Comparing Enhanced Cognitive-behavior Therapy and Family-based Treatment for Adolescents With an Eating Disorder (CogFam)

March 20, 2024 updated by: Øyvind Rø MD, Oslo University Hospital

Comparing Enhanced Cognitive-behavior Therapy and Family-based Treatment for Adolescents With an Eating Disorder: a Non-inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial

The goal of this randomized controlled clinical trial is to compare the efficacy of outpatient family-based treatment versus enhanced cognitive behavior therapy for children and adolescents with eating disorders.

The main aim is to determine if enhanced cognitive behavior therapy has a similar efficacy as family-based treatment among children and adolescents with eating disorders receiving treatment in an outpatient setting. The main outcome is improvement in eating disorders psychopathology at the end of treatment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Eating disorders (EDs) are severe mental illnesses, associated with high morbidity, increased mortality, and reduced quality of life. Despite treatment advancements, remission rates are modest. Even in specialized treatment settings offering evidence-based treatments such as family-based treatment (FBT), remission rates are about 50%. There is emerging evidence for the effectiveness of enhanced cognitive behavior therapy (CBT-E) for adolescents with EDs. However, no randomized controlled trial (RCT) has yet compared these two treatments.

The current study will compare FBT, which has proven efficacious and is currently recommended for adolescents with EDs, and the newer treatment approach of CBT-E in a large, national RCT. Young patients with all EDs (12-18 years of age) undergoing outpatient treatment from eight different clinics in Norway will be invited to participate in the study.

Primary aim:

This study is a randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of outpatient family-based treatment versus enhanced cognitive behavior therapy for children and adolescents with eating disorders. The main outcome is improvement in eating disorders psychopathology at the end of treatment.

Secondary aims:

To compare weight gain for underweight patients, changes in comorbid psychopathology including depression, self-esteem, family functioning, and quality of life at 6-and 12-months follow-up.

Potential moderators of outcome will be explored. Treatment satisfaction and experiences of the two different treatments will be investigated from the perspective of patients, parents, and clinicians. Data from the Norwegian Control and Payment of Health Reimbursements Database (KUHR), the Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR), and Social Security Database will be obtained to compare the direct and indirect costs of health care utilization for the two treatments.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Anne Louise Wennerberg, Master
  • Phone Number: +4723016230
  • Email: UXWEAC@ous-hf.no

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Bergen, Norway, 5009
      • Oslo, Norway, 0424
        • Recruiting
        • Oslo University Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Tromsø, Norway, 9019
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospital of North Norway
        • Contact:
      • Trondheim, Norway, 7030

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) diagnosed eating disorder
  2. Medically stable for outpatient treatment.
  3. Living with at least one of their parents
  4. At least one of their parents could be actively involved in the treatment
  5. Sufficient knowledge in reading, understanding and speaking Norwegian

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Avoidant restrictive food intake disorders
  2. A co-morbid medical condition or disorder known to influence eating or weight, or influence the possibilities to take part in treatment
  3. Psychotic disorders
  4. Acute suicidality
  5. Substance abuse and/or substance dependence
  6. Serious traumatic events in the family making treatment following FBT or CBT-E manual not recommended
  7. Unstable psychotropic medication last 6 weeks

