- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05956002
A Study to Evaluate the Study Medication (Etrasimod) When Mixed With Food in Healthy Participants
A PHASE 1, OPEN-LABEL, RANDOMIZED, SINGLE DOSE, CROSSOVER STUDY TO ESTIMATE THE RELATIVE BIOAVAILABILITY OF ETRASIMOD (PF-07915503) MINI TABLETS IN WATER AND 3 FOOD VEHICLES COMPARED TO THE ETRASIMOD (PF-07915503) CLINICAL IR TABLETS UNDER FASTED CONDITIONS, AND TO EVALUATE MINI TABLET PALATABILITY IN HEALTHY ADULT PARTICIPANTS
The purpose of this study is to compare how healthy adults process Etrasimod when taken in different forms. One form is Etrasimod taken without food. The other form is Etrasimod mixed with water and 3 different foods. The types of food used are applesauce, chocolate pudding or yogurt.
The study is seeking participants who are:
- Aged 18 or older
- Male or female who are healthy as determined by medical assessment
- Body-mass index (BMI) of 16 to 32, and a total body weight > 50kg.
The study will take up to 2.5 months, including the screening period. Participants will have to stay at the study clinic for at least 45 days. This includes 5 study periods in total.
Participants will take Etrasimod as a tablet by mouth without food. Participants will also take Etrasimod sprinkled in soft food or water. Blood samples will be taken both before and after participants take Etrasimod. Participants will also answer questions for taste assessment purposes. A follow-up phone call will be made 20 to 27 days after the last study period.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Bruxelles-capitale, Région DE
-
Brussels, Bruxelles-capitale, Région DE, Belgium, B-1070
- Pfizer Clinical Research Unit - Brussels
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Healthy participants
- BMI 16 to 32 kg/m2
- body weight more than 50kg
Exclusion Criteria:
- Ongoing or past history of significant medical conditions
- Eye disorders such as macular edema or uveitis
- Ongoing or recent infections
- Use of prescription or non prescription medications within 7 days of first dose
- Smoking or using nicotine products equivalent to more than 5 cigarettes per day
- History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Basic Science
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Sequence 1
Single oral dose of etrasimod 2 mg clinical IR tablet under fasted conditions (Reference) followed by single oral dose of etrasimod 2 mg mini tablets mixed with applesauce under fasted conditions (Test 1) followed by single oral dose of etrasimod 2 mg mini tablets mixed with chocolate pudding under fasted conditions (Test 2) followed by single oral dose of etrasimod 2 mg mini tablets mixed with water under fasted conditions (Test 3) followed by single oral dose of etrasimod 2 mg mini tablets mixed with yogurt under fasted conditions (Test 4)
|
an immediate release tablet
very small tablet mixed in water
very small tablet mixed in chocolate pudding
Very small tablet mixed in yogurt
Very small tablet mixed in applesauce
|
|
Experimental: Sequence 2
Single oral dose of etrasimod 2 mg mini tablets mixed with applesauce under fasted conditions (Test 1) followed by single oral dose of etrasimod 2 mg mini tablets mixed with water under fasted conditions (Test 3) followed by single oral dose of etrasimod 2 mg clinical IR tablet under fasted conditions (Reference) followed by single oral dose of etrasimod 2 mg mini tablets mixed with chocolate pudding under fasted conditions (Test 2) followed by single oral dose of etrasimod 2 mg mini tablets mixed with yogurt under fasted conditions (Test 4)
|
an immediate release tablet
very small tablet mixed in water
very small tablet mixed in chocolate pudding
Very small tablet mixed in yogurt
Very small tablet mixed in applesauce
|
|
Experimental: Sequence 3
Single oral dose of etrasimod 2 mg mini tablets mixed with chocolate pudding under fasted conditions (Test 2).
Followed by single oral dose of etrasimod 2 mg clinical IR tablet under fasted conditions (Reference).followed
by single oral dose of etrasimod 2 mg mini tablets mixed with water under fasted conditions (Test 3).
