Feasibility of a Diabetes Specialist Nurse-led Smoking Cessation Intervention

March 9, 2024 updated by: Joseph Grech, University of Malta

Feasibility Assessment of a Diabetes Specialist Nurse-led Multi-component Smoking Cessation Intervention for Individuals Living With Diabetes

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a multi-component smoking cessation intervention for individuals living with diabetes which is delivered by diabetes specialist nurses. The main question it aims to answer is:

Is a diabetes specialist nurse-led multi-component smoking cessation intervention tailored for persons living with diabetes who smoke feasible and acceptable among the providers and the participants, the individuals with diabetes?

Eligible individuals living with diabetes who smoke will be asked to participate in a feasibility study lasting twelve weeks. The participants will be allocated at random either to the diabetes specialist nurse-led multi-component smoking cessation intervention, or to standard care - an active referral to the Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Directorate's one-to-one smoking cessation service. The multi-component smoking cessation intervention will be provided by the diabetes specialist nurses at the Diabetes Education Unit at Mater Dei Hospital. The Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Directorate's one-to-one smoking cessation service is provided by tobacco cessation facilitators within the health centres of Mosta, Floriana, and Paola. Both interventions will help participants re-consider their smoking habits and support them to quit smoking, free of charge.

Primarily the researchers will:

  • assess the feasibility of a largescale randomized controlled trial, by analyzing the recruitment and study uptake, and the nurses' perceived challenges and facilitators to implementation;
  • and assess the acceptability of the intervention, by analyzing the nurses' feedback and the participants' satisfaction with and perceived usefulness of the smoking cessation intervention provided, in comparison to the satisfaction with standard care - the Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Directorate's one-to-one smoking cessation service.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND

Smoking cessation is an important aspect of diabetes management. Smoking worsens the cardiometabolic parameters of both individuals with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, significantly increasing the risk of various macro- and micro-vascular complications, and even death. Smoking cessation is associated with improved cardiometabolic values and a reduced risk of cardiovascular complications. However, evidence suggests that people living with diabetes may less likely quit smoking when compared to those without diabetes.

While the need for providing tailored smoking cessation support for those who have diabetes has been emphasized, evidence-based smoking cessation recommendations for such individuals are lacking. In addition, the literature suggests that diabetes educators tend to focus on other aspects of diabetes management, rather than tobacco use. Diabetes educators have reported feeling inadequately prepared in discussing smoking cessation amongst individuals with diabetes lacking motivation and time to do so.

STUDY AIM AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this randomized controlled feasibility study is to establish the feasibility and acceptability of a diabetes specialist nurse-led smoking cessation intervention, based on evidence and theory, tailored for people living with diabetes.

The primary objectives are to:

  • assess the feasibility of a large-scale randomized controlled trial, by analyzing the recruitment and study uptake, and the nurses' perceived challenges and facilitators to implementation;
  • and assess the acceptability of the intervention, by analyzing the participants' satisfaction with and perceived usefulness of the smoking cessation support provided, and the nurses' feedback.

The secondary objectives are to:

  • compare the participants' satisfaction with and perceived usefulness of the smoking cessation support provided to standard care - the provision of general smoking cessation support;
  • undergo a preliminary process evaluation, by assessing whether the intervention was delivered as intended and exploring the intervention's functioning;
  • and determine the preliminary evidence of the intervention's effectiveness, by comparing the smoking cessation rates achieved in the intervention group to the control group (standard care).

METHODS

Design

An open-label, two-arm randomized controlled trial.

Participants

Participants (individuals with diabetes) will be recruited from the Diabetes Education Unit and the Diabetes and Endocrine Centre (MOP2) at Mater Dei Hospital in Malta. The diabetes specialist nurses at the Diabetes Education Unit and the diabetologists and health care professionals at MOP2 will be identifying attending smokers, recruiting those who are interested to the study. Posters and flyers will also be present at MOP2 so that participants can also self-refer to the study. For feasibility studies, 30 to 60 participants per group have been suggested. Given that the sample size decision must also take into consideration the resources required and the time available, this study aims to recruit between 80 to 100 participants in total over a 12 month-period.

