Feasibility of Dynamic Muscle Stimulation + Radiofrequency for Improving Blink Quality in Subjects With Dry Eye Disease

January 21, 2024 updated by: Lumenis Be Ltd.

Feasibility of Dynamic Muscle Stimulation (DMSt) Combined With Radiofrequency (RF) for Improving Blink Quality in Subjects With Dry Eye Disease (DED)

To demonstrate that DMSt + RF improves eye blink quality in subjects with dry eye disease

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of the study is to demonstrate that a combination of DMSt and RF applied on the periocular skin below the lower eyelids improves eye blink quality in subjects with moderate to severe signs and symptoms of dry eye disease.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject is able to read, understand and sign an Informed Consent Form (ICF)
  • 22 or older
  • Lower lid laxity, as clinically judged with lower lid DT and the snapback test
  • Moderate to severe OSDI (larger or equal to 23)
  • TBUT smaller or equal to 5 sec in both eyes

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Abnormally high blink rate, as estimated by the study investigator
  • Any ocular surgery or eyelid surgery, within 3 months prior to screening
  • Blepharoptosis
  • Moderate or Severe Floppy Lid Syndrome
  • Corneal Dystrophy
  • Exophthalmos
  • Thyroid Eye Disease
  • Ocular Chemical Injury or burn
  • Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency
  • Facial Nerve Palsy
  • Blepharospasm
  • Hemifacial Spasm
  • Corneal neuropathy
  • Pregnant or nursing women
  • Participation in a different study
  • Any condition revealed whereby the study investigator deems the subject inappropriate for this study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: TriLift
Combination of Dynamic Muscle Stimulation and Radiofrequency
Dynamic Muscle Stimulation combined with tripolar Radiofrequency, administered on the skin of the inferior orbital rim and below the lower eyelids

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Impaired blink quality
Time Frame: 7 weeks after baseline (4 weeks after the 4th treatment)
binary (yes/no) variable, based on clinical estimation of the study investigator who will use a combination of two complementary tests (the lower lid distraction test and the snap-back test) to reach a yes/no decision.
7 weeks after baseline (4 weeks after the 4th treatment)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Eyelid appearance
Time Frame: 7 weeks after baseline (4 weeks after the 4th treatment)
Biomicroscopy with the slit lamp; normal, mild, moderate, severe
7 weeks after baseline (4 weeks after the 4th treatment)
Overall blink quality
Time Frame: 7 weeks after baseline (4 weeks after the 4th treatment)
Subjectively assessed by the study investigator; normal, mildly impaired, moderately impaired, severely impaired
7 weeks after baseline (4 weeks after the 4th treatment)
Margin to Reflex Distances MRD1 and MRD2
Time Frame: 7 weeks after baseline (4 weeks after the 4th treatment)
Distances from the margins of the upper and lower lids to the central corneal reflex, in millimeters
7 weeks after baseline (4 weeks after the 4th treatment)
modified Meibomian Gland Score
Time Frame: 7 weeks after baseline (4 weeks after the 4th treatment)
15 meibomian glands along the lower lid (5 nasal + 5 central + 5 temporal) will be gently expressed with the dedicated expression forceps. Each gland will be scored 0 to 3, as follows: 0 = clear liquid meibum; 1 = cloudy liquid meibum; 2 = inspissated meibum; 3 = blocked). The modified Meibomian Gland score will be evaluated as the sum of scores for these 15 glands. Hence, the minimal value is 0 (all 15 glands express a clear liquid meibum), and the maximal value is 45 (all 15 glands are blocked). A decrease in the modiified Meibomian Gland Score means that the functionality of meibomian glands improved, and that the condition of the patient improved.
7 weeks after baseline (4 weeks after the 4th treatment)
Ocular Surface Disease Index
Time Frame: 7 weeks after baseline (4 weeks after the 4th treatment)
Symptoms will be self-evaluated with the Ocular Surface Disease Index questionnaire. Twelve (12) questions will be asked about visual difficulties experienced by the subject during the past week. Each question will be scored 0 (none of the time), 1 (some of the time), 2 (half of the time), 3 (most of the time) or 4 (all the time). The Ocular Surface Disease Index will be calculated as the sum of scores times 25, divided by the number of questions answered. An increase in the Ocular Surface Disease Index means that the symptoms are reduced and that the condition of the patient improved.
7 weeks after baseline (4 weeks after the 4th treatment)
Corneal sensitivity
Time Frame: 7 weeks after baseline (4 weeks after the 4th treatment)
Measured with an esthesiometer; device settings: 1 to 6
7 weeks after baseline (4 weeks after the 4th treatment)
Blink rate
Time Frame: 7 weeks after baseline (4 weeks after the 4th treatment)
Blinks per minute during a video-watching task
7 weeks after baseline (4 weeks after the 4th treatment)
Degree of eyelid closure
Time Frame: 7 weeks after baseline (4 weeks after the 4th treatment)
full, or maximal vertical height of the palpebral fissure measured in mm
7 weeks after baseline (4 weeks after the 4th treatment)
Teat Breakup time
Time Frame: 7 weeks after baseline (4 weeks after the 4th treatment)
Time between full blink and first appearance of a break in a fluorescein-stained eye
7 weeks after baseline (4 weeks after the 4th treatment)
Adverse events
Time Frame: Throughout the study and up to 7 weeks after baseline (4 weeks after the 4th treatment)
Incidence and type of adverse events
Throughout the study and up to 7 weeks after baseline (4 weeks after the 4th treatment)
BCVA
Time Frame: At baseline, at 1 week after baseline (immediately before the second treatment), at 2 weeks after baseline (immediately before the third treatment), at 3 weeks after baseline (immediately before the fourth treatment) and at 7 weeks after baseline
Best-corrected visual acuity, using an ETDRS chart (20/20, 20/25, 20/32,20/40,20/50,20/63, 20/80, 20/100, 20/200, 20/400, where 20/20 is considered perfect vision and 20/400 is considered legal blindness)
At baseline, at 1 week after baseline (immediately before the second treatment), at 2 weeks after baseline (immediately before the third treatment), at 3 weeks after baseline (immediately before the fourth treatment) and at 7 weeks after baseline
Pain/Discomfort
Time Frame: Immediately after a treatment session
Pain.discomfort will be self-reported with a visual analog scale (0 to 100), with 0 representing no pain/discomfort and 100 representing intolerable pain/discomfort. A decrease in this visual analog score represents an improvement in the perception of pain/discomfort.
Immediately after a treatment session

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: James G Chelnis, MD, Manhattan Face and Eye

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 15, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 15, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 22, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 14, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 21, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dry Eye

Clinical Trials on TriLift device

3
Subscribe