此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

吸入一氧化碳治疗败血症引起的急性呼吸窘迫综合征 (ARDS) 的安全性研究

2026年5月22日 更新者:Rebecca Baron、Brigham and Women's Hospital

吸入一氧化碳治疗败血症引起的急性呼吸窘迫综合征 (ARDS) 的 Ib 期试验

本研究是一项多中心、随机、部分双盲和安慰剂对照的 Ib 期吸入 CO (iCO) 临床试验,用于治疗败血症引起的急性呼吸窘迫综合征 (ARDS)。 本研究的目的是评估基于 Coburn-Forster-Kane (CFK) 方程的个性化 iCO 剂量算法的安全性和准确性,以在脓毒症诱发的 ARDS 患者中实现 6-8% 的目标碳氧血红蛋白 (COHb) 水平. 我们还将检查脓毒症诱发的 ARDS 患者低剂量 iCO 治疗的生物学结果。

研究概览

详细说明

ARDS 是一种严重的急性肺部炎症和低氧性呼吸衰竭综合征,在美国每年发生 180,000 例病例。 尽管最近在重症监护管理和肺保护性通气策略方面取得了进展,但 ARDS 的发病率和死亡率仍然高得令人无法接受。 此外,目前不存在具体有效的药理疗法。 脓毒症是由宿主对感染的反应失调引起的危及生命的器官功能障碍,是发展为 ARDS 和多器官功能障碍综合征 (MODS) 的主要风险。 近年来,美国重症脓毒症患者每年增加到75万人,这对重症监护病房的重症患者发展为ARDS的风险是一个惊人的预测。 缺乏针对 ARDS 的特定有效疗法表明需要针对新途径的新疗法。 基于过去十年在脓毒症和 ARDS 实验模型中获得的数据,一氧化碳 (CO) 代表了脓毒症诱发的 ARDS 的一种新型治疗方式。

CO 已被证明在急性肺损伤 (ALI) 和败血症的实验模型中具有保护作用。 此外,多项人体研究表明,对几种不同浓度的 CO 进行实验给药具有良好的耐受性,并且可以在受控研究环境中安全地将低剂量吸入 CO 给药于受试者。 研究人员之前在脓毒症诱发的 ARDS 中进行了低剂量 iCO2 的 I 期试验,该试验表明,低剂量 iCO2(100 和 200 ppm)的精确给药在脓毒症诱发的 ARDS 患者中是可行的、耐受性良好且安全的。

本研究的目的是评估基于 CFK 方程的 iCO 个性化吸入一氧化碳 (iCO) 剂量算法的安全性和准确性,以在脓毒症诱发的 ARDS 机械通气患者中实现 6-8% 的目标 COHb 水平。

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

5

阶段

  • 阶段1

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston、Massachusetts、美国、02115
        • Brigham and Women's Hospital
      • Boston、Massachusetts、美国、02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital
    • Missouri
      • St Louis、Missouri、美国、63110
        • Washington University
    • New York
      • Brooklyn、New York、美国、11215
        • New York-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital
      • New York、New York、美国、10065
        • Weill Cornell Medical College
    • North Carolina
      • Durham、North Carolina、美国、27710
        • Duke University Hospital

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 及以上 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

不

描述

纳入标准:

如果所有患者(18 岁及以上)符合以下所有脓毒症和 ARDS 共识标准,则他们将有资格入选。

败血症患者被定义为因宿主对感染的反应失调而导致危及生命的器官功能障碍的患者:

  1. 疑似或确诊感染:感染部位包括胸部、泌尿道、腹部、皮肤、鼻窦、中央静脉导管和中枢神经系统
  2. 相继器官衰竭评估 (SOFA) 评分增加 ≥ 2 超过基线

当满足以下所有四个标准时,就定义为 ARDS:

  1. PaO2/FiO2 比率 ≤ 300,呼气末气道正压 (PEEP) 至少为 5 cm H2O
  2. 在已知的临床损伤或新的或恶化的呼吸道症状后 1 周内,正位胸片出现双侧混浊(不能完全用积液、肺叶/肺塌陷或结节解释)
  3. 需要通过气管或气管插管进行正压通气
  4. 心力衰竭或体液超负荷不能完全解释呼吸衰竭;如果不存在危险因素,则需要进行客观评估(例如超声心动图)以排除静水压性水肿

排除标准:

符合以下任何标准的个人将被排除在参与本研究之外:

  1. 年龄小于 18 岁
  2. ARDS 发作后超过 168 小时
  3. 怀孕或哺乳
  4. 囚犯
  5. 患者、代理人或医生未承诺全力支持(例外:如果患者将接受除心脏骤停复苏尝试以外的所有支持性护理,则不会被排除在外)
  6. 没有同意/无法获得同意或没有适当的法律代表
  7. 医生拒绝允许参加试验
  8. 垂死的病人预计无法存活 24 小时
  9. 没有动脉线或中心线/无意放置动脉线或中心线
  10. 无意/不愿遵循肺保护性通气策略
  11. 严重低氧血症定义为 SpO2 < 95 或 PaO2 < 90,FiO2 ≥ 0.9
  12. 血红蛋白 < 7.0 克/分升
  13. 耶和华见证人或其他不能或不愿在住院期间接受输血的受试者
  14. 最近 90 天内有急性心肌梗死 (MI) 或急性冠脉综合征 (ACS)
  15. 30 天内进行冠状动脉旁路移植术 (CABG) 手术
  16. 心绞痛或在日常生活活动中使用硝酸盐
  17. 纽约心脏协会 (NYHA) IV 级严重心肺疾病
  18. 前 1 个月内中风(缺血性或出血性),前 72 小时内需要心肺复苏术的心脏骤停,或心脏骤停后无法评估精神状态
  19. 烧伤 > 40% 全身表面积
  20. 严重气道吸入性损伤
  21. 使用高频振荡通气
  22. 体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)的使用
  23. 使用吸入性肺血管扩张剂治疗(例如 一氧化氮 [NO] 或前列腺素)
  24. 血管炎引起的弥漫性肺泡出血
  25. 同时参与其他药物研究

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:治疗
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:双倍的

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
安慰剂比较:医用空气
每天吸入医用空气长达 90 分钟,持续 3 天。
每天吸入医用空气长达 90 分钟,持续 3 天。
实验性的:吸入一氧化碳
以 CFK 方程式确定的个性化剂量(200-500 ppm 以达到 6-8% 的 COHb 水平)吸入一氧化碳,每天最多 90 分钟,持续 3 天。
以 CFK 方程式确定的个性化剂量(200-500 ppm 以达到 6-8% 的 COHb 水平)吸入一氧化碳,每天最多 90 分钟,持续 3 天。
其他名称:
  • iCO

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Primary Safety Outcome: Number of Pre-specified Administration-related Adverse Events (AEs).
大体时间:7 days

Safety of inhaled CO, defined by the incidence of pre-specified administration-related AEs (as defined below) and spontaneously reported AEs through study day 7.

  1. Acute myocardial infarction within 48 hours of study drug administration
  2. Acute cerebrovascular accident (CVA) within 48 hours of study drug administration
  3. New onset atrial or ventricular arrhythmia requiring DC cardioversion within 48 hours of study drug administration
  4. Increased oxygenation requirements defined as: an increase in FiO2 of ≥ 0.2 AND increase in PEEP ≥ 5 cm H2O within 6 hours of study drug administration
  5. Increase in COHb ≥ 10%
  6. Increase in lactate by ≥ 2 mmol/L within 6 hours of study drug administration
7 days
Percentage Change Measured Relative to Target COHb Level
大体时间:Post exposure 90 min day 1
This was assessed by comparing the measured 90-minute COHb level and the target COHb level of 6-8% post exposure. We present average data from the two available subjects in the CO group and report as "Mean" with standard deviation.
Post exposure 90 min day 1
Variance of Measured Relative to Target COHb Level
大体时间:Post exposure 90 min day 2
This was assessed by comparing the measured 90-minute COHb level and the target COHb level of 6-8% post exposure. The limited number of measurements prevent the variance and measures of dispersion calculations; therefore we present the data from one available subject in the CO group and report as "Mean" without standard deviation, since measures of dispersion cannot be calculated.
Post exposure 90 min day 2
Variance of Measured Relative to Target COHb Level
大体时间:Post exposure 90 min day 3
This was assessed by comparing the measured 90-minute COHb level and the target COHb level of 6-8% post exposure. The limited number of measurements prevent the variance and measures of dispersion calculations; therefore we present the data from one available subject in the CO group and report as "Mean" without standard deviation, since measures of dispersion cannot be calculated.
Post exposure 90 min day 3