Implementation and data collection methods

The Principal Investigator (PI) will screen all recruited patients to determine eligibility and obtain informed consent. Demographic data, the participants' perceived health status, their diabetes and smoking profiles, and reported feelings in the past week will be assessed using a questionnaire. Exhaled carbon monoxide will also be measured using the Bedfont piCO™ Smokerlyzer®. Participants will then be randomly allocated to the intervention or control arm on a 1:1 ratio using a computer-generated random block length, which will be concealed to the PI.

The participants assigned to the intervention group will receive a tailored smoking cessation intervention for individuals with diabetes based on evidence and theory and guided by the 5A's (Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist and Arrange) and 5R's (Relevance, Risks, Rewards, Roadblocks, and Repetition) framework for smoking cessation. This will consist of three to four (30-60 minutes) smoking cessation support sessions which will be provided by the two diabetes specialist nurses at the Diabetes Education Unit during the study period (12 weeks). As part of the first session, participants will also be shown three very brief video clips in which a person living with diabetes explains the serious health problems he suffered from (when smoking and having diabetes). Participants will also receive a six-week supply of Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) - nicotine patch and/or nicotine spray. Conversely, the participants who are assigned to the control group will be actively referred to the Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Directorate's one-to-one smoking cessation service which is provided by tobacco cessation facilitators at Mosta, Floriana, or Paola health centres. These participants will be provided with a number of smoking cessation sessions (20 minutes each) based on their needs, provided every fortnight during the 12-week study period.

To help capture fidelity, all the sessions provided by the diabetes specialist nurses will be audio-recorded with consent. The nurses, who will provide the experimental intervention, will also be asked to document the following information per participant:

  • the number (and duration) of the sessions provided (and the total time period [in weeks] during which the sessions were provided);
  • whether the participant opted not to see the informational video clips (with reasons);
  • whether the participant agreed to attempt to quit smoking (by setting a Target Quit Date, TQD) at their first session, (and subsequent session if still smoking), with reasons for not wanting to;
  • provision of the 5R's intervention at the first session;
  • non-attendance (and reasons);
  • the amount of NRT provided (and returned);
  • reported use of NRT (with reasons if a participant reports not using it) - including the total number of days of the nicotine patch and/or spray use (and the average use of the nicotine spray/day) during the first week following the TQD (and the subsequent TQD for those who agree to reattempt quitting), and in the next four weeks;
  • any problems encountered (such as side effects on using NRT, identified mental health issues, issues with managing diabetes, and any referrals, [including reasons for refusing support]).

The tobacco cessation officer at the Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Directorate will also be asked to take note of the number of sessions provided (including the total time period during which the sessions were provided) and any dropouts (with reasons).

At the end of the study period, all participants will be asked to fill in the end-of-study questionnaire (to assess smoking and measure abstinence, characterize the support utilized, and investigate the participants' satisfaction with and perceived usefulness of the smoking cessation intervention provided). For those who report quitting smoking (for at least seven days prior to assessment), biochemical verification of tobacco abstinence will be carried out by using the Bedfont piCO™ Smokerlyzer®, and analyzing a urine sample for cotinine exposure using a multilevel lateral flow immunoassays urine test strip with a nominal 200 ng/mL cutoff.

Semi-structured interviews will also be carried out with a sample (15-20) of the study intervention participants to obtain feedback on the study intervention and to explore their quit attempts. Semi-structured interviews will also be carried out with the two diabetes specialist nurses to obtain feedback on the study intervention and to explore the facilitators and challenges to implementation.

Data analysis

Recruitment - The average number of participants recruited per month and the total time period taken to recruit all participants will be calculated. Reasons for ineligibility or for not consenting to participate to the study will be noted. The number of eligible individuals who accept to participate in the study out of those who show interest will be calculated with 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs).

Study questionnaires - Quantitative data, collected at baseline and at the end of the study period, will be analyzed per study group using descriptive statistics. For categorical data, frequencies and proportions/percentages will be used. Continuous data will be summarised using mean and standard deviation, or median and range or interquartile range. Qualitative data will be summarised by following the Applied Thematic Analysis (ATA) approach. The questionnaires' response rate at 12 weeks follow-up, the participants' satisfaction with and perceived usefulness of the smoking cessation intervention provided, and the smoking cessation outcomes, will also be reported using 95% CIs. Intention-to-treat analysis will be used; smokers who can not be reached or are lost to follow-up will be considered non-quitters and non-reducers. The baseline characteristics of those followed up and those lost to follow-up will be compared descriptively.

