Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of First-line Polychemotherapy and Polychemotherapy in Combination With PIPAC Sessions

The Single-center Randomized Study "Comparison of Safety and Effectiveness of the First Line of Polychemotherapy and Polychemotherapy in Combination With PIPAC Sessions in Primary Gastric Cancer With Isolated Peritoneal Carcinomatosis.

After the initial diagnostic laparoscopy the Control group patients undergo 6 courses of polychemotherapy according to the FLOT scheme; the examination is carried out every 3 courses (after the 3rd and the 6th courses) with the control diagnostic laparoscopy after 6 courses of polychemotherapy. In the event of the complete regression of foci along the peritoneum and receiving Cy- in the peritoneal lavage, the dynamic observation or cytoreductive surgery is considered (optionally); in case of the incomplete response the dynamic observation is carried out until progression; in case of progression the 2nd line of chemotherapy or the optimal palliative care options depending on the clinical situation is considered.

After the initial diagnostic laparoscopy the Study group patients undergo courses of polychemotherapy according to the scheme FLOT (the 1st, the 3rd, the 5th courses) and mFLOT (the 2nd , the 4th, the 6th courses) in the amount of 6 (six, 3+3); the examination is carried out every 3 courses (after the 3rd and the 6th courses) with dPIPAC sessions using docetaxel (thus excluding it from the system administration) in the 2nd , the 4th, the 6th courses of polychemotherapy. Control diagnostic laparoscopy is not performed in the group No 2, its function is performed by the revision at the PIPAC session of the 6th course of polychemotherapy, which corresponds to the time interval of the Control group. In the event of the complete regression of foci along the peritoneum and receiving Cy- in the peritoneal lavage, the dynamic observation or cytoreductive surgery is considered (optionally); in case of the incomplete response the dynamic observation is carried out until progression; in case of progression the 2nd line of chemotherapy or the optimal palliative care options depending on the clinical situation is considered.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Signing the informed consent to participate in the study. All the patients with suspected peritoneal carcinomatosis (according to the results of radiation diagnostics, as well as confirmed peritoneal carcinomatosis by puncture biopsy or by taking ascitic fluid) undergo diagnostic laparoscopy at the first stage. In addition, screening will include all the patients with locally advanced gastric cancer undergoing laparoscopy prior to planning combination treatment. If they have foci of carcinomatosis in the peritoneum PCI up to 15 inclusive and/or Cy+ (as the only manifestation of M1), the patients of this group can be included in the study. The methodology for performing diagnostic laparoscopy is described below (excluding dPIPAC components). Note - the examination of the omental bursa as part of diagnostic laparoscopy is optional, depending on the clinical situation. Screening and examination of patients according to current clinical guidelines for nosology stomach cancer taking into account the examination criteria specified in this protocol. Performing initial diagnostic laparoscopy at the stationary stage according to the standard procedure (described above). If carcinomatosis is detected the evaluation of PCI is carried out by Sugarbaker. The patient randomization based on positive (Cy+) abdominal flushing and/or peritoneal dissemination with PCI index <16. The randomization will be carried out using an Internet resource https://www.sealedenvelope.com. Taking into account the planned set and heterogeneity of the groups, the patients will be stratified before randomization according to the following factors: microscopic carcinomatosis of Cy+ only, macroscopic carcinomatosis PCI up to 7 inclusive, macroscopic carcinomatosis PCI from 8 to 15 inclusive; accordingly, the patients within the strata will be randomized separately.

The Control group (the group No 1). Within 1-4 weeks after the initial diagnostic laparoscopy the group No 1 patients start polychemotherapy courses according to the FLOT scheme in the amount of 6 (six); the examination is carried out every 3 courses (after the 3rd and the 6th courses) with the control diagnostic laparoscopy after 6 courses of polychemotherapy for no more than 2 weeks with no obvious signs of progression (in this case, the patient switches to the 2nd line of chemotherapy). The evaluation of the therapeutic pathomorphosis of foci in the peritoneum is carried out according to the PRGS system (Peritoneal Regression Grading Score). As the result of the treatment: in the event of the complete regression of foci along the peritoneum and receiving Cy- in the peritoneal lavage, after the completion of the planned treatment, the patients switch to the dynamic observation or cytoreductive surgery is considered within 1 month after the completion of polychemotherapy (optionally, by decision of the local council); in case of the incomplete response (due to the immeasurable characteristics of the tumor and the impossibility of evaluation by RECIST), the dynamic observation is carried out until progression; in case of progression the 2nd line of chemotherapy (the scheme at the discretion of the attending physician) or the optimal palliative care options depending on the clinical situation is considered; accordingly the patient completes the therapy proposed by the study. The response criteria are specified separately. Shifting the timing of chemotherapy up to 10 days and the timing of control examinations up to 10 days due to objective circumstances is considered acceptable within the study.

