- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06300515
Exercise and Health Counseling in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (Henkō)
Exercise Intervention in Childhood and Adolescence Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: The Henkō Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), which is used to treat high-risk malignancies, as well as some other conditions or even autoimmune processes, consists of several phases: mobilization and subsequent collection of hematopoietic stem cells from the patient (autologous HSCT) or from a donor (allogeneic HSCT); pre-HSCT conditioning; infusion of patient/donor cells; establishment of a new immune and hematopoietic system in the recipient; and prophylaxis/treatment of possible adverse effects. Since the first successful allogeneic transplant was performed in 1968, thanks to the advances experienced in conditioning regimens, as well as in donor-recipient histocompatibility testing, in patient care and in the management of graft versus host disease (GvHD), together with the increase in the number of donors, the expectations of children and adolescents who receive HSCT have improved, achieving long-term survival rates (>5 years) >70%. Yet survivors are at high risk of suffering side effects and toxicities derived from the HSCT itself and/or the underlying disease, with subsequent functional decline. In addition, they show a higher risk of rehospitalization than pediatric cancer survivors who did not receive HSCT and tend to develop chronic pathologies (especially cardiometabolic conditions and frailty) at earlier stages of adulthood than the general population.
The investigators therefore aim to assess the impact of a physical exercise and health counseling program, compared to health counseling only (control group), in pediatric patients with cancer undergoing HSCT on the following outcomes assessed at 3 time points [start of hospitalization for HSCT (i.e., baseline), and 8 weeks and 3 months after hospital discharge, respectively]: muscle strength (primary outcome), and several fitness/function, clinical burden (i.e., cardiac damage, treatment toxicities, health-related quality of life, among others) and biological variables (omics, blood immune phenotype, microbiome) (secondary outcomes). We will also determine to what extent the benefits of this intervention are maintained over time. Additionally, the investigators will determine the intervention implementability in a real clinical situation in 3 different pediatric HSCT units.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Carmen Fiuza-Luces, PhD
- Phone Number: +34658961509
- Email: cfiuza.imas12@h12o.es
Study Locations
-
-
Madrid
-
Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 28041
- Recruiting
- Hospital 12 de Octubre
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age between 4 and 21 years.
- Undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for cancer diagnosis in complete remission or without remission, in 3 recruiting Hospitals in Madrid
- Undergoing treatment and follow-up in the same hospital.
- Speaking Spanish.
- Providing signed informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Not being able to participate in the trial according to protocol.
- Comorbidity or acute condition not associated with the diagnosis and that contraindicates the practice of physical exercise, such as severe deficiencies in the locomotor, neurological, cardiovascular and pulmonary systems.
- Serious or chronic medical or psychiatric condition that may increase the risk associated with participation in the trial or that may interfere with the interpretation of the results and, in the opinion of the investigator in discussion with the team, makes having such condition inappropriate for entry to this study; inability to understand the study requirements.
- Not being able to attend hospital visits to perform assessment tests, nor participate in the physical exercise and health counseling program as stipulated in the protocol.
Inability to understand the requirements of the study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Control
During the intervention phase (hospitalization for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and subsequent 8-week outpatient phase following discharge), the control group will participate in a Health Counseling Program (1 time/week) on aspects related to a healthy lifestyle such as reducing sedentary lifestyle, acquiring healthy nutritional habits, the importance sleep, screen use, and how to address barriers related to clinical status.
We will adapt the program to the needs and timing of the patient's treatment, providing the content in one session/week orally (e.g. using presentations) and in writing (e.g. through brochures).
|
During the intervention phase (hospitalization for HSCT and subsequent 8-week outpatient phase following discharge), the control group will participate in a Health Counseling Program (1 time/week) on aspects related to a healthy lifestyle such as reducing sedentary lifestyle, acquiring healthy nutritional habits, the importance sleep, screen use, and how to address barriers related to clinical status.
We will adapt the program to the needs and timing of the patient's treatment, providing the content in one session/week orally (e.g. using presentations) and in writing (e.g. through brochures).
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Exercise
During the intervention phase (hospitalization for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and subsequent 8-week outpatient phase following discharge), the intervention group will participate in exactly the same Health Counseling Program as the Control group.
Additionally, this group will perform an exercise program combining aerobic and muscle strength exercises
|
Same as Control Group + exercise program as described below: Same as Control Group + exercise program as described below: Hospital ward (during HSCT); and Hospital Gym or online (patients' home) during the outpatient phase. Frequency: 3-5 days/week. Session duration: 15 to 65 minutes. Muscle strength training (30 minutes): large muscle group exercises (upper/lower limb + trunk exercises) performed as a circuit using body weight or against resistance (against gravity and with body weight, elastic bands, dumbbells, weighted vests, machines), with a wide range of joint mobility and at submaximal/maximum voluntary speed. Aerobic training (10-20 minutes): bicycling, crank-ergometry, circuit-style exercises, and games. Inspiratory muscle training will also be performed (5 min daily, using a specific device that creates resistance against inspiration).
