- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Klinisk forsøg NCT04173078
Computerized Intervention for Distress Intolerance
20. november 2019 opdateret af: Richard Macatee, Auburn University
This study evaluates the impact of a computerized distress intolerance intervention relative to a control intervention on cannabis use-related behavior and neurophysiology.
Studieoversigt
Status
Afsluttet
Betingelser
Detaljeret beskrivelse
Distress intolerant cannabis users were randomized to a computerized distress intolerance intervention or a control intervention.
Primary and secondary outcomes consist of the treatment target, cannabis use-related behavior, and theoretically-relevant neurophysiological processes (i.e., cannabis cue reactivity, response inhibition).
Undersøgelsestype
Interventionel
Tilmelding (Faktiske)
60
Fase
- Ikke anvendelig
Deltagelseskriterier
Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.
Berettigelseskriterier
Aldre berettiget til at studere
18 år til 30 år (Voksen)
Tager imod sunde frivillige
Ingen
Køn, der er berettiget til at studere
Alle
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- Distress Intolerance Index score >= 20
- Average cannabis use frequency in the past year >= 2-3/week
Exclusion Criteria:
- Current suicidal ideation
- History of psychotic symptoms
- Bipolar-spectrum disorder without stabilization on medication for >= 3 months
- Change in psychotropic medication in the past month
- Current CBT for internalizing or substance use disorders
Studieplan
Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.
Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?
Design detaljer
- Primært formål: Behandling
- Tildeling: Randomiseret
- Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
- Maskning: Dobbelt
Våben og indgreb
Deltagergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandling |
---|---|
Eksperimentel: Computerized Distress Intolerance Intervention
Two, 1-hour computerized sessions that include psychoeducation about emotional avoidance, idiographic emotional exposure, and construction of idiographic implementation intentions to practice distress tolerance skills outside of session.
|
|
Placebo komparator: Computerized Healthy Behaviors Intervention
Two, 1-hour computerized sessions that focus on psychoeducation about the importance of a healthy lifestyle.
|
Hvad måler undersøgelsen?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
---|---|---|
Change in Distress Intolerance Index (DII) score from Baseline through 4-Month Follow-Up
Tidsramme: Baseline, post-treatment (i.e., ~1 week following the last treatment session), 1-month follow-up, 4-month follow-up
|
Self-report measure of Distress Intolerance (Distress Intolerance Index [DII]; McHugh & Otto, 2012).
The DII is a self-report measure comprised of 10 items that are summed together to form a total score (minimum: 0; maximum: 40).
Higher scores indicate greater distress intolerance (i.e., worse outcome).
|
Baseline, post-treatment (i.e., ~1 week following the last treatment session), 1-month follow-up, 4-month follow-up
|
Change in Mirror-Tracing Persistence Task (MTPT) quit latency from Baseline to Post-Treatment
Tidsramme: Baseline, post-treatment (i.e., ~1 week following the last treatment session)
|
Behavioral measure of Distress Intolerance (Mirror-Tracing Persistence Task [MTPT]; Macatee & Cougle, 2015).
The MTPT is a behavioral persistence measure that assesses behavioral distress intolerance via the latency to quit a distressing task.
Scores range from 0 seconds to a maximum persistence time of 7 minutes.
Lower scores indicate greater distress intolerance (i.e., worse outcome).
|
Baseline, post-treatment (i.e., ~1 week following the last treatment session)
|
Change in Marijuana Problems Scale (MPS) score from Baseline through 4-Month Follow-Up
Tidsramme: Baseline, post-treatment (i.e., ~1 week following the last treatment session), 1-month follow-up, 4-month follow-up
|
Self-report measure of marijuana use-related problems (Marijuana Problems Scale [MPS]; Stephens et al., 2000).
The MPS is a self-report measure of marijuana use-related problem severity in the past month.
The measure is comprised of 19 items with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 38.
Higher scores indicate greater marijuana use-related problem severity in the past month (i.e., worse outcome).
|
Baseline, post-treatment (i.e., ~1 week following the last treatment session), 1-month follow-up, 4-month follow-up
|
Change in Cannabis Use Disorder (CUD) diagnostic criteria from Baseline to 4-Month Follow-Up
Tidsramme: Baseline, 4-month follow-up
|
Interviewer-assessed Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-5 Cannabis Use Disorder diagnostic criteria.
DSM-5 Cannabis Use Disorder criteria were assessed via interview at baseline and again at the 4-month follow-up.
Total number of Cannabis Use Disorder criteria was used to assess Cannabis Use Disorder severity (minimum score: 0; maximum score: 11).