The Study group (the group No 2). Within 1-4 weeks after the initial diagnostic laparoscopy the group No 2 patients start polychemotherapy courses according to the scheme FLOT (the 1st , the 3rd, the 5th courses) and mFLOT (the 2nd, the 4th, the 6th courses) in the amount of 6 (six, 3+3); the examination is carried out every 3 courses (after the 3rd and the 6th courses) with with dPIPAC sessions using docetaxel the examination is carried out every 3 courses (after the 3rd and 6th) with the performance of dPIPAC sessions using docetaxel (thus excluding it from the system administration) in the 2nd , the 4th, the 6th courses of polychemotherapy (all the procedures are performed according to the method described in the protocol; the evaluation of the therapeutic pathomorphosis of lesions in the peritoneum is carried out according to the PRGS system (Peritoneal Regression Grading Score)). Control diagnostic laparoscopy is not performed in the group No 2, its function is performed by the revision at the PIPAC session of the 6th course of polychemotherapy, which corresponds to the time interval of the group No 1. As the result of the treatment: in the event of the complete regression of foci along the peritoneum and receiving Cy- in the peritoneal lavage, after the completion of the planned treatment, the patients switch to the dynamic observation or cytoreductive surgery is considered after the completion of polychemotherapy (optionally, by decision of the local council); in case of the incomplete response (due to the immeasurable characteristics of the tumor and the impossibility of evaluation by RECIST), the dynamic observation is carried out until progression; in case of progression the 2nd line of chemotherapy (the scheme at the discretion of the attending physician) or the optimal palliative care options depending on the clinical situation is considered; accordingly the patient completes the therapy proposed by the study. The method of performing the surgical manual is specified separately. The response criteria are specified separately. Shifting the timing of chemotherapy with dPIPAC sessions up to 10 days and the timing of control examinations up to 10 days due to objective circumstances is considered acceptable within the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

106

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation, 603126
        • Recruiting
        • Research Institute of Clinical Oncology "Nizhny Novgorod Regional Clinical Oncological Dispensary"
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Availability of signed informed voluntary consent of the patient
  2. Age ≥18 years and ≤75 years
  3. ECOG ≤1
  4. Histological verification of gastric cancer and esophageal-gastric junction Siewert III (adenocarcinoma, ring-cell carcinoma)
  5. Her2-neu negative tumor status
  6. The presence of a preserved informative block of the primary tumor in the histological archive of the NOCOD (performing a biopsy and/or providing archival material - with the consent of the patient)
  7. Verified gastric cancer (adenocarcinoma, ring-cell carcinoma) with the presence of M1 (with the only manifestation of M1 in the form of - Cy+ in initial peritoneal lavage and/or peritoneal dissemination PCI <16)
  8. Peritoneal adhesion index PAI <16
  9. Absence of active infectious, mental diseases, pronounced allergic conditions, as well as other concomitant pathology that may interfere with the implementation of the therapeutic and diagnostic measures provided for in the protocol
  10. Adequate organ function (evaluation by laboratory parameters at screening - evaluation of hemoglobin, neutrophils, platelets, AST, ALT, total bilirubin, urea, creatinine)
  11. Consent of men and women with preserved childbearing potential to use highly effective methods of contraception.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Lack of informed voluntary consent of the patient
  2. Age <18 years and >75 years
  3. ECOG ≥2
  4. Histological forms other than adenocarcinoma and ring-cell carcinoma of the stomach and esophageal-gastric junction Siewert III
  5. Her2-neu positive tumor status
  6. The absence of a preserved informative block of the primary tumor in the histological archive of the NOCOD
  7. M1 with the exception of Cy+ in initial peritoneal lavage and/or peritoneal dissemination PCI <16 (Distant metastases, including mts in supraclavicular, mediastinal, paraaortic (16 collector), ovarian metastases. Note - MTS in peripheral lymph nodes require a fine needle puncture with cytological examination for verification. In case of mts lesions of intracorporeal lymph nodes, the criteria of mts will be - dimensions of more than 15 mm along the short axis or mts-altered structure of the lymph node, regardless of size; PCI ≥16)
  8. Peritoneal adhesion index PAI ≥16
  9. Contraindications to performing diagnostic laparoscopy
  10. Complicated primary tumor (bleeding, decompensated stenosis, dysphagia III-IV) if not corrected.
  11. Decompensated concomitant pathology
  12. Primary multiple tumors (except basal cell skin cancer and cervical cancer in situ - provided there are no signs of relapse of the disease)
  13. Any specific antitumor treatment for stomach cancer and /or other malignant tumor in the anamnesis (except basal cell skin cancer and cervical cancer in situ - provided there are no signs of relapse of the disease)
  14. Previous specialized treatment for stomach cancer
  15. Known individual intolerance to drugs included in the protocol
  16. Pregnancy, breast-feeding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control group
FLOT: Docetaxel 50 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 + Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 + Calcium folinate 200 mg/m2 2-hour intravenous infusion on day 1 + fluorouracil 2600 mg/m2 x intravenous infusion 24-hours (infusion of the same of the total dose of fluorouracil for 48 hours) on day 1. Repeat every 2 weeks. 6 courses.
Docetaxel 50 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1
Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on Day 1
200 mg/m2 2-hour intravenous infusion on day 1
2600 mg/m2 x intravenous infusion 24-hours (infusion of the samee of the total dose of fluorouracil for 48 hours) on day 1.
Access to the abdominal cavity by Hassen (3 trocars). Carboxyperitoneum - 12 mm of water column - stable pressure maintenance throughout the operation. Revision. Photo recording of 4 quadrants of the abdominal cavity from the paraumbilical port. The evaluation of the PCI index. The evaluation of other distant dissemination. Standard peritoneal lavage of 300 ml Sol. NaCl 0.9 % (37 ºС), with the exposure of 3-5 minutes (with Trendelenburg and Fowler position alternately) and the lavage aspiration, the transfer of the lavage for the cytological examination. Biopsy of perioneal lessions if needed.The operation is completed as standard with the extraction of laparoports and suturing of laparoport wounds.
Experimental: Study group

