A Qualitative Study on Patients' (un)Ability and (un)Willingness to Use Telemonitoring in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

February 22, 2024 updated by: Franciscus Gasthuis

A Descriptive Qualitative Study Using Semi-structured Individual Interviews to Get a Better Understanding of Patients' (un)Ability and (un)Willingness to Use IBD Care Everywhere (IBD-CE), a Telemonitoring Application for Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Introduction: Telemedicine has shown to play a promising role in improving IBD treatment. However, it remains uncertain which patients benefit from telemedicine. A feasibility and development project using IBD Care Everywhere (IBD-CE), a telemonitoring application, found that some patients were unable or unwilling to use the application. However, why patients were not able or willing to use the application remains unknown. The WHO global strategy aims to implement telemedicine while ensuring digital health equity. Concerns exist that telemedicine may exacerbate healthcare disparities.

Research question: The aim of this qualitative study is to get a better understanding of factors influencing patients' (un)ability and (un)willingness to use IBD-CE. These insights could help to offer the best individualised IBD care to patients. This led to the following research questions:

1. What influences patients' (un)ability or (un)willingness to use IBD Care Everywhere? 1.1 What are the distinguishing characteristics of patients (un)willing and (un)able to use IBD Care Everywhere? 1.2 How can care givers support patients in making an informed choice between telemonitoring and standard care?

Study design: This is a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. Information about patient characteristics and potential factors that influence patients' ability or willingness to use IBD-CE will be collected. To guide the topics in the interview, three theories/models will be used:

  1. The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model
  2. The COM-B model for behavioural change
  3. The model of positive health Data will be analysed using thematic analysis.

Study population: Consecutive adult IBD patients (> 18 years) in stable remission, visiting the outpatient clinic at the Jeroen Bosch Hospital and Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland will be asked if the patients are willing to participate. Next, a total of 24 patients will be included through purposeful sampling. Both patients unwilling to use IBD-CE and patients interested in IBD-CE will be included. Should data saturation not have occurred, more patients will be included.

Expected results and relevance: The objective is to get better insights in the motivations of patients to choose for telemonitoring or standard care. This study aims to comprehend the requirements of patients to provide them with care that aligns with patients' needs.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

See brief summary

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

24

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population will comprise adult (>18 years) IBD patients visiting the outpatient clinics at Jeroen Bosch Hospital and Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland. These hospitals are teaching institutions with a combined patient population of approximately 4000 individuals.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged >18 years
  • A confirmed IBD-diagnosis according to current guidelines
  • Maintenance therapy with no medication changes in the last three months
  • Remission:
  • Crohn's disease: Faecal calprotectin (FCP) < 100 µ g/g and Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI) < 5
  • Ulcerative Colitis: Faecal calprotectin (FCP) < 250 µ g/g and Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index scores (SCCAI) < 3

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of a stoma
  • Presence of an ileo-anal pouch or ileorectal anastomosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients unwilling to receive information
Interview

This is a descriptive qualitative study using semi-structured individual interviews. The interview will aim to collect more information about the patients' underlying motives that influence their ability or willingness to use IBD-CE. An interview guide has been developed for this purpose, based on topics derived from the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model, the COM-B model for behavioural change and the model of positive health. This interview guide is divided into four sections, each introduced by an initial question. Subsequent follow-up questions will be formulated based on the patients' responses.

Furthermore, patient characteristics, disease characteristics, and socio-demographic data will be collected from the Electronic Medical Record (EMR). These data will provide insights into various aspects of the patients' profiles and are based on characteristics that seem to be determinants of technology acceptance and/or digital health literacy.

Patients not interested in IBD-CE after receiving information
Interview

This is a descriptive qualitative study using semi-structured individual interviews. The interview will aim to collect more information about the patients' underlying motives that influence their ability or willingness to use IBD-CE. An interview guide has been developed for this purpose, based on topics derived from the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model, the COM-B model for behavioural change and the model of positive health. This interview guide is divided into four sections, each introduced by an initial question. Subsequent follow-up questions will be formulated based on the patients' responses.

Furthermore, patient characteristics, disease characteristics, and socio-demographic data will be collected from the Electronic Medical Record (EMR). These data will provide insights into various aspects of the patients' profiles and are based on characteristics that seem to be determinants of technology acceptance and/or digital health literacy.

Patients interested in IBD-CE after receiving information
Interview

This is a descriptive qualitative study using semi-structured individual interviews. The interview will aim to collect more information about the patients' underlying motives that influence their ability or willingness to use IBD-CE. An interview guide has been developed for this purpose, based on topics derived from the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model, the COM-B model for behavioural change and the model of positive health. This interview guide is divided into four sections, each introduced by an initial question. Subsequent follow-up questions will be formulated based on the patients' responses.

Furthermore, patient characteristics, disease characteristics, and socio-demographic data will be collected from the Electronic Medical Record (EMR). These data will provide insights into various aspects of the patients' profiles and are based on characteristics that seem to be determinants of technology acceptance and/or digital health literacy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Explorative data
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months
Based on topics derived from the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model, the COM-B model for behavioral change, and the model of positive health. This data is evaluated with the semi-structured interview
through study completion, an average of 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 8, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 8, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 23, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Clinical Trials on Interview

3
Subscribe