Preventing Substance Use Among Youth
Preventing Substance Use Among Youth: Behavioral and Economic Impact of Enhanced Implementation Strategies for Communities
A tanulmány áttekintése
Állapot
Körülmények
Részletes leírás
Background: Drug use remains a major public health problem among youth in the United States. Effective implementation of evidence-based interventions for youth is critical for reducing the burden of drug use and its consequences. The Michigan Model for Health (MMH) is an intervention that has demonstrated efficacy in reducing adolescent substance use. Yet, youth rarely receive evidence-based interventions (EBIs) as intended; this is, in part, due to a poor fit between the intervention and the context. The disconnect between the EBI and context is especially pronounced among underserved and vulnerable populations, including among youth exposed to trauma. Trauma is a potent risk factor for substance use, abuse, and the development of substance use disorders. Consequently, there is a critical need to design and test effective, cost-efficient implementation strategies to optimize the fidelity of school-based drug use prevention to better meet the needs of youth exposed to trauma. The objective of this study is to design and test a multi-component implementation strategy to improve intervention-context fit and enhance fidelity and effectiveness.
Methods: Using a 2-group, mixed method, randomized trial design, this study will compare standard implementation (Replicating Effective Programs [REP]) versus enhanced Enhanced Replicating Effective Programs (Enhanced REP) to deliver MMH. REP is a previously established implementation strategy that promotes EBI fidelity through a combination of curriculum packaging, training, and as-needed technical assistance. Enhanced REP incorporates tailoring of the EBI package and training and deploys customized implementation support (i.e., implementation facilitation).
This research designs and tests an implementation strategy deployed to systematically enhance the fit between the intervention and the context for a universal drug use prevention curriculum. The proposed research will focus on youth at heightened risk of drug use and its consequences due to trauma exposure. The proposed research is significant because of its potential to have a positive public health impact by preventing and reducing youth drug use and its consequences.
Tanulmány típusa
Beiratkozás (Tényleges)
Fázis
- Nem alkalmazható
Kapcsolatok és helyek
Tanulmányi helyek
-
-
Michigan
-
Detroit, Michigan, Egyesült Államok, 48202
- Wayne State University
-
-
Részvételi kritériumok
Jogosultsági kritériumok
Tanulmányozható életkorok
Egészséges önkénteseket fogad
Tanulmányozható nemek
Leírás
Inclusion Criteria:
- Schools which fail to meet state standards for implementation (less than 80% of curriculum) and/or face one or more barriers to MMH implementation
Exclusion Criteria:
- None
Tanulási terv
Hogyan készül a tanulmány?
Tervezési részletek
- Elsődleges cél: Megelőzés
- Kiosztás: Véletlenszerűsített
- Beavatkozó modell: Párhuzamos hozzárendelés
- Maszkolás: Nincs (Open Label)
Fegyverek és beavatkozások
Résztvevő csoport / kar |
Beavatkozás / kezelés |
|---|---|
|
Aktív összehasonlító: Standard MMH Curriculum Implementation
Teachers will receive the MMH curriculum manual, standard training and as-needed technical assistance, provided to them by the health coordinators
|
Standard implementation of the Michigan Model for Health is akin to Standard REP and includes the curriculum materials, standard training and as-needed technical assistance.
Más nevek:
|
|
Kísérleti: Michigan Model for Health: Learning to Enhance and Adapt for Prevention (MI-LEAP)
We will deploy Enhanced REP to include additional tailoring of the MMH curriculum to include trauma-informed approaches, tailored trauma-focused curriculum training, and implementation facilitation, ongoing specialized implementation support.
|
Deploy Enhanced REP to optimize the delivery of a drug use prevention intervention in community schools and test its feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness; Enhanced REP includes tailoring the curriculum, training, and providing ongoing provider consultation, or facilitation, to support implementation.
|
Mit mér a tanulmány?
