- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06337708
Smart Walk: A Culturally Tailored Smartphone-Delivered Physical Activity Intervention for African American Women
Smart Walk: An Efficacy Trial of a Culturally Tailored Smartphone-Delivered Physical Activity Intervention for African American Women
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This study addresses major public health concerns among African American women: physical inactivity and cardiometabolic disease risk.
African American women experience a high burden of cardiometabolic diseases, including heart disease, obesity, and type 2 diabetes. Regular aerobic physical activity is an established behavior to prevent and treat these conditions. Yet, the many African American women are insufficiently active, with only 27-40% meeting national aerobic physical activity guidelines.
This study will test the efficacy of Smart Walk, a culturally tailored, theory-based smartphone-delivered intervention designed to increase physical activity and improve cardiometabolic disease risk factors among African American women. In a 12-month trial, participants will be randomly assigned to either the Smart Walk intervention or a Fitbit-only comparison arm for an active 4-month intervention period, followed by an 8-month minimal contact follow-up period.
Specific Aims:
- Test the effects of Smart Walk to increase physical activity and promote adherence to national aerobic physical activity guidelines; compared to Fitbit-only comparison group.
- Test the effects of Smart Walk to improve cardiometabolic risk factors; compared to Fitbit-only comparison group.
- Compare cost and cost effectiveness of the two intervention groups from a societal perspective.
- Examine if protocol adherence predicts outcomes and potential mediation and moderation of intervention effects on physical activity and cardiometabolic outcomes.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Rodney P Joseph, PhD
- Phone Number: 602-496-0772
- Email: rodney.joseph@asu.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Arizona
-
Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85004
- Recruiting
- Arizona State University
-
Contact:
- Carina Platte, PhD
- Phone Number: 602-543-2213
- Email: carina.platte@asu.edu
-
Principal Investigator:
- Rodney Joseph, PhD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Self-reported African American/Black female
- Aged of 24-65 years
- Insufficiently Active (< 60 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity per week as measured by Exercise Vital Sign Questionnaire)
- BMI > 30 kg/m2
- English speaking and reading
- Ownership of a smartphone with the ability to download applications (i.e., apps)
- Ownership of a smartphone with the ability to receive text messages
- Willingness to receive a physical activity intervention delivered through their smartphone
- Willingness to include their first name or create an alias to be used on their profile page on the Smart Walk app
Exclusion Criteria:
- Plans to relocate out of Phoenix area in next 12 months
- Endorsing an item on the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q), unless a doctor's note for study participation in provided
- Resting systolic blood pressure greater than 180 mmHG and/or a diastolic blood pressure greater than 120 mmHG , as assessed at baseline or at any other study assessment
- Self-reported participation in another diet or weight loss study at screening
- Pregnant or planning to become pregnant in the next 12 months
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Smart Walk
Participants will receive a culturally tailored smartphone-delivered physical activity intervention.
|
Smart Walk is a culturally tailored, Social Cognitive Theory-based multi-component smartphone delivered physical activity (PA) promotion intervention that delivered through the Smart Walk application, virtual physical activity coaching, and text messages.
The Smart Walk smartphone application includes four key features: 1) personal profile pages, 2) culturally relevant multi-media physical activity promotion modules, 3) discussion boards, and 4) physical activity self-monitoring/tracking feature that integrates with Fitbit activity monitors for participants to track their daily, weekly, and monthly activity.
Virtual physical activity coaches will actively engage and facilitate group-based dialogue among participants on the app discussion boards and provide individualized, one-on-one PA coaching via telephone or commercially available app-based video teleconferencing software (i.e., FaceTime, Zoom, Google hangouts).
|
Active Comparator: Fitbit
Participants will receive a Fitbit Inspire 3 activity monitor.
|
This intervention group will receive a Fitbit activity monitor and be encouraged to use the commercially available device to increase physical activity.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in accelerometer-measured moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
|
Participants will wear wrist-worn ActiGraph GT9X Link Activity monitors the activity monitor on their non-dominant wrist during all waking hours for 7 consecutive days to provide an assessment of usual activity
|
Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
|
Change in self-reported moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
|
Assessed by the 7-Day Physical Activity Recall
|
Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in cardiorespiratory fitness from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
|
A modified Balke treadmill protocol will be used to estimate maximal aerobic capacity (i.e., VO2 peak).
|
Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
|
Change in aortic pulse wave velocity from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
|
A measure of aortic stiffness and will be assessed using SphygmoCor XCEL system using validated methodology.
|
Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
|
Change in body weight from baseline to 4- and 12-months.