mFLOT: Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 + Calcium folinate 200 mg/m2 2-hour intravenous infusion on day 1 + fluorouracil 2600 mg/m2 x intravenous infusion 24-hours (infusion of the same of the total dose of fluorouracil for 48 hours) on day 1. Repeat every 2 weeks. 6 courses.

+ The drugs for PIPAC - Docetaxel 50 mg/ m2 diluted with saline sodium chloride to a total volume of 200 ml (intraperitoneal pressurized infusion).

Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on Day 1
200 mg/m2 2-hour intravenous infusion on day 1
2600 mg/m2 x intravenous infusion 24-hours (infusion of the samee of the total dose of fluorouracil for 48 hours) on day 1.
Access to the abdominal cavity by Hassen (3 trocars). Carboxyperitoneum - 12 mm of water column - stable pressure maintenance throughout the operation. Revision. Photo recording of 4 quadrants of the abdominal cavity from the paraumbilical port. The evaluation of the PCI index. The evaluation of other distant dissemination. Standard peritoneal lavage of 300 ml Sol. NaCl 0.9 % (37 ºС), with the exposure of 3-5 minutes (with Trendelenburg and Fowler position alternately) and the lavage aspiration, the transfer of the lavage for the cytological examination. Biopsy of perioneal lessions if needed.The operation is completed as standard with the extraction of laparoports and suturing of laparoport wounds.
Diagnostic laparoscopy described earlier and PIPAC session. The drugs for PIPAC - Docetaxel 50 mg/ m2 diluted with saline sodium chloride to a total volume of 200 ml. The rate of administration is 30 ml per minute. The maximum pressure in the injector system is 250 PSI. After the spray stage, the exposure is 30 minutes while maintaining the declared intraperitoneal pressure. After the exposure stage, only gas is removed from the abdominal cavity. The operation is completed as standard with the extraction of laparoports and suturing of laparoport wounds.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The progression-free survival.
Time Frame: 3 years
Time interval from randomization to progression of disease, death from any cause or date of last observation in the absence of these events. In months with an accuracy of 0.1. (Time Frame: 3 уеars)
3 years
Complications from polychemotherapy.
Time Frame: 3 years
Complications from polychemotherapy (including intraperitoneal administration), evaluated according to СТСАЕ v5.0. The proportion of patients with any adverse events; the proportion of patients with grade 3-5 adverse events; the proportion of patients with complications in qualitative terms (for example: hematological, gastrointestinal, etc.). (Time Frame: 3 years)
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The overall survival.
Time Frame: 3 years
Time interval from randomization to death from any cause or date of last observation in the absence of these events. In months with an accuracy of 0.1. (Time Frame: 3 уеars)
3 years
The completeness of the planned therapy.
Time Frame: 3 years
The proportion of patients who received all the therapy planned in the study in each group. (Time Frame: 3 уеars)
3 years
Percentage of patient conversions to Су- and PCI- rate.
Time Frame: 3 years
The proportion of patients conversions to Су- and PCI- rate (Time Frame: 3 уеars)
3 years
Surgical complications of operated patients
Time Frame: 3 years
Surgical complications of operated patients (the evaluation by Clavien-Dindo classification) (the proportion of patients with surgical complications IIIb-V grade). (Time Frame: 3 уеars)
3 years
Аssessment of the quality of life
Time Frame: 3 years
Quality of life assessment by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer scale Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (QLQ-C30) by Scoring of the QLQ-C30 Summary Score using the descriptive analysis with the qlqc30 command (detailed description in manual ISBN 2-9300 64-22-6). (Time Frame: 3 уеars)
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Sergey Gamayunov, DMS, Chief oncology specialist in the region

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 19, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 19, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 19, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 15, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 15, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastric Cancer

Clinical Trials on Docetaxel

3
Subscribe