Effectiveness of Conventional Therapy Plus Pulsed-Radiofrequency for Herniated Nucleus Pulposus

May 15, 2024 updated by: Dr. Syaiful Anwar Hospital, Malang

Comparison of The Effectiveness Between Conventional Therapy and Conventional Therapy Plus Pulsed-Radiofrequency in Herniated Nucleus Pulposus Patients at Dr. Saiful Anwar Hospital, Malang

The purpose of this research was to study whether the additional application of a certain medical intervention making use of radiofrequencies (pulsed-radiofrequency) would reduce pain in patients with herniated disk.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Pain is an uncomfortable sensory and emotional experience that can affect quality of life. Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common causes of pain, with herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP) being a common etiology. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) is a relatively novel technique that has shown promising results in many applications, including spinal pain conditions.

This quasi-experimental study aimed to compare pain levels between patients who underwent conventional therapy (CT) alone and CT plus PRF as management in patients with HNP. Pain severity was measured in the numeric rating scale before and 1 month after treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • East Java
      • Malang, East Java, Indonesia, 65112
        • Dr. Saiful Anwar Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Having an established diagnosis of HNP
  • Complaint present for at least the pas 3 months
  • Experiencing pain intensity of 4 or greater on the numeric rating scale
  • Capable of giving informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant patients
  • Presence of infection at the site of pulsed radiofrequency
  • HNP with red flags.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional therapy
Subjects in this arm received interventions which were conventional, including opioid and non-opioid analgesics, adjuvant analgesics, muscle relaxants, and physiotherapy.

Conventional therapy for HNP consisting of:

  • Acetaminophen
  • NSAID: Etoricoxib, celecoxib, meloxicam, diclofenac, ibuprofen
  • Muscle relaxant: eperisone, diazepam
  • Opioid: codein, tramadol
  • Adjuvant analgesics: Amitriptyline, pregabalin, gabapentin
  • Physiotherapy: Short wave diathermy, ultrasound diathermy, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, and exercise
Experimental: Conventional therapy + pulsed radiofrequency
Subjects in this arm received pulsed radiofrequency in addition to the same conventional therapy as the other arm.

Conventional therapy for HNP consisting of:

  • Acetaminophen
  • NSAID: Etoricoxib, celecoxib, meloxicam, diclofenac, ibuprofen
  • Muscle relaxant: eperisone, diazepam
  • Opioid: codein, tramadol
  • Adjuvant analgesics: Amitriptyline, pregabalin, gabapentin
  • Physiotherapy: Short wave diathermy, ultrasound diathermy, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, and exercise
Individualized dose of pulsed radiofrequency is given for 6 minutes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain severity
Time Frame: 1 month after treatment
Pain severity measured with the numeric rating scale (NRS). The numeric rating scale measures pain on a scale of 0-10 with 0 representing "no pain" and 10 representing "the worst pain possible".
1 month after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hana H Fachir, M.D., Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 2, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 14, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

September 16, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 10, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 17, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RSSA-00124

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Conventional therapy

3
Subscribe