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
|
Measured in kilograms using an electronic scale
|
Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
|
Change in body mass index from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
|
Calculated using the formula: weight (in kilograms) / height (in meters)squared
|
Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
|
Change in waste circumference from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
|
Measured in centimeters
|
Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
|
Change in blood pressure (mmHG) from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
|
Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure will be assessed using electronic sphygmomanometer following 5-min rest
|
Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
|
Change in tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
|
Measured in serum using a commercial multiplex immunoassay platform; blood will be drawn after a 10 hour fast.
|
Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
|
Change in interleukin 6 (IL-6) from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
|
Measured in serum using a commercial multiplex immunoassay platform; blood will be drawn after a 10 hour fast.
|
Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
|
Change in interleukin 10 (IL-10) from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
|
Measured in serum using a commercial multiplex immunoassay platform; blood will be drawn after a 10 hour fast.
|
Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
|
Change in interleukin 15 (IL-15) from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
|
Measured in serum using a commercial multiplex immunoassay platform; blood will be drawn after a 10 hour fast.
|
Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
|
Change in fasting blood glucose glucose from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
|
Plasma glucose assessed after a 10 hour fasting blood draw.
Measured using an automated chemistry analyzer.
|
Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
|
Change in serum insulin from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
|
Serum insulin collected after a 10 hour fasting blood draw.
|
Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
|
Change in serum lipids (mg/DL) from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
|
Triglycerides, total cholesterol, LDL-C, and HDL-C will be assessed
|
Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
|
Change in insulin sensitivity (µIU/mL) from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
|
Assessed by calculating homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) scores as: glucose (mg/dl) x insulin (μU/ml)/405.
|
Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
|
Change in exercise self-efficacy from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
|
Assessed by the 12-item Exercise Self-Efficacy survey (Sallis et al.1987).
The range of possible scores for this measure is 1-5, with higher scores indicating higher levels of physical activity self-efficacy.
|
Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
|
Change in self-regulation for physical activity from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
|
Assessed by the 10- item Self-Regulation Scale from the Health Beliefs Survey (Anderson-Bill 2006).
This scale assesses the use of behavioral strategies to incorporate physical activity into daily activities (i.e., take stairs instead of elevator, walking instead of driving when running errands).
The range of possible scores for this measure is 1-5, with higher scores indicating higher levels of physical activity self-regulation.
|
Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
|
Change in social support for physical activity from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
|
Assessed by the Social Support for Exercise survey developed by Sallis et al (1987).
This scale assesses social support from family support (10-items, with a possible range of scores from 10-50) and friends (8-items, with a possible score range from from 8-40).
Higher scores indicate greater levels of social support.
|
Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
|
Change in outcome expectations for physical activity from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
|
Assessed using the 9-item Outcome Expectation Scale for Exercise scale, developed by Resnick (2000).
The range of possible scores for this measure is 1-5, with higher scores indicating more positive expectancies associated with physical activity engagement.
|
Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
|
Change in behavioral capability for physical activity from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
|
Assessed using a 6-item scale developed by the research team in previous research.
The range of possible scores for this measure is 1-6, with higher scores indicating higher levels of behavioral capability of physical activity.
|
Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Treatment acceptance
Time Frame: Assessed at 4-months and 12-months
|
Survey assessing acceptance, feasibility, and consumer satisfaction of intervention.
|
Assessed at 4-months and 12-months
|
Protocol Adherence
Time Frame: Assessed at 4-months and 12-months
|
Fitbit wear, app utilization, and adherence to physical activity coaching session protocols will be assessed as moderators.
|
Assessed at 4-months and 12-months
|
Program costs
Time Frame: Assessed at 4-months and 12-months
|
Costs borne by the program, including Fitbit activity monitors, Smart Walk app development, and all personnel salaries/hourly wages.
|
Assessed at 4-months and 12-months
|
Participant costs
Time Frame: Assessed at 4-months and 12-months
|
Participant costs associated with study participation, including time spent using the Smart Walk app, time spent in physical activity coaching, and cellular phone data charges over their plan limit.
|
Assessed at 4-months and 12-months
|
Cost-effectiveness
Time Frame: Assessed at 4-months and 12-month
|
Cost effectiveness will be evaluated by combining the mean total cost per participant with effectiveness (baseline to 12-month changes in minutes/week of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity).
