Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Innovation Labs to Enhance Collaboration

24 mai 2022 mis à jour par: Larry Hawk, Ph.D., State University of New York at Buffalo

Controlled Evaluation of Innovation Labs for Enhancing Collaboration Among Early Career Scholars in the CTSA Network

We will conduct and evaluate the impact of two week-long Innovation Labs on collaboration attitudes and behavior among early career scholars. Applicants to each Innovation Lab will be screened and then randomized to either the Innovation Lab group or a control group.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Complété

Les conditions

Intervention / Traitement

Description détaillée

Building on the science of team science and preliminary work at the Buffalo and Vanderbilt CTSAs, we propose to work with our industry partner Knowinnovation to implement, assess, and disseminate an innovative and promising method for stimulating and nurturing new transdisciplinary research teams across the CTSA Program consortium: Innovation Labs. We will focus on early career investigators, have well-developed expertise, and will benefit from developing transdisciplinary collaborations. This work will further advance the field by taking a strong translational science approach to identify and test "best practices". To accomplish this, we will critically evaluate the impact of Innovation Labs in two preliminary randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In collaboration with NCATs and broad input from the CTSA network, we will develop a clinical and translational research grand challenge focus for each Innovation Lab. A diverse applicant pool of early career investigators invited from every CTSA hub in the consortium will be reviewed, and top applicants will be randomized to a 5-day residential Innovation Lab or "treatment as usual" control group (n=25/group/RCT). Measures of process and outcome will be collected from the application phase through 12-month follow-up and aggregated across the two RCTs. Given the preliminary nature of the work and an emerging consensus regarding the science of team science, primary outcomes will be measures of the depth and breadth of participants collaborative networks and attitudes towards collaboration, which we predict will be enhanced in the Innovation Lab group compared to the treatment as usual control group. We will also gather initial data on the degree to which Innovation Labs result in increased transdisciplinary collaborative output, including grant proposals, publications, and presentations. The significance of this work is clear: We aim to advance clinical and translational science by critically evaluating a potential "best practice" method for catalyzing collaborations and enhancing innovative translational research, a core goal of the CTSA Program. Our initial RCTs target an important segment of the workforce and begin the process of dissemination across the CTSA network, setting the stage for much broader implementation and impact.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

94

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

  • États-Unis
    • New York
      • Buffalo, New York, États-Unis, 14260
        • University at Buffalo

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Enfant
  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Oui

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

Completion of application and baseline assessment.

For randomization:

  • Faculty at a NIH CTSA hub institution or regional partner.
  • Early stage investigators (NIH-defined as "within 10 years of completing his/her terminal research degree or is within 10 years of completing medical residency (or the equivalent)") who are emerging as independent scholars.
  • Applications were reviewed for the above criteria and ranked by committee according to goodness of fit with the topic of the Innovation Lab, the quality and quantity of academic productivity and collaboration, and contribution to diversity of perspectives among Lab participants (e.g., biomedical and social/psychological, basic and applied). Top-ranked applicants were retained for randomization to the Innovation Lab group or control group.

All applicants (including 94 randomized ppts and 13 ppts who were not randomized) were encouraged to remain in the study and complete the follow-up assessments.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Autre
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Innovation Lab Group
Randomized to attend the Innovation Lab
Comportemental: Innovation Lab
An Innovation Lab is a facilitated 5-day residential event designed to create novel, transdisciplinary and potentially transformative research ideas and proposals to address a specific grand challenge. Participants, along with a director, organizers, subject matter guides, and KI facilitators communally explore the problem space, generate a broad range of ideas, and form transdisciplinary teams to pursue research projects.
Aucune intervention: Control Group
Randomized to NOT attend the Innovation Lab

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change from Baseline MATRICx Benefits Scale
Délai: through study completion, an average of 15 months
Self-report: Motivation Assessment for Team Readiness, Integration, and Collaboration (MATRICx; Mallinson, Lotrecchiano, et al., 2016) - Motivator scale
through study completion, an average of 15 months
Change from Baseline MATRICx Threats Scale
Délai: through study completion, an average of 15 months
Self-report: Motivation Assessment for Team Readiness, Integration, and Collaboration (MATRICx; Mallinson, Lotrecchiano, et al., 2016) - Threats scale
through study completion, an average of 15 months
Change from Baseline Transdisciplinary Orientation Scale
Délai: through study completion, an average of 15 months
Self-report: 12-item Transdisciplinary Orientation scale (TDO; Misra, Stokols, & Cheng, 2015)
through study completion, an average of 15 months
Change from Baseline Collaboration Network Size
Délai: through study completion, an average of 15 months
Objective size of network of collaborators from published articles on PubMed
through study completion, an average of 15 months

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change from Baseline Grants Submitted
Délai: through study completion, an average of 15 months
Self-Reported Number of New Grants Submitted
through study completion, an average of 15 months
ILab met goal - new collab
Délai: 3 months
The Lab met the goal of forming new transdisciplinary collaborations (ILab group only)
3 months
ILab met goal - novel proposals
Délai: 3 months
The Lab met the goal of developing novel grant proposals on long-lasting lifestyle interventions (ILab group only)
3 months
ILab - recommend
Délai: 3 months
I would recommend an Innovation Lab to a colleague (ILab group only)
3 months
ILab - positive impact
Délai: 3 months
My experience in the Innovation Lab will have a positive impact on my work at my home institution (ILab group only)
3 months

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

State University of New York at Buffalo

Collaborateurs

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

3 août 2017

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

12 juillet 2019

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

25 juin 2020

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

19 mai 2022

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

24 mai 2022

Première publication (Réel)

27 mai 2022

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

27 mai 2022

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

24 mai 2022

Dernière vérification

1 mai 2022

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • STUDY00001360

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

Essais cliniques sur Innovation Lab

Rechercher des essais similaires

Sponsors et collaborateurs

Les conditions médicales

Interventions en matière de drogue

CROs by country

CROs in Uganda

Conditions

Maladies rares

Interventions en matière de drogue

Compléments alimentaires

Commanditaire / collaborateurs

Emplacements

3
S'abonner