- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06011213
Early-warning Intervention for Heat and Cold in Older Hypertensive Patients: Impact on Blood Pressure and ECG
Early-warning Intervention for Heat and Cold in Older Hypertensive Patients: Impact on Blood Pressure and Electrocardiogram
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
This cluster-randomized trial will be conducted in various districts across Tianjin, China. As part of the early warning interventions for heat and cold, three communities from each of the two selected districts will be randomly chosen and assigned to one of three groups: the combined intervention group, the self-monitoring group, or the control group. The study will be divided into pre-intervention and intervention phases. The pre-intervention period for the heat wave health early-warning information intervention spans from July 1st, 2023, to July 7th, 2023, followed by the intervention period from July 8th to September 9th, 2023. Similarly, during the cold spell health early-warning information intervention, the pre-intervention phase occurs from December 1st, 2023, to December 7th, 2023, and the intervention.
Participants in the combined intervention group will receive heat health risk warnings via digital tools, specifically a WeChat mini-program, providing real-time updates on early warnings and health advisories. Additionally, they will be instructed to perform daily self-monitoring of their blood pressure (BP) and electrocardiogram (ECG) using automated home devices. Participants in the self-monitoring alone group will engage in daily BP and ECG monitoring but not receive any health warnings. In contrast, the control group will monitor their BP and ECG only during baseline assessments and routine health check-ups (the day after the first heat wave in July and August 2023, as well as following the first cold spell in January and February 2024).
All participants will be required to record their daily time-activity patterns. During the baseline and subsequent check-ups, data will be collected on participants' demographics, medical history, lifestyle factors (e.g., diet, smoking, physical activity), environmental exposures, sleep quality, mental health status (including stress levels, emotional stability, and psychological resilience), medication adherence, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular symptoms, respiratory system symptoms, and perceptions of heatwaves and cold spells. In addition, blood, urine, and stool samples will be gathered for further analysis.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Beijing, China, 100021
- National Institute of Environmental Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Individuals aged 60 to 65 years Individuals with a diagnosis of hypertension Individuals with untreated blood pressure above 140/90 mm Hg
Exclusion Criteria:
Having a history of coronary heart disease, heart failure, or stroke Unable to cooperate with follow-up
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Control
|
|
|
Experimental: Combined intervention
Participants in the combined intervention group will receive real-time health risk warnings for heat waves and cold spells via a WeChat mini-program and will perform daily self-monitoring of BP and ECG using automated home devices.
|
Whenever a health risk warning for a heat waves or cold spells is issued, only the elderly in the combined intervention group will be alerted to the early warning information through the digital heat or cold health risk early warning tool.
A WeChat mini-program provides real-time updates on early warnings and health advisories.
Devices for self-monitoring blood pressure and ECG
Participants in the self-monitoring alone group were instructed to self-measure their BP three times each morning (from 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m.) and evening (from 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.) at home, and to self-administer ECG measurements twice during the same morning and evening timeframes.
|
|
Other: Self-monitoring alone
|
Devices for self-monitoring blood pressure and ECG
Participants in the self-monitoring alone group were instructed to self-measure their BP three times each morning (from 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m.) and evening (from 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.) at home, and to self-administer ECG measurements twice during the same morning and evening timeframes.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from baseline in DBP
Time Frame: baseline, six months
|
The DBP was measured by a self-monitored electronic sphygmomanometer (Model Maibobo, Shenzhen Yike Network Technology Co., Ltd., China).
|
baseline, six months
|
|
Change from baseline in SBP
Time Frame: baseline, six months
|
The SBP was measured by a self-monitored electronic sphygmomanometer (Model Maibobo, Shenzhen Yike Network Technology Co., Ltd., China).
|
baseline, six months
|
|
Change from baseline in the risk of the overall warning level for abnormal ECG.
