Hip Activation vs. Hip Activation + Core Stabilization

Comparison of a Hip Activation Versus a Combined Hip Activation and Core Stabilization Program on Improving Lower Extremity Function: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

The purpose of this investigation is to compare the effects of a combined hip activation and core stabilization training home exercise program (HEP) versus a hip activation training HEP alone on lower extremity (LE) frontal plane mechanics in healthy individuals.

Specific Aim 1: To determine whether between- and/or within-group differences exist on the Forward Step-Down test (FSDT) when comparing a combined hip activation and core stabilization training HEP as compared to a hip activation training HEP.

Specific Aim 2: To determine whether between- and/or within-group differences exist on the peak external knee abduction moment when comparing a combined hip activation and core stabilization training HEP to a hip activation training HEP.

Specific Aim 3: To determine whether between- and/or within-group differences exist on gluteal and core muscle surface electromyography (sEMG) when comparing a combined hip activation and core stabilization training HEP to a hip activation training HEP.

Specific Aim 4: To determine whether a dose-response relationship exists between HEP compliance and change on the FSDT, peak external knee abduction moment, and sEMG.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

34

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Louisiana
      • Shreveport, Louisiana, United States, 71103
        • LSU Health Sciences Center at Shreveport

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants will be current first- or second-year Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students in the School of Allied Health Professions (SAHP) at Louisiana State University Health Shreveport over the age of 21.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current pain or pathology in either LE which currently limits their ability to perform the FSDT or drop landing task, a history of low back pain in the last three months, known pregnancy, as pregnancy is a risk factor for diastasis rectus abdominis (DRA) which may be exacerbated by participation in the intervention and could be a confounding variable, and current participation in other clinical trials.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Hip Activation Group
The hip activation HEP group will receive a combination of hip musculature activation exercises used by previous researchers that show an increase in hip muscle recruitment.
The hip activation HEP group will receive a combination of hip musculature activation exercises used by previous researchers that show an increase in hip muscle recruitment. Each participant will perform their respective intervention program at home twice weekly for eight weeks.
Experimental: Combined Hip Activation and Core Stabilization Group
The hip activation plus core stabilization HEP group will receive the same hip exercises as the other group, plus core stabilization exercises used by previous researchers.
The hip activation plus core stabilization HEP group will receive the same hip exercises, plus core stabilization exercises used by previous researchers. Each participant will perform their respective intervention program at home twice weekly for eight weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Forward Step Down Test (FSDT)
Time Frame: Pre- and post-eight week intervention
Rating on the FSDT (0-6; 0-1 = good movement quality, 2-3 = moderate movement quality, 4 or more = poor movement quality).
Pre- and post-eight week intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maximal volitional isometric contraction (MVIC) via sensory electromyography (sEMG) of gluteus maximus (GMax)
Time Frame: Pre- and post-eight week intervention
MVIC (microvolts) of GMax during performance of the FSDT
Pre- and post-eight week intervention
Mean activation of GMax via sEMG
Time Frame: Pre- and post-eight week intervention
Mean activation (% MVIC) of GMax during performance of the FSDT
Pre- and post-eight week intervention
Peak activation of GMax via sEMG
Time Frame: Pre- and post-eight week intervention
Peak activation (%MVIC) of GMax during performance of the FSDT
Pre- and post-eight week intervention
MVIC via sEMG of gluteus medius (GMed)
Time Frame: Pre- and post-eight week intervention
MVIC (microvolts) of GMed during performance of the FSDT
Pre- and post-eight week intervention
Mean activation of GMed via sEMG
Time Frame: Pre- and post-eight week intervention
Mean activation (% MVIC) of GMed during performance of the FSDT
Pre- and post-eight week intervention
Peak activation of GMed via sEMG
Time Frame: Pre- and post-eight week intervention
Peak activation (% MVIC) of GMed during performance of the FSDT
Pre- and post-eight week intervention
MVIC via of transversus abdominis (TA)
Time Frame: Pre- and post-eight week intervention
MVIC (microvolts) of TA during performance of the FSDT
Pre- and post-eight week intervention
Mean activation of TA via sEMG
Time Frame: Pre- and post-eight week intervention
Mean activation (% MVIC) of TA during performance of the FSDT
Pre- and post-eight week intervention
Peak activation of TA via sEMG
Time Frame: Pre- and post-eight week intervention
Peak activation (% MVIC) of TA during performance of FSDT
Pre- and post-eight week intervention
Peak external knee abduction moment during drop landing task
Time Frame: Pre- and post-eight week intervention
Kinetic assessment of the peak external knee abduction moment (Nm/kg) during the drop landing task
Pre- and post-eight week intervention
Compliance with Home Exercise Program
Time Frame: Post-eight week intervention
Self-reported completion of each HEP session will be recorded by the participant and then returned to the investigators post-completion
Post-eight week intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Daniel W. Flowers, PT, DPT, PhD, LSU Health Sciences Center at Shreveport

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 24, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 12, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

April 12, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 19, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 15, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

April 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STUDY00002568

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lower Extremity Problem

Clinical Trials on Hip activation home exercise program

3
Subscribe