Improving Gastrointestinal Function In High-Risk Newborns By Stimulation Of The Enteric Nervous System (NeoHemoHapt)

April 25, 2024 updated by: Radboud University Medical Center

The goal of this therapeutical intervention trial is to investigate whether tactile-kinesthaetic and oral sensorimotor stimulation can improve gastrointestional function in preterm infants born before gestational age of 30 weeks and newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. The main question it aims to answer is:

• To determine whether HAPTOS- intervention (Handling Adapted to Postnatal age with Tactile-kinaesthetic and Oral sensorimotor Stimulation) in the particpants results in earlier attainment (postnatal days) of full enteral feeding and/or full oral feeding (post menstrual age) compared to standard care. Researchers will compare an intervention group receiving standard of care plus HAPTOS intervention to a group of patients receiving only current standard of care.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Infants born preterm or with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) are at risk for several long-term unfavourable outcomes that can be related to feeding difficulties from birth onwards. Adverse nutritional outcomes in both patient groups mainly originate from mechanical dysfunction, based on dysmotility. Mechanical function includes suck-swallow coordination, gastrointestinal sphincter tone, gastric emptying and intestinal motility and is regulated by the complex interplay of the autonomic (ANS) and enteric (ENS) nervous system with modulation by the central nervous system (CNS). The intra-uterine environment provides the fetus with developmentally timed sensory exposures through 'touch' that are necessary for development of sensory control and autonomous coordination of bodily functions. Preterm infants miss out this normal maturation, while newborns with CDH may exhibit a delayed maturation probably as a result of the deviant anatomical situation and the severe illness during the direct postnatal period. In the postnatal situation both patient groups may be confronted with either 'negative' sensory stimulation through exposures such as procedural touch/handling, pain or otherwise a reduction in sensory exposures through avoidance of positive touch in relation to supposed clinical instability. All together this may affect normal development and may lead to sensory deprivation and delayed maturation of the nervous regulation and cerebral maturation. Tactile-kinaesthetic and oral sensorimotor stimulation using positive gentle touch have been shown to positively affect cardiorespiratory stability, weight gain, gastro-intestinal performance, and length of stay in hospital for preterm infants. However, these strategies have not been evaluated in high-risk infants. The current study aims at evaluating an intervention programme that provides positive stimuli through touch adapted to the stage of development of the infant with regard to timing, duration and intensity that supports the maturational development of gastrointestinal functionality. (Handling Adapted to Postnatal age with Tactile-kinaesthetic and Oral sensorimotor Stimulation; HAPTOS intervention). We hypothesize that the HAPTOS intervention will improve the postnatal maturation of the autonomous and enteral nervous system and cause improvements in gastrointestinal motility, enteral and oral feeding and cardiorespiratory stability.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Preterm birth at gestational age < 30 weeks or
  2. Diagnosis of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia
  3. Born at Amalia Children's Hospital or admitted 1rst day of life
  4. Written informed consent of both parents or representatives

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Preterm infant born at gestational age ≥ 30 weeks
  2. Perinatal Asphyxia; (Apgar score at 5' < 5 and first pH ≤ 7,0)
  3. Major congenital anomalies or birth defects other than congenital diaphragmatic hernia;
  4. Metabolic disease that necessitates a special diet other than human milk or formula feeding and or has a prognosis of impaired neurological development
  5. Parental refusal of participation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Standard care
Will receive standard of care according to the institutional protocol and principles of developmental care which currently belongs to (inter-) national guidelines and is regarded as safe.
Experimental: Standard care supplemented with HAPTOS intervention
Will receive standard of care according to the principles of developmental care which currently belongs to (inter-) national guidelines plus HAPTOS intervention which includes: tactile/ kinaesthetic massage of the trunk and extremities twice daily and stimulation of oral function by providing perioral stimulation up to 4 times a day. Interventions will be continued until clinical improvement.
Tactile-kinaesthetic and Oral sensorimotor Stimulation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of days to achieve full enteral feeding
Time Frame: 60 days
measuring the time from birth until enteral intake reaches 150ml/kg/d
60 days
Postmenstrual age at achievement of full oral feeding
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Number of postmenstrual weeks until gastrointestinal tube is taken out
52 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
First meconium passage
Time Frame: 14 days
Postnatal day at first meconium
14 days
Duration of meconium passage
Time Frame: 14 days
Number of days until normal defecation
14 days
Use of laxatives
Time Frame: 60 days
Number of laxatives given
60 days
Gastrointestinal Motility
Time Frame: 100 days
Volume of gastric residuals per week
100 days
Vomiting
Time Frame: duration of hospitalization up to 15 months
Number of incidences of vomiting in combination with aspiration
duration of hospitalization up to 15 months
Periodic breathing
Time Frame: duration of hospitalization up to 15 months
Number of desaturations < 80% and/or bradycardia < 80/min that require intervention per week
duration of hospitalization up to 15 months
Feeding difficulties
Time Frame: 24 months
Number of infants with impaired oral motor skills
24 months
Maturation of heart rate variability
Time Frame: duration of intensive care stay up to 60 days
Number of infants with delayed regulation of the para- and sympathicus tonus measured continuously through monitordata collection
duration of intensive care stay up to 60 days
Growth at postmenstrual age
Time Frame: at 40 weeks, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 weeks
Gain in weight, length, and head circumference including percentiles
at 40 weeks, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 weeks
Morbidity
Time Frame: 100 days
Number of infants with necrotizing enterocolitis, spsis, chronic lung disease, retinopathy of prematurity, intra-ventricular hemorrhage
100 days
Duration hospital stay
Time Frame: 100 days
Postnatal age at time of discharge home
100 days
Neurocognitive development
Time Frame: at 24 months
Measuring cognitive and motor development using Bayley Scores of Infant Development (BSID III)
at 24 months
Parent participation in care
Time Frame: duration of hospitalization up to 100 days
Measuring number of parents who participate and frequency of activity
duration of hospitalization up to 100 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Viola Christmann, MD, PhD, Radboud University Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 21, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 28, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

April 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Feeding and Eating Disorders

3
Subscribe