Detection of Pathogen and Antibiotic Resistance Genes by Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing in ICU Patients.

Detection of Pathogen and Antibiotic Resistance Genes by Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Compared With Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in ICU Patients.

It is difficult to determine the pathogens in the early stage of infection in critically ill patients, and empirical use of broad-spectrum antibiotics for a long time is often necessary, leading to antibiotics drug resistance. Targeted next generation sequencing (tNGS) can provide faster results for pathogen and related antibiotic resistant diagnosis. But it lacks sufficient clinical evidence. Evidence regarding the clinical diagnostic accuracy and drug resistance is needed to comprehensively evaluate targeted next generation sequencing (tNGS) for diagnosis of patients in ICU who and will be critical to inform national policy.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

Infectious diseases are one of the highest mortality and morbidity diseases in humans. Due to the difficulty in identifying the pathogen in the early stage of infection, patients with severe infections often need to empirically use broad-spectrum antimicrobials for a long time. The traditional gold standard of etiological detection - etiological culture, even in sepsis patients, only about 60% of the results are positive. Therefore, the accurate identification and rapid classification of pathogenic microorganisms is very important for the patient's precise diagnosis and timely treatment.

Metagenomic next generation sequencing (mNGS), which has emerged in recent years, have been shown to provide early diagnosis and targeted medication guidance for bloodstream infections and respiratory infections, but it is expensive and not able to provide related drug resistant genes. Therefore, targeted next generation sequencing (tNGS) has been derived, which is characterized by rapid sequencing and genetic testing for drug resistance.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of etiological diagnosis and provide patients with more accurate treatment.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients in ICU truly have infected disease and non-infected disease diagnosed by two ICU physicians determining whether the patient have an infectious etiology and identifying the pathogen through existing clinical guidelines, clinical features, laboratory tests, microbiological tests, chest imaging, and treatment response.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The presence of an infection or clearly excluded the presence of infection.
  • Etiological culture and/or metagenomic next-generation sequencing detection of specimens sent for testing.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Suspected infection.
  • Participation in other clinical trials in the past 2 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Non-Infection group
Participants received traditional etiological culture of suspected site of infection.
To provide rapid etiological diagnosis of patients by means of targeted next-generation sequencing.
Infection group
Participants received traditional etiological culture, metagenomic next-generation sequencing of infectious sites.
To provide rapid etiological diagnosis of patients by means of targeted next-generation sequencing.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity
Time Frame: 1 year
The probability of being positive in clinical composite diagnosis, the probability that etiological culture, mNGS, and tNGS tests are also positive, which is also known as the true positive rate.
1 year
Specificity
Time Frame: 1 year
It refers to the probability that cultures, mNGS, and tNGS tests are also negative in the presence of non-infection confirmed by the gold standard.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
False-positive rate
Time Frame: 1 year
It refers to the probability that the gold-standard confirmed absence of infection is also positive for etiological culture, mNGS, and tNGS tests.
1 year
False-negative rate
Time Frame: 1 year
It refers to the probability of being positive in the clinical composite diagnosis, and the probability that etiological cultures, mNGS, and tNGS tests will also be negative.
1 year
Positive predictive value
Time Frame: 1 year
Positive predictive value is the probability that subjects with a positive test truly have the disease.
1 year
Negative predictive value
Time Frame: 1 year
Negative predictive value is the probability that subjects with a negative screening test truly don't have the disease.
1 year
Kappa values
Time Frame: 1 year
Kappa values are used to measure the agreement between two raters. The range of possible values of kappa is from -1 to 1, though it usually falls between 0 and 1. Unity represents perfect agreement, indicating that the raters agree in their classification of every case. Kappa values of 0.41~0.60 are moderately consistent, 0.61~0.80 are basically consistent, and 0.81~1.00 is almost identical.
1 year
Drug resistant gene by targeted next-generation sequencing
Time Frame: 1 year
It refers to the distribution of drug resistance by targeted next-generation sequencing using the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Zhijie He, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital,Sun Yat-sen University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

December 20, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 10, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 10, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 19, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2023

First Posted (Estimated)

December 5, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 5, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SYSKY-2023-667-03

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infections

Clinical Trials on targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS)

3
Subscribe