Complications and Long-term Satisfaction in Autologous vs. Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction

March 5, 2024 updated by: Medical University of Graz

The Complex Relationship of Complications and Patient-reported Outcome Measures in Autologous Versus Alloplastic Breast Reconstruction.

Current literature on complications and health-related quality of life in autologous and alloplastic breast reconstruction is inconclusive. Despite the great demand for more in-depth, long-term studies of both techniques, current evidence is low or moderate and there are only few studies focusing on both health-related quality of life and complication rates in the same patient collective.

This study aims at investigating the complex relationship between the occurrence of complications and patient-reported long-time satisfaction in autologous and alloplastic breast reconstruction.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study is conducted at the Medical University of Graz and has been approved by the responsible ethics' committee (EK: 32-235 ex 19/20). The study includes female breast cancer patients who underwent elective breast reconstruction at one of the participating departments between April 2020 and April 2023. Written informed consent was obtained from all individual study participants enrolled.

Exclusion criteria is defined as:

  • Missing or insufficient information
  • combination of reconstruction techniques on the same breast
  • reconstruction procedures with insufficient number of cases
  • inability to fully understand study procedures and to provide informed consent

Data were first collected retrospectively from the clinical data management programs using surgical reports, outpatient charts, and physicians' letters. Personal data such as patient age, concomitant diseases, nicotine abuse, anticoagulation status, previous oncological therapy and surgery, etc. were acquired. Furthermore, surgery-related data (site and type of reconstruction, size and location of implant/tissue expander, intraoperative complications) and data on the postoperative course (early and late complications, revision surgeries, number of total surgeries required, etc.) were acquired.

The five-level modified Clavien-Dindo classification is used to objectively classify postoperative complications, to allow further comparisons between treatment options, different time periods and correlations to health-related quality of life. Postoperative changes in health-related quality of life are measured using the BREAST-Q questionnaire, an effective and reliable patient-reported outcome measure in breast reconstruction.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

162

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Graz, Austria, 8036
        • Medical University of Graz

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Female breast cancer patients between 18 and 80 years who underwent autologous or alloplastic breast reconstruction at our department, willing to participate in this study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • female breast cancer patient undergoing autologous or alloplastic breast reconstruction willing to participate in this study
  • age between 18 and 80 years (upper limit due to indication for breast reconstruction)
  • written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Missing or insufficient information
  • combination of reconstruction techniques on the same breast
  • reconstruction procedures with insufficient number of cases
  • inability to fully understand study procedures and to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Autologous Breast Reconstruction
Patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction with free flaps
Patient-reported outcome measure
Alloplastic Breast Reconstruction
Patients undergoing alloplastic breast reconstruction with implants or expander prosthesis
Patient-reported outcome measure

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complications
Time Frame: Retrospective data analysis at the time of study inclusion (up to 10 years postoperative)
The five-level modified Clavien-Dindo classification is used to objectively classify postoperative complications. A subgroup analysis will be done for complications requiring revision surgery under general anesthesia and complications not requiring revision surgery under general anesthesia.
Retrospective data analysis at the time of study inclusion (up to 10 years postoperative)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health-related quality of life and satisfaction
Time Frame: Retrospective data analysis at the time of study inclusion (up to 10 years postoperative)
Postoperative changes in health-related quality of life are measured using the BREAST-Q questionnaire (postoperative, reconstructive module), an effective and reliable patient-reported outcome measure in breast reconstruction. Questions in each category can be answered on a scale from 0 to 100, with 100 indicating the highest satisfaction or well-being.
Retrospective data analysis at the time of study inclusion (up to 10 years postoperative)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 10, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 28, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 27, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 6, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 6, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 32-235 ex 19/20

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Access to trial IPD can be requested by qualified researchers engaging in independent scientific research, and will be provided following review and approval of a research proposal and Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) and execution of a Data Sharing Agreement (DSA).

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data requests can be submitted starting 9 months after article publication and the data will be made accessible for up to 24 months. Extensions will be considered on a case-by-case basis

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • SAP
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on BREAST-Q Questionnaire

3
Subscribe