Efficacy and Safety of add-on Apremilast Versus add-on Methotrexate in Patients With Oral Lichen Planus

February 13, 2024 updated by: Dr. Monalisa Jena, M.D., All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar

Efficacy and Safety of add-on Apremilast Versus add-on Methotrexate in Patients With Oral Lichen Planus: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Lichen planus is an inflammatory disorder of unknown aetiology affecting the stratified squamous epithelia, with an estimated global prevalence of 0.22 to 0.5 %. Oral mucosa (Oral Lichen Planus; OLP) is the most commonly affected region. Corticosteroids are the primary treatment of choice. A prolonged treatment with steroids is required for clinical improvement, which increases the chances of long-term adverse effects. So, there is a need for newer, effective treatment modalities, such as retinoids, methotrexate, Janus kinase inhibitors, PDE4 inhibitors, etc.

Of these, methotrexate is a dihydrofolate reductase inhibitor that inhibits the replication and function of T and B lymphocytes. It has shown a good response to OLP (around 83%) in a study by Lajevardi et al. and can be considered a treatment option in patients with moderate to severe OLP. Apremilast is a drug with a novel immunomodulatory mechanism of action. It inhibits phosphodiesterase type IV, which increases levels of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), thus activating protein kinase A and inhibiting various inflammatory mediators. Based on a pilot study by Paul et al., apremilast is associated with clinical improvement in lichen planus.

Among the various treatment options, there is a lack of head-on trials. Methotrexate is an immunosuppressant with various systemic adverse effects and requires close monitoring. Whereas apremilast is a non-immunosuppressive drug with a better safety profile, it does not show such adverse effects. These drugs can be used as an add-on to low-dose steroids in view of reducing the adverse effects associated with steroid therapy. To the best of our knowledge, there is no randomized controlled trial comparing these two drugs to date. Hence, the present study has been planned to evaluate the safety and efficacy of methotrexate versus apremilast as an add-on to the standard steroid therapy in OLP patients.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

64

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged ≥18 of either sex with the clinical diagnosis of oral lichen planus.
  • Patients with a PGA score of ≥3 (moderate and severe oral LP).
  • Patient not responding to topical or intralesional corticosteroid.
  • Patients who are willing to give informed written consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Treatment with a systemic corticosteroid within the last 4 weeks.
  • Patients on any immunosuppressive agents such as azathioprine, cyclosporine and others within one month of recruitment.
  • Patients with clinical history and any lesion distribution suspicious of a lichenoid drug eruption and patients with other skin diseases.
  • Past or current history of any malignancy including moderate to severe dysplasia of the oral mucosa on oral biopsy.
  • Severe active infection, including active tuberculosis, hepatitis B or C infection
  • Patients with cytopenia (Hb <9g/dl, leukocyte count <4000/mm3, platelet count <100,000/mm3)
  • Patient with history of alcohol abuse.
  • Decreased liver or renal function (creatinine > 2.0mg/dl, total bilirubin > 2.5 mg/dl).
  • Severe acute infection, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, untreated glaucoma, congenital or acquired immunodeficiency, active gastroduodenal ulcer, severe osteoporosis, severe cardiac disease (NYHA grade IV), MI in the last four weeks, severe schizophrenia or depression.
  • Patient with a history of hypersensitivity to Methotrexate or Apremilast.
  • Pregnancy and lactation, women of childbearing age without effective contraception.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Prednisolone and Methotrexate (Control Arm)
prednisolone 0.75mg/kg/day (a maximum dose of 30mg at baseline) and Methotrexate 15 mg weekly for 12 weeks.
prednisolone 0.75mg/kg/day (a maximum dose of 30mg at baseline) orally
Methotrexate 15 mg weekly orally
Experimental: Prednisolone and Apremilast (Test Arm)
prednisolone 0.75mg/kg/day (a maximum dose of 30mg at baseline) and Apremilast 30 mg twice daily for 12 weeks.
prednisolone 0.75mg/kg/day (a maximum dose of 30mg at baseline) orally
Apremilast 30 mg twice daily orally

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score
Time Frame: 8 weeks and 12 weeks
Change in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score after treatment with prednisolone and methotraxate Vs Prednisolone and Apremilast at baseline, 8 weeks and 12 weeks. The VAS consists of a 10 cm line, with two endpoints representing 0 ('no pain') and 10 ('pain as bad as it could possibly be') interpretation of the scores: 0 =No Pain 2 = Mild 4 = Nagging 6 =Miserable 8 =Intense 10 = Worst
8 weeks and 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Severity by Physician global assessment of disease (PGA) score
Time Frame: 8 weeks and 12 weeks

compare the proportion of patients achieving a reduction of Physician global assessment of disease (PGA) score of 0 or a 2-grade reduction (minimum initial PGA 3) after treatment with prednisolone and methotraxate Vs Prednisolone and Apremilast at baseline, 8 weeks and 12 weeks by using a 6-point disease severity scoring system.

(0=clear, 1=almost clear, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe, 5=very severe).

8 weeks and 12 weeks
Severity and pain by oral mucosal disease severity score
Time Frame: 8 weeks and 12 weeks

the change in oral mucosal disease severity score (maximum 106) after treatment with prednisolone and methotraxate Vs Prednisolone and Apremilast at baseline, 8 weeks and 12 weeks.

Total score = Site score + Activity score + pain Score (Maximum 106) higher scores indicating greater disease activity

8 weeks and 12 weeks
serum IL 6 level
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Change in serum IL 6 after treatment with prednisolone and methotraxate Vs Prednisolone and Apremilast he levels of salivary and serum IL-6 were significantly higher among patients with OLP than among healthy control participants
12 weeks
Quality of life by using oral health-related quality of life score (ORAL HEALTH IMPACT PROFILE - 14 )
Time Frame: 8 weeks and 12 weeks

Change in the oral health-related quality of life from baseline after 8 and 12 weeks.

designed to assess patients' perception of the impact of oral disorders on their quality of life (QoL).

The OHIP-14 scores can range from 0 to 56 and are calculated by summing the ordinal values for the 14 items. The domain scores can range from 0 to 8. Higher OHIP-14 scores indicate worse and lower scores indicate better OHRQol

8 weeks and 12 weeks
Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events of both test and control group
Time Frame: 12 weeks
treatment-emergent adverse events in both the groups The adverse events in the patients are to be assessed by non-directive questioning at the time of the follow-up visit. Patients can access the investigators directly in case of any adverse events and report them. All adverse events irrespective of their previous reported status are to be recorded with details about nature, intensity, duration, measures taken, outcome, and causal relationship to prednisolone, methotrexate and apremilast.
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Debasish Hota, MD, DM, professor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 26, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 25, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

February 15, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Oral Lichen Planus

Clinical Trials on Prednisolone

3
Subscribe