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in unilateral knee-extension muscle strength (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Unilateral knee-extension muscle strength will be assessed using a 5-RM test
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in unilateral knee-extension muscle strength (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Unilateral knee-extension muscle strength will be assessed using a 5-RM test
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in unilateral maximal voluntary isometric contraction of the elbow flexor muscles (at 90º angle) (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Unilateral maximal voluntary isometric contraction of the elbow flexor muscles (at 90º angle) will be assessed using a portable digital dynamometer tissue
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in unilateral maximal voluntary isometric contraction of the elbow flexor muscles (at 90º angle) (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Unilateral maximal voluntary isometric contraction of the elbow flexor muscles (at 90º angle) will be assessed using a portable digital dynamometer tissue
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in unilateral maximal voluntary isometric contraction of the knee extensor muscles (at 90º angle) (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Unilateral maximal voluntary isometric contraction of the knee extensor muscles (at 90º angle) will be assessed using a portable digital dynamometer tissue
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in unilateral maximal voluntary isometric contraction of the knee extensor muscles (at 90º angle) (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Unilateral maximal voluntary isometric contraction of the knee extensor muscles (at 90º angle) will be assessed using a portable digital dynamometer tissue
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in handgrip strength (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Handgrip strength will be assessed using a handheld digital Smedley dynamometer (TKK 5401, Takei Scientific Instruments Co., Ltd., Niigata, Japan)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in handgrip strength (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Handgrip strength will be assessed using a handheld digital Smedley dynamometer (TKK 5401, Takei Scientific Instruments Co., Ltd., Niigata, Japan)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in maximum inspiratory muscle strength (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Maximum inspiratory muscle strength will be assessed using a mouth pressure meter (CareFusion MicroRPM Respiratory Pressure Meter; Kent, UK)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in maximum inspiratory muscle strength (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Maximum inspiratory muscle strength will be assessed using a mouth pressure meter (CareFusion MicroRPM Respiratory Pressure Meter; Kent, UK)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in VO2 (mL·kg-1·min-1) at peak (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
VO2 (mL·kg-1·min-1) at peak will be assessed using a ramp-like bicycle ergometer
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in VO2 (mL·kg-1·min-1) at peak (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
VO2 (mL·kg-1·min-1) at peak will be assessed using a ramp-like bicycle ergometer
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in VO2 (mL·kg-1·min-1) at the ventilatory threshold (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
VO2 (mL·kg-1·min-1) at the ventilatory threshold will be assessed using a ramp-like bicycle ergometer
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in VO2 (mL·kg-1·min-1) at the ventilatory threshold (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
VO2 (mL·kg-1·min-1) at the ventilatory threshold will be assessed using a ramp-like bicycle ergometer
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in power output (watts) at peak (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Power output (watts) at peak will be assessed using a ramp-like bicycle ergometer
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in power output (watts) at peak (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Power output (watts) at peak will be assessed using a ramp-like bicycle ergometer
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in power output (watts) at the ventilatory threshold (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Power output (watts) at the ventilatory threshold will be assessed using a ramp-like bicycle ergometer
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in power output (watts) at the ventilatory threshold (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Power output (watts) at the ventilatory threshold will be assessed using a ramp-like bicycle ergometer
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in walking distance covered (m) (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Walking distance will be assessed using the 6-minute walking test
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in walking distance covered (m) (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Walking distance will be assessed using the 6-minute walking test
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in heart rate recovery (beats/min) (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Heart rate recovery will be assessed using a heart rate monitor after completing the 3-minute step test
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in heart rate recovery (beats/min) (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Heart rate recovery will be assessed using a heart rate monitor after completing the 3-minute step test
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in range of motion of the ankle (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Range of motion of the ankle will be assessed using a goniometer (Baseline Evaluation Instruments, Fabrication Enterprises Inc.; Elmsford, NY)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in range of motion of the ankle (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Range of motion of the ankle will be assessed using a goniometer (Baseline Evaluation Instruments, Fabrication Enterprises Inc.; Elmsford, NY)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in physical activity (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Physical activity will be assessed using the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in physical activity (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Physical activity will be assessed using the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in body mass index (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Body mass index will be calculated dividing body weight in kilograms by the square of the height in meters (kg/m2)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in body mass index (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Body mass index will be calculated dividing body weight in kilograms by the square of the height in meters (kg/m2)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in waist-to-hip ratio (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Waist-to-hip ratio will be calculated dividing waist by hip circumference (Gulick II Tape Measure, Country Technology, Inc.; Gays Mills, WI) using the same units
