Examining Lateralized Aspects of Motor Control Using Non-invasive Neural Stimulation

March 19, 2024 updated by: Virginia Commonwealth University
Motor adaptation and generalization are believed to occur via the integration of various forms of sensory feedback for a congruent representation of the body's position in space along with estimation of inertial properties of the limb segments for accurate specification of movement. Thus, motor adaptation is often studied within curated environments incorporating a "mis-match" between different sensory systems (i.e. a visual field shift via prism googles or a visuomotor rotation via virtual reality environment) and observing how motor plans change based on this mis-match. However, these adaptations are environment-specific and show little generalization outside of their restricted experimental setup. There remains a need for motor adaptation research that demonstrates motor learning that generalizes to other environments and movement types. This work could then inform physical and occupational therapy neurorehabilitation interventions targeted at addressing motor deficits.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Voluntary movement and sensory perception are fundamental aspects of the human experience. Senses such as visual and proprioceptive feedback inform movement by continuously providing the central nervous system with information on limb location, movement error, and task performance. However, the specific mechanisms behind how different forms of sensory information are used to adapt and generalize movement remain poorly understood.

Motor adaptation, or the modification of movement based on error feedback (Martin et al., 1996), is often elicited during rehabilitation but must be generalized to functional performance, such as activities of daily living, in order to successfully rehabilitate motor deficits following stroke. Motor adaptation and generalization are believed to occur via the integration of various forms of sensory feedback for a congruent representation of the body's position in space along with estimation of inertial properties of the limb segments for accurate specification of movement. Thus, motor adaptation is often studied within curated environments incorporating a "mis-match" between different sensory systems (i.e. a visual field shift via prism googles or a visuomotor rotation via virtual reality environment) and observing how motor plans change based on this mis-match. However, these adaptations are environment-specific and show little generalization outside of their restricted experimental setup. There remains a need for motor adaptation research that demonstrates motor learning that generalizes to other environments and movement types. This work could then inform physical and occupational therapy neurorehabilitation interventions targeted at addressing motor deficits.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Brooke Dexheimer, PhD, OTD, OTR/L
  • Phone Number: 563-547-0125
  • Email: dexheimerb@vcu.edu

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Right-handed as determined by the short-form Edinburgh Handedness Inventory
  • Between the ages of 18 and 40

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Mixed- or left-handed as determined by the short-form Edinburgh Handedness Inventory
  • Self-reported history of any of the following:

Seizure and/or diagnosis of epilepsy Fainting spells Concussion with loss of consciousness Ringing in the ears (tinnitus) Cochlear implants Migraines Diagnosed psychological or neurological condition Metal in the scalp

  • Any previous adverse reaction to a brain stimulation technique
  • Any previous adverse reaction to 3D virtual reality environments (i.e. 'cybersickness')
  • Possibility of being currently pregnant (for females only)
  • Current open head wound or skin condition of the scalp
  • Current implanted device(s) (i.e. cardiac pacemaker)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Posterior parietal cortex group
Posterior parietal cortex group, which will receive the stimulation to their left posterior parietal cortex
By comparing motor adaptation reaching performance between these three groups, the investigators can examine how stimulation to each specific area of the brain modulates different aspects of motor adaptation
Experimental: Cerebellum group
Cerebellum group, which will receive stimulation to their right cerebellum,
By comparing motor adaptation reaching performance between these three groups, the investigators can examine how stimulation to each specific area of the brain modulates different aspects of motor adaptation
Sham Comparator: Sham group
Sham group, which will have the electrode cap placed on their head but receive no stimulation
By comparing motor adaptation reaching performance between these three groups, the investigators can examine how stimulation to each specific area of the brain modulates different aspects of motor adaptation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Initial direction error, or difference between participant's fingertip direction
Time Frame: Completion of the study visit, approx 20 minutes
Initial direction error, or difference between participant's fingertip direction at the timepoint of peak velocity relative to a linear path to the target. As for time frame, this is a single-visit study. Initial direction error will be compared during baseline reaching and following 20 minutes of non-invasive neural stimulation.
Completion of the study visit, approx 20 minutes
Initial direction error variance
Time Frame: Completion of the study visit, approx 20 minutes
Initial direction error variance across multiple trials.
Completion of the study visit, approx 20 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Final position error
Time Frame: Completion of the study visit, approx 20 min
Secondary outcome: final position error, or distance from participant's fingertip position at the conclusion of the reach to the center of the target. Similar to above, this measure will be compared during baseline and following 20 minutes of stimulation.
Completion of the study visit, approx 20 min
Final position error variance across multiple trials.
Time Frame: Completion of the study visit, approx 20 min
Final position error variance across multiple trials.
Completion of the study visit, approx 20 min
Deviation from linearity
Time Frame: Completion of the study visit, approx 20 min
Deviation from linearity, or a ratio of minimum and maximum displacement across the parallel and perpendicular planes of the reaching movement.
Completion of the study visit, approx 20 min
Peak tangential velocity
Time Frame: Completion of the study visit, approx 20 min
Peak tangential velocity, or highest tangential velocity reached during reach.
Completion of the study visit, approx 20 min

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 15, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 15, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 30, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 7, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 17, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 21, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HM20025761

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cerebellum

Clinical Trials on Comparing motor adaptation reaching performance

3
Subscribe