Time Frame: baseline, six months
|
Overall warning level for abnormal ECG is measured by a handheld electrocardiographic recorder, CarePatch (ECG-H01, Hangzhou Proton Technology Co., Ltd., China).
This device is employed to assess and report on the presence of abnormal ECG states.
|
baseline, six months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from baseline in the control rate of blood pressure (SBP/DBP <120/80 mm Hg)
Time Frame: baseline, six months
|
The blood pressure was measured by a self-monitored electronic sphygmomanometer (Model Maibobo, Shenzhen Yike Network Technology Co., Ltd., China).
The proportion of participants achieving a systolic blood pressure (SBP) below 120 mm Hg and a diastolic blood pressure (DBP) below 80 mm Hg is calculated by dividing the number of participants who meet these criteria by the total number of participants at baseline and each routine health check-up.
|
baseline, six months
|
|
Change from baseline in the control rate of blood pressure (SBP/DBP <140/90 mm Hg)
Time Frame: baseline, six months
|
The blood pressure was measured by a self-monitored electronic sphygmomanometer (Model Maibobo, Shenzhen Yike Network Technology Co., Ltd., China).
The proportion of participants achieving a systolic blood pressure (SBP) below 140 mm Hg and a diastolic blood pressure (DBP) below 90 mm Hg is calculated by dividing the number of participants who meet these criteria by the total number of participants at baseline and each routine health check-up.
|
baseline, six months
|
|
Change from baseline in left ventricular hypertrophy
Time Frame: baseline, six months
|
The trained staff use a handheld electrocardiographic recorder, CarePatch (ECG-H01, Hangzhou Proton Technology Co., Ltd., China) to measure the participants' the change of left ventricular hypertrophy.
|
baseline, six months
|
|
Change from baseline in sinus arrhythmia
Time Frame: baseline, six months
|
The trained staff use a handheld electrocardiographic recorder, CarePatch (ECG-H01, Hangzhou Proton Technology Co., Ltd., China) to measure the participants' the change of sinus arrhythmia.
|
baseline, six months
|
|
Change from baseline in right bundle branch block
Time Frame: baseline, six months
|
The trained staff use a handheld electrocardiographic recorder, CarePatch (ECG-H01, Hangzhou Proton Technology Co., Ltd., China) to measure the participants' the change of right bundle branch block.
|
baseline, six months
|
|
Change from baseline in ventricular premature beats
Time Frame: baseline, six months
|
The trained staff use a handheld electrocardiographic recorder, CarePatch (ECG-H01, Hangzhou Proton Technology Co., Ltd., China) to measure the participants' the change of ventricular premature beats.
|
baseline, six months
|
|
Change from baseline in atrial premature beats
Time Frame: baseline, six months
|
The trained staff use a handheld electrocardiographic recorder, CarePatch (ECG-H01, Hangzhou Proton Technology Co., Ltd., China) to measure the participants' the change of atrial premature beats.
|
baseline, six months
|
|
Change from baseline in Q waves
Time Frame: baseline, six months
|
The trained staff use a handheld electrocardiographic recorder, CarePatch (ECG-H01, Hangzhou Proton Technology Co., Ltd., China) to measure the participants' the change of Q waves.
|
baseline, six months
|
|
Change from baseline in T-wave changes
Time Frame: baseline, six months
|
The trained staff use a handheld electrocardiographic recorder, CarePatch (ECG-H01, Hangzhou Proton Technology Co., Ltd., China) to measure the participants' the change of T-wave changes.
|
baseline, six months
|
|
Change from baseline in ST changes
Time Frame: baseline, six months
|
The trained staff use a handheld electrocardiographic recorder, CarePatch (ECG-H01, Hangzhou Proton Technology Co., Ltd., China) to measure the participants' the change of ST changes.
|
baseline, six months
|
|
Change from baseline in the heat wave and cold spell perception score
Time Frame: baseline, six months
|
The heat wave and cold spell perception score is measured by the heat wave and cold spell perception questionnaire.
