Spontaneous Eye Blinking in Disorders of Consciousness (Blink-DoC)

March 20, 2024 updated by: Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus

Spontaneous Eye Blinking as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Marker in Patients With Disorders of Consciousness After Severe Acquired Brain Injury

Differential diagnosis between Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome (UWS) and Minimally Conscious State (MCS) is complicated due to severe cognitive and/or sensorimotor deficits in these patients. In this study the investigators aimed at exploring the diagnostic and prognostic validity of spontaneous eye blinking parameters (rate, amplitude, duration, variability) in a sample of patients with Disorders of Consciousness (DoC).

This is a multi-center prospective observational study conducted in patients with Severe Acquired Brain Injury (sABI) and DoC admitted to 8 European participating centers, with clinical data collection not deviating from routine practice. The study is non-commercial and will have a maximum total duration of 24 months.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

Observational, multicenter, longitudinal study. In this study, all patients admitted to the nine participating centers with diagnosis of DoC, and meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria, will be enrolled.

The admission of a patient to the research program is subject to the signing of an informed consent by the legal representative/primary caregiver of the patient. The representative will be informed about the study and its objectives, and an informational sheet will be provided.

Population All patients with DoC after sABI consecutively admitted to participating centers who meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria (see below).

Sample size On the basis of the effect size found in a previous study regarding the diagnostic value of eye blink rate (d=0.68), it is planned to enroll 58 patients with DoC (power=0.8; α=0.05) + an additional 20% to cope with possible drop-outs, for a total of 70 patients (23 in UWS, 23 in MCS minus; 23 in MCS plus; about 9 patients per center). For the secondary outcomes (i.e., diagnostic and prognostic value of further blink features) there is no previous data in the literature. In addition, a sample of 23 healthy individuals, balanced in terms of sex and age with the patient sample, will be enrolled as a reference group.

Data collection procedure Within two weeks from study entry, patients will undergo two 20-minute resting electroencephalogram-electrooculogram (EEG-EOG) examinations, separated by 24 hours. Sessions will take place, following standard nursing procedures, between 10:00 AM and 5:00 PM, a time window minimally influenced by circadian peaks of drowsiness in patients with DoC, and a period during which it is believed that EBR is stable in healthy individuals.

The EEG-EOG recording will be conducted at the patient's bedside or, if possible, on their wheelchair, with the patient awake (i.e., eyes open), maintaining a quiet and dimly lit environment. If the patient's arousal level is insufficient, the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) arousal facilitation protocol will be administered; if the patient continues to keep their eyes closed, the recording session will be postponed to the next available day. During each session, the experimenter is positioned beside the patient, out of her/his visual field. Blinks will be detected in the EOG and defined as a sharp positive peak followed by a negative deflection within a time window of less than 400 ms. To assess the level of consciousness at the time of the EEG-EOG recordings, a CRS-R will be administered at the end of each session. To prevent the patient's awareness of the blink recording from affecting their blink rate, the patient is not informed about the blink recording during the EEG-EOG session but is simply encouraged to remain relaxed with eyes open and not to move. This procedure is carried out independently of the patient's clinical diagnosis. A follow-up assessment is planned at 6 months from T0 (T1).

The healthy volunteers will also perform two resting EEG-EOG examinations, each lasting 20 min, 24 h apart.

EEG will be recorded by at least 19 electrodes placed on the patients' scalp according to the international 10-20 system (Fp1, Fp2, F7, F8, F3, F4, C3, C4, T3, T4, P3, P4, T5, T6, O1, O2, Fz, Cz, Pz) + vertical EOG electrodes, referenced to the vertex. Impedance will be kept below 5 kΩ for electrodes covering the cortex as well as for EOG electrodes. Data will be sampled at a 1000-Hz rate and band pass filtered between 0.1 Hz and 30 Hz; a notch filter will be used to eliminate frequencies around 50 Hz for online visualization. If the EEG recording in a session presents a considerable number of artefacts, the acquisition will be repeated within the next available day.

