- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06412965
Reliability of Rimegepant for the Acute Treatment of Migraine (Adelphi DSP)
May 8, 2024 updated by: Pfizer
Evaluation of the Reliability of Effect of Rimegepant for the Acute Treatment of Migraine Across Multiple Attacks
This protocol describes the analysis of the Adelphi Real World (ARW) Migraine Disease Specific Programme(TM) 2022, a cross-sectional study which used both physician and patient surveys to assess the perception of the acute treatment for migraine attacks.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Detailed Description
This is a retrospective database study that aims to explore the reliability of effect with acute use of Rimegepant, to evaluate the satisfaction with Rimegepant, to evaluate willingness to continue using Rimegepant, and to explore proportion optimized on treatment with Rimegepant.
The data will be extracted from the Adelphi Real World (ARW) Migraine Disease Specific ProgrammeTM (DSP) 2022 database, which was conducted across a number of countries including United States, between May 2022 and November 2022.
The DSP was an observational study of clinical practice.
Treatment practice data were collected by physicians (physician survey) who were asked to provide information for the next 10 patients consulting for migraine.
These patients were then invited to fill out a self-completion form (patient survey) providing their own assessment on the disease and treatments.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
91
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10001
- Pfizer
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Physician personally responsible for treatment decision of migraine patients were enrolled in the survey.
Each physician then enrolled consecutive patients to complete a patient self-completion questionnaire.
Description
Inclusion criteria
- Patients who have episodic and/or chronic migraine
- Patients age > 18
- Currently prescribed rimegepant for the acute treatment of migraine
Exclusion criteria
- currently prescribed rimegepant for prevention of migraine or for both the acute treatment & prevention of migraine
- Currently prescribed an acute treatment for migraine other than rimegepant
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
---|
Physician Survey
Physicians who were enrolled in the Adelphi Migraine Disease Specific Programme (DSP)™
|
Patient survey
Patients who were enrolled in the Adelphi Migraine Disease Specific Programme (DSP)™
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Failure to achieve pain freedom within 2 hours post dose (physician perspective)
Time Frame: 2 hours post dose
|
Frequency of patients for which the physician reports that fail to achieve pain freedom at 2 hours post dose on more than half of occasions measured by using answers on the physician survey
|
2 hours post dose
|
Number of migraine attacks acute treatment achieves pain freedom within 2 hours post dose (patient perspective)
Time Frame: 2 hours post dose
|
Frequency of patients who reported migraine pain freedom within 2 hours post dosing in 0 out of every 5 attacks, 1 out of every 5 attacks, 2 out of every 5 attacks, 3 out of every 5 attacks, 4 out of every 5 attacks, or 5 out of every 5 attacks measured by using answers on the patient survey
|
2 hours post dose
|
Reason for choice of current acute treatment - 'consistency of response after repeated use' (physician perspective)
Time Frame: Over the last 3 months prior completing the survey
|
Description of the reasons why the physician chooses the acute treatment considering the following domains: type of control and effects; formulation/dosage; quality of life; side effects and safety; patient types; and general attributes measured by using answers on the physician survey
|
Over the last 3 months prior completing the survey
|
Satisfaction with current acute treatment (physician perspective)
Time Frame: Over the last 3 months prior completing the survey
|
Frequency with which the physician is extremely satisfied, satisfied, slightly satisfied, neither satisfied not dissatisfied, slightly dissatisfied, or extremely dissatisfied with the patient´s acute treatment prescription measured by using answers on the physician survey
|
Over the last 3 months prior completing the survey
|
Drivers for lack of satisfaction with current acute treatment (physician perspective)
Time Frame: Over the last 3 months prior completing the survey
|
Description of the reasons why the physician is not satisfied with patient´s treatment prescription measured by using answers on the physician survey
|
Over the last 3 months prior completing the survey
|
Satisfaction with current acute treatment (patient perspective)
Time Frame: Over the last 3 months prior completing the survey
|
Frequency of patients who reported being extremely satisfied, satisfied, slightly satisfied, neither satisfied not dissatisfied, slightly dissatisfied, or extremely dissatisfied with the treatment for their migraine attacks measured by using answers on the patient survey
|
Over the last 3 months prior completing the survey
|
Drivers for lack of satisfaction with current acute treatment (patient perspective)
Time Frame: Over the last 3 months prior completing the survey
|
Description of the reasons why the patients are not satisfied or extremely satisfied with their acute treatment measured by using answers on the patient survey
|
Over the last 3 months prior completing the survey
|
Patient willingness to continue use of acute treatment (patient perspective)
Time Frame: Over the last 3 months prior completing the survey
|
Frequency of patients who reported willingness to continue using their acute treatment, categorized into definitely yes, probably yes, do not know, probably not, or definitely not measured by using answers on the patient survey
|
Over the last 3 months prior completing the survey
|
Migraine treatment optimization questionnaire (mTOQ6)
Time Frame: Over the last 3 months prior completing the survey
|
Mean and median of total scores.
