- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06307028
Sistas Informing Sistas on Topics About AIDS and Prevention (SISTA-P) (SISTA-P)
April 7, 2026 updated by: Shawnika J. Hull, PhD, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Sistas Informing Sistas on Topics About AIDS and PrEP
In this project, the investigators will provide a new HIV prevention training and empowerment sessions to Black women in Washington D.C., Atlanta and New Orleans, who are at high risk for getting HIV.
This training is tailored to the experience of Black women and seeks to reduce the high HIV transmission rates in the Black community.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Experienced facilitators will implement three cycles of six 3-hour sessions with up to 15 participants per cycle while expert panelists observe.
After each session, participants and subject matter expert observers will complete brief surveys.
Surveys following each session include closed and open-ended measures: six items rating how well the session conveyed core information (e.g., I am confident I can communicate more effectively [Session 3]; I have a better understanding of the effects of alcohol on making sexual choices, [Session 4]) and single-item scales to evaluate the facilitator's performance and the session overall.
In open-ended measures, respondents will be prompted to elaborate on their survey responses to identify ways the session could be improved.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
23
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
District of Columbia
-
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States, 20002
- The Women's Collective
-
-
New Jersey
-
New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States, 08854
- Rutgers University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Black women are eligible if you:
- Have sex with men
- Are age 18+
- Live in Washington D.C., Atlanta, GA, or New Orleans, LA
- Are not HIV+
Exclusion Criteria:
- HIV+
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: SISTA-P Intervention
Participants will complete four sessions lasting up to three hours each over the course of one week.
The sessions will be conducted by two facilitators with a technical monitor and the PI observing.
Core elements of SISTA-P are: (1) small group discussions, modeling and role-play that facilitate repetition, reinforcement and sequential approximation; (2) skilled facilitators; (3) gender and culturally specific materials to enhance pride and self-worth; (4) teaching negotiation, self-advocacy; and (5) HIV prevention relevant skills; (6) discussing gender and culture-specific barriers and facilitators to prevention; and (7) enhancing HIV prevention norms and self-efficacy.
Each discussion group will consist of up to 15 participants and each cycle will consist of one group.
Participants will be asked to complete a follow up survey and two booster sessions.
They will also be asked to submit photo-confirmation of PrEP prescription to the research team.
|
This intervention is a small group discussion designed specifically for Black women.
The sessions cover topics including: self pride and self-care; HIV & PrEP education; assertiveness skills training; coping skills; skills practice; and barriers and facilitators to HIV prevention and PrEP.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Feasibility of the Intervention Scale
Time Frame: At the time of post-test (after 6 sessions)
|
5-item scale, range 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).
Lower values indicate less feasibility and higher values indicate more feasibility; adapted from Weiner, B.J., Lewis, C.C., Stanick, C. et al.
Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures.
Implementation Sci 12, 108 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3
|
At the time of post-test (after 6 sessions)
|
|
Acceptability of the Intervention Scale
Time Frame: At the time of post-test (after 6 sessions).
|
5-item scale, range 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).
Lower scores indicate less acceptability, and higher scores indicate more acceptability.
adapted from Weiner, B.J., Lewis, C.C., Stanick, C. et al.
Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures.
Implementation Sci 12, 108 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3
|
At the time of post-test (after 6 sessions).
|
|
Appropriateness of the Intervention Scale
Time Frame: At the time of the post-test (after 6 sessions)
|
5-item scale, range 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).
Lower scores indicate lower appropriateness, and higher scores indicate higher appropriateness.
adapted from Weiner, B.J., Lewis, C.C., Stanick, C. et al.
Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures.
Implementation Sci 12, 108 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3
|
At the time of the post-test (after 6 sessions)
|
|
Behavioral Intentions (Post-test)
Time Frame: This occurred immediately before session 1 and again after session 6 (42 days after the first session was delivered; 42 days post baseline)
|
Participants' intentions to use PrEP within the next 12 months.
range 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).
Lower scores indicate lower behavioral intentions and higher scores indicate higher behavioral intentions.
adapted from Scott RK, Hull SJ, Huang JC, et al.
Factors Associated with Intention to Initiate Pre-exposure Prophylaxis in Cisgender Women at High Behavioral Risk for HIV in Washington, D.C. Arch Sex Behav.
