Artesunate Pessaries (Vaginal Inserts) for Cervical Precancer in Kenya

Self-administered Artesunate Pessaries for Treatment of Cervical Precancer in Kenya

To investigate the use of self-administered artesunate vaginal pessaries as treatment for cervical precancer in low and middle-income countries (LMIC). The central hypothesis of this study is that self-administered intravaginal Artesunate will be safe, and result in a clinical response among both HIV-positive and HIV-negative women with cervical precancer in LMICs.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Despite being preventable, cancer of the cervix is a leading cause of cancer death in Kenya and other low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Cervical cancer can be prevented if early changes in the cervix, called cervical precancer, are detected through screening, and adequately treated. Cervical precancer treatment includes a surgical procedure called Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure (LEEP), which removed the involved area of the cervix.

In countries like Kenya, this LEEP procedure is only available in referral hospitals which have trained consultants, and hence is difficult to access for most women who live in rural areas and away from tertiary facilities. Additionally, the LEEP procedure also increases the chance of a woman not being able to carry a pregnancy to full term, because the cervix is shorter after the procedure. For these reasons, alternative treatments, including self-administered treatments such as Artesunate are being investigated as alternative cervical precancer treatment that can be self-administered.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

18

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Kisumu, Kenya
        • Recruiting
        • Lumumba sub-County Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jackton Omoto, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Cervical lesions referred for excision with CIN2/3 diagnosis on biopsy
  2. Weight ≥50 kg
  3. Agreement to use contraception (barriers or hormonal) through week 24 of the study if of childbearing age.
  4. Ability and willingness to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Current pregnancy or breastfeeding status.
  2. Current or past history of invasive cervical cancer.
  3. History of total hysterectomy.
  4. CD4 count less than 200 cells/mm3.
  5. Presence of adenocarcinoma in situ on cervical biopsy
  6. Currently receiving systemic chemotherapy or radiation therapy for another cancer
  7. Current use of systemic immunosuppressants or steroids (>10 mg of prednisone or equivalent)
  8. Have a medical comorbidity that in the opinion of the investigator would interfere with study participation.
  9. Prior chemotherapy within 1 month prior to day 1 of study treatment
  10. Male at birth

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Artesunate vaginal inserts/ pessaries
Artesunate vaginal inserts/pessaries are used as a treatment for cervical precancerous lesions.
Subjects will self-administer 200 mg of Artesunate pessary (vaginal insert) daily for 5 days, on weeks 1, 3, 5, 7.
Colposcopy is a procedure that allows close examination of the cervix, vagina, and vulva, performed on weeks 8 and 14.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the type, frequency, severity and duration of adverse events
Time Frame: From the first day of the study treatment to week 14 ( 8 weeks after artesunate use)

Safety will be assessed by evaluating the type, frequency, severity, and duration of adverse events (AEs) using the U.S National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, v5.0 (CTCAE 5.0).

The NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events is a descriptive terminology that can be utilized for Adverse Event (AE) reporting. A grading (severity) scale is provided for each AE term. Grade 1 Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2 Moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Grade 3 Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care ADL. Grade 4 Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 Death related to AE.

From the first day of the study treatment to week 14 ( 8 weeks after artesunate use)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adherence
Time Frame: From the first day of the study treatment to week 14 ( 8 weeks after artesunate use)
Adherence will be evaluated based on participant self-report, returned packaging for used pessaries, and inspection of vaginal applicators under ultraviolet light for evidence of intravaginal insertion. A participant will be considered adherent if both methods support use of 80% (16 of 20) of the pessaries.
From the first day of the study treatment to week 14 ( 8 weeks after artesunate use)
Change in lesion
Time Frame: From the first day of the study treatment to week 24
Change in lesion size will be assessed by comparing colposcopic images of cervical lesions at baseline compared to the time of excision or week 24, whichever comes earlier, noting changes in the number and size of lesions and cervical quadrants involved. Blinded before and after treatment images will be evaluated by two gynecologists not involved in the study for evidence of a reduction in lesion size (Yes/No). A third gynecologist will be used as a tiebreaker if the two do not agree. The difference in proportions with the reduction in lesion size between the HIV-positive and HIV-negative groups will be reported.
From the first day of the study treatment to week 24
Histologic regression
Time Frame: From the first day of the study treatment to week 24
Histologic regression will be evaluated by comparing the initial diagnostic biopsy at study entry with the exit biopsy or excisional specimen final diagnosis. Participants who have complete regression at follow-up will have a confirmatory biopsy at the lesion site which will be used for final diagnosis. Regression will be defined as CIN1 or less in the resection or biopsy specimen. All specimens will be reviewed by a pathologist in-country and slides scanned for review by a 2nd pathologist at UNC. A 3rd pathologist will be utilized for consensus if the first two pathologists disagree. The difference in proportions with the histologic regression between the HIV-positive and HIV-negative groups will be reported.
From the first day of the study treatment to week 24
Acceptability
Time Frame: At week 8
Acceptability will be assessed using a questionnaire with study participants using Artesunate. Responses to questions will be graded on a Likert scale. The Likert scale has questions from 1 to 6. Higher scores represent better QOL.
At week 8

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chemtai Mungo, MD, MPH, FACOG, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina Chapel Hill

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 4, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 21, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 8, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

December 11, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

This can be requested and provided under reasonable request.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Precancerous Conditions

Clinical Trials on Artesunate pessary

3
Subscribe