We will calculate the incremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICER) for the Smart Walk intervention compared to the Fitbit comparison arm.
|
Assessed at 4-months and 12-month
|
Objectively-measured home neighborhood characteristics
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline
|
GIS mapping and computer vision techniques will be used to assess macro-scale and micro-scale home neighborhood environment characteristics of participants.
|
Assessed at baseline
|
Subjectively-measured Neighborhood environment walkability
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline
|
Subjectively-measured Neighborhood Environment Walkability will be measured using the Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale (NEWS).
This measure includes 43 items and assesses the following environmental characteristics: residential density (6-items, possible range of scores range 1-5), land use mix-diversity (22 items, possible range of scores range 1-5), street connectivity (2 items, possible range of scores range 1-4), walking/cycling facilities (6 items, possible range of scores range 1-4), aesthetics (4 items, possible range of scores 1-4), pedestrian/traffic safety (3 items, possible range of scores 1-4).
Higher scores indicate greater walkability.
|
Assessed at baseline
|
Race-related Stress
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline
|
Race-related stress, as a result of experiencing individual, cultural and institutional racism, will be assessed using the 22-item Index of Race-Related Stress-Brief survey.
This survey has a possible score range of 0 to 88, with higher scored indicating greater stress as a result of experiencing racism.
|
Assessed at baseline
|
Perceived Structural Racism
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline
|
Structural racism will be assessed using the 20-item Perceived Structural Racism Scale.
This scale has a possible scoring range of 20-120 with higher scores indicating greater levels of perceived structural racism.
|
Assessed at baseline
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY00017286
- R01HL168170 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Heart Diseases
-
Baker Heart and Diabetes InstitutePrincess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Royal Perth Hospital; Alice... and other collaboratorsRecruitingHeart Failure | Valve Heart DiseaseAustralia
-
Medical University of ViennaUnknownHeart Diseases | Heart Failure | Valvular Heart DiseaseAustria
-
Centre Chirurgical Marie LannelongueActive, not recruitingValvular Heart Disease | Valve Disease, Heart
-
Abiomed Inc.RecruitingHeart Diseases | Acute Decompensated Heart Failure | Congestive Heart Failure | Acute Heart FailureUnited States
-
Kathirvel SubramaniamUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore; CSL BehringRecruitingHeart Failure,Congestive | Heart Disease End StageUnited States
-
Wuerzburg University HospitalRecruitingHeart Failure | Chronic Heart Failure | Chronic Heart DiseaseGermany
-
University of MichiganTerminatedDiastolic Heart Failure | Hypertensive Heart DiseaseUnited States
-
Yonsei UniversityCompletedMitral Valvular Heart Disease
-
Aristotle University Of ThessalonikiRecruitingCardiovascular Diseases | Heart Failure | Valvular Heart Disease | Biochemical DysfunctionGreece
-
Xiao-dong ZhuangRecruitingValvular Heart DiseaseChina
Clinical Trials on Smart Walk
-
University of California, San FranciscoWithdrawnHeart FailureUnited States
-
Barretos Cancer HospitalUnknown
-
University of MinnesotaNot yet recruiting
-
University of California, San FranciscoUniversity of California, BerkeleyCompleted
-
University of MinnesotaCompletedStress | AttentionUnited States
-
Joslin Diabetes CenterTerminatedDiabetes | Physical ActivityUnited States
-
Ulsan University HospitalMinistry of Health & Welfare, KoreaCompletedArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | RoboticsKorea, Republic of
-
Istanbul UniversityCompletedMorbid ObesityTurkey
-
Bristol-Myers SquibbCardioxyl Pharmaceuticals, Inc; Colorado Prevention CenterCompletedAcute Heart FailureUnited States
-
Inje UniversityCompletedBRONCHIAL ASTHMAKorea, Republic of