Higher scores indicate greater Cannabis Use Disorder severity (i.e., worse outcome).
|
Baseline, 4-month follow-up
|
Change in Timeline follow-back (TLFB) cannabis use frequency from Baseline through 4-Month Follow-Up
Tidsramme: Baseline, post-treatment (i.e., ~1 week following the last treatment session), 1-month follow-up, 4-month follow-up
|
Percent cannabis use days in the past month (Timeline follow-back [TLFB]; Hjorthoj et al., 2012).
The Timeline follow-back (TLFB) is a self-report measure that assesses cannabis use over the past 4 weeks.
Percentage of days on which cannabis was used in the past four weeks was used to assess cannabis use frequency (minimum: 0%; maximum: 100%).
Higher scores indicate greater cannabis use frequency (i.e., worse outcome).
|
Baseline, post-treatment (i.e., ~1 week following the last treatment session), 1-month follow-up, 4-month follow-up
|
Change in Marijuana Motives Measure (MMM) score from Baseline through 4-Month Follow-Up
Tidsramme: Baseline, post-treatment (i.e., ~1 week following the last treatment session), 1-month follow-up, 4-month follow-up
|
Self-reported motives for cannabis use (Marijuana Motives Measure [MMM]; Zvolensky et al., 2007).
The Marijuana Motives Measure (MMM) is a self-report measure that assesses different motives for marijuana use.
The coping motives subscale was the subscale of interest in this project.
The Coping motives subscale is comprised of 4 items that are then averaged (minimum score: 1; maximum score: 5).
Greater scores indicate greater coping motives for marijuana use (i.e., worse outcome).
|
Baseline, post-treatment (i.e., ~1 week following the last treatment session), 1-month follow-up, 4-month follow-up
|
Change in Marijuana Craving Questionnaire (MCQ) score from Baseline to Post-Treatment
Tidsramme: Baseline, post-treatment (i.e., ~1 week following the last treatment session)
|
Self-reported state craving for marijuana (Marijuana Craving Questionnaire [MCQ]; Heishman et al., 2009).
The Marijuana Craving Questionnaire (MCQ) is a self-report measure of current craving for marijuana use.
The emotionality subscale was the subscale of interest in this project.
The Emotionality subscale is comprised of 5 items that are then averaged (minimum score: 1; maximum score: 7).
Greater scores indicate greater marijuana craving (i.e., worse outcome).
In this project, the outcome of interest is the extent to which a laboratory stress induction increases state marijuana craving.
|
Baseline, post-treatment (i.e., ~1 week following the last treatment session)
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
---|---|---|
Change in electroencephalography (EEG) index of acute stress modulation of cannabis cue reactivity (assessed by the Late Positive Potential [LPP]) from Baseline to Post-Treatment
Tidsramme: Baseline, post-treatment (i.e., ~1 week following the last treatment session)
|
Acute Stress modulation of the Late Positive Potential (LPP) to Cannabis Cues.
The LPP to visual cannabis cues before and after a laboratory stress induction will be measured as a neurophysiological index of acute stress modulation of cannabis cue incentive salience.
Greater values indicate a larger neural response to cannabis cues during acute stress (i.e., worse outcome).
|
Baseline, post-treatment (i.e., ~1 week following the last treatment session)
|
Change in electroencephalography (EEG) index of acute stress modulation of threat reactivity (assessed by the Late Positive Potential [LPP]) from Baseline to Post-Treatment
Tidsramme: Baseline, post-treatment (i.e., ~1 week following the last treatment session)
|
Acute Stress modulation of the Late Positive Potential (LPP) to threat stimuli.
The LPP to visual threat stimuli before and after a laboratory stress induction will be measured as a neurophysiological index of acute stress modulation of threat reactivity.
Greater values indicate a larger neural response to threat during acute stress (i.e., worse outcome).
|
Baseline, post-treatment (i.e., ~1 week following the last treatment session)
|
Change in electroencephalography (EEG) index of acute stress modulation of response inhibition (assessed by the N200 [N2]) from Baseline to Post-Treatment
Tidsramme: Baseline, post-treatment (i.e., ~1 week following the last treatment session)
|
Acute stress modulation of the N2 to no-go stimuli.
The N2 to no-go vs. go stimuli on a go/no-go task before and after a laboratory stress induction will be measured as a neurophysiological index of the acute stress modulation of response inhibition.
More negative values indicate a larger neural response to stimuli requiring response inhibition during acute stress (i.e., better outcome).
|
Baseline, post-treatment (i.e., ~1 week following the last treatment session)
|
Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere
Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.
Sponsor
Efterforskere
- Ledende efterforsker: Richard J Macatee, PhD, Auburn University
Publikationer og nyttige links
Den person, der er ansvarlig for at indtaste oplysninger om undersøgelsen, leverer frivilligt disse publikationer. Disse kan handle om alt relateret til undersøgelsen.
