarks of 3D reconstructions of lumbar spines from robot-assisted and handheld US scanning.
The project consists of three pillars as objectives to help solidify the US reconstruction of the lumbar spine as a novel navigational method in interventional spine applications.
- 1st Pillar: A first-of-a-kind in-vivo robot-assisted and handheld US reconstruction dataset of the lumbar spine in healthy subjects is acquired. The collected dataset is compared to ground truth CT data to assess quality.
- 2nd Pillar: A novel machine learning algorithm is trained to segment the US reconstructions of all the collected lumbar spine data into each identified vertebra.
- 3rd Pillar: A novel measurement method to identify pedicle screw trajectories based on posterior vertebral landmarks is applied to the segmented US reconstructions. This research further promotes US for future use in robot-assisted interventions.
This project consists of two phases. First, a preliminary pilot study is planned to assess the project's feasibility and improve the planned workflow and safety measures. For this pilot, the investigators will mouth-to-mouth recruit two volunteers. After completing and thoroughly evaluating the pilot, the investigators will conduct the actual study.
The volunteers for the actual study are selected through public calls for participation. Possible volunteers are young, healthy, and not affected by illness or deformation of the lumbar spine. The selected volunteers are screened by asking about their medical history. If included and willing to participate, the volunteers are invited to the study at Balgrist Campus and will be clinically examined regarding the lumbar spine. Furthermore, a low-dose CT scan, a handheld US scan, and a robot-assisted US scan are held.
The CT scans are manually segmented into 3D surface models to obtain a "segmentation ground truth". A novel machine learning algorithm automatically performs 3D reconstruction and segments the robot-assisted and handheld US scans.
The 3D US reconstructions are then utilized to identify pedicle screw trajectories through a novel method based on the posterior anatomical landmarks of lumbar vertebrae.
This single-center study combines the clinical and computer-science knowledge from the Research in Orthopedic Computer Science (ROCS) team of the University of Zurich, Switzerland, with the robotics and US application knowledge from the Faculty of Engineering of the University of Leuven, Belgium. The data collection is performed at Balgrist Campus.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Zurich, Switzerland, 8008
- University Hospital Balgrist, Balgrist Campus
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Oral and written informed consent from the volunteer
- Volunteers aged ≥18 y/o and ≤35 y/o
- BMI above or equal to 19 kg/m2 or below or equal to 25 kg/m2
- Proficient in German or English language
Exclusion Criteria:
- Documented volunteer refusal
- Volunteers in whom CT cannot be performed
- Positive pregnancy test prior to radiology (contraindication to CT)
- Pregnancy
- Chronic pain in the lumbar spine
- Moderate or severe deformity of the lumbar spine
Any prior intervention to the lumbar spine:
- Chiropractic adjustment therapy
- Injections such as local anesthetics and corticosteroids
- Surgery
- Fracture of the lumbar spine
- BMI below 19 kg/m2 or above 25 kg/m2
- Anatomies, such as subcutaneous fat or tendon, occlude the bony surface or do not allow a clear image in the US scan
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Other: Young, healthy volunteers
Total study time per volunteer: 3 Hours 20 minutes |
A standardized robot-assisted US-Scan of the vertebra L1 to the S1 is executed.
The two probe trajectories are generated automatically by an optical camera or RedGreenBlue-Depth (RGB-D) camera.
Then the robot will scan at two mm/s, automatically following the trajectory.
A 6 degrees of freedom (DoF) force sensor (Nano25, Ati Industrial Automation Inc.) was assembled at the US probe.
During the scanning, it measures the interaction force and torque between the US probe and volunteers' skin to ensure volunteer safety.
The US images and corresponding robot poses are recorded for the reconstruction.
A previously developed algorithm is used to obtain a preliminary 3D reconstruction that will be used to adapt the scanning pattern in case of incomplete scanning.
A handheld US-Scan of the vertebra L1 to S1 is executed.
An optical marker for an Atracsys Camera is mounted to the US probe to track its position.
Simultaneously, the optical tracking allows for standardization of the US-Scan through navigation.
The acquired US images and corresponding poses are used to reconstruct the lumbar spines and compared to the ground truth (CT scan).
Handheld US scanning will be performed at around two mm/s in two scanning trajectories.
The US probe orientation will be adjusted during the scanning by comparing the optical marker orientation with the initial probe orientation.
This combination leads to different scanning patterns.
For each pattern, the scanning procedure will be repeated three times.
At least once per volunteer, each handheld scanning pattern will be performed with a higher manual speed to assess the reconstruction quality with faster scanning.
A graphical user interface (GUI) will synchronize and store the data during the scanning.
A ULD CT scan (CT, Siemens Naeotom Alpha: A-207883-62) of the lumbar spine (L1-S1) is performed at the Swiss Center for Musculoskeletal Imaging (SCMI) at Balgrist Campus, Zurich.
The total duration estimate for the CT examination is 30 minutes, whereas the scan takes 15 minutes.
The volunteers lie on their abdomen during this procedure to simulate the spine's position during the subsequent US examination.
The vertebrae (L1-S1) in the CT Scans are manually segmented with global thresholding and the region growing tool in a standard segmentation software (Materialise Mimics, Leuven, Belgium).
The 3D surface models are then exported as Standard Triangle Language (STL) files.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Target registration errors between US reconstructions and ground truth CT data
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Evaluating the accuracy of the US reconstructions
|
Up to 1 year
|
Pedicle screw placement - Trajectory errors in terms of position
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Evaluating the positional accuracy of the Pedicle screw placement
|
Up to 1 year
|
Pedicle screw placement - Trajectory errors in terms of direction
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Evaluating the directional accuracy of the Pedicle screw placement
|
Up to 1 year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Gender
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks
|
female, male, non-binary, do not know, other
|
Up to 4 weeks
|
Age
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks
|
in years
|
Up to 4 weeks
|
Smoking status
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks
|
yes/no; if yes, pack years
|
Up to 4 weeks
|
BMI
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks
|
weight and height
|
Up to 4 weeks
|
Tegner activity score
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks
|
Subjective activity score of the volunteers
|
Up to 4 weeks
|
ODI Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks
|
Standardized Low Back Pain Disability Index
|
Up to 4 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Philipp Fürnstahl, PhD, Balgrist University Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- W1001
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Healthy
-
Prevent Age Resort "Pervaya Liniya"RecruitingHealthy Aging | Healthy Diet | Healthy LifestyleRussian Federation
-
Maastricht University Medical CenterCompletedHealthy Volunteers | Healthy Subjects | Healthy AdultsNetherlands
-
Yale UniversityNot yet recruitingHealth-related Benefits of Introducing Table Olives Into the Diet of Young Adults: Olives For HealthHealthy Diet | Healthy Lifestyle | Healthy Nutrition | CholesterolUnited States
-
Hasselt UniversityRecruitingHealthy | Healthy AgingBelgium
-
Galera Therapeutics, Inc.Syneos HealthCompleted
-
Galera Therapeutics, Inc.Syneos HealthCompletedHealthy | Healthy VolunteersAustralia
-
University of PennsylvaniaActive, not recruitingHealthy | Healthy AgingUnited States
-
Chalmers University of TechnologyGöteborg UniversityCompletedHealthy | Nutrition, HealthySweden
-
University of ManitobaNot yet recruitingHealthy | Healthy Diet
Clinical Trials on Robot-assisted US Scan of the vertebra L1 to S1
-
Guiyang Maternal and Child Health Care HospitalCompletedNurse-Patient RelationsChina
-
Rennes University HospitalNot yet recruitingHysterectomies for Low- or Intermediate-risk Endometrial CarcinomaFrance