Effects of Flavor Modification for Management of Radiation Induced Dysgeusia

March 13, 2024 updated by: Jennifer Larsson, University of South Florida

Effects of Flavor Modification for Management of Radiation Induced Dysgeusia in Head and Neck Cancer Patients

Intervention for dysgeusia in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy. This research proposal aims to investigate potential benefits of mBerry in improving quality of life and nutritional outcome in head and neck cancer patients' post-radiation therapy. Our hypothesis is that cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy will benefit from use of miracle berry in treatment of dysgeusia.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Dysgeusia, characterized by altered taste, is a common side effect of radiation used in oropharyngeal cancer treatment. Radiation affects taste buds, leading to issues like loss of appetite, malnutrition, dependence on feeding tubes, dysphagia, and impacts social and overall quality of life. Patients often report bitter, metallic or no taste with food after radiation. Miracle berries, known for interacting with sweet taste receptors, could potentially transform acidic tastes into sweet ones.

The aim is to explore mBerry's potential in alleviating dysgeusia, aiding patients in achieving better nutritional status and quality of life.This study includes the use of mBerry tablets, which contain protein within the miracle berry called miraculin, for the treatment of radiation-induced dysgeusia. mBerry is not approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of radiation-induced dysgeusia. It is being used as part of this research study to find out if mBerry tablets improve taste outcomes among head and neck cancer patients after radiation therapy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Over 18 years
  • Diagnosis of mandibular cancer, tonsillar cancer, and lingual cancer
  • Receiving primary or adjuvant radiation therapy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Received a total glossectomy or total laryngectomy.
  • Patients with allergies to peanut, latex, peach, or soy will be excluded as they are at increased risk of allergy to mBerry.
  • Diagnosis of diabetes as well as prediabetic patients and those that are taking Metformin.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental group given mBerry tablet
For the experiment group, the clinician will be providing participant with daily 0.4 gram mBerry tablets (total of 112 tablets) to consume twice a day (for two meals) over an 8-week period. The participant will be provided with a log form to track mBerry use for the two meals each day for the 8-week period. They will be requested to bring log to each of the clinical visits which include bi-weekly taste assessments.
mBerry tablets (.4 grams), which contain protein within the miracle berry called miraculin.
Active Comparator: Control group not receiving mBerry
The control group will not be given a placebo. The control group will come to clinic for bi-weekly taste assessments.
The control group will not received intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
5-Point Hedonic Rating Scale
Time Frame: Bi-weekly for 8 weeks

Taste Test Scale used to assessing liking or preference of taste of a product. Dislike Very Much: Assigned a value of 1, this represents strong disliking. Dislike Slightly: Assigned a value of 2, indicating mild disliking. Neither Like nor Dislike: Assigned a value of 3, representing a neutral response.

Like Slightly: Assigned a value of 4, indicating mild liking. Like Very Much: Assigned a value of 5, representing strong liking. The higher the number scored indicates the participants enjoyed the taste vs the lower the number participant liked the taste less.

Bi-weekly for 8 weeks
Chemotherapy-induced Taste Alteration Scale (CITAS)
Time Frame: Bi-weekly for 8 weeks
Perceived taste scale- Self- administered questionnaire of 18 items evaluated on a five-point. Using a Likert scale 1-5 (where 1 = no difficulty or absence of the disturbance and 5 = maximum difficulty or disturbance). Higher scores indicate more severe taste alterations.
Bi-weekly for 8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)
Time Frame: Bi-weekly for 8 weeks
Patient questionaire on swallow function. Scored on a scale score from 0 to 100. Lower the scores indicate a greater impact of dysphagia on the patients quality of life.
Bi-weekly for 8 weeks
Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS)
Time Frame: Bi-weekly for 8 weeks
Level of least restrictive diet- the higher the number the participant is able to eat by mouth the lesser of number the patient might be reliable on a feeding tube
Bi-weekly for 8 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patients weight measurement
Time Frame: Patients will be seen for 4 follow-up appointments in the 8 week time frame of the study. The patient will be weighed at the 1st and 4th follow-up visit.
Weight
Patients will be seen for 4 follow-up appointments in the 8 week time frame of the study. The patient will be weighed at the 1st and 4th follow-up visit.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jennifer Larsson, University of South Florida

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 14, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 14, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 6, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 15, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 6795

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dysgeusia

3
Subscribe