SURGERY VS BOTULINUM TOXIN ON QUALITY OF LIFE IN STROKE PATIENTS: RANDOMIZED TRIAL

SURGERY VS BOTULINUM TOXIN ON QUALITY OF LIFE IN STROKE PATIENTS

We present a research project in the form of a controlled clinical trial with the aim of analyzing and demonstrating whether the surgical treatment of upper limb spasticity is an effective and efficient measure to improve dependence and quality of life perceived by patients with sequelae of stroke and therefore, should be included in the therapeutic protocols, in which it is not usually contemplated, as a complement or alternative to traditional treatment with botulinum toxin, rehabilitation and occupational therapy.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or "stroke" is the leading cause of permanent disability in adulthood and many patients require lifelong medical treatment and assistance from other people for the development of their daily activities. The repercussion in the family, professional, labor and social fields is enormous, producing a very important economic expense. The usual treatment of spastic upper limb secondary to stroke is rehabilitation, occupational therapy and periodic injection of botulinum toxin, and surgical correction is not usually considered. A two-arm Randomized Clinical Trial [surgical treatment (n=22) vs. botulinum toxin (n=22)] is proposed with the aim of investigating the efficacy and efficiency of surgery for upper limb spasticity with respect to treatment with botulinum toxin in patients with established spastic sequelae after stroke.

We will evaluate the effect on functionality and "hygienic" changes; the impact on quality of life, sleep quality, anxiety and depression; as well as on brain activity by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, at baseline and at 6 and 12 months follow-up. The health and care costs of the established groups of patients will also be evaluated. This research is framed in the context of chronic diseases, aging and patients with functional and mobility difficulties. The results of this work are expected to have a great impact due to the high prevalence of the disease, the severe disability it causes, and the number of patients who would benefit, in addition to the savings in healthcare resources. The incorporation of surgery into stroke care would change the current treatment paradigm, favoring the formation of multidisciplinary teams for the treatment of the disease.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

44

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Pedro Hernández-Cortés, MD PhD
  • Phone Number: 958240721
  • Email: phc@ugr.es

Study Locations

      • Granada, Spain, 18016
        • Recruiting
        • University of Granada
        • Contact:
          • Pedro Hernández-Cortés, MD PhD
          • Phone Number: 958240721
          • Email: phc@ugr.es

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients of legal age, with spasticity in the upper limb due to stroke, with a minimum evolution time of 12 months, who, after being informed orally and in writing of the objectives of the study, sign the informed consent form (themselves or their legal representatives).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Absence of consent, refusal of possible surgical treatment, stroke evolution time of less than 12 months, anaesthetic risk (ASA) class IV or higher, presence of involuntary movements, inability to respond adequately to surveys, deformities that cannot be addressed by surgical treatment or inability to follow up for at least one year.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group I
Patients who meet the inclusion criteria and who will be treated with botulinum toxin (1 injection/4months).
Treatment consists of periodic injections of the toxin into the spastic muscles. It causes reversible chemical denervation by preventing the release of acetylcholine vesicles at the neuromuscular junctions of the affected muscles.
Experimental: Group II
Patients who meet the inclusion criteria and who will be treated by surgery.
Deformity correction can be performed with single event multilevel surgery, using a combination of soft tissue releases and lengthening, tendon transfers and joint stabilization procedures. In addition, selective and supraselective neurectomies can also be performed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of life by 36-Item Short Form Survey Instrument (SF-36)
Time Frame: t0 (basal assesment) t1 (6 months evaluation) t2 (12 months evaluation)
SF-36 is a set of generic, coherent, and easily administered quality-of-life measures. These measures rely upon patient self-reporting and have been widely used.
t0 (basal assesment) t1 (6 months evaluation) t2 (12 months evaluation)
Quality of life by Newcastle Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Measure
Time Frame: t0 (basal assesment) t1 (6 months evaluation) t2 (12 months evaluation)
is a specific questionnaire to measure the QoL of patients who suffered a stroke. It was developed and validated by Buck et al. It is different from other questionnaires because it includes domains of vision, cognition and communication, and it can used for patients with ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke and motor aphasia.
t0 (basal assesment) t1 (6 months evaluation) t2 (12 months evaluation)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional outcome by Asworth scale
Time Frame: t0 (basal assesment) t1 (6 months evaluation) t2 (12 months evaluation)
It measures the degree of spasticity from 0 to 5. Significant improvement of at least 1 of the 5 joints evaluated (elbow, forearm, wrist, thumb, fingers) will be considered a positive result.
t0 (basal assesment) t1 (6 months evaluation) t2 (12 months evaluation)
Functional outcome by House hand function scale
Time Frame: t0 (basal assesment) t1 (6 months evaluation) t2 (12 months evaluation)
Scale of hand function with 10 degrees of capability
t0 (basal assesment) t1 (6 months evaluation) t2 (12 months evaluation)
Functional outcome by Fugl-mayer scale
Time Frame: t0 (basal assesment) t1 (6 months evaluation) t2 (12 months evaluation)
is the first quantitative evaluative instrument for measuring sensorimotor stroke recovery, based on Twitchell and Brunnstrom's concept of sequential stages of motor return in the hemiplegic stroke patient.
t0 (basal assesment) t1 (6 months evaluation) t2 (12 months evaluation)
Functional outcome by GAS score
Time Frame: t0 (basal assesment) t1 (6 months evaluation) t2 (12 months evaluation)
5-grade scale for the domains hygiene, esthetics and pain. Krasny-Pacini y cols, 2013
t0 (basal assesment) t1 (6 months evaluation) t2 (12 months evaluation)
Carer Burden by Carer Burden Score
Time Frame: t0 (basal assesment) t1 (6 months evaluation) t2 (12 months evaluation)
Scores the caregiver's degree of difficulty for 4 basic activities (nail clipping, palm grooming, armpit grooming, arm dressing) on a 5-point Likert scale.
t0 (basal assesment) t1 (6 months evaluation) t2 (12 months evaluation)
Pain by Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: t0 (basal assesment) t1 (6 months evaluation) t2 (12 months evaluation)
A tool used to help a person assess the intensity of certain sensations and feelings, such as pain. The visual analogue pain scale is a straight line where one end means no pain and the other end means the worst pain imaginable. The patient marks a point on the line that matches the amount of pain he or she feels.
t0 (basal assesment) t1 (6 months evaluation) t2 (12 months evaluation)
Sleep health by SATED scale
Time Frame: t0 (basal assesment) t1 (6 months evaluation) t2 (12 months evaluation)
5 questions scale about satisfaction, alertness, timing, efficiency and duration of sleep to know the sleep health of patients. Higher scores (0-10) mean better sleep health.
t0 (basal assesment) t1 (6 months evaluation) t2 (12 months evaluation)
Anxiety and depression by HADS scale
Time Frame: t0 (basal assesment) t1 (6 months evaluation) t2 (12 months evaluation)
Includes 14 items, with scores from 0 to 3 (higher scores reflect greater severity of symptomatology).
t0 (basal assesment) t1 (6 months evaluation) t2 (12 months evaluation)
Activity, structure and brain function by MRI
Time Frame: t0 (basal assesment) t1 (6 months evaluation) t2 (12 months evaluation)
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) at rest and with the patient's repeated attempt to extend the elbow and wrist. Anatomical and functional volumes shall be obtained by MRI and fMRI imaging, using a Siemens Prisma 3T functional MRI.
t0 (basal assesment) t1 (6 months evaluation) t2 (12 months evaluation)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 26, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 30, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 30, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Botulinum Toxin A

3
Subscribe