Reliability of Rimegepant for the Acute Treatment of Migraine (Adelphi DSP)

May 8, 2024 updated by: Pfizer

Evaluation of the Reliability of Effect of Rimegepant for the Acute Treatment of Migraine Across Multiple Attacks

This protocol describes the analysis of the Adelphi Real World (ARW) Migraine Disease Specific Programme(TM) 2022, a cross-sectional study which used both physician and patient surveys to assess the perception of the acute treatment for migraine attacks.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This is a retrospective database study that aims to explore the reliability of effect with acute use of Rimegepant, to evaluate the satisfaction with Rimegepant, to evaluate willingness to continue using Rimegepant, and to explore proportion optimized on treatment with Rimegepant. The data will be extracted from the Adelphi Real World (ARW) Migraine Disease Specific ProgrammeTM (DSP) 2022 database, which was conducted across a number of countries including United States, between May 2022 and November 2022. The DSP was an observational study of clinical practice. Treatment practice data were collected by physicians (physician survey) who were asked to provide information for the next 10 patients consulting for migraine. These patients were then invited to fill out a self-completion form (patient survey) providing their own assessment on the disease and treatments.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

91

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10001
        • Pfizer

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Physician personally responsible for treatment decision of migraine patients were enrolled in the survey. Each physician then enrolled consecutive patients to complete a patient self-completion questionnaire.

Description

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients who have episodic and/or chronic migraine
  • Patients age > 18
  • Currently prescribed rimegepant for the acute treatment of migraine

Exclusion criteria

  • currently prescribed rimegepant for prevention of migraine or for both the acute treatment & prevention of migraine
  • Currently prescribed an acute treatment for migraine other than rimegepant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Physician Survey
Physicians who were enrolled in the Adelphi Migraine Disease Specific Programme (DSP)™
Patient survey
Patients who were enrolled in the Adelphi Migraine Disease Specific Programme (DSP)™

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Failure to achieve pain freedom within 2 hours post dose (physician perspective)
Time Frame: 2 hours post dose
Frequency of patients for which the physician reports that fail to achieve pain freedom at 2 hours post dose on more than half of occasions measured by using answers on the physician survey
2 hours post dose
Number of migraine attacks acute treatment achieves pain freedom within 2 hours post dose (patient perspective)
Time Frame: 2 hours post dose
Frequency of patients who reported migraine pain freedom within 2 hours post dosing in 0 out of every 5 attacks, 1 out of every 5 attacks, 2 out of every 5 attacks, 3 out of every 5 attacks, 4 out of every 5 attacks, or 5 out of every 5 attacks measured by using answers on the patient survey
2 hours post dose
Reason for choice of current acute treatment - 'consistency of response after repeated use' (physician perspective)
Time Frame: Over the last 3 months prior completing the survey
Description of the reasons why the physician chooses the acute treatment considering the following domains: type of control and effects; formulation/dosage; quality of life; side effects and safety; patient types; and general attributes measured by using answers on the physician survey
Over the last 3 months prior completing the survey
Satisfaction with current acute treatment (physician perspective)
Time Frame: Over the last 3 months prior completing the survey
Frequency with which the physician is extremely satisfied, satisfied, slightly satisfied, neither satisfied not dissatisfied, slightly dissatisfied, or extremely dissatisfied with the patient´s acute treatment prescription measured by using answers on the physician survey
Over the last 3 months prior completing the survey
Drivers for lack of satisfaction with current acute treatment (physician perspective)
Time Frame: Over the last 3 months prior completing the survey
Description of the reasons why the physician is not satisfied with patient´s treatment prescription measured by using answers on the physician survey
Over the last 3 months prior completing the survey
Satisfaction with current acute treatment (patient perspective)
Time Frame: Over the last 3 months prior completing the survey
Frequency of patients who reported being extremely satisfied, satisfied, slightly satisfied, neither satisfied not dissatisfied, slightly dissatisfied, or extremely dissatisfied with the treatment for their migraine attacks measured by using answers on the patient survey
Over the last 3 months prior completing the survey
Drivers for lack of satisfaction with current acute treatment (patient perspective)
Time Frame: Over the last 3 months prior completing the survey
Description of the reasons why the patients are not satisfied or extremely satisfied with their acute treatment measured by using answers on the patient survey
Over the last 3 months prior completing the survey
Patient willingness to continue use of acute treatment (patient perspective)
Time Frame: Over the last 3 months prior completing the survey
Frequency of patients who reported willingness to continue using their acute treatment, categorized into definitely yes, probably yes, do not know, probably not, or definitely not measured by using answers on the patient survey
Over the last 3 months prior completing the survey
Migraine treatment optimization questionnaire (mTOQ6)
Time Frame: Over the last 3 months prior completing the survey
Mean and median of total scores. The mTOQ-6 score is calculated by summing individual question scores (score range of 6-24), with higher scores indicating better acute treatment optimization
Over the last 3 months prior completing the survey
Migraine Treatment Optimization Questionnaire (m-TOQ6)
Time Frame: Over the last 3 months prior completing the survey
Frequency of each item with the response options (never, rarely, less than half of the time, or half of the time or more)
Over the last 3 months prior completing the survey
When patients takes acute prescription treatment
Time Frame: Over the last 3 months prior completing the survey
Frequency of patients who usually take their acute treatment: before any sign of a migraine attack, but in anticipation of one starting; or at the first sign of a migraine attack (before the pain starts); or when the pain starts; or after the pain has started and have an idea of how severe it is measured by using answers on the patient survey
Over the last 3 months prior completing the survey
How many days per month patient takes acute prescription treatment
Time Frame: Over the last 3 months prior completing the survey
Average number of days per month the patient takes the acute treatment measured by using answers on the patient survey
Over the last 3 months prior completing the survey

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Pfizer

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 2, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 3, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

January 3, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 16, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 14, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 14, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Migraine Disorders

3
Subscribe