2022;51(5):2613-2624. doi:10.1007/s10508-021-02274-4
|
This occurred immediately before session 1 and again after session 6 (42 days after the first session was delivered; 42 days post baseline)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Enrolled Out of All Eligible Participants
Time Frame: At the end of each Session 1
|
Initial outcome was 8-12 participants enrolled per cycle (3). The research team revised to accommodate smaller groups of 5-8 participants. Each participant was counted by the researchers if they attended Session 1 in each cycle (city). |
At the end of each Session 1
|
|
Number of Participants Enrolled That Are Potentially PrEP Eligible Black Women
Time Frame: At the time of session 1
|
proportion of participants enrolled who are potentially PrEP eligible Black women (benchmark: 100%)
|
At the time of session 1
|
|
Acceptability of the Intervention Delivery (Acceptability)
Time Frame: At the time of post-test (after 6 sessions)
|
10-point scale assessment of facilitator performance, with 1 indicating "poor" and 10 indicating "excellent" performance.
Higher scores indicated greater acceptability of the intervention delivery, and lower scores indicated lower acceptability.
Benchmark: average acceptability rating of >7.5/10
|
At the time of post-test (after 6 sessions)
|
|
Participant Retention
Time Frame: At the time of post-test (after 6 sessions).
|
Proportion of Session 1 participants who complete session 6. Benchmark: 80%
|
At the time of post-test (after 6 sessions).
|
|
Visual Confirmation of Self-reported PrEP Uptake
Time Frame: At the time of post-test (after 6 sessions)
|
Photo confirmation of self-reported PrEP use.
|
At the time of post-test (after 6 sessions)
|
|
Number of Participants Who Completed Post-intervention Surveys
Time Frame: At the time of post-test (after 6 sessions)
|
Proportion of post-intervention surveys completed.
The researchers administered surveys and counted how many participants completed the surveys.
Benchmark: 80%
|
At the time of post-test (after 6 sessions)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Shawnika Hull, PhD, Rutgers University School of Communication and Information
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 8, 2024
Primary Completion (Actual)
November 13, 2024
Study Completion (Actual)
November 13, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 23, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 6, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
March 12, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 28, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 7, 2026
Last Verified
April 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Pro2023002116
- K01DA050496 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
IPD Plan Description
As of now, there are no plans to share the IPD.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
-
Universiti Teknologi MaraUniversiti Putra Malaysia; Ministry of Health, Malaysia; Institute for Health... and other collaboratorsRecruitingHealth Attitude | Health Behavior | Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice | Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice | Health-Related Behavior | Behavior, Health | Attitude to Health | Preparedness | OutbreaksMalaysia
-
Amref Health AfricaRecruitingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeKenya
-
Nigde Omer Halisdemir UniversityGazi University; Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt UniversityRecruitingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeTurkey
-
Bournemouth UniversityUniversity College, London; University of Leeds; University of SouthamptonCompletedHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeUnited Kingdom
-
Galderma R&DCompletedHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeFrance, Germany, Spain, United Kingdom
-
Virginia Commonwealth UniversityCompletedHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeUnited States
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalCompletedHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeTaiwan
-
Goethe UniversityUnknownHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeGermany
-
Continuity Research NetworkCompletedHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeUnited States
-
Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt UniversityNot yet recruitingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeTurkey
Clinical Trials on SISTA-P Intervention
-
University of OxfordOxford University Hospitals NHS TrustUnknown
-
University of UtahKilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Tanzania; Kilimanjaro Clinical Research...RecruitingImplementation Science | Health Care Providers | Pediatric Emergency Medicine | Accidental Injuries | Global Child Health | Public Health System ResearchTanzania
-
University of Maryland, College ParkNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); Medical Research Council, South AfricaCompletedSubstance-Related Disorders | HIV | Substance Use | Substance Use Disorders | Treatment Adherence | Treatment Adherence and Compliance | Stigmatization | Delivery of Health Care | Stigma, Social | Attitude of Health Personnel | Community Health Workers | Health Personnel | Health Personnel Attitude | Health Care Seeking... and other conditionsSouth Africa
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamO'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at UABCompletedCervical Cancer | Vulvar Cancer | Cancer, Breast | Uterine Cancer | Cancer Colorectal | Cancer, OvarianUnited States
-
Columbia UniversityNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH); Wayne State University; University... and other collaboratorsCompletedOfficers' Skills and BehaviorsUnited States
-
Malaria Vaccine and Drug Development CenterNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI); Asoclinic Inmunología Ltda.Completed
-
University of California, IrvineCompletedPain, Postoperative | Infant BehaviorUnited States, Canada
-
Laval UniversityCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)Recruiting
-
Aydin Adnan Menderes UniversityCompletedNursing Care | Position on Premature InfantsTurkey
-
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiBiosense Webster, Inc.TerminatedVentricular TachycardiaIndia