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in waist-to-hip ratio (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Waist-to-hip ratio will be calculated dividing waist by hip circumference (Gulick II Tape Measure, Country Technology, Inc.; Gays Mills, WI) using the same units
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in arm circumference (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Arm circumference will be assessed under relaxed and contracted conditions (Gulick II Tape Measure, Country Technology, Inc.; Gays Mills, WI)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in arm circumference (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Arm circumference will be assessed under relaxed and contracted conditions (Gulick II Tape Measure, Country Technology, Inc.; Gays Mills, WI)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in lean mass (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Lean mass will be assessed using a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry assessment (Hologic Serie Discovery QDR, Software Physician's Viewer, APEX System Software version 3.1.2.; Bedford, MA)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in lean mass (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Lean mass will be assessed using a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry assessment (Hologic Serie Discovery QDR, Software Physician's Viewer, APEX System Software version 3.1.2.; Bedford, MA)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in fat mass (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Fat mass will be assessed using a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry assessment (Hologic Serie Discovery QDR, Software Physician's Viewer, APEX System Software version 3.1.2.; Bedford, MA)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in fat mass (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Fat mass will be assessed using a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry assessment (Hologic Serie Discovery QDR, Software Physician's Viewer, APEX System Software version 3.1.2.; Bedford, MA)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in visceral fat (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Visceral fat will be assessed using a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry assessment (Hologic Serie Discovery QDR, Software Physician's Viewer, APEX System Software version 3.1.2.; Bedford, MA)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in visceral fat (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Visceral fat will be assessed using a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry assessment (Hologic Serie Discovery QDR, Software Physician's Viewer, APEX System Software version 3.1.2.; Bedford, MA)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in fat percentage (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Fat percentage will be assessed using triceps skinfold (Harpenden caliper, Crymych, United Kingdom)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in fat percentage (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Fat percentage will be assessed using triceps skinfold (Harpenden caliper, Crymych, United Kingdom)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in bone mineral density of the total body (less head) (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Bone mineral density of the total body (less head) will be assessed using a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry assessment (Hologic Serie Discovery QDR, Software Physician's Viewer, APEX System Software version 3.1.2.; Bedford, MA)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in bone mineral density of the total body (less head) (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Bone mineral density of the total body (less head) will be assessed using a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry assessment (Hologic Serie Discovery QDR, Software Physician's Viewer, APEX System Software version 3.1.2.; Bedford, MA)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in bone mineral density of the femoral neck (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Bone mineral density of the femoral neck will be assessed using a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry assessment (Hologic Serie Discovery QDR, Software Physician's Viewer, APEX System Software version 3.1.2.; Bedford, MA)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in bone mineral density of the femoral neck (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Bone mineral density of the femoral neck will be assessed using a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry assessment (Hologic Serie Discovery QDR, Software Physician's Viewer, APEX System Software version 3.1.2.; Bedford, MA)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in phase angle (º) (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Phase angle (º) will be assessed using multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (BodyComposition software, version 9.0.21212-29;
Dietosystem, Italy), and it is calculated as the arctangent of reactance to resistance, following standardized measurement procedures.Physician's Viewer, APEX System Software version 3.1.2.; Bedford, MA)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in phase angle (º) (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Phase angle (º) will be assessed using multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (BodyComposition software, version 9.0.21212-29;
Dietosystem, Italy), and it is calculated as the arctangent of reactance to resistance, following standardized measurement procedures.Physician's Viewer, APEX System Software version 3.1.2.; Bedford, MA)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in adherence to Mediterranean diet (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Adherence to Mediterranean diet will be assessed using the Mediterranean Diet Quality Index for children and adolescents (KIDMED) questionnaire
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in adherence to Mediterranean diet (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Adherence to Mediterranean diet will be assessed using the Mediterranean Diet Quality Index for children and adolescents (KIDMED) questionnaire
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in health-related quality of life (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) 3.0 (Patients and Tutor's version, Cancer Module)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in health-related quality of life (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) 3.0 (Patients and Tutor's version, Cancer Module)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in cancer-related fatigue (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Cancer-related fatigue will be assessed using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) 3.0 (Patients and Tutor's version, Multidimensional Fatigue Scale)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in cancer-related fatigue (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Cancer-related fatigue will be assessed using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) 3.0 (Patients and Tutor's version, Multidimensional Fatigue Scale)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in survival (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Survival will be assessed from diagnosis to the end of the study or death using medical records
