A Study Comparing Two Doses of AGTC-501 in Male Subjects With X-linked Retinitis Pigmentosa Caused by RPGR Mutations (SKYLINE)

March 20, 2024 updated by: Beacon Therapeutics

A Phase 1/2 Open-Label Dose Escalation Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of AGTC-501 (rAAV2tYF-GRK1-RPGR) and a Phase 2 Randomized, Controlled, Masked, Multi-center Study Comparing Two Doses of AGTC-501 in Male Subjects With X-linked Retinitis Pigmentosa Confirmed by a Pathogenic Variant in the RPGR Gene

This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of a recombinant adeno-associated virus vector (rAAV2tYF-GRK1-RPGR) in patients with X-linked retinitis pigmentosa caused by RPGR mutations.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Approximately 12 participants, who were not part of the Phase 1/2 (HORIZON) study, will be enrolled into the dose expansion portion of the study. These participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to 1 of 2 treatment groups (i.e., Group 1 [low dose] and Group 2 [high dose]). Each participant will receive the assigned dose of AGTC-501 in one eye on a single occasion.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

14

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32209
        • University of Florida
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Boston Children's Hosptial
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45242
        • Cincinnati Eye Institute
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • Casey Eye Institute
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75231
        • Retina Foundation of the Southwest

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Provide written informed consent or assent (per local regulation), prior to the conduct of any study-related procedure. Subjects who provide assent must have a parent, guardian, or legal representative provide written informed consent.
  • Be between 8 and 50 years of age (inclusive) at the time of informed consent and assent (as applicable).
  • Be male and have at least one documented pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in the RPGR gene
  • Have a clinical diagnosis of XLRP.
  • Have a BCVA no better than 75 letters and no worse than 35 letters based on an ETDRS chart at each screening visit.
  • Be able to perform all tests of visual and retinal function and structure in both eyes based on the subject's reliability, and fixation, per the investigator's discretion.
  • Have detectable baseline mean macular sensitivity measured by (MAIA) microperimetry, as determined by the investigator and confirmed by the Central Reading Center (CRC).
  • Have detectable EZ line in both eyes as assessed by SD-OCT and confirmed by the CRC.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have other known disease-causing mutations documented in the subject's medical history or identified through a retinal dystrophy gene panel, that in the opinion of the investigator would interfere with the potential therapeutic effect of the study agent or the quality of the assessments.
  • For subjects with herpes simplex virus (HSV):

    1. Have history of oral or genital herpes and unable and/or unwilling to utilize prophylactic antiviral medication.
    2. Have a history of ocular herpes.
    3. Have active oral or genital herpes or are currently receiving treatment for HSV infection.
  • Have complicating systemic diseases (e.g., medical conditions causing immunosuppression, active systemic infection) that would preclude the gene transfer or ocular surgery.
  • Have known sensitivity or allergy to systemic corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive medications.
  • Have used anti-coagulant agents that may alter coagulation
  • Have received any vaccination/immunization within 28 days prior to screening and/or during screening with the exception of the influenza vaccine, which is only exclusionary if they have received the influenza vaccine within 28 days prior to randomization.
  • Have used systemic corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive medications within 3 months prior to screening and/or intend to use during screening.
  • Have previously received any AAV gene therapy product, stem cell therapy, cell-based therapy, or similar biologics.

Ocular Exclusion Criteria (Either Eye):

