A Study to Evaluate the Study Medication (Etrasimod) When Mixed With Food in Healthy Participants

February 7, 2025 updated by: Pfizer

A PHASE 1, OPEN-LABEL, RANDOMIZED, SINGLE DOSE, CROSSOVER STUDY TO ESTIMATE THE RELATIVE BIOAVAILABILITY OF ETRASIMOD (PF-07915503) MINI TABLETS IN WATER AND 3 FOOD VEHICLES COMPARED TO THE ETRASIMOD (PF-07915503) CLINICAL IR TABLETS UNDER FASTED CONDITIONS, AND TO EVALUATE MINI TABLET PALATABILITY IN HEALTHY ADULT PARTICIPANTS

The purpose of this study is to compare how healthy adults process Etrasimod when taken in different forms. One form is Etrasimod taken without food. The other form is Etrasimod mixed with water and 3 different foods. The types of food used are applesauce, chocolate pudding or yogurt.

The study is seeking participants who are:

  • Aged 18 or older
  • Male or female who are healthy as determined by medical assessment
  • Body-mass index (BMI) of 16 to 32, and a total body weight > 50kg.

The study will take up to 2.5 months, including the screening period. Participants will have to stay at the study clinic for at least 45 days. This includes 5 study periods in total.

Participants will take Etrasimod as a tablet by mouth without food. Participants will also take Etrasimod sprinkled in soft food or water. Blood samples will be taken both before and after participants take Etrasimod. Participants will also answer questions for taste assessment purposes. A follow-up phone call will be made 20 to 27 days after the last study period.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

16

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Bruxelles-capitale, Région DE
      • Brussels, Bruxelles-capitale, Région DE, Belgium, B-1070
        • Pfizer Clinical Research Unit - Brussels

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy participants
  • BMI 16 to 32 kg/m2
  • body weight more than 50kg

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ongoing or past history of significant medical conditions
  • Eye disorders such as macular edema or uveitis
  • Ongoing or recent infections
  • Use of prescription or non prescription medications within 7 days of first dose
  • Smoking or using nicotine products equivalent to more than 5 cigarettes per day
  • History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Sequence 1
Single oral dose of etrasimod 2 mg clinical IR tablet under fasted conditions (Reference) followed by single oral dose of etrasimod 2 mg mini tablets mixed with applesauce under fasted conditions (Test 1) followed by single oral dose of etrasimod 2 mg mini tablets mixed with chocolate pudding under fasted conditions (Test 2) followed by single oral dose of etrasimod 2 mg mini tablets mixed with water under fasted conditions (Test 3) followed by single oral dose of etrasimod 2 mg mini tablets mixed with yogurt under fasted conditions (Test 4)
an immediate release tablet
very small tablet mixed in water
very small tablet mixed in chocolate pudding
Very small tablet mixed in yogurt
Very small tablet mixed in applesauce
Experimental: Sequence 2
Single oral dose of etrasimod 2 mg mini tablets mixed with applesauce under fasted conditions (Test 1) followed by single oral dose of etrasimod 2 mg mini tablets mixed with water under fasted conditions (Test 3) followed by single oral dose of etrasimod 2 mg clinical IR tablet under fasted conditions (Reference) followed by single oral dose of etrasimod 2 mg mini tablets mixed with chocolate pudding under fasted conditions (Test 2) followed by single oral dose of etrasimod 2 mg mini tablets mixed with yogurt under fasted conditions (Test 4)
an immediate release tablet
very small tablet mixed in water
very small tablet mixed in chocolate pudding
Very small tablet mixed in yogurt
Very small tablet mixed in applesauce
Experimental: Sequence 3
Single oral dose of etrasimod 2 mg mini tablets mixed with chocolate pudding under fasted conditions (Test 2). Followed by single oral dose of etrasimod 2 mg clinical IR tablet under fasted conditions (Reference).followed by single oral dose of etrasimod 2 mg mini tablets mixed with water under fasted conditions (Test 3). Followed by single oral dose of etrasimod 2 mg mini tablets mixed with applesauce under fasted conditions (Test 1) Followed by single oral dose of etrasimod 2 mg mini tablets mixed with yogurt under fasted conditions (Test 4)
an immediate release tablet
very small tablet mixed in water
very small tablet mixed in chocolate pudding
Very small tablet mixed in yogurt
Very small tablet mixed in applesauce
Experimental: Sequence 4
Single oral dose of etrasimod 2 mg mini tablets mixed with water under fasted conditions (Test 3). Followed by single oral dose of etrasimod 2 mg mini tablets mixed with chocolate pudding under fasted conditions (Test 2). Followed by single oral dose of etrasimod 2 mg mini tablets mixed with applesauce under fasted conditions (Test 1). Followed by single oral dose of etrasimod 2 mg clinical IR tablet under fasted conditions (Reference). Followed by single oral dose of etrasimod 2 mg mini tablets mixed with yogurt under fasted conditions (Test 4)
an immediate release tablet
very small tablet mixed in water
very small tablet mixed in chocolate pudding
Very small tablet mixed in yogurt
Very small tablet mixed in applesauce

