Standardized Physician-modified Fenestrated Endograft Registry (SPHERE)

April 13, 2024 updated by: Michele Piazza, University Hospital Padova
Multicenter retrospective study including all consecutive patients treated by PMEG using a standard modification technique of Valiant Captivia (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN-USA).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

INTRODUCTION

Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) without an adequate proximal neck length for safe sealing and fixation with a standard EVAR may benefit from complex endovascular repair. The most common are short neck AAA, juxta/para-renal AAA, and type IV thoracoabdominal aneurysm (TAAA), where incorporation of renal and visceral vessels is required to obtain an adequate proximal sealing. Several endovascular options are available, with the most effective being represented by incorporation of target vessels by custom-made or off-the-shelf fenestrated/branched endografts.

Custom-made devices have shown excellent early and long-term outcomes, but due to manufacturing time (up to three months), they can be used only for elective cases. In urgent cases, readily available off-the-shelf devices can be used, but their anatomical feasibility is not exhaustive, and may require long segment of aortic coverage above the celiac trunk. Parallel aortic grafts with chimneys or periscopes have been proposed as a timely alternative; however, gutter endoleaks and lack of proximal sealing are serious concerns for these techniques, especially for those cases where more than two target vessels need to be incorporated.

In patients presenting with large aneurysm, symptomatic, or requiring urgent repair, the use of physician-modified endograft (PMEG) represents a valid option. It allows for a rapid customization of a standard abdominal or thoracic device with the creation of fenestrations, scallops or branches, based on patient aneurysm anatomical extent and target vessel position.

However, these techniques demand high level of skills and experience; a recent review showed also that in the literature there is an extreme variability on indication to treatment, type of aneurysm and extension, type of graft, and method of modification, thus limiting the possibility to adequately analyze outcomes or drive comparison between different techniques.

Here the investigators describe an initial experience on safety and feasibility of a standardized approach with PMEG, based on specific anatomical selection criteria, measurement method and a standard technique of modification, using the Valiant Captivia (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN-USA) thoracic endograft.

BACKGROUND AND PRELIMINARY DATA

The vast majority of the literature on PMEG is based on the Cook platform. Recently Chait et al. reported the long term outcomes of more than 150 Cook PMEGs, with excellent results in terms of early mortality, freedom from aortic-related mortality, and target instability, especially for complex AAA compared to TAAA.

There is only a single experience using Valiant Captivia PMEG Valiant in the version without free-flow. In this experience the authors reported 18 cases; after complete unsheathing, the graft was introduced in a sterile aortic 3D model for precise fenestration allocation and then re-sheathed. The investigators think that leaving the graft on its device may reduce the risk of infection, reducing manipulation and contact with other materials, as the the printed aortic model. The other two case reports using the Valiant platform for the treatment of the paravisceral segment are from Gibello et al., that used a Valiant Navion graft, and Joseph et al., that applied mini-cuff-augmented fenestration using Valiant Captivia.

STANDARDIZED DEVICE MODIFICATION

The graft is modified on a sterile back-table in a hybrid operating room, while the patient is prepared for general anesthesia. A Valiant Captivia thoracic graft with free-flow (either with tubular or tapered shape) is fully deployed without releasing the free-flow, that is maintained retained on its tip. After that, a vertical dotted line is drawn to mark the graft anterior 0° degree, and fabric holes are performed with ophthalmologic cautery in the desired position, taking care of not having graft struts within the fenestrations. The fenestrations need to be nicely round, ideally 6x6 mm for the renals and 8x8 mm for superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and celiac trunk (CT), and are reinforced with the tip of a 0.018 guidewire (V-18, Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts-USA) through a continuous 5-0 non-adsorbable locking suture (Ti-cron, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota-USA).

A posterior constraining wire is created to temporarily reduce the diameter of the graft by 20-30%, in order to allow partial rotation during the deployment phase. The back of a 0.018'' guidewire is routed on the posterior aspect of the graft passing within the external suture of the struts, thus not requiring fabric puncture; the prolene used to reduce the diameter are tied around the stent struts and subsequently looped to the posterior wire. The four "8" markers on the top of the graft are carefully removed with a scalpel; one of these is modified as an "S" and re-sutured on the anterior aspect at 0 degree position, with a 5-0 prolene continuous suture. This "S" marker will allow anteroposterior graft orientation. Finally, the graft is re-sheathed with help of vessel loop.

FOLLOW-UP

A postoperative CTA is required within 30 days. Further follow-up follow-up is left to each center, but ideally includes imaging follow-up at 6, 12, 24 months and yearly thereafter.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Padova, Italy, 35020
        • Recruiting
        • Vascular and Endovascular Clinic - Padova University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients who underwent e PMEG with 4-fenestration procedure for the treatment of a short neck AAA, juxta/para-renal AAA, and type IV thoracoabdominal aneurysm (TAAA).

Description

INCLUSION CRITERIA

  • Complex AAA (including short-neck AAA, JRAA, PRAA, extent IV TAAA)
  • Haemodynamic stability
  • Anatomical feasibility is based on the presence of a proximal aortic neck above the mid celiac trunk of ≥25 mm in length and between 18 mm and 35 mm in diameter; the neck needs to be "healthy" with no parietal calcifications or thrombus with a cylindrical shape. The visceral aorta is required to be no larger than 40 mm in maximum diameter.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

  • Extent I-III TAAA
  • Hemorrhagic shock

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients treated
All patients treated with 4-fen PMEG endograft

On a sterile back-table a Valiant Captivia thoracic graft is deployed. A dotted line is drawn to mark the graft anterior 0° degree, and fabric holes are performed with cautery in the desired position. The fenestrations need to be 6x6 mm for the renals and 8x8 mm for superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and celiac trunk (CT), and are reinforced with the tip of a 0.018 guidewire through a continuous 5-0 locking suture.

A posterior constraining wire is created to reduce the diameter of the graft by 20-30%, in order to allow rotation during the deployment phase. The four "8" markers on the top of the graft are carefully removed with a scalpel; one of these is modified as an "S" and re-sutured on the anterior aspect at 0 degree position, with a 5-0 prolene continuous suture. This "S" marker will allow anteroposterior graft orientation. Finally, the graft is re-sheathed and deployed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Technical success
Time Frame: Intra-operative
Number of participants who underwent a successful deployment of the endograft and stenting of the 4 visceral vessels
Intra-operative
Freedom from target vessel instability
Time Frame: 5 years
Number of participants who experience any occlusion, endoleak, aneurysm rupture, stent restenosis needing a re-intervention
5 years
Freedom from endograft instability
Time Frame: 5 years
Number of participants who show absence of endoleak, aneurysm rupture, endograft migration
5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Early (30-days) Major Adverse Event (MAE)
Time Frame: 5 years
Any early (30-days) Major Adverse Event
5 years
Aneurysm sac dynamics
Time Frame: 5 years
Number of participants who experience aneurysm sac diameter change during follow-up
5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michele Piazza, MD, University Hospital Padova

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2033

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 7, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 10, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 16, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aortic Diseases

Clinical Trials on Physician-modification of Valiant Captivia Endograft (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN-USA).

3
Subscribe