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in survival (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Survival will be assessed from diagnosis to the end of the study or death using medical records
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in treatment tolerability (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Treatment tolerability will be assessed as the number of days of treatment interruption/delay and hospitalization length (additional/prolonged hospitalization during treatment) using medical records
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in toxicity grades (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Toxicity grade will be assessed using the formula from Langlais et al (2022)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in toxicity grades (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Toxicity grade will be assessed using the formula from Langlais et al (2022)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in left-ventricular (LV) mass (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
LV mass will be assessed using 2-D guided M-mode imaging
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in left-ventricular (LV) mass (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
LV mass will be assessed using 2-D guided M-mode imaging
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in interventricular septum thickness (IVS) (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
IVS will be assessed using 2-D guided M-mode imaging
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in interventricular septum thickness (IVS) (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
IVS will be assessed using 2-D guided M-mode imaging
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
LVEDV will be assessed using 2-D guided M-mode imaging
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
LVEDV will be assessed using 2-D guided M-mode imaging
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in LV posterior wall thickness (LVPW) (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
LVPW will be assessed using 2-D guided M-mode imaging
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in LV posterior wall thickness (LVPW) (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
LVPW will be assessed using 2-D guided M-mode imaging
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in relative wall thickness (RWT) (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
RWT will be assessed using the following formula: RWT = (IVS + LVPW)/LVEDV
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in relative wall thickness (RWT) (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
RWT will be assessed using the following formula: RWT = (IVS + LVPW)/LVEDV
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in LV hypertrophy (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
LV hypertrophy will be assessed using the age-specific >95th percentile for LV mass indexed by height (in g·m-2.7)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in LV hypertrophy (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
LV hypertrophy will be assessed using the age-specific >95th percentile for LV mass indexed by height (in g·m-2.7)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in LV ejection fraction (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
LV ejection fraction will be assessed using color tissue Doppler echocardiography
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in LV ejection fraction (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
LV ejection fraction will be assessed using color tissue Doppler echocardiography
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in LV fractional shortening (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
LV fractional shortening will be assessed using color tissue Doppler echocardiography
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in LV fractional shortening (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
LV fractional shortening will be assessed using color tissue Doppler echocardiography
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in LV global longitudinal strain (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
LV global longitudinal strain will be assessed using 2D-speckle tracking echocardiography
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in LV global longitudinal strain (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
LV global longitudinal strain will be assessed using 2D-speckle tracking echocardiography
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in NT-proBNP (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
NT-proBNP will be determined with the relevant immunoassay kits on an automated biochemistry analyzer (Cobas C701, Roche Diagnostics; Madrid, Spain)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in NT-proBNP (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
NT-proBNP will be determined with the relevant immunoassay kits on an automated biochemistry analyzer (Cobas C701, Roche Diagnostics; Madrid, Spain)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in high-sensitivity cardiac troponin-I (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
High-sensitivity cardiac troponin-I will be determined with the relevant immunoassay kits on an automated biochemistry analyzer (Cobas C701, Roche Diagnostics; Madrid, Spain)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in high-sensitivity cardiac troponin-I (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
High-sensitivity cardiac troponin-I will be determined with the relevant immunoassay kits on an automated biochemistry analyzer (Cobas C701, Roche Diagnostics; Madrid, Spain)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in cardiometabolic-related proteome (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Cardiometabolic-related proteome will be assessed using the Olink® Cardiovascular panel (Olink Target 96 Cardiovascular II Protein assay list), which measures 92 cardiometabolic-related human proteins simultaneously in plasma (expressed in Normalized Protein eXpression (NPX) values, an arbitrary unit presented in Log2 scale) (https://olink.com/products-services/target/cardiometabolic-panel/)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in cardiometabolic-related proteome (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Cardiometabolic-related proteome will be assessed using the Olink® Cardiovascular panel (Olink Target 96 Cardiovascular II Protein assay list), which measures 92 cardiometabolic-related human proteins simultaneously in plasma (expressed in Normalized Protein eXpression (NPX) values, an arbitrary unit presented in Log2 scale) (https://olink.com/products-services/target/cardiometabolic-panel/)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
