Co-Design and Pilot Testing of Peer-led Community Outreach to Improve Equity, Veteran-Centeredness and Uptake of Lung Cancer Screening (VPC)

April 25, 2024 updated by: Renda Wiener, VA Boston Healthcare System

Co-design will be implemented to develop an innovative, Veteran-centered intervention (Vet Peer Connects program) that meets the needs of Black Veterans.

Next, a feasibility pilot test of the Vet Peer Connects program will be conducted. The Peer will lead up to 4 group lung cancer screening orientations in community partner sites to reach around 40 lung cancer screening eligible Black Veterans. The Peer will provide one-to-one tailored support to up to 15 Veterans (coaching, goal-setting, navigation to access Veterans Affairs lung cancer screening). Then, the study team will evaluate program delivery through ethnographic observation and field notes, Peer activity logs, and weekly check-ins between the study team and Peer. Investigators will interview Veteran participants, community partners, and lung cancer screening clinical staff to explore feasibility and acceptability of the Vet Peer Connects program and solicit suggestions for improvement. Preliminary data on the outcomes of the Vet Peer Connects program will be collected by study team through administering surveys to assess change in Social Cognitive Theory constructs, and extracting lung cancer screening uptake and tobacco treatment 3 months post enrollment from VA's Corporate Data Warehouse. This work will inform a subsequent multi-site stepped-wedge trial to assess effectiveness, implementation, and cost of the Vet Peer Connects program in VA lung cancer screening sites and neighboring branches of the National Association for Black Veterans

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Self-identified Black Veterans
  • Meet United States Preventive Services Task Force guidelines for lung cancer ( still smoking cigarettes or quit within past 15 years, greater than or equal to 20 pack-years total)
  • Have not yet undergone lung cancer screening

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-Black Veterans

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Peer led intervention
The peer-led program will be pilot tested enrolling 40 self-identified lung cancer screening eligible Black Veterans.
To assess outcomes of the Peer-led program, the study team will collect information from Veteran pilot test participants via surveys and data abstraction on healthcare utilization (Lung cancer screening completion, tobacco treatment) from the Veterans Affairs Corporate Data Warehouse. Survey data will be collected at 3 timepoints: baseline, post-Peer-led orientation, and 3-months post-enrollment. Healthcare utilization data will be abstracted from the corporate data warehouse to reflect the 3-month post-enrollment timepoint. Finally, interviews will be conducted with a subset of participants.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lung Cancer Screening Uptake
Time Frame: 3 months
Assessing electronic health record data to determine if screening has occurred
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tobacco cessation Treatment
Time Frame: 3 months
Assessing electronic health record data to determine if tobacco treatment has been utilized
3 months
Stigma Related to Smoking
Time Frame: 7 months
Assess via qualitative interviews
7 months
Perceived support from peer
Time Frame: 7 months
Assess via qualitative interviews
7 months
Lung Cancer Screening Knowledge
Time Frame: 7 months
a brief measure of smokers' knowledge of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography. Scale 0-12, higher score means better outcome
7 months
Lung Cancer Screening Fatalism
Time Frame: 7 months
Adapted Illness Perception Questionnaire. Scale 10-50, higher score means better outcome
7 months
Trust in VA
Time Frame: 7 months
Modified trust scale for VA health system. Scale 10-90, higher score means better outcome
7 months
Lung Cancer Self-efficacy
Time Frame: 7 months
Lung cancer screening health belief self-efficacy scale Scale 9-36, higher score means a better outcome
7 months
General Cancer Self-efficacy
Time Frame: 7 months
New General Self-efficacy scale Scale 8-40, higher score means a better outcome
7 months
Intention to engage in shared decision making
Time Frame: 7 months
Preparation for Decision Making, scale 10-40, lower score means better outcome
7 months
Motivation to quit smoking
Time Frame: 7 months
Readiness to change smoking behavior, contemplation ladder, scale 1-10, higher score means a better outcome
7 months
Intention to undergo lung cancer screening
Time Frame: 7 months
decisional conflict scale, scale 16-80, higher score means a better outcome
7 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 28, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 1, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 29, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Datasets meeting VA standards for disclosure to the public will be made available within 1 year of publication. Prior to distribution, a local privacy officer will certify that all datasets contains no protected health information. Final data sets will be maintained locally until enterprise-level resources become available for long-term storage and access. Guidance on request and distribution processes will be provided by office of research and development. Those requesting data will be asked to sign a Letter of Agreement.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Within 1 year of publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Those requesting data will be asked to sign a Letter of Agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on Veterans peer connect Program

3
Subscribe