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Lung Injury Score (LIS) on Days 1-5 Days
大体时间:5 days
The Lung Injury Score (LIS) is a composite 4-point scoring system including the PaO2/FiO2, PEEP, quasi-static respiratory compliance, and the extent of infiltrates on the chest X-ray. Each of the four components is categorized from 0 to 4, where a higher number is worse. The total Lung Injury Score is obtained by dividing the aggregate sum by the number of components used. Previous randomized clinical trials in ARDS have shown that a decreased LIS correlates with improvement in lung physiology as well as important clinical outcomes including mortality and ventilator-free days (VFDs). The number presented is the average difference from beginning to end of treatment. We present the average of data from the 2 available subjects in each group and report as "Mean" with standard deviation.
5 days
Percent Change in PaO2/FiO2 Ratio Between Baseline and Day 5
大体时间:Baseline to day 5
PaO2/FiO2 was to be measured on days 1-5 in ventilated subjects. We are providing percent change in PaO2/FiO2 ratio from baseline to day 5. We present the average of data from the 2 available subjects in each group and report as "Mean" with standard deviation.
Baseline to day 5
Oxygenation Index (OI) on Days 1-5 Days
大体时间:5 days
The oxygenation index will be measured on days 1-5 in ventilated subjects. Oxygenation index is calculated as (FiO2 X mean airway pressure)/PaO2. We provide change in Oi from baseline. Oi is only measured when subjects are ventilated, therefore not all timepoints are available. Limited number of measurements prevents variance and measures of dispersion analyses; therefore we present the data from the subjects available in each group and report as "Mean" without standard deviation, where measures of dispersion cannot be calculated.
5 days
Dead Space Fraction (Vd/Vt) on Days 1-3
大体时间:Day 3
The dead space fraction will be measured days 1-3 in ventilated subjects. We present change in dead space fraction between initial and final measurements that were available (measurements only taken while the subjects were intubated). We present the data from the subjects available in each group and report as "Mean" with standard deviation.
Day 3
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score on Days 1-5.
大体时间:1-5 days
Organ failure will be assessed using the SOFA score. SOFA scores will be assessed daily on days 1-5, as the SOFA score has been shown to be a reliable prognostic indicator of outcomes in critically ill patients. To calculate the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, each of the six components (Respiratory, Coagulation, Liver, Cardiovascular, Central Nervous System, Renal) is categorized from 0-4, where a higher number is worse. The SOFA score (0-24) will be calculated by summing all six components. We present changes in SOFA score over the time of hospitalization, over the time of ICU admission (up to days 3 and 5 for the enrolled subjects). We present the data from the subjects available in each group and report as "Mean" with standard deviation.
1-5 days
Ventilator-free Days at Day 28
大体时间:28 days
Ventilator-free days to day 28 are defined as the number of days from the time of initiating unassisted breathing to day 28 after randomization, assuming survival for at least two consecutive calendar days after initiating unassisted breathing and continued unassisted breathing to day 28. If a subject returns to assisted breathing and subsequently achieves unassisted breathing to day 28, VFDs will be counted from the end of the last period of assisted breathing to day 28. Participants who do not survive to day 28 are assigned zero ventilator-free days. We present data of ventilator free days for enrolled subjects. Note that one subject in the medical air group died at day 9. We present the data from the subjects available in each group and report as "Mean" with standard deviation.
28 days
ICU-free Days at Day 28
大体时间:28 days
ICU-free days will be assessed on day 28. ICU-free days is defined as the number of days between randomization and day 28 in which the patient is in the ICU (for any part of a day). We present average number of ICU free days. Please note that one subject in the medical air group died at day 9. We present the data from the subjects available in each group and report as "Mean" with standard deviation.
28 days
Hospital-free Days at Day 60
大体时间:60 days
Hospital-free days will be assessed on day 60. Hospital-free days are days alive post hospital discharge through day 60. Patients who die on or prior to day 60 are assigned zero hospital-free days. We present hospital free days at day 60. Please note that one subject in the air group died at day 9. We present the data from the subjects available in each group and report as "Mean" with standard deviation.
60 days
Hospital Mortality to Day 28 and 60
大体时间:60 days
Mortality will be assessed on day 28 and day 60.
60 days
Montreal Cognitive Assessment- MoCA-Blind
大体时间:3 months

Montreal Cognitive Assessment - Blind Version (MoCA-Blind) The MoCA-Blind is a remote adaptation of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) used as a screening assessment for detecting cognitive impairment. It is administered via telephone interview.

The MoCA-Blind assesses the following cognitive domains (points):

  • Attention (0-6)
  • Language: (0-3 (Repetition (0-2) and fluency (0-1))
  • Abstraction (0-2)
  • Memory: Delayed recall (0-5)
  • Orientation (0-6)

The minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 22 points. Calculated as the sum of all domains. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better cognitive functioning. Lower scores indicate worse cognitive functioning (greater cognitive impairment). A score of 18 or above is within the normal range. A limited number of measurements prevents variance and dispersion analyses; therefore, we report available group data as "means" without standard deviation where dispersion cannot be calculated.