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Enhanced cognitive-behavior therapy for adolescents with an eating disorder (CBT-E)
CBT-E posits the eating problem as belonging to the individual, and is designed to encourage the adolescent, rather than their parent, to take control of the problem. Parents are not excluded from participating in treatment, but their involvement is limited to helping to create a family environment that allows for recovery. Patients are actively involved in all phases of treatment, including the decision to address weight regain and/or binge eating and purging, with the goal of promoting self-management. A primary goal of CBT-E is to address the patient's eating disorder psychopathology, i.e. patients' concerns about shape, weight, dietary restraint and restriction, and other extreme weight control behaviors. Following manualized CBT-E guidelines, for patients in the lower weight cohort, treatment involves 40 sessions over 9-12 months. For those in the higher weight cohort, treatment involves 20 sessions over the course of 6 months.
Psychotherapy
Active Comparator: Family-based treatment for adolescents with an eating disorder (FBT)
FBT for adolescent eating disorders usually includes all members of the adolescent's immediate family. Treatment progresses through three phases, with the first (∼10 sessions) focusing mainly on guiding the parents to support their adolescent toward weight restoration (when appropriate), and disrupting eating disorder behaviors (e.g. binge eating and purging). The second phase (∼5-7 sessions) focuses on assisting the parents to restore food choices to the adolescent, with an emphasis on the developmental stage of the adolescent. Phase 3 is brief (2-3 sessions), focusing on adolescent developmental matters and helping the parents and their offspring navigate these tasks largely in the absence of acute eating disorder symptoms. Twenty treatment sessions are provided over a span of approximately 6 months.
Psychotherapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in eating disorder psychopathology
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention.
Change in global scores on a well-validated semi-structured interview of eating disorder attitudes and behavior, the Eating Disorder Examination - Interview. Possible scores range from 0-6 where higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
Baseline, immediately after the intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in eating disorder psychopathology
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, 6 months after the end of treatment, 12 months after the end of treatment.
Change in global and subscale scores on a well-validated self-report questionnaire of eating disorder attitudes and behavior, the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire. Possible scores range from 0-6 where higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
Baseline, immediately after the intervention, 6 months after the end of treatment, 12 months after the end of treatment.
Change in depression
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, 6 months after the end of treatment, 12 months after the end of treatment
Change in global score on a well-validated self-report questionnaire of depression, the Beck Depression Inventory II. Possible scores range from 0 to 63 where higher scores mean worse symptoms.
Baseline, immediately after the intervention, 6 months after the end of treatment, 12 months after the end of treatment
Change in anxiety
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, 6 months after the end of treatment, 12 months after the end of treatment
Change in global score on a well-validated self-report questionnaire of anxiety, the Beck Anxiety Inventory. Possible scores range from 0 to 63 where higher scores mean worse symptoms.
Baseline, immediately after the intervention, 6 months after the end of treatment, 12 months after the end of treatment
Change in quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, 6 months after the end of treatment, 12 months after the end of treatment
Change in global score on a well-validated self-report measure of quality of life, Health-Related Quality of Life Index (KIDDIESCREEN 10). Possible scores range from 10 to 50 where higher scores mean better quality of life.
Baseline, immediately after the intervention, 6 months after the end of treatment, 12 months after the end of treatment
Change in impairment due to eating difficulties
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, 6 months after the end of treatment, 12 months after the end of treatment
Change in global score on well validated self report measure of eating disorders-specific quality of life, the Clinical Impairment assessment. Possible scores range from 0 (no impairment) to 48 (highest level of impairment).
Baseline, immediately after the intervention, 6 months after the end of treatment, 12 months after the end of treatment
Change in self-esteem
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, 6 months after the end of treatment, 12 months after the end of treatment
Change in global score on a well validated self-report measure of self-esteem, the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale questionnaire. Scores range from 10 to 40, where higher scores mean better self-esteem.
Baseline, immediately after the intervention, 6 months after the end of treatment, 12 months after the end of treatment
Change in weight (kg) for underweight participants (defined as those participants who are below 18,5 Body Mass Index (BMI) (kg/m2) at baseline or corresponding BMI to age and gender).
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, 6 months after the end of treatment, 12 months after the end of treatment
Weight gain in kilogram. Higher weight gain means better outcome.
Baseline, immediately after the intervention, 6 months after the end of treatment, 12 months after the end of treatment

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in family function
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, 6 months after the end of treatment, 12 months after the end of treatment
Change in parent ratings of family functioning measured by the subscale score on a well validated self-report questionnaire- the McMaster Family Assessment Device, General Functioning subscale. Scores on this subscale range from 12 to 48, where higher scores means worse level of family function.
Baseline, immediately after the intervention, 6 months after the end of treatment, 12 months after the end of treatment
Changes caregiving experience and psychological symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, 6 months after the end of treatment, 12 months after the end of treatment
Change in parent ratings on the impact of eating disorder symptoms on caregiving experiences measured by a well validated, self-report measure -the Eating Disorders Symptom Impact Scale. Scores range from 0 to 96, where higher scores mean worse impact of eating disorder symptoms.
Baseline, immediately after the intervention, 6 months after the end of treatment, 12 months after the end of treatment
Changes caregiving mental health
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, 6 months after the end of treatment, 12 months after the end of treatment
Change in parent ratings on the mental health symptoms by a well validated, self-report measure -the Hopkins symptoms checklist 25 items. Scores range from 1 to 4 where higher scores mean worse mental health symptoms.
Baseline, immediately after the intervention, 6 months after the end of treatment, 12 months after the end of treatment
Direct and indirect costs of health care use for patients and parents/caregivers
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, 6 months after the end of treatment, 12 months after the end of treatment
Register data from the Norwegian Control and Payment of Health Reimbursements Database (KUHR), the Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR), and Social Security Database.
Baseline, immediately after the intervention, 6 months after the end of treatment, 12 months after the end of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 7, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2033

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 21, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 13, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 21, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CogFamNorway

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Feeding and Eating Disorders

Clinical Trials on Enhanced Cognitive-behavior therapy for adolescents with an eating disorder

3
Subscribe