Effects of Kinesio Taping vs Jones Technique on Myofascial Trigger Points in Cervicalgia.

June 30, 2023 updated by: Blanca González Sanchez

Effects of Kinesio Taping vs Jones Technique on Myofascial Trigger Points in Cervicalgia: a Pilot Study of a Randomised Control Trial.

A large number of workers in different sectors suffer from musculoskeletal neck disorders, which are the most common work-related illness in Europe. A multitude of combinations of techniques can be used to treat these conditions, including recorded film and the Jones technique. This pilot study examines the efficacy of Kinesio taping and the Jones technique in improving pain, joint range of motion and muscle tension in active subjects with latent myofascial trigger points. A clinical trial was conducted with 38 patients with neck pain. The sample was randomly distributed into three groups: a Jones technique group, a kinesio taping group and a combined therapy group in which both techniques were performed. The duration of treatment was 4 weeks, with a follow-up of 2 weeks. Cervical spine joint range of motion, pain and functional disability were assessed with the goniometer, the visual analogue scale, the pressure algometer and the cervical disability index.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

38

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of latent PGM in the upper trapezius
  • Have been working for more than 6 months in the center or company
  • Work more than 4 hours a day with the computer
  • Be over 18 years of age and under 64 years of age

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of fibromyalgia
  • Having suffered a cervical sprain
  • Diagnosis of radiculopathy, cervical spine surgery
  • Medical contraindications to neuromuscular bandaging or Jones technique
  • Diseases such as diabetes and cancer, pregnancy, and any other pathology that produces neck pain other than that specified in the objective of the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Jones technique group
Performs Jones technique 12 participants.
is a gentle soft tissue manipulation consisting of a passive procedure that positions the body in a position of comfort to release tissue that compresses or shortens the body structure (muscle contraction and joint dysfunction)
Experimental: kinesio tapping group
Performs kinesiotape 14 participants.
KT has an S-shaped glue, which lifts the skin, thus improving blood and lymphatic circulation, with the intention of relieving pain and improving musculoskeletal diseases especially in sports
Experimental: combined therapy group
Performs Jones technique and kinesiotape 12 participants.
is a gentle soft tissue manipulation consisting of a passive procedure that positions the body in a position of comfort to release tissue that compresses or shortens the body structure (muscle contraction and joint dysfunction)
KT has an S-shaped glue, which lifts the skin, thus improving blood and lymphatic circulation, with the intention of relieving pain and improving musculoskeletal diseases especially in sports

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline VAS at 4 weeks of treatment and at the 2-week follow-up
Time Frame: time 0, after 4 weeks of treatment, and at the 2-week follow-up
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), consisting of a 10 cm line representing the continuous spectrum of painful experience. Only at the ends appear descriptions, "no pain" at one end and "worst pain imaginable" at the other, with no other description along the line. The subject will subjectively estimate his or her level of pain by indicating it on the ruler
time 0, after 4 weeks of treatment, and at the 2-week follow-up
Change from Baseline UDP at 4 weeks of treatment and at the 2-week follow-up
Time Frame: time 0, after 4 weeks of treatment, and at the 2-week follow-up
Measurement of the pressure pain threshold (UDP) This is performed using a pressure algometer that aims to objectify the ability of muscle fibers to adapt to compression on underlying planes
time 0, after 4 weeks of treatment, and at the 2-week follow-up
Change from Baseline NDI at 4 weeks of treatment and at the 2-week follow-up
Time Frame: time 0, after 4 weeks of treatment, and at the 2-week follow-up
Neck Disability Index (NDI), a questionnaire for self-assessment of function and activity disability in patients with neck pain. It consists of 10 items referring to functional activities, pain intensity, concentration and headache. The maximum score is 50 points, so that the higher the score the worse the function
time 0, after 4 weeks of treatment, and at the 2-week follow-up
Change from Baseline GONIOMETER at 4 weeks of treatment and at the 2-week follow-up
Time Frame: time 0, after 4 weeks of treatment, and at the 2-week follow-up
Goniometer, instrument used for the study of joint mobility (MA). Cervical flexion, right and left lateralizations, and right and left rotations were evaluated. Each measurement was made three times with a separation of 30 seconds in time, taking the average between the three measurements.
time 0, after 4 weeks of treatment, and at the 2-week follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 10, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 01/2015

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cervicalgia

Clinical Trials on Jones technique

3
Subscribe