Elsődleges eredményintézkedések
Eredménymérő |
Intézkedés leírása |
Időkeret |
|---|---|---|
|
Curriculum Feasibility
Időkeret: 9 months
|
To evaluate comprehensively curriculum feasibility, the investigators adopt a convergent mixed methods design.
The purpose of a convergent design is to obtain complementary, though different, data on the same topic.
Weiner et al.'s measures will be used to assess feasibility.
Each construct has 4 items (e.g., REP is appealing, REP seems suitable), from 1: Strongly disagree to 5: Strongly agree.
The investigators will use the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) interview guide to guide the qualitative investigation of using Enhanced REP for MMH.
The interview guide will be designed to elicit specific feedback on Enhanced REP components (manual, training, and facilitation) and their feasibility to deliver MMH.
|
9 months
|
|
Curriculum Acceptability
Időkeret: 9 months
|
To evaluate comprehensively curriculum acceptability, the researchers adopt a convergent mixed methods design.
The purpose of a convergent design is to obtain complementary, though different, data on the same topic.
Weiner et al.'s measures will be used to assess acceptability.
Each construct has 4 items (e.g., REP is appealing, REP seems suitable), from 1: Strongly disagree to 5: Strongly agree.
The investigators will use the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) interview guide to guide the qualitative investigation of using Enhanced REP for MMH.
The interview guide will be designed to elicit specific feedback on Enhanced REP components (manual, training, and facilitation) and their acceptability to deliver MMH.
|
9 months
|
|
Curriculum Appropriateness
Időkeret: 9 months
|
To evaluate comprehensively appropriateness the investigators adopt a convergent mixed methods design.
The purpose of a convergent design is to obtain complementary, though different, data on the same topic.
Weiner et al.'s measures will be used to assess appropriateness.
Each construct has 4 items (e.g., REP is appealing, REP seems suitable), from 1: Strongly disagree to 5: Strongly agree.
The investigators will use the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) interview guide to guide the qualitative investigation of using Enhanced REP for MMH.
The interview guide will be designed to elicit specific feedback on Enhanced REP components (manual, training, and facilitation) and their appropriateness to deliver MMH.
|
9 months
|
|
Cost-Effectiveness
Időkeret: 9 months
|
Implementation cost measures are guided by Costs of Implementing New Strategies (COINS) and include implementation strategy costs across phases of implementation relevant for replication. The investigators will measure implementation costs using a micro-costing approach to assess labor and non-labor costs. The investigators will also use available cost data from the school district as needed, summary data from previous empirical studies on implementation costs, and routinely available cost data using market prices. Net costs (net increase in costs from the Enhanced REP condition versus standard implementation) and net effectiveness (net decrease in substance use from the Enhanced REP condition versus standard implementation) will be used to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. |
9 months
|
Másodlagos eredményintézkedések
Eredménymérő |
Intézkedés leírása |
Időkeret |
|---|---|---|
|
Substance Use
Időkeret: 9 months
|
The investigators will assess past substance use using items from Monitoring the Future (MTF) with adapted response options and timeframe.
|
9 months
|
|
Student Engagement
Időkeret: 9 months
|
The investigators will assess student engagement using student satisfaction and key intervention skills.
The satisfaction measure will be adapted based on a scale developed by Giles et al. for another drug prevention intervention with good psychometric properties that will include 4 items.
The investigators will evaluate key intervention skills: assertive communication, refusal skills, and decision making.
These dimensions are identified in the curriculum summative evaluation materials identified by the MMH curriculum and assessed in previous MMH studies and based on National Health Education Standards.
The current study will assess secondary behavioral outcomes including poly-drug use using an item from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH).
Substance use consequences (e.g., missed school due to substance use) will be ascertained using items from the Problem Oriented Screening Instrument for Teenagers.
|
9 months
|
|
Dose Delivered
Időkeret: 9 months
|
The investigators will assess dose or amount of program delivered using a curriculum fidelity tracking from.
Teachers will be asked to complete a brief form following each lesson/unit included in the study.