Interviews - The audio-recorded interviews will be transcribed verbatim, anonymized, and analyzed using ATA.

To provide a further understanding of the acceptability of the study intervention and its functioning as experienced by the study participants (individuals with diabetes) the quantitative and qualitative data will be compared for confirming, disconfirming, or expanding each other.

Audio recording of the provision of the study intervention - To assess fidelity, a random sample (20%) from all the audio recordings of the sessions provided by each provider will be selected. By using a checklist that outlines the study algorithm's components, the occurrence or non-occurrence of these steps will be scored for calculating the level of adherence. Any deviations from the study protocol will also be taken note of.

Intervention log - The rate of compliance to the provided interventions, i.e. the attendance rate to the scheduled sessions, and the reported use of NRT (intervention group only) will be noted. The latter includes the average percentage of days the nicotine patch and/or spray were used (and the average use of the nicotine spray/day) during the first week following the TQD (and the subsequent TQD for those who agree to reattempt quitting), and in the next four weeks. Reasons for non-attendance/not using NRT will be noted. The number of participants who opt not to see the informational video clips and the number of participants who do not want to set a TQD at their first session (and the subsequent session if they report still smoking) will also be noted (with reasons). In terms of resources utilized, the proportion of participants from the intervention group who are provided with the 5R's intervention, the total and average number of sessions provided (in both groups) and the average time period over which these are provided will be calculated. The average time taken to deliver the sessions in the intervention group will also be calculated. In addition, the total and average amount of NRT which are provided (taking note of any returned items) will be calculated (intervention group). Proportions/rates and means with standard deviation will be reported using 95% CIs. Any problems (including reported adverse events) identified by the nurses (and referrals) will be quantified. Participants who refuse additional support will be noted (with reasons).

Ethical clearance for this study was sought from the Faculty of Health Sciences Research Ethics Committee on behalf of the University Research Ethics Committee (UREC FORM V_15062020 8618)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Imsida, Malta
        • Recruiting
        • Diabetes Education Unit, Mater Dei Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Living with type 1 or type 2 diabetes and attending the Diabetes Education Unit or the Diabetes and Endocrine Centre (MOP2) at Mater Dei Hospital on an outpatient basis
  • Having smoked ≥100 cigarettes during his/her entire life and currently smoking (having at least smoked one tobacco product over the past 7 days)
  • Being ≥ 18 years old
  • Speaking and understanding English or Maltese
  • Able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not being able to provide informed consent (due to dementia, a learning disability, or a psychological disorder)
  • Being pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Unable to independently attend to the Diabetes Education Unit and the Mosta, Floriana, or Paola health centres in Malta during the 12-week study period
  • Currently enrolled in another smoking cessation study/program or multi-behavioral program which also focuses on smoking cessation
  • Enrolment of the investigator or the research collaborators, and their family members

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
A diabetes specialist nurse-led multi-component smoking cessation intervention tailored for individuals with diabetes based on evidence and theory and guided by the 5A's and 5R's framework for smoking cessation The intervention consists of three to four (30-60 minutes) smoking cessation support sessions which are to be delivered by the two diabetes specialist nurses at the Diabetes Education Unit during the study period (12 weeks). As part of the first session, participants will also be shown three very brief video clips in which a person living with diabetes explains the serious health problems he suffered from (when smoking and having diabetes). Participants will also receive a six-week supply of Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) - nicotine patch and/or nicotine spray.

Aims to:

  • inform participants on the association between smoking and diabetic complications;
  • motivate and encourage smokers to quit;
  • support participants in using the appropriate behavioural skills to quit smoking and avoid relapse.

In the first session, the participants will be supported to set a Target Quit Date (TQD) within two weeks. Participants will be followed up within a week (or two weeks max.) from their TQD. Those who report having not smoked (for ≥24 hours from the time of assessment) will be provided with a final follow-up session within five weeks from their set TQD (three sessions in total). Conversely, those who report still smoking will be encouraged to set another TQD and will be seen again in one (or two weeks max.) and five weeks from their new TQD (four sessions in total). The participants will also receive a six-week supply of Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) nicotine patch and/or spray to use for a few days prior to their TQD and on quitting.