High-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels will be assessed using a chemistry analyzer (Cobas C701, Roche Diagnostics; Madrid, Spain)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
High-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels will be assessed using a chemistry analyzer (Cobas C701, Roche Diagnostics; Madrid, Spain)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in total cholesterol (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Fasting blood samples will be used to assess total cholesterol
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in total cholesterol (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Fasting blood samples will be used to assess total cholesterol
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Fasting blood samples will be used to assess high-density lipoprotein cholesterol
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Fasting blood samples will be used to assess high-density lipoprotein cholesterol
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Fasting blood samples will be used to assess low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Fasting blood samples will be used to assess low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in triglycerides (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Fasting blood samples will be used to assess triglycerides
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in triglycerides (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Fasting blood samples will be used to assess triglycerides
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in apolipoprotein B (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Fasting blood samples will be used to assess apolipoprotein B
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in apolipoprotein B (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Fasting blood samples will be used to assess apolipoprotein B
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in fasting glycaemia (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Fasting blood samples will be used to assess glycaemia
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in fasting glycaemia (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Fasting blood samples will be used to assess glycaemia
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in glycated hemoglobin (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Fasting blood samples will be used to assess glycated hemoglobin
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in glycated hemoglobin (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Fasting blood samples will be used to assess glycated hemoglobin
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in insulin (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Fasting blood samples will be used to assess insulin
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in insulin (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Fasting blood samples will be used to assess insulin
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance index (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Fasting blood samples will be used to assess glucose and insulin, and homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance index will be computed
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance index (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Fasting blood samples will be used to assess glucose and insulin, and homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance index will be computed
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in total leukocyte and monocyte count (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Total leukocyte and monocyte count will be assessed using a hematology analyzer (Advia 120 Hematology System, Bayer Corporation; Tarrytown, NY)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in total leukocyte and monocyte count (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Total leukocyte and monocyte count will be assessed using a hematology analyzer (Advia 120 Hematology System, Bayer Corporation; Tarrytown, NY)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in main lymphocyte subpopulations (%) (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Main lymphocyte subpopulations will be assessed on fresh blood samples using a multiparametric flow cytometer (FACSCantoTM II, Becton Dickinson and Company BD Biosciences; San Jose, CA) together with BD FACSDivaTM software version 8 (Becton Dickinson and Company BD Biosciences)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in main lymphocyte subpopulations (%) (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Main lymphocyte subpopulations will be assessed on fresh blood samples using a multiparametric flow cytometer (FACSCantoTM II, Becton Dickinson and Company BD Biosciences; San Jose, CA) together with BD FACSDivaTM software version 8 (Becton Dickinson and Company BD Biosciences)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in gut microbiome diversity (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
DNA sequencing to determine gut microbiome diversity (i.e., alpha and beta)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in gut microbiome diversity (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
DNA sequencing to determine gut microbiome diversity (i.e., alpha and beta)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in specific bacteria abundance (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
DNA sequencing to determine specific bacteria abundance
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in specific bacteria abundance (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
DNA sequencing to determine specific bacteria abundance
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in functional mobility (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Functional mobility will be assessed using the Timed Up and Go test
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in functional mobility (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Functional mobility will be assessed using the Timed Up and Go test
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in functional mobility (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Functional mobility will be assessed using the Timed Up and Down Stairs test
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in functional mobility (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Functional mobility will be assessed using the Timed Up and Down Stairs test
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in functional mobility (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Functional mobility will be assessed using the 30-second chair stand test
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in functional mobility (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Functional mobility will be assessed using the 30-second chair stand test
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in functional mobility (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Functional mobility will be assessed using the 5-times Sit-To-Stand test
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in functional mobility (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Functional mobility will be assessed using the 5-times Sit-To-Stand test
