Psychosocial Mobile Application (THRIVE-M) for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (THRIVE-M)

February 11, 2024 updated by: El-Jawahri, Areej,M.D., Massachusetts General Hospital

Randomized Controlled Trial of a Psychosocial Mobile Application (THRIVE-M) for Patients Living With Multiple Myeloma

This clinical trial aims to evaluate whether a psychosocial mobile application (THRIVE-M), is efficacious for improving quality of life, psychological distress, and fatigue in patients living with multiple myeloma compared to usual care.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Multiple myeloma, the second most common hematologic malignancy, can be associated with severe end-organ destruction and life-threatening complications (e.g., kidney failure, infection, anemia) resulting in significant morbidity (e.g., pain syndromes, fatigue). The protracted course and treatment of multiple myeloma is also characterized by physical symptoms that can undermine psychological well-being, functioning, and quality of life across the illness trajectory and care continuum.

Despite the high psychological burden that may accompany life with multiple myeloma, the special mental health workforce needed to adequately address their psychological needs is limited. Hence, mobile application-delivered psychosocial interventions offer an innovative approach to overcome the shortage of psychosocial services to support the unique needs of patients living with multiple myeloma. With no psychosocial mobile application interventions for patients living with multiple myeloma, we developed a patient-centered, population-specific, mobile-application psychosocial intervention, THRIVE-M, tailored to the unique needs of patients living with multiple myeloma. With this study, we will establish the impact of THRIVE-M on patient-reported outcomes compared to usual care.

The study will use validated questionnaires to measure patients' quality of life, psychological distress symptoms, fatigue, and self-management targets like coping, spiritual well-being, and self-efficacy. Study questionnaires will be completed in the hospital or clinic, with an option to also complete them remotely via a secure web link or a mailed paper copy.

Divine Mercy University is funding this research study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Recruiting
        • Massachusetts General Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Areej El-Jawahri, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients (aged 18 years or older) with one of the following diagnoses:

    1. newly diagnosed multiple myeloma receiving first-line therapy,
    2. multiple myeloma on maintenance therapy, or
    3. relapsed multiple myeloma receiving 2nd or 3rd line therapy
  • Ability to comprehend, read, and respond to questions in English

Exclusion Criteria:

- Patients with acute or unstable psychiatric or cognitive conditions that the treating clinicians believe prohibit informed consent or compliance with study procedures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: THRIVE-M

Participants will be recruited from the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and randomized in a 1:1 fashion, stratified by diagnosis type (newly diagnosed versus maintenance versus relapsed), to THRIVE-M versus usual care.

Participants will use THRIVE-M following a diagnosis of multiple myeloma to learn how to cope with physical symptoms, articulate their needs and navigate relationships, and focus on self-care while living with multiple myeloma using an iPad provided by the study team or the participant's own iPad.

Questionnaires (in person, over the computer or telephone, or by mail) will be completed by participants at predetermined days per protocol days.

THRIVE-M is a self-administered psychosocial mobile application for patients living with multiple myeloma that includes the following five modules:

  1. Health module - teaching patients about physical symptoms and strategies to cope with physical symptoms
  2. Relationships module - helping patients articulate different support needs and communication styles in navigating relationships
  3. emotions module - helping patients identify connections between thoughts, feelings, and behaviors, as well as helpful states of mind and gratitude
  4. Lifestyle module - helping patients practice skills for saving up energy and using self-care strategies
  5. Reflection module - teaching patients to reflect on their lives, meaningful relationships, and sense of purpose.

Each module takes about 15-20 minutes to complete and participants will be instructed to complete all modules within an eight-week period.

No Intervention: Usual Care

Participants will be recruited from the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and randomized in a 1:1 fashion, stratified by diagnosis type (newly diagnosed versus maintenance versus relapsed), to THRIVE-M versus usual care.

Questionnaires (in person, over the computer or telephone, or by mail) will be completed by participants at predetermined days per protocol days.

Participants in the usual care arm will receive their usual care with the multiple myeloma team, including all routine supportive care resources (e.g., support from social work, psychology, or psychiatry) offered by the multiple myeloma team to all patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma.

Patients in both the usual care and THRIVE-M group are permitted to use all supportive care services per usual care. We will track referrals to supportive care services in both groups by reviewing the Electronic Health Record (EHR).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Life as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Multiple Myeloma (FACT-MM) scale
Time Frame: 8 weeks

Compare quality of life between participants receiving THRIVE-M versus usual care as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Multiple Myeloma (FACT-MM) at 8 weeks. the FACT-MM score ranges 0-164 with higher scores indicating better quality of life

Higher scores on the FACT-MM (range 0-164) indicate better quality of life.

8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of life longitudinally based on the FACT-MM scale
Time Frame: Up to 15 weeks

Compare quality of life using the Functional Assessment of Cancer therapy (FACT-MM) between the two groups. The FACT-MM ranges 0-164 with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

Higher scores on the HADS anxiety subscale (range 0-21) indicate greater anxiety symptoms.

Up to 15 weeks
Anxiety Symptoms based on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Time Frame: Up to 15 weeks

Compare anxiety symptoms between participants receiving THRIVE-M versus usual care as measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)-anxiety subscale. The HADS-Anxiety subscale ranges from 0-21 with higher scores indicating worse anxiety symptoms.