Generelle publikationer
- Stephens RS, Roffman RA, Curtin L. Comparison of extended versus brief treatments for marijuana use. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000 Oct;68(5):898-908.
- McHugh RK, Otto MW. Refining the measurement of distress intolerance. Behav Ther. 2012 Sep;43(3):641-51. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2011.12.001. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
- Macatee RJ, Cougle JR. Development and evaluation of a computerized intervention for low distress tolerance and its effect on performance on a neutralization task. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2015 Sep;48:33-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.01.007. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
- Hjorthoj CR, Hjorthoj AR, Nordentoft M. Validity of Timeline Follow-Back for self-reported use of cannabis and other illicit substances--systematic review and meta-analysis. Addict Behav. 2012 Mar;37(3):225-33. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.11.025. Epub 2011 Nov 26.
- Zvolensky MJ, Vujanovic AA, Bernstein A, Bonn-Miller MO, Marshall EC, Leyro TM. Marijuana use motives: A confirmatory test and evaluation among young adult marijuana users. Addict Behav. 2007 Dec;32(12):3122-30. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.06.010. Epub 2007 Jun 9.
- Heishman SJ, Evans RJ, Singleton EG, Levin KH, Copersino ML, Gorelick DA. Reliability and validity of a short form of the Marijuana Craving Questionnaire. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009 Jun 1;102(1-3):35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.12.010. Epub 2009 Feb 13.
- Macatee RJ, Preston TJ, Afshar K, Schmidt NB, Cougle JR. Impact of a computerized distress intolerance intervention on electrocortical reactivity to cannabis and threat cues: A randomized controlled trial. Psychol Addict Behav. 2022 Nov;36(7):920-929. doi: 10.1037/adb0000815. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
Datoer for undersøgelser
Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.
Studer store datoer
Studiestart (Faktiske)
1. juni 2016
Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)
30. oktober 2017
Studieafslutning (Faktiske)
30. oktober 2017
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først indsendt
13. november 2019
Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier
20. november 2019
Først opslået (Faktiske)
21. november 2019
Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler
Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)
21. november 2019
Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier
20. november 2019
Sidst verificeret
1. november 2019
Mere information
Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse
Nøgleord
Andre undersøgelses-id-numre
- 201720828
- F31DA039644-01A1 (U.S. NIH-bevilling/kontrakt)
Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)
Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?
INGEN
IPD-planbeskrivelse
All individual participant data will be made available upon request once primary and secondary outcome manuscripts have been published.
Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt
Ingen
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt
Ingen
Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .
Kliniske forsøg med Misbrug af cannabis
-
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal...RekrutteringCannabis | Cannabis afhængighed | Brug af cannabis | Cannabis rygning | Cannabisbrug, uspecificeretCanada
-
Elias DakwarRekrutteringAfhængighed | Cannabis afhængighed | Brug af cannabis | Stofmisbrug | Cannabismisbrug | Misbrug af cannabisForenede Stater
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); National Institutes of Health... og andre samarbejdspartnereIkke rekrutterer endnuBrug af tobak | Cannabis | Brug af cannabis | Vaping | THC | Cannabis rygningForenede Stater
-
Western University, CanadaRekrutteringBrug af cannabis | Marihuana rygning | Cannabis rygning | Brug af marihuanaCanada
-
Douglas Mental Health University InstituteRekrutteringPsykotiske lidelser | Kognitiv dysfunktion | Cannabis afhængighed | Brug af cannabis | Hukommelsessvækkelse | Skizofreni; Psykose | Misbrug af cannabis | NeuroimagingCanada
-
University College, LondonMedical Research Council; InvicroAfsluttetCannabis | Cannabis afhængighed | Brug af cannabis | CBD | Ungdomsudvikling | THC | Marihuana | CannabisforgiftningDet Forenede Kongerige
-
The Scripps Research InstituteNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)AfsluttetAlkohol afhængighed | Cannabis afhængighed | Alkoholbrugsforstyrrelse | Misbrug af cannabisForenede Stater
-
Yale UniversityAfsluttet
-
New York State Psychiatric InstituteNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)AfsluttetCannabis afhængighedForenede Stater
-
Medical University of South CarolinaNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)AfsluttetCannabis afhængighedForenede Stater
Kliniske forsøg med Computerized Distress Intolerance Intervention
-
Washington University School of MedicineSt. Jude Children's Research HospitalAfsluttetBarnekræft | Børnekræft | HjertetoksicitetForenede Stater
-
Virginia Commonwealth UniversityNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RekrutteringHeuristisk værktøj til at forbedre selvhåndteringen af symptomer hos unge og unge voksne med kræftKræft | Barnekræft | Symptomer og tegnForenede Stater
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamAfsluttetBrug af alkohol | HIV positivForenede Stater