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in functional mobility (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Functional mobility will be assessed using the Quick test
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in functional mobility (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Functional mobility will be assessed using the Quick test
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in the number and duration of viral infections (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Number and duration of viral infections will be retrieved from medical records
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in the number and duration of viral infections (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Number and duration of viral infections will be retrieved from medical records
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in the number and duration of bacterial infections (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Number and duration of bacterial infections will be retrieved from medical records
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in the number and duration of bacterial infections (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Number and duration of bacterial infections will be retrieved from medical records
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Change in the number and duration of fungal infections (from baseline to end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Number and duration of fungal infections will be retrieved from medical records
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 8-9 weeks post-discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Change in the number and duration of fungal infections (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Number and duration of fungal infections will be retrieved from medical records
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Reach: Exclusion rate (baseline)
Time Frame: Assessed at one time point (implementation phase): (1) at baseline (diagnosis)
|
Exclusion rate will be evaluated using the Reach questionnaire
|
Assessed at one time point (implementation phase): (1) at baseline (diagnosis)
|
|
Reach: Non-participation rate (baseline)
Time Frame: Assessed at one time point (implementation phase): (1) at baseline (diagnosis)
|
Non-participation rate will be evaluated using the Reach questionnaire
|
Assessed at one time point (implementation phase): (1) at baseline (diagnosis)
|
|
Reach: Recruitment rate (baseline)
Time Frame: Assessed at one time point (implementation phase): (1) at baseline (diagnosis)
|
Recruitment rate will be evaluated using the Reach questionnaire
|
Assessed at one time point (implementation phase): (1) at baseline (diagnosis)
|
|
Reach: Test feasibility rate (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at three time points (implementation phase): (1) at baseline (diagnosis); (2) 8-9 weeks post discharge (i.e., end of treatment); and (3) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Feasibility rate will be evaluated using the Reach questionnaire
|
Assessed at three time points (implementation phase): (1) at baseline (diagnosis); (2) 8-9 weeks post discharge (i.e., end of treatment); and (3) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Reach: Intervention session feasibility rate (end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at one time point (implementation phase): (1) 8-9 weeks post discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Intervention session feasibility rate will be evaluated using the Reach questionnaire
|
Assessed at one time point (implementation phase): (1) 8-9 weeks post discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Reach: Dropout rate (from end of treatment to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points (implementation phase): (1) 8-9 weeks post discharge (i.e., end of treatment); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Dropout rate will be evaluated using the Reach questionnaire (from end of treatment to follow-up)
|
Assessed at two time points (implementation phase): (1) 8-9 weeks post discharge (i.e., end of treatment); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Reach: Intervention satisfaction level (end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at one time point (implementation phase): (1) 8-9 weeks post discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Intervention satisfaction level will be evaluated using the Reach questionnaire
|
Assessed at one time point (implementation phase): (1) 8-9 weeks post discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Reach: Reasons why the patient participates in the trial (baseline)
Time Frame: Assessed at one time point (implementation phase): (1) at baseline (diagnosis)
|
Reasons why the patient participates in the trial will be evaluated using the Reach questionnaire
|
Assessed at one time point (implementation phase): (1) at baseline (diagnosis)
|
|
Reach: Reasons why the patient does not participate in the trial (baseline)
Time Frame: Assessed at one time point (implementation phase): (1) at baseline (diagnosis)
|
Reasons why the patient does not participate in the trial will be evaluated using the Reach questionnaire
|
Assessed at one time point (implementation phase): (1) at baseline (diagnosis)
|
|
Reach: Reasons why the patient is excluded (baseline)
Time Frame: Assessed at one time point (implementation phase): (1) at baseline (diagnosis)
|
Reasons why the patient is excluded will be evaluated using the Reach questionnaire
|
Assessed at one time point (implementation phase): (1) at baseline (diagnosis)
|
|
Reach: Reasons why the patient drops out (from end of treatment to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two points (implementation phase): (1) 8-9 weeks post discharge (i.e., end of treatment); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Reasons why the patient drops out will be evaluated using the Reach questionnaire (from end of treatment to follow-up)
|
Assessed at two points (implementation phase): (1) 8-9 weeks post discharge (i.e., end of treatment); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Reach: Medical conditions and sociocultural of the patient and caregivers (baseline)
Time Frame: Assessed at one time point (implementation phase): (1) at baseline (diagnosis)
|
Medical conditions and sociocultural of the patient and caregivers will be evaluated using the Reach questionnaire
|
Assessed at one time point (implementation phase): (1) at baseline (diagnosis)
|
|
Reach: Sociocultural, economic and demographic characteristics of the patient and caregivers (baseline)
Time Frame: Assessed at one time point (implementation phase): (1) at baseline (diagnosis)
|
Sociocultural, economic and demographic characteristics of the patient and caregivers will be evaluated using the Reach questionnaire
|
Assessed at one time point (implementation phase): (1) at baseline (diagnosis)
|
|
Reach: Reasons why efficacy and effectiveness research evaluation tests are not carried out (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at three time points (implementation phase): (1) at baseline (diagnosis); (2) 8-9 weeks post discharge (i.e., end of treatment); and (3) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Reasons why efficacy and effectiveness research evaluation tests are not carried out will be evaluated using the Reach questionnaire