Followed by single oral dose of etrasimod 2 mg mini tablets mixed with applesauce under fasted conditions (Test 1) Followed by single oral dose of etrasimod 2 mg mini tablets mixed with yogurt under fasted conditions (Test 4)
|
an immediate release tablet
very small tablet mixed in water
very small tablet mixed in chocolate pudding
Very small tablet mixed in yogurt
Very small tablet mixed in applesauce
|
|
Experimental: Sequence 4
Single oral dose of etrasimod 2 mg mini tablets mixed with water under fasted conditions (Test 3).
Followed by single oral dose of etrasimod 2 mg mini tablets mixed with chocolate pudding under fasted conditions (Test 2).
Followed by single oral dose of etrasimod 2 mg mini tablets mixed with applesauce under fasted conditions (Test 1).
Followed by single oral dose of etrasimod 2 mg clinical IR tablet under fasted conditions (Reference).
Followed by single oral dose of etrasimod 2 mg mini tablets mixed with yogurt under fasted conditions (Test 4)
|
an immediate release tablet
very small tablet mixed in water
very small tablet mixed in chocolate pudding
Very small tablet mixed in yogurt
Very small tablet mixed in applesauce
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of Etrasimod
Time Frame: At pre-dose and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of each period
|
AUClast was calculated using linear/log trapezoidal method.
|
At pre-dose and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of each period
|
|
Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinity (AUCinf) of Etrasimod
Time Frame: At pre-dose and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of each period
|
AUCinf was calculated as AUClast + (Clast*/kel), where Clast is the predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point from the log-linear regression analysis, and kel is the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the loglinear concentration-time curve.
|
At pre-dose and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of each period
|
|
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Etrasimod
Time Frame: At pre-dose and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of each period
|
At pre-dose and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of each period
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 24 Hours on Day 1
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 24 hours post dose on Day 1
|
Heart rate was measured in beats per minute.
|
Baseline, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 24 hours post dose on Day 1
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time Frame: From start of study treatment up to 28-35 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum up to 72 days)
|
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention.
TEAEs were any AEs that occurred following start of treatment.
A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose, met one or more of the criteria: resulted in death, life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect.
AEs included SAEs and all non-SAEs.
|
From start of study treatment up to 28-35 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum up to 72 days)
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities
Time Frame: Up to Day 45
|
Clinical laboratory abnormalities test criteria included haematology: lymphocytes (10^3/ mm^3) and lymphocytes/leukocytes percentage (%) less than (<) 0.8* lower limit of normal (LLN), neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes (10^3/mm^3), eosinophils/leukocytes monocytes/leukocytes (%) more than (>) 1.2* upper limit of normal (ULN); clinical chemistry: bicarbonate milliequivalents per liter (mEq/L) > 1.1* ULN; Urinalysis: urine hemoglobin, nitrite, leukocyte esterase greater than or equal to (>=) 1 and squamous epithelial cells /low power field (/LPF) > 4. Number of participants meeting any clinical laboratory abnormalities criteria is reported in this outcome measure.
|
Up to Day 45
|
|
Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Results
Time Frame: Up to Day 45
|
Supine blood pressure (SBP) and pulse rate (PR) were measured.
Vital sign criteria included: Systolic BP: <90 millimeter of mercury [mmHg]; Systolic BP change from baseline: maximum increase and decrease >=30 mmHg; Diastolic BP < 50 mmHg; Diastolic BP change from baseline: maximum decrease and increase >=20 mmHg; pulse rate <40 and >120 beats per minute.
|
Up to Day 45
|
|
Number of Participants According to Categorization of Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Findings
Time Frame: Up to Day 45
|
Standard 12-lead ECGs were used to measure PR interval, QT interval, QTc corrected using Fridericia's formula (QTcF), and QRS complex.
ECG abnormalities were categorized as: QTcF interval, aggregate (milliseconds [msec]) 450 < Value <= 480, 480 < value <= 500, value > 500; 30 <= Change <= 60; Change > 60.
Participants with any ECG abnormality criteria were reported in this outcome measure.
|
Up to Day 45
|
|
Assessment of Mouth Feel Based on Palatability Questionnaire
Time Frame: At 1, 5, 10 and 20 minutes after tasting dose in each vehicle on Day 1 of each period
|
Participants were required to answer mouth feel (such as grittiness, stickiness, waxiness) of the product tasted.