Active Comparator: Control
Active referral to the Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Directorate's one-to-one general stop-smoking service. This counseling service is provided every fortnight within Mosta, Floriana, or Paola health centres. The number of counseling sessions (lasting around 20 minutes each) provided during the study period (12 weeks) will be based on the client's needs.
A behavioral smoking cessation intervention based on motivational interviewing and delivered by trained tobacco cessation facilitators within community health centres. Participants will be provided with 20-minute counseling sessions based on their needs.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility (recruitment parameters) - consent rate
Time Frame: Baseline
The proportion of participants who consent to participate to the study out of the number of individuals who initially indicated an interest in participating and meet the eligibility criteria, including reasons for not consenting.
Baseline
Feasibility (recruitment parameters) - the total time period of recruitment
Time Frame: Baseline
Total time period (in months).
Baseline
Feasibility (participation compliance) - participation rate in both groups
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The proportion of participants who attend the scheduled sessions per group, with reasons for dropping out.
12 weeks
Feasibility (participation compliance) - reported use of Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) on the TQD in the intervention group
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The proportion of participants who report having used the nicotine patch and/or spray on their TQD (and on the subsequent TQD for continuing smokers), with reasons for not using it.
12 weeks
Feasibility (participation compliance) - average percentage of days of NRT use during the first week following the TQD in the intervention group
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The average percentage of days the nicotine patch and/or spray were used during the first week following the TQD (and the subsequent set TQD among continuing smokers).
12 weeks
Feasibility (participation compliance) - average use of the nicotine spray per day during the first week following the TQD in the intervention group
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The average number of times the nicotine spray was used per day during the first week following the TQD (and the subsequent TQD for continuing smokers).
12 weeks
Feasibility (participation compliance) - reported use of NRT during the final follow-up period in the intervention group
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The proportion of participants who report having used the nicotine patch and/or spray during their final follow-up period, with reasons for not using it.
12 weeks
Feasibility (participation compliance) - average percentage of days of NRT use during the final follow-up period in the intervention group
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The average percentage of days the nicotine patch and/or spray were used during the subsequent four weeks following one week from the TQD.
12 weeks
Feasibility (participation compliance) - average use of the nicotine spray per day during the final follow-up period in the intervention group
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The average number of times the nicotine spray was used per day during the subsequent four weeks following one week from the TQD.
12 weeks
Feasibility (resources utilized) - average number of sessions provided in both groups
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The average number of sessions provided per participant per group.
12 weeks
Feasibility (resources utilized) - average time period taken to provide smoking cessation support in both groups
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The average time period (in weeks) per participant per group during which smoking cessation support was provided.
12 weeks
Feasibility (resources utilized) - average time taken to deliver the sessions in the intervention group
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The average time (in minutes) taken to deliver the intervention sessions.
12 weeks
Feasibility (resources utilized) - provision of NRT in the intervention group
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The average amount of NRT provided per participant (taking note of any returned items).
12 weeks
Feasibility - response rate at 12 weeks follow-up
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The proportion of participants who attend their 12-week post-intervention evaluation session (in the intervention and control groups). Participants who drop out from the study or are lost to follow-up at 12 weeks will be noted (with reasons).
12 weeks
Feasibility - number of problems (including reported adverse events when using NRT) identified by the nurses (intervention providers) and number of referrals to additional support services (e.g. psychotherapist, diabetologist).
Time Frame: through study completion, estimated at 12 months
As logged by the nurses in carrying out the intervention. Participants who refuse additional support will be noted (with reasons).
through study completion, estimated at 12 months
Feasibility - nurses' (intervention providers) perceived challenges and facilitators to implementation (intervention group)
Time Frame: through study completion, estimated at 12 months
As identified when conducting interviews with the nurses.
through study completion, estimated at 12 months
Acceptability - intervention group participants' satisfaction with the intervention provided (quantitative assessment)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
By analyzing the results from the self-developed satisfaction questionnaire.
12 weeks
