Sistas Informing Sistas on Topics About AIDS and Prevention (SISTA-P) (SISTA-P)

March 6, 2024 updated by: Shawnika J. Hull, PhD, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Sistas Informing Sistas on Topics About AIDS and Prevention

In this project, the investigators will provide a new HIV prevention training and empowerment sessions to Black women in Washington D.C. who are at high risk for getting HIV. This training is tailored to the experience of Black women and seeks to reduce the high HIV transmission rates in the Black community.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Experienced facilitators will implement two cycles of six 3-hour sessions with up to 15 participants per cycle while expert panelists observe. After each session, participants and subject matter expert observers will complete brief surveys. Surveys following each session include closed and open-ended measures: six items rating how well the session conveyed core information (e.g., I am confident I can communicate more effectively [Session 3]; I have a better understanding of the effects of alcohol on making sexual choices, [Session 4]) and single-item scales to evaluate the facilitator's performance and the session overall. In open-ended measures, respondents will be prompted to elaborate on their survey responses to identify ways the session could be improved.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20002
        • Active, not recruiting
        • The Women's Collective
    • New Jersey
      • New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States, 08854
        • Recruiting
        • Rutgers University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Shawnika Hull, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Black women are eligible if you:
  • Have sex with men
  • Are age 18+
  • Live in Washington D.C.
  • Are not HIV+

Exclusion Criteria:

  • HIV+

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SISTA-P Intervention
Participants will complete four sessions lasting up to three hours each over the course of one week. The sessions will be overseen by two facilitators and a technical monitor. Core elements of SISTA-P are: (1) small group discussions, modeling and role-play that facilitate repetition, reinforcement and sequential approximation; (2) skilled facilitators; (3) gender and culturally specific materials to enhance pride and self-worth; (4) teaching negotiation, self-advocacy; and (5) HIV prevention relevant skills; (6) discussing gender and culture-specific barriers and facilitators to prevention; and (7) enhancing HIV prevention norms and self-efficacy. Each discussion group will consist of 12- 15 participants and each cycle will consist of one group. Participants will be asked to complete a follow up survey and two booster sessions. They will also be asked to submit photo-confirmation of PrEP prescription to the research team.
This intervention is a small group discussion designed specifically for Black women. The sessions cover topics including: self pride and self-care; HIV & PrEP education; assertiveness skills training; coping skills; skills practice; and barriers and facilitators to HIV prevention and PrEP.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of the Intervention Scale
Time Frame: At the end of each cycle (each cycle is 42 days)
5-item scale, range 1 (strongly disagree) to (strongly agree). Weiner, B.J., Lewis, C.C., Stanick, C. et al. Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implementation Sci 12, 108 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3
At the end of each cycle (each cycle is 42 days)
Acceptability of the Intervention Scale
Time Frame: At the end of each cycle (each cycle is 42 days)
5-item scale, range 1 (strongly disagree) to (strongly agree). Weiner, B.J., Lewis, C.C., Stanick, C. et al. Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implementation Sci 12, 108 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3
At the end of each cycle (each cycle is 42 days)
Appropriateness of the Intervention Scale
Time Frame: At the end of each cycle (each cycle is 42 days)
5-item scale, range 1 (strongly disagree) to (strongly agree). Weiner, B.J., Lewis, C.C., Stanick, C. et al. Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implementation Sci 12, 108 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3
At the end of each cycle (each cycle is 42 days)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recruitment
Time Frame: At the end of each cycle (each cycle is 42 days)
12-15 participants enrolled
At the end of each cycle (each cycle is 42 days)
Intervention Fidelity- participant characteristics
Time Frame: At the end of each cycle (each cycle is 42 days)
proportion of participants are potentially PrEP eligible Black women (benchmark: 100%)
At the end of each cycle (each cycle is 42 days)
Intervention Fidelity
Time Frame: At the end of each cycle (each cycle is 42 days)
Proportion of assigned materials distributed and assigned activities implemented (benchmark: 100%)
At the end of each cycle (each cycle is 42 days)
Acceptability of the intervention delivery
Time Frame: At the end of each session
10-point scale assessment of facilitator performance. Benchmark: average acceptability rating of >7.5/10
At the end of each session
Participant Enrollment
Time Frame: At the end of each cycle (each cycle is 42 days)
Number of in-person participants in attendance at the first session. Benchmark: N = 12 - 15 in attendance at first session
At the end of each cycle (each cycle is 42 days)
Participant Retention
Time Frame: At the end of each cycle (each cycle is 42 days)
Proportion of Session 1 participants who complete session 6. Benchmark: 80%
At the end of each cycle (each cycle is 42 days)
Feasibility of delivering 6 sessions in 6 weeks
Time Frame: At the end of each cycle (each cycle is 42 days)
Delivery of intervention sessions according to the planned timeline (6 weeks)
At the end of each cycle (each cycle is 42 days)
Visual confirmation of self-reported PrEP uptake
Time Frame: At the end of each cycle (each cycle is 42 days)
Photo confirmation of self-reported PrEP use.
At the end of each cycle (each cycle is 42 days)
Post-Intervention Follow-up
Time Frame: At the end of each cycle (each cycle is 42 days)
Proportion of post-intervention surveys completed. Benchmark: 80%
At the end of each cycle (each cycle is 42 days)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shawnika Hull, PhD, Rutgers University School of Communication and Information

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 8, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 23, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 12, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Pro2023002116
  • K01DA050496 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

As of now, there are no plans to share the IPD.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice

Clinical Trials on SISTA-P Intervention

3
Subscribe