|
Assessed at three time points (implementation phase): (1) at baseline (diagnosis); (2) 8-9 weeks post discharge (i.e., end of treatment); and (3) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Reach: Reasons why the planned intervention sessions are not being carried out (end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at one time point (implementation phase): (1) 8-9 weeks post discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Reasons why the planned intervention sessions are not being carried out will be evaluated using the Reach questionnaire
|
Assessed at one time point (implementation phase): (1) 8-9 weeks post discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Effectiveness: RE-AIM Effectiveness component (end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at one time point (implementation phase): (1) 8-9 weeks post discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
RE-AIM Effectiveness component will be evaluated using the Effectiveness questionnaire
|
Assessed at one time point (implementation phase): (1) 8-9 weeks post discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Effectiveness: Impact of the intervention on the results of the efficacy and effectiveness variables (end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at one time point (implementation phase): (1) 8-9 weeks post discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Impact of the intervention on the results of the efficacy and effectiveness variables will be evaluated using the Effectiveness questionnaire
|
Assessed at one time point (implementation phase): (1) 8-9 weeks post discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Effectiveness: Serious adverse effects of the intervention (from end of treatment to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two points (implementation phase): (1) 8-9 weeks post discharge (i.e., end of treatment); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Serious adverse effects of the intervention will be evaluated using the Effectiveness questionnaire
|
Assessed at two points (implementation phase): (1) 8-9 weeks post discharge (i.e., end of treatment); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Maintenance: RE-AIM maintenance component (wear rate) (from end of treatment to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points (implementation phase): (1) 8-9 weeks post discharge (i.e., end of treatment); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
RE-AIM maintenance component (wear rate) will be evaluated using the Maintenance questionnaire
|
Assessed at two time points (implementation phase): (1) 8-9 weeks post discharge (i.e., end of treatment); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Maintenance: Reasons why the end-of-follow-up evaluation of the research focused on efficacy and effectiveness was not carried out (follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at one time point (implementation phase): (1) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Reasons why the end-of-follow-up evaluation of the research focused on efficacy and effectiveness was not carried out will be evaluated using the Maintenance questionnaire
|
Assessed at one time point (implementation phase): (1) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Adoption: RE-AIM adoption component related to the clinical team (participation) (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at three time points (implementation phase): (1) at baseline (diagnosis); (2) 8-9 weeks post discharge (i.e., end of treatment); and (3) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
RE-AIM adoption component related to the clinical team (participation) will be evaluated using the Adoption questionnaire
|
Assessed at three time points (implementation phase): (1) at baseline (diagnosis); (2) 8-9 weeks post discharge (i.e., end of treatment); and (3) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Adoption: RE-AIM adoption component related to the clinical team (non-participation rate) (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at three time points (implementation phase): (1) at baseline (diagnosis); (2) 8-9 weeks post discharge (i.e., end of treatment); and (3) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
RE-AIM adoption component related to the clinical team (non-participation rate) will be evaluated using the Adoption questionnaire
|
Assessed at three time points (implementation phase): (1) at baseline (diagnosis); (2) 8-9 weeks post discharge (i.e., end of treatment); and (3) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Adoption: RE-AIM adoption component related to the clinical team (dropout rate) (from end of treatment to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points (implementation phase): (1) 8-9 weeks post discharge (i.e., end of treatment); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
RE-AIM adoption component related to the clinical team (dropout rate) will be evaluated using the Adoption questionnaire
|
Assessed at two time points (implementation phase): (1) 8-9 weeks post discharge (i.e., end of treatment); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Adoption: Reasons why the clinical team participates in the trial (preparatory phase)
Time Frame: Assessed at one time point (preparatory phase): (1) at the beginning of the trial over an average of two months
|
Reasons why the clinical team participates in the trial will be evaluated using the Adoption questionnaire
|
Assessed at one time point (preparatory phase): (1) at the beginning of the trial over an average of two months
|
|
Adoption: Reasons why the clinical team does not participate in the trial (preparatory phase)
Time Frame: Assessed at one time point (preparatory phase): (1) at the beginning of the trial over an average of two months
|
Reasons why the clinical team does not participate in the trial will be evaluated using the Adoption questionnaire
|
Assessed at one time point (preparatory phase): (1) at the beginning of the trial over an average of two months
|
|
Adoption: Reasons why the clinical team drops out (from end of treatment to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points (implementation phase): (1) 8-9 weeks post discharge (i.e., end of treatment); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Reasons why the clinical team drops out will be evaluated using the Adoption questionnaire
|
Assessed at two time points (implementation phase): (1) 8-9 weeks post discharge (i.e., end of treatment); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Adoption: Sociocultural, economic, demographic and motivational characteristics of the clinical team (preparatory phase)
Time Frame: Assessed at one time point (preparatory phase): (1) at the beginning of the trial over an average of two months
|
Sociocultural, economic, demographic and motivational characteristics of the clinical team will be evaluated using the Adoption questionnaire
|
Assessed at one time point (preparatory phase): (1) at the beginning of the trial over an average of two months
|
|