Acceptability - intervention group participants' satisfaction with the intervention provided (qualitative assessment)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
As identified when conducting interviews with the participants.
12 weeks
Acceptability - intervention group participants' perceived usefulness of the intervention provided (quantitative assessment)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
By analyzing the results from the self-developed perceived usefulness questionnaire.
12 weeks
Acceptability - intervention group participants' perceived usefulness of the intervention provided (qualitative assessment)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
As identified when conducting interviews with the participants.
12 weeks
Acceptability - nurses' (intervention providers) satisfaction with the intervention
Time Frame: through study completion, estimated at 12 months
As identified when conducting interviews with the nurses.
through study completion, estimated at 12 months
Feasibility (recruitment parameters) - recruitment rate
Time Frame: Baseline
The average number of eligible participants recruited per month.
Baseline
Feasibility (recruitment parameters) - the proportion of eligible smokers who indicate an interest in participating in the study from each source of recruitment
Time Frame: Baseline
Sources of recruitment include: the diabetes education unit and the diabetes and endocrine centre [(MOP2) and self-referral (from posters and flyers present at the diabetes out-patients department).
Baseline
Feasibility (participation compliance) - the proportion/number of participants from the intervention group who opt not to see the informational video clips
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The proportion/number of participants from the intervention group who opt not to see the informational video clips at their first session, with reasons.
12 weeks
Feasibility (participation compliance) - the proportion/number of participants from the intervention group who opt not to set a Target Quit Date (TQD)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The proportion/number of participants from the intervention group who opt not to set a TQD at their first session, with reasons.
12 weeks
Feasibility (participation compliance) - the proportion/number of continuing smokers from the intervention group who opt not to set a subsequent TQD
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The proportion/number of continuing smokers from the intervention group who opt not to set a subsequent TQD at their second session, with reasons.
12 weeks
Feasibility (resources utilized) - provision of the 5R's intervention in the intervention group
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The proportion/number of participants from the intervention group who were provided with the 5R's intervention.
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Group comparison of the satisfaction with the intervention provided
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Group comparison of the participants' satisfaction with the smoking cessation support provided as measured by the self-developed satisfaction questionnaire.
12 weeks
Group comparison of the perceived usefulness of the intervention provided
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Group comparison of the results obtained from the self-developed questionnaire on the perceived usefulness of the smoking cessation intervention provided.
12 weeks
Preliminary process evaluation - intervention fidelity (intervention group)
Time Frame: through study completion, estimated at 12 months
A random sample (20%) from all the audio recordings of the sessions provided by each provider will be selected. By using a checklist that outlines the study algorithm's components, the occurrence or non-occurrence of these steps will be scored for calculating the level of adherence. Any deviations from the study protocol will also be taken note of.
through study completion, estimated at 12 months
Preliminary process evaluation - exploring the intervention's functioning (intervention group)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
As identified when conducting interviews with the participants.
12 weeks
Preliminary evidence of effectiveness - quit episode
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Proportion of participants reporting a quit episode (intentionally have spent ≥24 hours not smoking or using smokeless/alternative products, e.g. electronic cigarettes) during the study period.
12 weeks
Preliminary evidence of effectiveness - floating abstinence
Time Frame: 12 weeks
A reported 7-day point prevalence abstinence (from combustible tobacco products, smokeless tobacco products, and alternative products) at any time during the study period.
12 weeks
Preliminary evidence of effectiveness - change in average number of cigarettes smoked per day
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The change in the average number of cigarettes smoked per day (amongst continuing smokers) per group at follow-up.
12 weeks
Preliminary evidence of effectiveness - point prevalence smoking abstinence at follow-up
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The 7-day point prevalence abstinence (from combustible tobacco products, smokeless tobacco products, and alternative products) at follow-up, validated by measuring exhaled Carbon Monoxide (eCO) and additionally confirmed by using a multilevel lateral flow immunoassays urine test strip with a nominal 200 ng/mL cutoff for cotinine levels.
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Joseph Grech, PhD student, University of Malta

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 31, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 15, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

June 27, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus

Clinical Trials on Diabetes specialist nurse-led multi-component smoking cessation intervention

3
Subscribe