Therapeutic Drug Monitoring - Targeting IMproved Effectiveness (TDM-TIME)

February 1, 2024 updated by: Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring - Targeting Improved Effectiveness (TDM-TIME): An Observational Study of Turnaround Time for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Antimicrobial Agents in Critically Ill Patients With Respiratory Sepsis

Severe infections can be caused by various organisms, such as bacteria or viruses, and lead to otherwise healthy people getting very unwell, sometimes needing treatment in hospital or even intensive care. For the treatment of bacterial infections to be successful, the correct antibiotics need to be given promptly. Early in the course of illness, clinicians often do not know exactly which bacteria are causing the infection. Furthermore, patients differ in terms of how their bodies process the antibiotics they are given; this means that some may get too much and others too little. This can in turn lead to some patients not being fully cured, and others coming to harm due to side effects of higher doses of these drugs.

For certain types of antibiotics, clinicians are able to measure their levels in the bloodstream, which can help guide dosing. This is called therapeutic drug monitoring, and is commonly used in clinical practice. One of the problems with therapeutic drug monitoring is that it is often not available outside of regular working hours, is costly, and most importantly, provides clinicians with useful information only after a few days of treatment have already been completed. This may be too late to treat these severely ill patients with life-threatening infections, where early and appropriate treatments matter.

The aim of our study, called TDM-TIME, is to look at how long it takes for blood samples to get from the patient to the laboratory to be measured, with the results then communicated back to clinicians. We are further looking to investigate whether steps can be taken to improve these timings, which would lead to shorter times until treatments can be improved. As our study is observational, we will not change anything about the treatment of our patients, but will only be measuring levels of antibiotics in their blood.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Manchester, United Kingdom, M23 9LT
        • Recruiting
        • Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
        • Contact:
          • Jan Hansel, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All individuals will be considered for inclusion in this study regardless of age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion and belief, sex, and sexual orientation except where the study inclusion and exclusion criteria explicitly state otherwise.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years;
  • Admitted to intensive care;
  • Treated for presumed or confirmed lower respiratory tract infection;
  • Receiving OR about to receive the first dose of intravenous antimicrobials (either meropenem of piperacillin/tazobactam);
  • Valid informed consent OR enrolment through deferred consent appropriate.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe anaemia (haemoglobin level < 70 g/L);
  • Unlikely to survive 24 hours as judged by the treating physician;
  • Study antimicrobial course started more than 24 hours ago.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Critically ill patients with presumed or confirmed lower respiratory tract infection
Non-interventional. Admitted to intensive care unit. Presumed or confirmed lower respiratory tract infection. Receiving either piperacillin/tazobactam or meropenem. Participants will have samples collected during an antimicrobial dose cycle.
No intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Availability of LC-MS/MS results within two dose intervals of antimicrobial (dichotomous)
Time Frame: 48 hours
Proportion of participants within timeframe for antimicrobial
48 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time elapsed from peripheral blood collection to LC-MS/MS result availability
Time Frame: 48 hours
Mean time required for result availability
48 hours
Time elapsed from first dose of antimicrobial to LC-MS/MS result availability
Time Frame: 72 hours
Mean time required for result availability from first antimicrobial dose administration
72 hours
Duration of pre-analytical stage
Time Frame: 24 hours
Mean time required for pre-analytical stage
24 hours
Duration of analytical stage
Time Frame: 24 hours
Mean time required for analytical stage
24 hours
Duration of post-analytical stage
Time Frame: 24 hours
Mean time required for post-analytical stage
24 hours
Therapeutic target attainment (100% fT>4xMIC)
Time Frame: 72 hours
Proportion of patients attaining target (100% fT>4xMIC)
72 hours
28-day mortality
Time Frame: 28 days
Proportion of patients alive at 28 days from enrolment
28 days
ICU length of stay
Time Frame: 28 days
Number of days from ICU admission to discharge
28 days
Hospital length of stay
Time Frame: 28 days
Number of days from hospital admission to discharge
28 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jan Hansel, MD, University of Manchester

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 14, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 15, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 15, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 25, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 2, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pneumonia

Clinical Trials on No intervention

3
Subscribe