This questionnaire captures participants' perceptions of heatwave-related health risks and their level of preparedness.
Respondents rate their responses on a continuous scale from 0 to 100, with 0 representing "not at all" or "very low" and 100 representing "very much" or "very high," allowing them to express the degree of their perception and concern.
|
baseline, six months
|
|
Change from baseline in the PSQI score
Time Frame: baseline, six months
|
The PSQI score is measured by the pittsburgh sleep quality index questionnaire.
The PSQI consists of 19 individual items that assess seven key components of sleep: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency (the time it takes to fall asleep), sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency (the ratio of total sleep time to time spent in bed), sleep disturbances, use of sleep medication, and daytime dysfunction.Each of the seven components is scored from 0 to 3, with the total PSQI score ranging from 0 to 21.
A total score greater than 5 indicates poor sleep quality, while a lower score suggests good sleep quality.
|
baseline, six months
|
|
Change from baseline in the PHQ-9 score
Time Frame: baseline, six months
|
The PHQ-9 score is measured by Patient Health Questionnaire-9.
This questionnaire evaluates nine key symptoms of depression experienced over the past two weeks, including loss of interest or pleasure in activities, feeling down or hopeless, trouble sleeping, fatigue, poor appetite or overeating, feelings of worthlessness or failure, difficulty concentrating, physical agitation or slowing, and thoughts of self-harm or suicide.
Each symptom is rated on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day), with total scores ranging from 0 to 27.
Scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 indicate mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe depression, respectively.
|
baseline, six months
|
|
Change from baseline in the MMSE score
Time Frame: baseline, six months
|
The MMSE score is measured by the mini-mental state examination.
This examination evaluates five main areas: orientation (to time and place), memory (short-term and long-term), attention and calculation (concentration and basic arithmetic), language (fluency and comprehension), and executive function (complex task performance).
Each area is scored on a scale from 0 to 5, with a total score ranging from 0 to 30.
Typically, a score above 24 indicates normal cognitive function, while a score below 24 may suggest cognitive impairment.
|
baseline, six months
|
|
Change from baseline in the GAD-7 score
Time Frame: baseline, six months
|
The GAD-7 score is measured by the generalized anxiety disorder scale.
This scale evaluates seven key symptoms of anxiety: feeling nervous, anxious, or on edge; not being able to stop or control worrying; worrying too much about different things; trouble relaxing; being so restless that it is hard to sit still; becoming easily annoyed or irritable; and feeling afraid as if something awful might happen.
Each symptom is rated on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day), resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 21.
A score of 5 or above indicates the presence of generalized anxiety disorder symptoms, with higher scores reflecting greater symptom severity.
|
baseline, six months
|
|
Change from baseline in the PSSS score
Time Frame: baseline, six months
|
The PSSS score is measured by the perceived social support scale.
This scale evaluates three key sources of support: family, friends, and significant others.
It consists of 12 items, with four items each related to family, friends, and significant others.
Participants rate their agreement with each statement on a scale from 1 (very strongly disagree) to 7 (very strongly agree), resulting in a total score ranging from 12 to 84, where higher scores indicate higher perceived social support.
|
baseline, six months
|
|
Change from baseline in time-activity patterns
Time Frame: baseline, six months
|
The time-activity patterns is measured by the self-reported time-activity diaries questionnaire.
This questionnaire captures duration spent in various settings (such as outdoor environments, workplaces, transportation, home, and other indoor areas) and at different intensity levels of physical activity were recorded.
|
baseline, six months
|
|
Change from baseline in HPSMBRS score
Time Frame: baseline, six months
|
The HPSMBRS score is measured by the hypertension patient self-management behavior rating scale.
The HPSMBRS consists of 33 individual items across six dimensions: medication management, condition monitoring, dietary management, exercise management, work-rest management, and emotional management.
Each item is rated on a 1 to 5 Likert scale, with 1 indicating "never" and 5 indicating "always."