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of Etrasimod
Time Frame: At pre-dose and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of each period
AUClast was calculated using linear/log trapezoidal method.
At pre-dose and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of each period
Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinity (AUCinf) of Etrasimod
Time Frame: At pre-dose and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of each period
AUCinf was calculated as AUClast + (Clast*/kel), where Clast is the predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point from the log-linear regression analysis, and kel is the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the loglinear concentration-time curve.
At pre-dose and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of each period
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Etrasimod
Time Frame: At pre-dose and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of each period
At pre-dose and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of each period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 24 Hours on Day 1
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 24 hours post dose on Day 1
Heart rate was measured in beats per minute.
Baseline, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 24 hours post dose on Day 1
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time Frame: From start of study treatment up to 28-35 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum up to 72 days)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. TEAEs were any AEs that occurred following start of treatment. A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose, met one or more of the criteria: resulted in death, life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect. AEs included SAEs and all non-SAEs.
From start of study treatment up to 28-35 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum up to 72 days)
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities
Time Frame: Up to Day 45
Clinical laboratory abnormalities test criteria included haematology: lymphocytes (10^3/ mm^3) and lymphocytes/leukocytes percentage (%) less than (<) 0.8* lower limit of normal (LLN), neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes (10^3/mm^3), eosinophils/leukocytes monocytes/leukocytes (%) more than (>) 1.2* upper limit of normal (ULN); clinical chemistry: bicarbonate milliequivalents per liter (mEq/L) > 1.1* ULN; Urinalysis: urine hemoglobin, nitrite, leukocyte esterase greater than or equal to (>=) 1 and squamous epithelial cells /low power field (/LPF) > 4. Number of participants meeting any clinical laboratory abnormalities criteria is reported in this outcome measure.
Up to Day 45
Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Results
Time Frame: Up to Day 45
Supine blood pressure (SBP) and pulse rate (PR) were measured. Vital sign criteria included: Systolic BP: <90 millimeter of mercury [mmHg]; Systolic BP change from baseline: maximum increase and decrease >=30 mmHg; Diastolic BP < 50 mmHg; Diastolic BP change from baseline: maximum decrease and increase >=20 mmHg; pulse rate <40 and >120 beats per minute.
Up to Day 45
Number of Participants According to Categorization of Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Findings
Time Frame: Up to Day 45
Standard 12-lead ECGs were used to measure PR interval, QT interval, QTc corrected using Fridericia's formula (QTcF), and QRS complex. ECG abnormalities were categorized as: QTcF interval, aggregate (milliseconds [msec]) 450 < Value <= 480, 480 < value <= 500, value > 500; 30 <= Change <= 60; Change > 60. Participants with any ECG abnormality criteria were reported in this outcome measure.
Up to Day 45
Assessment of Mouth Feel Based on Palatability Questionnaire
Time Frame: At 1, 5, 10 and 20 minutes after tasting dose in each vehicle on Day 1 of each period
Participants were required to answer mouth feel (such as grittiness, stickiness, waxiness) of the product tasted. The score ranged from 0 (favorable) to 100 (not favorable), where higher scores indicated worse mouth feel.
At 1, 5, 10 and 20 minutes after tasting dose in each vehicle on Day 1 of each period
Assessment of Bitterness Based on Palatability Questionnaire
Time Frame: At 1, 5, 10 and 20 minutes after tasting dose in each vehicle on Day 1 of each period
Participants were required to tell about the degree of bitterness of the product tasted. The score ranged from 0 (favorable) to 100 (not favorable), where higher scores indicated worse bitterness.
At 1, 5, 10 and 20 minutes after tasting dose in each vehicle on Day 1 of each period
Assessment of Tongue/Mouth Burns Based on Palatability Questionnaire
Time Frame: At 1, 5, 10 and 20 minutes after tasting dose in each vehicle on Day 1 of each period
Participants were required to tell about the degree of palatability attribute of tongue/mouth burns of the product tasted. The score ranged from 0 (favorable) to 100 (not favorable), where higher scores indicated more tongue/mouth burns.
At 1, 5, 10 and 20 minutes after tasting dose in each vehicle on Day 1 of each period
Assessment of Likeness of Throat Burn Based on Palatability Questionnaire
Time Frame: At 1, 5, 10 and 20 minutes after tasting dose in each vehicle on Day 1 of each period
Participants were required to tell the palatability attribute of throat burn of the product tasted. The score ranged from 0 (favorable) to 100 (not favorable), where higher scores indicated more throat burn.
At 1, 5, 10 and 20 minutes after tasting dose in each vehicle on Day 1 of each period
Assessment of Overall Liking Based on Palatability Questionnaire
Time Frame: At 1, 5, 10 and 20 minutes after tasting dose in each vehicle on Day 1 of each period
Participants were required to tell the palatability attribute of overall liking of the product tasted. The score ranged from 0 (favorable) to 100 (not favorable), where higher scores indicated less overall liking.
At 1, 5, 10 and 20 minutes after tasting dose in each vehicle on Day 1 of each period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Pfizer

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 4, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 4, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

January 4, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 29, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 20, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 21, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • C5041034
  • 2023-504411-32-00 (Registry Identifier: CTIS (EU))

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy Participants

Clinical Trials on Estraimod Immediate Release (IR)

Subscribe