These units/lessons include the alcohol, tobacco and other drug prevention unit, the skills unit, and the social and emotional learning unit.
The investigators will assess dose delivered by calculating the total number of lessons completed within each unit (10 lessons/unit).
As part of the tracking form, teachers will report any adaptations or modifications, guided by the framework proposed by Wiltsey-Stirman et.al.
This includes adding, removing and changing content, substituting activities and changing activity formats.
|
9 months
|
Együttműködők és nyomozók
Szponzor
Publikációk és hasznos linkek
Általános kiadványok
- Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 7;4:50. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50.
- Weiner BJ, Lewis CC, Stanick C, Powell BJ, Dorsey CN, Clary AS, Boynton MH, Halko H. Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implement Sci. 2017 Aug 29;12(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3.
- Stirman SW, Miller CJ, Toder K, Calloway A. Development of a framework and coding system for modifications and adaptations of evidence-based interventions. Implement Sci. 2013 Jun 10;8:65. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-65.
- O'neill JM, Clark JK, Jones JA. Promoting mental health and preventing substance abuse and violence in elementary students: a randomized control study of the Michigan Model for Health. J Sch Health. 2011 Jun;81(6):320-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2011.00597.x.
- Eisman AB, Kilbourne AM, Greene D Jr, Walton M, Cunningham R. The User-Program Interaction: How Teacher Experience Shapes the Relationship Between Intervention Packaging and Fidelity to a State-Adopted Health Curriculum. Prev Sci. 2020 Aug;21(6):820-829. doi: 10.1007/s11121-020-01120-8.
- Kilbourne AM, Neumann MS, Pincus HA, Bauer MS, Stall R. Implementing evidence-based interventions in health care: application of the replicating effective programs framework. Implement Sci. 2007 Dec 9;2:42. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-2-42.
- Eisman AB, Palinkas LA, Koffkey C, Herrenkohl TI, Abbasi U, Fridline J, Lundahl L, Kilbourne AM. Michigan Model for HealthTM Learning to Enhance and Adapt for Prevention (Mi-LEAP): protocol of a pilot randomized trial comparing Enhanced Replicating Effective Programs versus standard implementation to deliver an evidence-based drug use prevention curriculum. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Sep 10;8(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01145-6.
Tanulmányi rekorddátumok
Tanulmány főbb dátumok
Tanulmány kezdete (Tényleges)
Elsődleges befejezés (Tényleges)
A tanulmány befejezése (Tényleges)
Tanulmányi regisztráció dátumai
Először benyújtva
Először nyújtották be, amely megfelel a minőségbiztosítási kritériumoknak
Első közzététel (Tényleges)
Tanulmányi rekordok frissítései
Utolsó frissítés közzétéve (Tényleges)
Az utolsó frissítés elküldve, amely megfelel a minőségbiztosítási kritériumoknak
Utolsó ellenőrzés
Több információ
A tanulmányhoz kapcsolódó kifejezések
További vonatkozó MeSH feltételek
Egyéb vizsgálati azonosító számok
- IRB-20-10-2821
Terv az egyéni résztvevői adatokhoz (IPD)
Tervezi megosztani az egyéni résztvevői adatokat (IPD)?
IPD terv leírása
IPD megosztási időkeret
IPD-megosztási hozzáférési feltételek
Az IPD megosztását támogató információ típusa
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- NEDV
Gyógyszer- és eszközinformációk, tanulmányi dokumentumok
Egy amerikai FDA által szabályozott gyógyszerkészítményt tanulmányoz
Egy amerikai FDA által szabályozott eszközterméket tanulmányoz
Ezt az információt közvetlenül a clinicaltrials.gov webhelyről szereztük be, változtatás nélkül. Ha bármilyen kérése van vizsgálati adatainak módosítására, eltávolítására vagy frissítésére, kérjük, írjon a következő címre: register@clinicaltrials.gov. Amint a változás bevezetésre kerül a clinicaltrials.gov oldalon, ez a webhelyünkön is automatikusan frissül. .