The mTOQ-6 score is calculated by summing individual question scores (score range of 6-24), with higher scores indicating better acute treatment optimization
|
Over the last 3 months prior completing the survey
|
Migraine Treatment Optimization Questionnaire (m-TOQ6)
Time Frame: Over the last 3 months prior completing the survey
|
Frequency of each item with the response options (never, rarely, less than half of the time, or half of the time or more)
|
Over the last 3 months prior completing the survey
|
When patients takes acute prescription treatment
Time Frame: Over the last 3 months prior completing the survey
|
Frequency of patients who usually take their acute treatment: before any sign of a migraine attack, but in anticipation of one starting; or at the first sign of a migraine attack (before the pain starts); or when the pain starts; or after the pain has started and have an idea of how severe it is measured by using answers on the patient survey
|
Over the last 3 months prior completing the survey
|
How many days per month patient takes acute prescription treatment
Time Frame: Over the last 3 months prior completing the survey
|
Average number of days per month the patient takes the acute treatment measured by using answers on the patient survey
|
Over the last 3 months prior completing the survey
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Pfizer
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 2, 2024
Primary Completion (Actual)
January 3, 2024
Study Completion (Actual)
January 3, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 16, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 8, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
May 14, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
May 14, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 8, 2024
Last Verified
May 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- C4951066
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
IPD Plan Description
Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g.
protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions.
Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Migraine Disorders
-
Austrian Migraine Registry CollaborationMedical University of Vienna; Medical University Innsbruck; Austrian Headache...RecruitingMigraine | Chronic Migraine | Migraine Without Aura | Migraine With Aura | Episodic MigraineAustria
-
Harvard University Faculty of MedicineBrigham and Women's Hospital; Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research (PCCR)CompletedMigraine | Migraine Disorders | Migraine Without Aura | Migraine With Aura | Migraine, ClassicUnited States
-
University of FlorenceAzienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino; University... and other collaboratorsRecruitingMigraine | Chronic Migraine | Migraine Without Aura | Migraine With AuraItaly
-
Notre-Dame Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, CanadaAllerganCompletedChronic Migraine | Migraine Without Aura | Migraine With AuraCanada
-
Glostrup University Hospital, CopenhagenUnknownChronic Migraine | Migraine Without Aura | Migraine With AuraDenmark
-
University of FlorenceAzienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino; University... and other collaboratorsRecruitingMigraine | Chronic Migraine | Migraine Without Aura | Migraine With AuraItaly
-
CoolTech LLCTerminatedMigraine | Migraine Without Aura | Migraine With Aura | Episodic MigraineUnited States
-
Tonix Pharmaceuticals, Inc.PremierCompletedChronic Migraine | Chronic Migraine, Headache | Chronic Migraine Without Aura | Aura MigraineUnited States
-
Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Neurologico Carlo...CompletedMigraine With Aura | Migraine in ChildrenItaly
-
University of FlorenceAzienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino; University... and other collaboratorsRecruitingMigraine | Chronic Migraine | Migraine Without Aura | Migraine With AuraItaly