Secondary Access - FEmoral or Radial in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation? (SAFER-TAVI)

May 12, 2026 updated by: Jennifer Zhou, The Alfred
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a well-known safe and effective treatment for anatomically suitable patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). Despite rapid improvements in TAVI technique and technology, vascular and bleeding complications from both primary and secondary access sites remain significant, with approximately 25% of access related complications thought to be related to secondary access. The transfemoral route remains the most common approach for primary access during TAVI due to proven safety and efficacy. Secondary access during TAVI, which is needed for angiographic guidance, has drawn little attention in randomised trials of TAVI. In coronary intervention, the radial approach is now preferred due to high quality evidence suggesting lower bleeding and vascular complications compared to the femoral approach. Whilst randomised control trials comparing radial vs femoral as secondary access are lacking in the TAVI setting, observational studies comparing the two secondary access routes have shown a lower risk of bleeding and vascular complications with radial compared to femoral access. A systematic review of all the major observational trials also suggests that radial access might reduce risk of bleeding, vascular complications, and even 30-day mortality, but these data are limited to observational trials and there are no randomised controlled data to confirm these findings. Accordingly, we aim to undertake a multicentre, randomised controlled trial among patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI to assess if radial secondary access is superior to femoral secondary access.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

542

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Victoria
      • Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3004
        • Recruiting
        • Alfred Health
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Antony Walton, MBBS
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Dion Stub, MBBS, PhD
      • Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3144
        • Recruiting
        • Cabrini Health
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Dion Stub, MBBS, PhD
        • Contact:
      • Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3121
        • Recruiting
        • Epworth Healthcare
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Antony Walton, MBBS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >18 years
  • Undergoing transfemoral TAVI with any commercially available transcatheter heart valve
  • Suitable radial and secondary femoral access

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Primary arterial access via surgical cut-down
  • Inadequate contralateral femoral artery access and/or bilateral radial artery access as determined by the interventional cardiologist
  • Previously failed attempt to access bilateral radial arteries.
  • Patient on hemodialysis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Radial secondary access
The SAFER-TAVI trial is randomized study comparing secondary access via a transradial versus transfemoral approach among patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI for aortic valve disease. Secondary access is gained along with primary access at the commencement of the TAVI procedure and is used for aortography before and after valve deployment and for assessment of the primary femoral access site after closure to confirm haemostasis. For patients assigned to radial access, the radial sheath will be removed using a radial band at the end of the procedure. For patients assigned to femoral access, the puncture site will be obtained under ultrasound guidance and fluoroscopic landmark identification. Unless contraindicated, the use of vascular closure devices will be recommended for all femoral cases. The choice of closure device is at the discretion of the operator. Catheters used in the access groups will be 5 or 6 French size at the discretion of the operator.
Active Comparator: Femoral secondary access
The SAFER-TAVI trial is randomized study comparing secondary access via a transradial versus transfemoral approach among patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI for aortic valve disease. Secondary access is gained along with primary access at the commencement of the TAVI procedure and is used for aortography before and after valve deployment and for assessment of the primary femoral access site after closure to confirm haemostasis. For patients assigned to radial access, the radial sheath will be removed using a radial band at the end of the procedure. For patients assigned to femoral access, the puncture site will be obtained under ultrasound guidance and fluoroscopic landmark identification. Unless contraindicated, the use of vascular closure devices will be recommended for all femoral cases. The choice of closure device is at the discretion of the operator. Catheters used in the access groups will be 5 or 6 French size at the discretion of the operator.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
All clinically relevant bleeding and all vascular complications
Time Frame: 30 days
The composite of all clinically relevant bleeding (defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC] type ≥2) and vascular complications (Valve Academic Research Consortium [VARC3] criteria) at 30 days.
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Major adverse cardiovascular events
Time Frame: 30 days
The composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and non-fatal stroke
30 days
Length of stay post-procedure
Time Frame: 30 days
Length of stay post-procedure measured in time (days) from procedure to discharge
30 days
Overall procedure duration
Time Frame: 1 day
TAVI procedure duration measured in time (minutes)
1 day
Radiation dose
Time Frame: 1 day
Radiation dose measured as air kerma in milligrays
1 day
Conversion rate to alternative vascular access site
Time Frame: 30 days
Conversion rate to alternative vascular access site
30 days
Tertiary site utilised to treat vascular complication
Time Frame: 30 days
Tertiary site utilised to treat vascular complication
30 days
Failure to perform angiogram of primary access site at completion of TAVI
Time Frame: 1 day
Failure to perform angiogram of primary access site at completion of TAVI
1 day
All clinically relevant bleeding (BARC ≥2), overall and by access site
Time Frame: 30 days
Using BARC criteria
30 days
All vascular complications, overall and by access site
Time Frame: 30 days
Using VARC-3 criteria
30 days
All-cause death
Time Frame: 30 days
Using VARC-3 criteria
30 days
Stroke
Time Frame: 30 days
Using VARC-3 criteria
30 days
Myocardial infarction
Time Frame: 30 days
Using VARC-3 criteria
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Antony Walton, MBBS, The Alfred and Epworth Healthcare
  • Principal Investigator: Dion Stub, MBBS, PhD, The Alfred and Cabrini Health

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 4, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 8, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 29, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 14, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Yes if ethics is approved

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Valve Stenoses, Aortic

Clinical Trials on Access site

Subscribe