Measurement and Treatment of Back Pain

February 6, 2024 updated by: Fernanda Rossi Paolillo, State University of Minas Gerais

Measurement and Treatment With Laser and Mechanical Systems to Treat Back Pain

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical aspects and to investigate the therapeutic effects of combined therapy with laser on back pain.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Dysfunctions of the musculoskeletal system are related to physiological, kinesiological and biomechanical factors that result in pain, paresthesia, inflammation, heaviness, fatigue and compression of peripheral nerves. Clinical aspects related to back pain were investigated. For treatment, photobiomodulation can be performed with laser equipment that emits red and infrared light, which promotes analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects. Mechanical stimulus can be combined with laser to improve therapeutical effects. In this context, the laser was combined with ultrasound, negative pressure and positive pressure to treat back pain.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minas Gerais
      • Passos, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 37902092
        • Fernanda Rossi Paolillo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Volunteers (female and male)
  • Aged between 20 and 60 years
  • Who had medical referral for pain complaint in low back

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Psychiatric illnesses
  • Endocrinopathies
  • Heart diseases
  • Neurological diseases
  • Osteoporosis
  • Cancer
  • Analgesic, anti-inflammatory or muscle relaxant drugs in the last four weeks

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Laser
Infrared Laser on back pain.
Infrared Laser (808 nm), continuous mode, 100 mW. The treatment was carried out during 20 minutes on the lumbar, thoracic and cervical spine regions. Seven sessions were performed.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Laser
The placebo laser treatment.
Laser: off mode. The placebo treatment was carried out during 20 minutes on the lumbar, thoracic and cervical spine regions. Seven sessions were performed.
Experimental: Negative pressure and Laser: Combined Therapy
Vacuum therapy combined with laser on back pain.
Synergistic application (single handle) - Laser: Red (660 nm) and infrared (808 nm) lasers, continuous mode, 100 milliwatts (mW) per laser. Vacuum therapy: 60 mm suction cup, pulsed mode (MP9, 50 pulsations per minute) and pressure of -150 at -350 mbar. The treatment was carried out during 20 minutes on the lumbar, thoracic and cervical spine regions. Seven sessions were performed.
Experimental: Positive Pressure and Laser: Combined Therapy
Rollers combined with laser on back pain.
Synergistic application (single handle) - Laser: Red (660 nm) and infrared (808 nm) lasers, continuous mode, 100 mW per laser. Positive Pressure: Massage with rollers. The treatment was carried out during 20 minutes on the lumbar, thoracic and cervical spine regions. Seven sessions were performed.
Experimental: Ultrasound and Laser: Combined Therapy
Ultrasound combined with laser on back pain.
Synergistic application (single handle) - Laser: Red (660 nm) and infrared (808 nm) lasers, continuous mode, 100 mW per laser. Ultrasound: 1 megahertz (MHz), continuous mode and 1 milliwatts per square centimeter (mW/cm2). The treatment was carried out during 20 minutes on the lumbar, thoracic and cervical spine regions. Seven sessions were performed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Intensity
Time Frame: 1 day and 7 weeks
Visual analogue scale (VAS): The volunteer was instructed to give a score for pain intensity between 0 (no pain) and 10 (worst imaginable pain).
1 day and 7 weeks
Algometry - Pressure threshold measurement
Time Frame: 1 day and 7 weeks
Pain pressure threshold on low back using algometer. Data obtained in Newton. Higher pressure pain threshold is reported for lower pain sensitivity.
1 day and 7 weeks
Dynamometry - Strenght measurement
Time Frame: 1 day and 7 weeks
Isometric trunk strength using dynamometer. Data obtained in Newton. greater the value, greater the strength.
1 day and 7 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anamnesis
Time Frame: 1 day
Questionnaire to get the clinical characteristics of patients.
1 day
Flexibility of the spine
Time Frame: 1 day and 7 weeks
Fingertip-to-floor test was carried out. In upright standing position with knees joint fully extended, the volunteers were instructed to bend forward and attempt to reach for the floor with their fingertips. The distance between the patient's right long finger and the floor were measured using a measuring tape. Three measurements were taken to calculate the average value.
1 day and 7 weeks
Quality of life assessment
Time Frame: 1 day and 7 weeks
Quality of Life was measured using the World Health Organization Quality of Life-Abbreviated form (WHOQOL-BREF), a 26-item questionnaire in which items are rated on a 5-point scale. It evaluates 4 domains related to physical factors, psychological factors, social relationships, and environmental context. Higher scores indicate a better quality of life.
1 day and 7 weeks
Well-being assessment
Time Frame: 1 day and 7 weeks
The Subjective Well-Being Scale (EBES) was answered by patients. It is composed of 62 items related to three factors that evaluate subjective well-being: positive affect; negative affection and satisfaction with life versus life dissatisfaction. The first 47 items measure positive and negative affect using a 5-point scale with ratings from "not at all" to "to a great extent". The last 22 items measure life satisfaction (or dissatisfaction) using a 5-point scale with ratings from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree".
1 day and 7 weeks
Body mass index (BMI) measurement
Time Frame: 1 day
Body mass index: BMI = mass (kg) / height2 (m). Classification: BMI less than 18.5 kg/m2 are underweight, BMI between 18.5 and 24.9 kg/m2 is considered normal weight, BMI between 25 and 29.9 kg/m2 is considered overweight, and BMI ≥ 30 kg/m² is considered obese. Obesity is divided into grades; grade I being a BMI between 30 to 34.9 kg/m², grade II being a BMI 35 to 39.9 kg/m² and grade III BMI ≥ 40 kg/m².
1 day
Waist-hip ratio (WHR) measurement
Time Frame: 1 day
Waist-hip ratio: WHR = waist (cm) / hips (cm). The anatomical landmarks to measure the circumference (cm), in the upright position of the body were: 1) waist: measured at the above the iliac crest; 2) hip: measured at the largest protuberance of the buttocks. Classification: Gynoid (WHR between 0.68 and 0.8) and Android (WHR>0.8).
1 day
Body composition measurement
Time Frame: 1 day
Body composition was performed to evaluate the hydration and the body fat percentage using bipolar bioimpedance.
1 day
Shoulder mobility measurement
Time Frame: 1 day and 7 weeks
Bilateral range of motion was assessed, combining internal rotation with shoulder adduction and external rotation with abduction of the other shoulder, placing the hand on the central axis of the body in the thoracic region. Three distance measurements were obtained on both sides between the third fingers of the right and left hands to calculate the average.
1 day and 7 weeks
Goniometry - Angular measurement
Time Frame: 1 day and 7 weeks
Active goniometry was performed to assess range of motion (ROM) of the spine (angular measure).
1 day and 7 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Fernanda R Paolillo, PhD, State University of Minas Gerais

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 20, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 20, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 19, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 7, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 8, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Back Pain

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Laser

3
Subscribe