The score ranged from 0 (favorable) to 100 (not favorable), where higher scores indicated worse mouth feel.
|
At 1, 5, 10 and 20 minutes after tasting dose in each vehicle on Day 1 of each period
|
|
Assessment of Bitterness Based on Palatability Questionnaire
Time Frame: At 1, 5, 10 and 20 minutes after tasting dose in each vehicle on Day 1 of each period
|
Participants were required to tell about the degree of bitterness of the product tasted.
The score ranged from 0 (favorable) to 100 (not favorable), where higher scores indicated worse bitterness.
|
At 1, 5, 10 and 20 minutes after tasting dose in each vehicle on Day 1 of each period
|
|
Assessment of Tongue/Mouth Burns Based on Palatability Questionnaire
Time Frame: At 1, 5, 10 and 20 minutes after tasting dose in each vehicle on Day 1 of each period
|
Participants were required to tell about the degree of palatability attribute of tongue/mouth burns of the product tasted.
The score ranged from 0 (favorable) to 100 (not favorable), where higher scores indicated more tongue/mouth burns.
|
At 1, 5, 10 and 20 minutes after tasting dose in each vehicle on Day 1 of each period
|
|
Assessment of Likeness of Throat Burn Based on Palatability Questionnaire
Time Frame: At 1, 5, 10 and 20 minutes after tasting dose in each vehicle on Day 1 of each period
|
Participants were required to tell the palatability attribute of throat burn of the product tasted.
The score ranged from 0 (favorable) to 100 (not favorable), where higher scores indicated more throat burn.
|
At 1, 5, 10 and 20 minutes after tasting dose in each vehicle on Day 1 of each period
|
|
Assessment of Overall Liking Based on Palatability Questionnaire
Time Frame: At 1, 5, 10 and 20 minutes after tasting dose in each vehicle on Day 1 of each period
|
Participants were required to tell the palatability attribute of overall liking of the product tasted.
The score ranged from 0 (favorable) to 100 (not favorable), where higher scores indicated less overall liking.
|
At 1, 5, 10 and 20 minutes after tasting dose in each vehicle on Day 1 of each period
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Pfizer
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- C5041034
- 2023-504411-32-00 (Registry Identifier: CTIS (EU))
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Healthy Participants
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Not yet recruitingHealthy Participants | Healthy Adult ParticipantsUnited States
-
University of PalermoCompletedHealthy Participants | Healthy Adult Participants | Healthy Young AdultsItaly
-
Touro University, CaliforniaNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)RecruitingHealthy Participants | Obese But Otherwise Healthy ParticipantsUnited States
-
Beijing Tide Pharmaceutical Co., LtdRecruitingHealthy | Healthy ParticipantsChina
-
Aston UniversityCooperVision, Inc.Enrolling by invitationHealthy | Healthy ParticipantsUnited Kingdom
-
Universidad San SebastiánAgencia Nacional de Investigación y DesarrolloNot yet recruitingHealthy | Healthy Adult ParticipantsChile
-
Standard Process Inc.Recruiting
-
PfizerCompletedHealthy Subjects | Healthy ParticipantsUnited States
-
Simcere Pharmaceutical Co., LtdNot yet recruiting
-
Fresenius KabiOxford Brookes UniversityNot yet recruiting
Clinical Trials on Estraimod Immediate Release (IR)
-
PfizerCompletedHealthy ParticipantsBelgium
-
BayerCompletedRenal Impairment | Chronic Kidney Disease | Healthy VolunteersGermany
-
Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Completed
-
AstraZenecaWithdrawnHealthy Male Subjects | Pharmacokinetics | Safety | Food EffectUnited Kingdom
-
Elcelyx Therapeutics, Inc.CompletedType 2 Diabetes MellitusUnited States
-
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development...Grünenthal GmbHCompleted
-
Hangzhou Highlightll Pharmaceutical Co., LtdCompleted
-
Arbor Pharmaceuticals, Inc.CompletedAbuse PotentialUnited States
-
GlaxoSmithKlineQuotient ClinicalCompletedAutoimmune DiseasesUnited Kingdom