3 months
Montreal Cognitive Assessment- MoCA-Blind
大体时间:6 months

Montreal Cognitive Assessment - Blind Version (MoCA-Blind) The MoCA-Blind is a remote adaptation of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) used as a screening assessment for detecting cognitive impairment. It is administered via telephone interview.

The MoCA-Blind assesses the following cognitive domains (points):

  • Attention (0-6)
  • Language: (0-3 (Repetition (0-2) and fluency (0-1))
  • Abstraction (0-2)
  • Memory: Delayed recall (0-5)
  • Orientation (0-6)

The minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 22 points. Calculated as the sum of all domains. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better cognitive functioning. Lower scores indicate worse cognitive functioning (greater cognitive impairment). A score of 18 or above is within the normal range. A limited number of measurements prevents variance and dispersion analyses; therefore, we report available group data as "means" without standard deviation, since dispersion cannot be calculated.

6 months
Hayling Sentence Completion Test
大体时间:3 months

The Hayling Sentence Completion Test assesses executive functioning (response initiation and inhibition), administered via telephone. With 30 sentence-completion items split into 2 sections (15 each).

Sections:

  • 1: Response initiation (time to provide a contextually appropriate word).
  • 2: Response inhibition (time and error score for providing an unrelated word).

Scores (response time and errors) from both sections are combined and converted to an age-adjusted standardized total score.

Total combined standardized score ranges from 1-10:

  1. Impaired
  2. Abnormal
  3. Poor
  4. Low Average
  5. Moderate Average
  6. Average
  7. High Average
  8. Good
  9. Superior
  10. Very Superior

Higher scores= Better executive functioning Lower scores= Greater impairment. A limited number of measurements prevents variance and dispersion analyses; therefore, we report available group data as "means" without standard deviation where dispersion cannot be calculated.

3 months
Hayling Sentence Completion Test
大体时间:6 months

The Hayling Sentence Completion Test assesses executive functioning (response initiation and inhibition), administered via telephone. With 30 sentence-completion items split into 2 sections (15 each).

Sections:

  • 1: Response initiation (time to provide a contextually appropriate word).
  • 2: Response inhibition (time and error score for providing an unrelated word).

Scores (response time and errors) from both sections are combined and converted to an age-adjusted standardized total score.

Total combined standardized score ranges from 1-10:

  1. Impaired
  2. Abnormal
  3. Poor
  4. Low Average
  5. Moderate Average
  6. Average
  7. High Average
  8. Good
  9. Superior
  10. Very Superior

Higher scores= Better executive functioning Lower scores= Greater impairment. A limited number of measurements prevents variance and dispersion analyses; therefore, we report available group data as "means" without standard deviation, since dispersion cannot be calculated.

6 months

其他结果措施

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Change in Biomarkers of Mitochondrial Dysfunction
大体时间:Baseline and 3 days
Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) plasma levels will be measured on days 1-3 by quantitative PCR of human NADH dehydrogenase 1. Limited number of measurements prevents variance analyses; therefore we present the data from the subjects available in each group and report as "Mean" without standard deviation, since measures of dispersion cannot be calculated.
Baseline and 3 days
Change in Biomarkers of Inflammasome Activation
大体时间:5 days
Plasma IL-18 levels will be measured on days 1-3 and day 5 by ELISA. We present the data from the subjects available in each group and report as "Mean" with standard deviation.
5 days
Change in Biomarkers of Necroptosis
大体时间:5 days
Plasma RIPK3 levels will be measured on days 1-3 and day 5 by ELISA. We present the data from the subjects available in each group and report as "Mean" with standard deviation.
5 days
Plasma Lipid Mediators (LM) and Specialized Pro-resolving Mediators (SPMs)
大体时间:5 days
Lipid mediators (LM) and specialized pro-resolving mediators (SPMs) will be measured in plasma on days 1-3 and day 5 using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) based methods. We present the data from the subjects available in each group and report as "Mean" with standard deviation.
5 days

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

一般刊物

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2023年12月6日

初级完成 (实际的)

2024年10月25日

研究完成 (实际的)

2024年10月25日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2021年4月26日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2021年4月28日

首次发布 (实际的)

2021年5月3日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年5月26日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年5月22日

最后验证

2026年5月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

是的

IPD 计划说明

我们会将临床试验中去识别化的数据集和相关文件提交给 NHLBI 数据存储库生物标本和数据存储库信息协调中心 (BioL​​INCC)。

IPD 共享时间框架

根据 NHLBI 指南

IPD 共享访问标准

根据 NHLBI 指南

IPD 共享支持信息类型

  • 研究方案
  • 国际碳纤维联合会

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

是的

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

在美国制造并从美国出口的产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