Block and Periarticular Injection Study

April 15, 2026 updated by: Washington University School of Medicine

The Effect of Regional Anesthesia and Periarticular Injection and Versus Periarticular Injection Alone on Early Recovery After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Trial

The purpose of the study is to compare two types of perioperative analgesic modalities, adductor canal block plus interspace between popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (IPACK) block and periarticular injection versus periarticular injection alone, to determine their relative efficacies with regard to pain relief and functional outcomes in the early postoperative period following primary total knee arthroplasty.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The widespread adoption of multimodal analgesia in contemporary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has led to improvements in perioperative pain control, expedited recovery times, and shorter hospital stays1-3. Periarticular injections (PAIs), adductor canal blocks (ACBs), and interspace between popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (IPACK) blocks are commonly utilized as part of contemporary multimodal analgesia protocols, but their relative efficacies in improving early recovery after TKA has yet to be definitively elucidated4. There are a few known potential drawbacks of ACBs and IPACKs including surgical delay due to administration timing, increased costs, and small risks associated with a regional block. Both regional anesthesia and PAI have been found to be effective alone in improving pain and opioid consumption, but there is limited data on whether there is an additive benefit of providing both treatments for patients undergoing primary TKA. Therefore, the purpose of our study is to compare the efficacy of regional anesthesia and PAI vs. PAI alone for pain management and functional recovery in the early postoperative period following TKA.

Design Prospective randomized trial

Treatment Groups All ACBs will be administered as a single shot preoperatively in the holding area on the day of surgery by the regional anesthesia team and PAIs will be administered intraoperatively by the treating orthopaedic surgeon.

Group 1: regional anesthesia (ACB + IPACK) and PAI Group 2: PAI alone

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

174

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Missouri
      • Creve Coeur, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Planning to undergo Unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty.
  • 18 and up
  • Willing to sign informed consent
  • Willing to return for all follow-up visits
  • Smartphone or tablet device capable of running the FocusMotion platform

Exclusion Criteria:

  • BMI > 45
  • Preexisting functionally limiting neurologic disorders
  • Hepatic or renal insufficiency
  • History of unprovoked venous thromboembolism
  • Inability to complete baseline functional testing
  • Chronic opioid or gabapentin and pregabalin use (chronic defined as use >5 days per week prior to the surgical procedure)
  • Allergy or intolerance to trial medications
  • Planned admission to a postoperative rehabilitation facility
  • Planned general anesthesia
  • Receiving workers compensation or disability payments

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Block and Periarticular injection
regional anesthesia (Adductor canal block +IPACK) and Periarticular injection
this is the block portion of the study
Other Names:
  • adductor canal block
  • periarticular injection
this is the no block portion of the study
Other Names:
  • Periarticular injections
Active Comparator: Periarticular injectin alone
Periarticular injection alone
this is the no block portion of the study
Other Names:
  • Periarticular injections

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Score for 2 Weeks Postoperatively
Time Frame: at 2 weeks
pain score 0-10 10 being more pain
at 2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Opioid Use
Time Frame: postop day 2

opioid medications survey Opioids calculated MMEs (morphine milligram equivalents) milligrams of opioids correlates with the morphine equivalents.

Morphine equivalents are standard units used to compare the analgesic potency of different opioids to a reference dose of oral morphine. They calculate total daily, safe, and effective doses

postop day 2
Daily Step Count at 2 Weeks Postop
Time Frame: 2 weeks postop
step count throught fitbit
2 weeks postop
Oxford Knee Score
Time Frame: baseline

oxford knee survey through app, 0-48 scale 0 being min and 48 being max score assesses pain and function of the knee

Score 0 to 19 May indicate severe knee arthritis requiring surgical intervention.

Score 20 to 29 May indicate moderate to severe knee arthritis.

Score 30 to 39 May indicate mild to moderate knee arthritis. Score 40 to 48 May indicate satisfactory joint function not requiring treatment.

baseline
Sleep Quality Via Survey That Patients Completed Ranging From Very Good Sleep and Fairly Good Sleep
Time Frame: baseline % of very good sleep and fairly good sleep
sleep quality through app surveys number of participants that answered survey in the app with choices of very good sleep to very bad sleep. 0=very good sleep, 1=fairly good sleep, 2=fairly bad sleep. 3=very bad sleep the outcome measures data table reflects the number or participants that scored 0-1 on the survey at the baseline timepoint.
baseline % of very good sleep and fairly good sleep
Oxford Knee Score
Time Frame: 7 days postop

oxford knee survey through app, 0-48 scale 0 being min and 48 being max assesses pain and function of the knee

Score 0 to 19 May indicate severe knee arthritis requiring surgical intervention.

Score 20 to 29 May indicate moderate to severe knee arthritis.

Score 30 to 39 May indicate mild to moderate knee arthritis. Score 40 to 48 May indicate satisfactory joint function not requiring treatment.

7 days postop
Oxford Knee Score
Time Frame: 14 days postop

oxford knee survey through app, 0-48 scale 0 being min and 48 being max assesses pain and function of the knee

Score 0 to 19 May indicate severe knee arthritis requiring surgical intervention.

Score 20 to 29 May indicate moderate to severe knee arthritis.

Score 30 to 39 May indicate mild to moderate knee arthritis. Score 40 to 48 May indicate satisfactory joint function not requiring treatment.

14 days postop
Sleep Quality Via App Surveys With Range of Very Good Sleep and Fairly Good Sleep
Time Frame: 7 days postop % of fairly good to very good sleep
sleep quality through app surveys number of participants that answered survey in the app with choices of very good sleep to very bad sleep. 0=very good sleep, 1=fairly good sleep, 2=fairly bad sleep. 3=very bad sleep the outcome measures data table reflects the number or participants that scored 0-1 on the survey at the 7 day timepoint.
7 days postop % of fairly good to very good sleep
Sleep Quality Via App Surveys With Range of Very Good Sleep to Fairly Good Sleep
Time Frame: 14 days postop % of very good sleep to fairly good sleep
sleep quality through app surveys number of participants that answered survey in the app with choices of very good sleep to very bad sleep. 0=very good sleep, 1=fairly good sleep, 2=fairly bad sleep. 3=very bad sleep the outcome measures data table reflects the number or participants that scored 0-1 on the survey at the 14 day timepoint.
14 days postop % of very good sleep to fairly good sleep

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andrew Schneider, MD, Washington University School of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 4, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 12, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

May 12, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 11, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 7, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 13, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain, Postoperative

Clinical Trials on regional anesthesia and PAI

Subscribe