The total score ranges from 33 to 165, with higher scores indicating better self-management.
To ensure comparability across dimensions, individual scores are converted to standardized scores using the formula: standardized score = (actual ctual score of each factor / total score of each factor)×100.
Self-management levels are categorized as low (<60), moderate (60~80), and high (>80) based on standardized scores.
|
baseline, six months
|
|
Change from baseline in HPMARS score
Time Frame: baseline, six months
|
The HPMARS score is measured by the hypertension patient medication adherence rating scale.
The HPMARS consists of 8 individual items that assess key components of medication adherence: forgetting to take medication, intentional non-adherence, reducing or stopping medication due to side effects without consulting a doctor, forgetting medication during travel, forgetting to take medication the previous day, reducing dosage after symptoms are controlled, inconvenience of daily medication with maintaining adherence, and the frequency of forgetting to take medication.
Each item is scored as 1 or 0, with the total HPMARS score ranging from 0 to 8. A total score of 8 indicates high adherence, 6 to 7 indicates moderate adherence, and a score below 6 suggests low adherence.
|
baseline, six months
|
|
Changes in liver function biomarkers (e.g., albumin (ALB), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), etc.) from baseline
Time Frame: baseline, six months
|
This section evaluates changes in liver function biomarkers using appropriate omics technologies to explore their potential role in liver-related diseases.
|
baseline, six months
|
|
Changes in kidney function biomarkers (e.g., uric acid (UA), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (CREA), etc.) from baseline
Time Frame: baseline, six months
|
This section assesses changes in kidney function biomarkers through suitable omics techniques, investigating their involvement in kidney disorders.
|
baseline, six months
|
|
Changes in cardiovascular biomarkers (e.g., creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB), creatine kinase (CK), etc.) from baseline
Time Frame: baseline, six months
|
This section assesses changes in cardiovascular function biomarkers through suitable omics techniques, investigating their involvement in cardiovascular diseases.
|
baseline, six months
|
|
Changes in inflammatory biomarkers (e.g., interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), etc.) from baseline
Time Frame: baseline, six months
|
This section examines the alterations in inflammatory biomarkers using relevant omics approaches, aiming to uncover their potential role in inflammatory and immune responses.
|
baseline, six months
|
|
Changes in metabolic biomarkers (e.g., lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) , etc.) from baseline
Time Frame: baseline, six months
|
This section examines the alterations in metabolic biomarkers using relevant omics approaches, aiming to uncover their potential implications in metabolic processes and health outcomes.
|
baseline, six months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Tiantian Li, National lnstitute of Environmental Health, Chinese Center for Disease Controland Prevention
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 202361
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Hypertension
-
National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu BranchRecruitingHypertension,Essential | Hypertension, MaskedTaiwan
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamTroy UniversityCompletedHypertension | Hypertension, Resistant to Conventional Therapy | Uncontrolled Hypertension | Hypertension, White CoatUnited States
-
Franz Rischard, DOAcceleron Pharma, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway...Not yet recruitingPulmonary Hypertension | Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH)United States
-
BackBeat Medical IncNot yet recruitingHypertension, Systolic | Hypertension (HTN) | Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEFGeorgia
-
Abant Izzet Baysal UniversityNot yet recruitingPRIMARY HYPERTENSIONTurkey (Türkiye)
-
SingHealth PolyclinicsNanyang PolytechnicEnrolling by invitationHypertension,EssentialSingapore
-
Hacettepe UniversityBozok UniversityCompletedHypertension | Arterial Hypertension | Systemic HypertensionTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Xuanwu Hospital, BeijingNot yet recruiting
-
Shenzhen Salubris Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.Not yet recruiting
-
Instituto de Cardiologia do Rio Grande do SulCompletedHypertension (HTN) | Hypertension ArterialBrazil
Clinical Trials on Issuing health risk warning for a heat waves or cold spells
-
Tiantian LiCompleted