Prognostic Evaluation Prediction Model Survival Spinal Epidural Metastases

May 8, 2024 updated by: Radboud University Medical Center

Prognostic Evaluation of Prediction Model Survival Spinal Epidural Metastases

Patients with symptomatic spinal metatstasis will be prosepectively included in a database after theu signes informed consent. Minimally six months after inclusion the survival status is analyzed. These are correlated with factors that are used in an earlier develloped prediction model

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The prediction model is web-based and used five parameters: Karnofsky performance score (KPS) (in case of sudden (<24 hours) deterioration the score was used just before the deterioration), the curative intention to treat the primary, the spinal level of the symptomatic tumor, histopathology of the metastasis, and sex. These parameters will be recorded in addition to baseline characteristics. The date of presentation will be recorded. Four months after inclusion of the last patient survival status of all patients will scored. If applicable the date of death will be noted.

Patients are eligible if they suffer from a symptomatic epidural spinal metastatic lesion warranting therapy, either radiation therapy or a combination of surgery and radiation therapy. The nature of the lesion should be verified by pathological examination. In case of an active primary that has recently been diagnosed (less than one year previous to presentation of spinal lesion), the metastatic lesion is considered to be related to this primary. However, if the patient has more than one primary in the history, pathological verification of the tissue is obligatory.

After the patients provided informed consent of using their data for scientific use including the publication of the results, they will be included. The data will be collected, and electronically and anonymized stored. Patients will be included during three successive years. It is estimated that approximately 450 patients can be included. Two centers will participate, Radboud University Medical Center and Haaglanden Medical Center.

Statistical analysis The Cox model will be validated as described earlier 4, first graphically the predictive ability will be plotted, whereas next it will be quantitatively expressed as Harrel's c-index and the Royston -Sauerbrei D-statistic, Rd2. The calibration slope is also calculated. A sample of one third of all patients will be used for validation purpose. If needed the model is adapted. Then the validation is performed using the data of all patients.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

428

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Gelderland
      • Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands, 6500 HB
        • Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

adult with a known or unknown malignancy presenting with symptomatic spinal metastasis

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with spinal spinal metastasis
  • symptomatic
  • adult
  • informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • not understanding informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
survival after diagnosis of spinal metastasis
Time Frame: minimal 6 months after inclusion
survival after diagnosis of spinal metastasis
minimal 6 months after inclusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 8, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 13, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 13, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Radboudumcnch001

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Predictive Cancer Model

3
Subscribe