Clinical Efficiency of Xanthan Hydrogels Containing Local Anesthetics Encapsulated in Nanostructured Lipid Carries

June 12, 2023 updated by: Michelle Franz Montan Braga Leite, DDS, MSc, PhD, University of Campinas, Brazil
In a crossover, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, 40 volunteers will receive the following formulations: hydrogels containing LAs (local anesthetic) - lidocaine and prilocaine (both at 2.5%) encapsulated in CLN (XAN-CLN) or not (XAN-CLN ), EMLA (topical anesthetic available on the market) and placebo hydrogel. The formulations will be applied for 2 minutes, bilaterally on the palatal mucosa (first premolar region), in two distinct sessions. Soon after removal of the topical formulation, an AL will be performed at the region using 0.3 mL of anesthetic solution at an injection speed of 1 mL/min. Pain resulting from needle insertion and LA injection will be measured using two visual analog scales (VAS).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Dental treatment presents numerous innovations, but the pain associated with the administration of local anesthesia (LA) continuous to be a traumatic procedure for many patients. Although we use topical anesthetics (TA) to reduce pain, the commercially available formulations are only effective in preventing the pain of the needle puncture.

This project aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of xanthan-based hydrogels (2%) containing LAs encapsulated in nanostructured lipid carriers (CLN), reducing pain during puncture and injection of LA in the palatine mucosa. In a crossover, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, 40 volunteers will receive the following formulations: hydrogels containing LAs - lidocaine and prilocaine (both at 2.5%) encapsulated in CLN (XAN-CLN) or not (XAN-CLN ), EMLA and placebo hydrogel. The formulations will be applied for 2 minutes, bilaterally on the palatal mucosa (first premolar region), in two distinct sessions. Soon after the removal of the topical formulation, an AL will be performed at the region using 0.3 mL of anesthetic solution at an injection speed of 1 mL/min. The computerized Morpheus® anesthetic injector will be used in order to control the variables of volume and injection speed. Pain resulting from needle insertion and LA injection will be measured using two visual analog scales (VAS). Hydrogels containing CLN are expected to have good mechanical properties and allow the permeation of LAs efficiently through the oral mucosal epithelium. In addition, they can improve the efficacy of topical anesthesia in order to perform a painless LA in the palatal mucosa.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • São Paulo
      • Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil, 13414903
        • Michelle Franz Montan Braga Leite

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy participants
  • No lesions in the study area
  • Have already been submitted to local anesthesia without intercurrence

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Used any drugs that change the pain sensibility 1 week before
  • Smokers
  • Alcoholic

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Topical anesthetic available on the market - Lidocaine (2.5%), Prilocaine (2.5%)

Applied at palatal mucosa (first premolar region), for 2 minutes. After that, this formulation will be removed.

100 mg.

The topical anesthetic, or topical formulation, was applied to the palatal mucosa for 2 minutes.
Other Names:
  • Topical Formulation
Placebo Comparator: Xanthan hydrogel 2%

Applied at palatal mucosa (first premolar region), for 2 minutes. After that, this formulation will be removed.

100 mg.

The topical anesthetic, or topical formulation, was applied to the palatal mucosa for 2 minutes.
Other Names:
  • Topical Formulation
Experimental: Xanthan hydrogel (2%), Lidocaine (2.5%), Prilocaine (2.5%) in NLC

Applied at palatal mucosa (first premolar region), for 2 minutes. After that, this formulation will be removed.

100 mg. Local Anesthetic encapsulated in nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC)

The topical anesthetic, or topical formulation, was applied to the palatal mucosa for 2 minutes.
Other Names:
  • Topical Formulation
Experimental: Xanthan hydrogel (2%), Lidocaine (2.5%), Prilocaine (2.5%)

Applied at palatal mucosa (first premolar region), for 2 minutes. After that, this formulation will be removed.

100 mg.

The topical anesthetic, or topical formulation, was applied to the palatal mucosa for 2 minutes.
Other Names:
  • Topical Formulation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain sensitivity assessment by Visual Analogue Scale after the puncture of the needle of the local anesthetic.
Time Frame: 2 minutes
The blind investigator evaluated the values obtained on VAS, with a rule, the left far end mean 0, for no pain at all and the right far end mean 100 for maximum pain. Therefore, a a higher score means a worse outcome.
2 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain sensitivity assessment by Visual Analogue Scale after the injection of the local anesthetic.
Time Frame: 2 minutes
The blind investigator evaluated the values obtained on VAS, with a rule, the left far end mean 0, for no pain at all and the right far end mean 100 for maximum pain. Therefore, a a higher score means a worse outcome.
2 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 2, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 20, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

May 3, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 25, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

June 22, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 22, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Local Anesthesia

Clinical Trials on Topical anesthetic

3
Subscribe