Adoption: RE-AIM adoption component in relation to the environment (HSCT units) (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at three time points (implementation phase): (1) at baseline (diagnosis); (2) 8-9 weeks post discharge (i.e., end of treatment); and (3) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
RE-AIM adoption component in relation to the environment (HSCT units) will be evaluated using the Adoption questionnaire
|
Assessed at three time points (implementation phase): (1) at baseline (diagnosis); (2) 8-9 weeks post discharge (i.e., end of treatment); and (3) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Adoption: Participation rate of HSCT units (preparatory phase)
Time Frame: Assessed at one time point (preparatory phase): (1) at the beginning of the trial over an average of two months
|
Participation rate of HSCT units will be evaluated using the Adoption questionnaire
|
Assessed at one time point (preparatory phase): (1) at the beginning of the trial over an average of two months
|
|
Adoption: Facilitators/barriers to implementing the intervention (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at three time points (implementation phase): (1) at baseline (diagnosis); (2) 8-9 weeks post discharge (i.e., end of treatment); and (3) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Facilitators/barriers to implementing the intervention will be evaluated using the Adoption questionnaire
|
Assessed at three time points (implementation phase): (1) at baseline (diagnosis); (2) 8-9 weeks post discharge (i.e., end of treatment); and (3) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Adoption: Suitability of the implementation strategies applied (closing phase)
Time Frame: Assessed at one time point (closing phase): (1) at the end of the trial over an average of two months
|
Suitability of the implementation strategies applied will be evaluated using the Adoption questionnaire
|
Assessed at one time point (closing phase): (1) at the end of the trial over an average of two months
|
|
Adoption: Differences between efficacy/effectiveness research and implementation research (closing phase)
Time Frame: Assessed at one time point (closing phase): (1) at the end of the trial over an average of two months
|
Differences between efficacy/effectiveness research and implementation research will be evaluated using the Adoption questionnaire
|
Assessed at one time point (closing phase): (1) at the end of the trial over an average of two months
|
|
Adoption: Intervention costs (closing phase)
Time Frame: Assessed at one time point (closing phase): (1) at the end of the trial over an average of two months
|
Intervention costs will be evaluated using the Adoption questionnaire
|
Assessed at one time point (closing phase): (1) at the end of the trial over an average of two months
|
|
Implementation: RE-AIM implementation component (feasibility rate) (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at three time points (implementation phase): (1) at baseline (diagnosis); (2) 8-9 weeks post discharge (i.e., end of treatment); and (3) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
RE-AIM implementation component (feasibility rate) will be evaluated using the Implementation questionnaire
|
Assessed at three time points (implementation phase): (1) at baseline (diagnosis); (2) 8-9 weeks post discharge (i.e., end of treatment); and (3) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
|
Implementation: Level of satisfaction related to communication between families, patients, research team and clinician (end of treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at one time point (implementation phase): (1) 8-9 weeks post discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Level of satisfaction related to communication between families, patients, research team and clinician will be evaluated using the Implementation questionnaire
|
Assessed at one time point (implementation phase): (1) 8-9 weeks post discharge (i.e., end of treatment)
|
|
Implementation: Degree of execution of the clinical team's implementation research functions within their usual practice (from baseline to follow-up)
Time Frame: Assessed at three time points (implementation phase): (1) at baseline (diagnosis); (2) 8-9 weeks post discharge (i.e., end of treatment); and (3) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Degree of execution of the clinical team's implementation research functions within their usual practice will be evaluated using the Implementation questionnaire
|
Assessed at three time points (implementation phase): (1) at baseline (diagnosis); (2) 8-9 weeks post discharge (i.e., end of treatment); and (3) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- PI23/00396
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Hematopoietic System--Cancer
-
Capital Research Institute of PediatricsUnknownHematopoietic System--CancerChina
-
Leland MethenyNo longer availableHematopoietic/Lymphoid CancerUnited States
-
Fred Hutchinson Cancer CenterUniversity of WashingtonCompletedCancer | Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationUnited States
-
Mayo ClinicRecruitingMalignant Solid Neoplasm | Cancer | Hematopoietic and Lymphoid System Neoplasm | Cancer Gene Mutation | PAN Gene MutationUnited States
-
Victor WangDana-Farber Cancer Institute; care.coach corporationRecruitingCancer | Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationUnited States
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingCancer | Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationUnited States, Tanzania, India
-
Mayo ClinicNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingMalignant Solid Neoplasm | Hematopoietic and Lymphoid System Neoplasm | Hematopoietic and Lymphatic System NeoplasmUnited States
-
Phoenix Children's HospitalUniversity of ArizonaCompletedPediatric Cancer | Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant | DeconditioningUnited States
-
Mayo ClinicCompletedMalignant Solid Neoplasm | Cancer | Hematopoietic and Lymphatic System NeoplasmUnited States
-
University of Colorado, DenverNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedHematopoietic/Lymphoid CancerUnited States
Clinical Trials on Control Group (Active Comparator)
-
Penn State UniversityNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)RecruitingSubstance Use Disorders | Substance Abuse | Prevention | Legislation | Use of Research EvidenceUnited States
-
Hasan Kalyoncu UniversityNot yet recruitingOsteoarthritis, KneeTurkey
-
The Hospital for Sick ChildrenChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario; IWK Health Centre; Provincial Health...RecruitingJuvenile Idiopathic ArthritisCanada
-
Riphah International UniversityCompleted
-
Linnea PolgreenNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)CompletedHypertensionUnited States
-
Dokuz Eylul UniversityDokuz Eylül University, Scientific Research Projects Coordination UnitNot yet recruitingVirtual Reality | Nursing Students | Breaking Bad News Skills
-
University of Illinois at ChicagoNot yet recruiting
-
Mackay Medical CollegeNot yet recruitingBehavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia
-
University of ExtremaduraActive, not recruitingOlder Adults, Balance | Postural Balance | Older Adult | Balance AssessmentSpain
-
Federal University of PelotasActive, not recruitingFibromyalgia | Fibromyalgia, PrimaryBrazil