Efficacy and Safety of Remote Ischemic Conditioning in the Treatment of Essential Hypertension (RICBP-EH)

February 26, 2024 updated by: Yi Yang

Efficacy and Safety of Remote Ischemic Conditioning in the Treatment of Essential Hypertension

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of remote ischemic conditioning in the treatment of essential hypertension.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Current studies have shown that remote ischemic conditioning can improve vascular endothelial function, inhibit sympathetic nervous system activity and regulate immune and inflammatory reactions. Thus it may exert anti-hypertensive effects through multiple mechanisms. The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of remote ischemic conditioning on blood pressure patients with essential hypertension.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

102

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Jilin
      • Changchun, Jilin, China, 130000
        • Recruiting
        • The first hospital of Jilin University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age≥18 years, regardless of sex;
  2. Patients with systolic blood pressure ≥140mmHg with or without taking oral antihypertensive drugs
  3. Signed and dated informed consent is obtained

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Secondary hypertension;
  2. Clinical blood pressure ≥ 180/110 mmHg or 24-hour mean arterial pressure ≥ 170/100 mmHg;
  3. Severe organ dysfunction or failure;
  4. Severe hematologic disorders or significant coagulation abnormalities;
  5. History of atrial fibrillation or myocardial infarction within 6 months;
  6. Individuals who had contraindication of remote ischemic conditioning, such as severe soft tissue injury, fracture or vascular injury in the upper limb, acute or subacute venous thrombosis, arterial occlusive disease, subclavian steal syndrome, etc;
  7. Individuals who will or have received anticoagulant therapy with drugs such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban, warfarin, etc; ;
  8. Pregnant or lactating women;
  9. Those who are participating in other clinical research or has participated in other clinical research or has participated in this study within 3 months prior to enrollment;
  10. Other conditions that the researchers think are not suitable for the project.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: RIC group
Patients are treated with remote ischemic conditioning (RIC).
Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is induced by 4 cycles of 5 min of upper limb ischemia followed by 5 min reperfusion. Limb ischemia was induced by inflation of a blood pressure cuff to 200 mm Hg.
Sham Comparator: Sham RIC group
Patients are treated with sham remote ischemic conditioning (sham-RIC).
Sham-RIC is induced by 4 cycles of 5 min of upper limb ischemia followed by 5 min reperfusion. Limb ischemia was induced by inflation of a blood pressure cuff to 60 mm Hg.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean systolic blood pressure
Time Frame: 1-7 days
Difference in mean systolic blood pressure during RIC/sham-RIC between two groups.
1-7 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean diastolic blood pressure
Time Frame: 1-7 days
Difference in mean diastolic blood pressure during RIC/sham-RIC between two groups.
1-7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 20, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 7, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 15, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 28, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RICBP-EH

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Essential Hypertension

Clinical Trials on Remote ischemic conditioning

3
Subscribe