Higher scores on the HADS anxiety subscale (range 0-21) indicate greater anxiety symptoms.

Up to 15 weeks
Depression Symptoms based on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Time Frame: Up to 15 weeks

Compare depression symptoms between participants receiving THRIVE-M versus usual care as measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)-depression. The HADS-Depression subscale ranges from 0-21 with higher scores indicating worse depression symptoms.

Higher scores on the HADS-depression subscale (range 0-21) indicate greater depression symptoms.

Up to 15 weeks
Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Symptoms based on the PTSD Checkist
Time Frame: Up to 15 weeks

Compare PTSD symptoms between participants receiving THRIVE-M versus usual care as measured by the PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version. The PTSD checklist score ranges from 17-85 with higher scores indicating worse post-traumatic stress symptoms.

Higher Scores on the PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version (range 17-85) indicate greater PTSD symptoms.

Up to 15 weeks
Fatigue based on the FACT-Fatigue Scale
Time Frame: Up to 15 weeks

Compare fatigue between participants receiving THRIVE-M versus usual care as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue (FACT-Fatigue). The FACT-Fatigue ranges from 0-52 with higher scores indicating lower fatigue.

Higher scores on the FACT-Fatigue (range 0-52) indicate worse fatigue.

Up to 15 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Coping based on the Measure of Current Status Part A (MOCS-A) scale
Time Frame: Up to 15 weeks

Compare coping between participants receiving THRIVE-M versus usual care as measured by the Measure of Current Status Part A (MOCS-A). The MOCS-A ranges from 0-52 with higher scores indicating greater coping skills.

Higher scores on the MOCS-A (range 0-52) indicate better coping.

Up to 15 weeks
Self-efficacy based on the Cancer Self-Efficacy Scale (CASE)
Time Frame: Up to 15 weeks

Compare self-efficacy between participants receiving THRIVE-M versus usual care as measured by the Cancer self-efficacy Scale (CASE). The Case ranges from 0-170 with higher scores indicating higher self-efficacy.

Higher scores on the CASE (range 0-170) indicate greater self-efficacy.

Up to 15 weeks
Spiritual Well-being based on the FACT-spiritual scale
Time Frame: Up to 15 weeks

Compare spiritual well-being between participants receiving THRIVE-M versus usual care as measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual (FACIT-Sp-12). The FACIT-SP-12 score ranges from 0-48 with higher scores indicating better spiritual wellbeing.

Higher scores on the FACIT-Sp-12 (range 0-48) indicate greater spiritual well-being.

Up to 15 weeks
Optimism based on the Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R) scale
Time Frame: Up to 15 weeks

Compare optimism between participants receiving THRIVE-M versus usual care as measured by the Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R). The score range is 0-24 with higher scores indicating better optimism

Higher scores on the LOT-R (range 0-24) indicate greater optimism.

Up to 15 weeks
Life Satisfaction based on the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS)
Time Frame: Up to 15 weeks

Compare life satisfaction between participants receiving THRIVE-M versus usual care as measured by the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS). The SWLS ranges 5-25 with higher scores indicating better life satisfaction.

Higher scores on the SWLS (range 5-35) indicate greater life satisfaction.

Up to 15 weeks
Positive Affect based on the Positive Affect Schedule (PANAS)
Time Frame: Up to 15 weeks

Compare positive affect between participants receiving THRIVE-M versus usual care as measured by the positive affect subscale of the Positive Affect Schedule (PANAS). The score ranges 10-50, with higher scores indicating more positive affect.

Higher scores on the positive affect scale of the PANAS (range 10-50) indicate greater positive affect.

Up to 15 weeks
Gratitude based on the Gratitude Questionniare-6
Time Frame: Up to 15 weeks

Compare gratitude between participants receiving THRIVE-M versus usual care as measured by the Gratitude Questionnaire-6 (GQ-6). the score range 6-42 with higher scores indicating more gratitude.

Higher scores on the GQ-6 (range 6-42) indicate greater gratitude.

Up to 15 weeks
Loneliness based on the Cancer Loneliness Scale (CLS)
Time Frame: Up to 15 weeks

Compare loneliness between participants receiving THRIVE-M versus usual care as measured by the Cancer Loneliness Scale (CLS). The score ranges 20-80 with higher scores indicating greater feelings of loneliness

Higher scores on the CLS (range 15-75) indicate greater loneliness.

Up to 15 weeks
Usability of THRIVE-M app based on the System Usability Scale
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks

We will use the System Usability Scale to assess the usability of THRIVE-M for those receiving the intervention. This scale ranes 0-100 with higher scores indicating better usability.

Higher scores on the System Usability Scale ( range 0-100) indicate better usability.

Up to 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Areej El-Jawahri, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 2, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 2, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 10, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 13, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 11, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The Dana-Farber / Harvard Cancer Center encourages and supports the responsible and ethical sharing of data from clinical trials. De-identified participant data from the final research dataset used in the published manuscript may only be shared under the terms of a Data Use Agreement. Requests may be directed to Sponsor Investigator or designee. The protocol and statistical analysis plan will be made available on Clinicaltrials.gov only as required by federal regulation or as a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data can be shared no earlier than 1 year following the date of publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Contact the Mass General Brigham innovations team at http://www.partners.org/innovation

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Myeloma

Clinical Trials on THRIVE-M

3
Subscribe