Enrollment duration: 12 months Study duration: about 24 months.

Statistical plan Patient characteristics at study entry will be compared between the diagnostic groups (UWS, MCS minus, MCS plus) through parametric or non-parametric univariate analyses, as deemed appropriate after verification of data distribution. Similarly, univariate analyses will be performed to compare eye blink rate (EBR) and additional blink features between diagnostic groups.

Univariate within-subject analyses will be performed to compare EBR and additional blink features across time.

In addition, correlation analyses will be performed to verify the existence of a relationship between blink features and level of consciousness as measured by the total score of the CRS-R. If so, logistic regression models will be implemented with blink features and demographic and anamnestic variables as predictors, and outcome as dependent variable. The results will be considered statistically significant if p<05.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

70

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Liege, Belgium, 4000
        • Coma Science Group, GIGA-Consciousness, University of Liege
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Olivia Gosseries, PhD
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Aurore Thibaut, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Youssra Mezoudi, M.Sc.
      • Burgau, Germany, 89331
        • Therapiezentrum Burgau
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Andreas Bender, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Martin Rosenfelder, PhD
      • Munich, Germany, 81377
        • Dipartimento di Neurologia, LMU Hospital, LMU Munich
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Konstantinos Dimitriadis
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Moritz Schmidbauer
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Julia Zibold
      • Ferrara, Italy, 44124
        • Unità Gravi Cerebrolesioni - Dipartimento Neuroscienze - Azienda Ospedaliera - Universitaria Ferrara
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Susanna Lavezzi
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Valentina Bonsangue
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Sofia Straudi
      • Florence, Italy, 50143
        • IRCCS Fondazione Don Gnocchi ONLUS
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Bahia Hakiki, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Andrea Mannini, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Piergiuseppe Liuzzi, PhD
      • Milan, Italy, 20148
        • IRCCS Santa Maria Nascente Fondazione Don Gnocchi ONLUS
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Angela Comanducci, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Tiziana Atzori
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Chiara-Camilla Derchi
    • AV
      • Sant'Angelo dei Lombardi, AV, Italy, 83054
        • Polo Specialistico Riabilitativo Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Anna Estraneo, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Alfonso Magliacano, PhD
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Giovanni Scarano, BS
      • Valencia, Spain, 46007
        • Instituto de Rehabilitación Neurológica IRENEA
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Enrique Noé, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Roberto Llorens, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Alejandro Galvao, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients in UWS or MCS due to severe acquired brain injury with different etiology (traumatic, anoxic, vascular) consecutively admitted at participating neurorehabilitation units. The total sample will be composed of 70 patients (n=9 pts per participating unit).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • clinical diagnosis of DoC (UWS, MCS minus, MCS plus) following repeated clinical evaluation (at least four CRS-R in a week)
  • age ≥ 18 years
  • time post-onset ≤6 months
  • Previous sABI of any etiology (traumatic, vascular, anoxic, mixed, etc.)
  • Negative anamnesis for neurological or psychiatric disorders.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • unstable clinical conditions (e.g. respiratory failure, fever, status epilepticus, etc.);
  • ophthalmic diseases, or clinically detected peripheral damage in eyelid motility (e.g. orbital fracture);
  • intake of sedative drugs in the preceding 24 hours;
  • additional brain event following admission (e.g., stroke).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Patients with DoC consecutively admitted to participating units and met the inclusion criteria
Patients in VS or MCS due to severe acquired brain injury with different etiology (traumatic, anoxic, vascular) consecutively admitted at participating neurorehabilitation units. The total sample will be composed of 70 patients (n=9 pts per participating unit).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Diagnosis
Time Frame: 6 months from enrollment
Clinical diagnosis as assessed by the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (min. - max- score = 0-23, with higher scores indicating a higher level of consciousness)
6 months from enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 14, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 21, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 21, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

IPD will be shared upon reasonable request.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After study completion.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Upon reasonable request to the study's PI.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Disorders of Consciousness

3
Subscribe