  • Have pre-existing eye conditions that would preclude the planned surgery, interfere with the interpretation of study endpoints, or increase the risk of surgical complications
  • Have significant media opacity impacting evaluation of the retina or vitreous.
  • Had intraocular surgery within 90 days of study treatment administration.
  • Have any active ocular/intraocular infection or inflammation
  • Have a history of steroid-induced raised IOP of >25 mmHg following corticosteroid exposure, despite topical IOP-lowering pharmacologic therapy.
  • Have any artificial retinal implant or prosthesis.
  • Have absence of clear ocular media and/or inadequate pupil dilation to facilitate good quality OCT images.
  • Have any history of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.
  • Have myopia (spherical equivalent) exceeding -10 diopters (or axial length of >30 mm if PI deems it appropriate to measure) or presence of pathologic myopia in the study eye.
  • Have passed the Low Contrast Ora-VNC™ mobility course in either eye or binocularly at any screening visit.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Low Dose Group
Male subjects at least 8 y/o treated with a lower dose (Dose 2 in RPGR-001 Horizon Phase 1/2 study) of rAAV2tYF-GRK1-RPGR study drug.
Adeno-associated virus vector expressing a human RPGR gene
Experimental: High Dose Group
Male subjects at least 8 y/o treated with a higher dose (Dose 5 in RPGR-001 Horizon Phase 1/2 study) of rAAV2tYF-GRK1-RPGR study drug.
Adeno-associated virus vector expressing a human RPGR gene

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The difference in the proportion of responding eyes between treated and control eyes in the low dose group and high dose group at 12 months, as measured by MAIA microperimetry, where response is defined as a 7dB or more improvement in at least 5 loci.
Time Frame: Day 0 - Month 12
Day 0 - Month 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Proportion of responding eyes in treated eyes versus control eyes in the low dose group and the high dose group at Month 12 where responder is defined as an ORA-VNC mobility test score improvement of 2 or more luminance levels.
Time Frame: Day 0 - Month 12
Day 0 - Month 12
Proportion of responding eyes in treated versus control eyes in the low dose group and the high dose group at Month 12, as measured by MAIA microperimetry, where responder is defined as a 7 dB or more improvement in at least 5 loci within bleb.
Time Frame: Day 0 - Month 12
Day 0 - Month 12
Proportion of responding eyes in treated vs control eyes in the low dose group and the high dose group at Month 12, measured by MAIA microperimetry where responder is defined as 7 dB or more improvement in at least 5 loci within the central 16 loci
Time Frame: Day 0 - Month 12
Day 0 - Month 12
Difference in mean change from baseline in the central 36 loci (C36) mean sensitivity, as measured by MAIA microperimetry, in treated eyes versus control eyes in the low dose group and high dose group at Month 12.
Time Frame: Day 0 - Month 12
Day 0 - Month 12
Difference in mean change from baseline in "within bleb" mean sensitivity, as measured by MAIA microperimetry, in treated eyes versus control eyes in the low dose group and high dose group at Month 12.
Time Frame: Day 0 - Month 12
Day 0 - Month 12
Difference in mean change from baseline in central 10 degrees of vision on light adapted static perimetry, as measured by Octopus 900, in treated eyes versus control eyes in the low dose group and high dose group at Month 12.
Time Frame: Day 0 - Month 12
Day 0 - Month 12
Difference in mean change from baseline in BCVA, as measured by ETDRS or tumbling "E" chart, in treated eyes versus control eyes in the low dose group and high dose group at Month 12.
Time Frame: Day 0 - Month 12
Day 0 - Month 12
Proportion of responding eyes in treated versus control eyes in the low dose group and high dose group at Month 12 where responder is defined as a 10-letter vision gain as measured by ETDRS or tumbling "E" chart.
Time Frame: Day 0 - Month 12
Day 0 - Month 12
Difference in mean change from baseline in the EZ area, as measured by SD-OCT, in treated eyes versus control eyes in the low dose group and high dose group at Month 12 Visit.
Time Frame: Day 0 - Month 12
Day 0 - Month 12
Mean change from baseline in Impact of Vision Impairment (IVI) (Weih et al, 2002; Lamoureaux et al, 2007) or Impact of Vision Impairment for Children (IVI-C) (Cochrane et al, 2008) in the low dose group and high dose group at Month 12 Visit
Time Frame: Day 0 - Month 12
Day 0 - Month 12
Mean change from baseline in Patient Global Impressions of Change (PGI-C) and Patient Global Impressions of Severity (PGIS) in the low dose group and high dose group at Month 12 Visit.
Time Frame: Day 0 - Month 12
Day 0 - Month 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 13, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 11, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 16, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 27, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 27, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on X-Linked Retinitis Pigmentosa

Clinical Trials on rAAV2tYF-GRK1-RPGR

3
Subscribe